SuSE 9.1 Available for Download 229
Aiua writes "Novell and SuSE AG have made the Live Evaluation CD of SuSE Linux 9.1 available for download. A list of mirrors carrying the 680MB ISO image is available on the SuSE Website. The Live CD allows you to test some of the new features of 9.1 without installation, and is a SuSE recommended download to test your computer for distribution compatability. The full Personal and Professional Editions are now shipping and available for purchase in the SuSE Store or your local reseller." Reader Sweetshark points out that the first release of the Live CD has problems, so make sure you get the most recent one: "SUSE Security Announcement: Live CD 9.1 (SuSE-SA:2004:011) describes a big security hole in the SuSE 9.1 Personal Edition Live CD: 'Upon boot, the Live CD will automatically configure a network card if one has been detected. [...] A configuration error on the Live CD allows for a passwordless, remote root login to the system via ssh, if the computer has booted from the Live CD and if it is connected to a network.' A fixed iso is available."
FTP Install (Score:2)
Re:FTP Install (Score:4, Informative)
I've been waiting... can ya tell?
Re:FTP Install (Score:5, Informative)
From the readme.txt on the suse ftp site:
Wed May 5 12:50:00 MEST 2004 - draht@
This tree contains the source RPM packages for the SUSE LINUX 9.1
distribution. The SUSE LINUX 9.1 ftp version will be published on June 4th
in this directory.
Thanks,
Roman Drahtmüller,
Sebastian Nagel,
ftpadmin@suse.com
Re:FTP Install (Score:1)
Re:FTP Install (Score:4, Informative)
Re:FTP Install (Score:2)
Re:FTP Install (Score:2)
Re:FTP Install (Score:3, Informative)
Someone should link the gpl here; I'm too lazy and need to take a shower and head out for debauchery and s
Re:FTP Install (Score:2)
Re:FTP Install (Score:2, Informative)
No, they just have to make the source available to you if you ask them.
No, they have to give you then source when they give you the binaries or make it available to any third party upon request, although they can change for media distribution.
Plus, they can deliver it to you any way they want: teletype, microfiche, or Morse Code.
Incorrect - it has to be on a "on a medium customarily used for software interchange" to comply with the GPL. I don't think any of those would qualify.
Re:FTP Install (Score:2)
No, it has to be machine-readable.
Still no full install ISOs.... (Score:5, Interesting)
Blah blah ftp install blah blah... I've heard it before.
Agreed - I love the distro, hate no-iso policy (Score:1)
Re:Still no full install ISOs.... (Score:1, Insightful)
Gee, talk about hearing it all before.
WTF? Offtopic?!? (Score:5, Informative)
Just because someone thinks ftp isn't convenient as an ISO download that gets an interesting modification? Someone tells them that GNU GPL doesn't mandate that it has to be an ISO in the same langauge they use it's off-topic?
Somebody give me +Informative modpoints for informing moderators how to mod correctly.
Re:It's called ease of use, not being spoiled... (Score:2)
As others have mentioned, there are copies of the install disks floating around xMule and other P2P networks, as well you could chip in with some friends and buy the disks, then share them with each other. Do your community a favor and talk a local library into lending out a copy.
Options abound.
Re:It's called ease of use, not being spoiled... (Score:2)
There *were* .bin/.cue files on USENET of the CDs (Score:3, Informative)
I then realized that the CD version was also on usenet, as you can see HERE. [newzbin.com] Unfortunately, those files are no longer on my news provider (easynews).
I am hoping someone will post a
Re:There *were* .bin/.cue files on USENET of the C (Score:3, Informative)
Don't know why the mods gave it -1 Redundant. Mods on crack?
Re: [ISOs here!] (Score:4, Informative)
Scott
G-Vegas, NC
Re:I wonder... (Score:3, Funny)
You must be very, very young my friend. SUSE stopped making ISOs with version 7 which dates WAY back to Q3 of the year 2000!! Since any "friend" will gladly make you a copy, what's the big deal? In fact, it saves you the download time and everything!!
Hmmm... I guess there is the requirement that you have to have at least one friend though... m
Spirit of the GPL (Score:2)
For those who want books, want media, etc, buy the CD. For those who are technical enough, use the FTP install. I've always used the FTP install and have zero problems with it, works great.
Of course, if you're a REAL whiner about it, you can
Re:$30??? It is $90 ($60 the update) (Score:2)
I'm still trying to figure out what, besides 64-bit support, Pro HAS that Personal doesn't.
Re:Still no full install ISOs.... (Score:2, Informative)
So if you have a few Gigs of free space why not get a copy off ebay for $5 and host them for the rest of us.
Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? (Score:5, Interesting)
Oh hold on this a bloody "live cd" again isnt it - I thought SuSE had stopped being difficult about allowing their distro to be downloaded as CD images.
Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? (Score:1)
In fact I love Distros that install almost from scratch over the network e.g debian. I carry a debian business card sized CD with me all the time - contains all I need to install it.
Shit that probably wont work on this new motherboard either! lol.
Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? (Score:2)
Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? (Score:2)
I wasn't the original poster on this - but I'll reply anyway.
That is interesting about the forcedeth module. I didn't even know it existed until you posted this. (In the past, I had downloaded the nForce drivers from NVidia to get my second NIC working.)
I wonder why MDK 10.0 only shows me my onboard 3com card by default? I assume I can probably ad
Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? (Score:5, Insightful)
Apparently, the 2.6.5 (and perhaps other) kernels trigger a bit of an nForce2 chipset problem; I needed to need to turn of APIC and Local APIC for them to work reliably at their rated speed. Here's how I did it using GRUB (my root partition is a mirrored RAID device). Note the "noapic nolapic" in the kernel specification. Using lilo, you would add an append="noapic nolapic" to your image=... stanza...
After this change, it's been running rock solid under heavy use for over a week. I am running Debian; perhaps the SUSE or other distributions have already patched their 2.6.X kernels for this problem, but I doubt it.
Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? (Score:2)
By reliably, do you mean "for them to work at all"? Of the distro I've installed on this machine (as well as FreeBSD), I can't get it to even install unless I specify "noapic nolapic". There's also a "noioapic" option, but I don't appear to need that.
Once it's installed, I leave "noapic nolapic" in my lilo.conf or e
Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? (Score:2)
There is a known fix!
Thanks t onvidia's developer Allen Martin who (finally) stepped up an released some hard facts about what is causing the problem and how to fix it, there is a patch that will cleanly apply to the 2.6.5 kernel.
You can read Allen Martins comment on the subject here [lkml.org] and the patch is here [lkml.org].
Note that though the patch was untested at that point there were several posts to confirm that it worked.
Thanks nvidia
Now: Release t
OpenSSH (Score:5, Funny)
A whole new meaning of *Open*SSH
Obscure version numbering? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Obscure version numbering? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Obscure version numbering? (Score:3, Insightful)
Especially with Debian!
I mean, really. There is no good way to do what you are asking, short of having something like the Geek Code for Distros...
Re:Obscure version numbering? (Score:2)
On the other hand, for all I know SuSE 9.1 wouldn't have a 2.6 kernel because it might have been released in 2002. I can't tell.
It just seems strange to me that totally different packagings of Linu
Re:Obscure version numbering? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Obscure version numbering? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Obscure version numbering? (Score:2)
LINs (like VINs?) (Score:5, Funny)
WSPKY474X4F000001
Where W means it's made in germany, KY means it runs 2.6 kernel, and so forth and so on. Then all you gotta do is ask the person for their LIN number and you know everything about their distribution and release! Genius!
Re:LINs (like VINs?) (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, cause we all know that you'll need some KY to run a 2.6 kernel!
Re:Obscure version numbering? (Score:2)
New release->new minor number.
Its the second release this year, so 9.1
Last year there were 4 releases, 8.0,.1,.2,.3
Quite easy.
Re:Obscure version numbering? (Score:2)
SuSE releases on a 5/6 month cycle, with three point revisions per major number.
Re:Obscure version numbering? (Score:2)
The latest release of Gentoo is 2004.1. This means it was the second release this year. (First being 2004.0)
That helps a little...
Update From 9.0 (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Update From 9.0 (Score:3, Informative)
Not anytime soon. I've been watching for the RPMS for 9.1 to appear on their server ever since 9.1 was released... First they had a note that said they would be available in a few days (posted April 22), and a few days ago they changed that to say that it would not be available until June.
This is driving me nuts. There are some major bugs in 9.0 that they didn't fix... YaST segfaul
Cool (Score:5, Funny)
distribution compatiblity, eh? (Score:2)
I'm supposed to test my computer for distribution compatibility? I thought I was paying money to the commercial Linux distributions to do just that.
Re:distribution compatiblity, eh? (Score:2)
Re:distribution compatiblity, eh? (Score:2)
Unfortunately, we don't have the luxury of looking at a sticker that says "Designed for SUSE(R) Linux(R) Professional" so yeah, testing would be a good idea.
YaST? (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes. (Score:5, Informative)
Small correction... (Score:4, Informative)
The article title seems to say that the full SuSE 9.1 is available for download, when is a bit far from it. As far I remember, SuSE always had a "live" demo to test it released around the same time as the full product and available for free download, but that don't mean that can be installed in hard disk or from it install the full 9.1 ftp version from their servers.
Nothing new about this (Score:5, Informative)
Really nothing new here, apart from maybe more people paying attention.
StarTux
Mine's already waiting for me (Score:4, Insightful)
Decided this time around I'd do the responsible thing and actually *gasp!* pre-order a copy of 9.1 to support a Linux company. Comes with the install CDs and the live CD to boot. Already got delivered and sitting at home-this clock at work really needs to hurry the hell up.
I think I'll count my donation to SuSE as my charitable donation for the year.Weeee! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Weeee! (Score:2, Insightful)
*realizes the ftp-install option for 9.1 isnt out yet...*
*Thinks...*
*Runs away to the local store...*
Best linux desktop so far! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Best linux desktop so far! (Score:5, Funny)
Bugger. There goes my last chance of meeting a girl.
Re:Best linux desktop so far! (Score:2)
Now what excuse will we have in order to hold someone's hand?
I'm posting this from 9.1 LiveCD running instance (Score:3, Informative)
Personal vs. Professional (Score:2, Interesting)
Here (Score:3, Informative)
A Very Nice Distro (Score:5, Informative)
Now that SuSE's using submounts, tho, things are kinda weird when trying to run installers that expect to be able to run the mount command (i.e. UT2004). Since it dynamically mounts the media, you can't run a mount command any more without changing fstab.
SuSE's is my favorite installer so far (I like thinking of installation processes as checklists, which is how SuSE organizes them) and YaST2's integration into KDE's control panel is nice. Also it bears noting that this has both 32 and 64 bit installations - they aren't charging extra for 64 anymore.
The only tweaks I've had to make so far are to KDE's look and feel. Such a nice time saver to have a works-out-of-the-box installation.
But... (Score:2, Funny)
Seriously! I gave him a copy of the CD and then when I got back to my desk and took a look at
Oh well. I guess that was a waste of a CD. Time to get him a copy of 9.1.
ftp install out in a month (Score:2, Informative)
Professional vs. Personal (Score:2)
Re:Professional vs. Personal (Score:3)
For the pro version on 9.0, the crossover plugin (win32 apps on Linux) was in there. I'm sure there might be a couple others along that line of thought, but that was the killer add-on for me!
local reseller list for USA sucks ass (Score:2)
1. amazon.com doesn't have it
2. bestbuy doesn't find any "suse" products
3. beyond.com is out of business
4. borders was bought by amazon.com
5. cdromusa.com doesn't find any "suse" products
6. compusa (or cockusa as I friend calls them) doesn't list 9.1 at all.
7. programmer's paradise doesn't list 9.1 either
8. shopforsoftware site was too slow to bear
Finally found it at cheapbytes. Man!
Re:local reseller list for USA sucks ass (Score:2)
Looks like the suse store is the only place. How completely useless.
http://mirrors.kernel.org/suse/i386/live-cd-9.1/ (Score:2)
I'm in the processing of mirroring the updated iso now, but I've made the first livecd iso available at http://mirrors.kernel.org/suse/i386/live-cd-9.1/ [kernel.org]
You can get it via ftp, http, or rsync. The -01 cd will take about an hour from the time this message is posted to appear.
Enjoy! Note that we don't currently actively mirror SuSE so there's a large chance that this area will bitrot later since I'm manually making this available.
-- Nathan Laredo
Torrent?? (Score:2)
I tried both and Knoppix is better (Score:2)
It recognized my sound card. Suse did not.
Knoppix also recognized my Intel wireless card and configured it properly. Suse did not.
I frankly expected more from Suse.
Re:I'll wait a week. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I'll wait a week. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I'll wait a week. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I'll wait a week. (Score:1, Insightful)
you want a lot of people downloading a torrent.
Re:I'll wait a week. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:on the contrary, (Score:5, Informative)
Not neccessarily. When there are few people with the whole file, the torrents will be fairly slow, even if there are lots of peers. On the other hand, if you wait a few days, there will be lots of people with the full file, and not many people downloading it.
Typically, for a new torrent with lots of people downloading at once, my download speed will stay around the 30-70 kB/s range. For a somewhat older torrent with sufficient numbers of people seeding the file, I'll often get 200-300 kB/s or better. Of course, YMMV, but the general trends seem to be pretty consistent.
Re:on the contrary, (Score:2)
I don't know the specific details of bittorrent, but in general, that shouldn't be the way it works...
P2P programs with any form of load-balancing will have each person's download start at a random (different) segment.
So, 70 people who have downloaded 10MB each of an ISO should have the whole file among them (or close to it). Obviously, downloading from 70+ different people (that have parts o
Re:on the contrary, (Score:2)
It's a simple matter of available bandwidth. If you have 100 people downloading from each other, there's going to be less bandwidth to spare for you than if you have 50 people serving out the file to only 5 downloaders.
And Gnutella fills a completely different role than Bittorrent. Unless things have changed dramatically in the last year or so, there's no way in hell that Gnutella can compete with Bitto
Re:on the contrary, (Score:2)
They have. It does quite a good job... It's just unfortunate that less people are on it.
Re:on the contrary, (Score:3, Insightful)
*knock knock* is this thing on?
Re:I'll wait a week. (Score:2, Funny)
Wait 20 minutes and check it again, you just told all of
LK
Re:Remote hole!? (Score:2)
Re:Remote hole!? (Score:1)
Re:Remote hole!? (Score:5, Insightful)
The exploit would be a code defect instead of a configuration screw up. Also, it would be in the production product rather than the no-install, evalutation only version.
Apple? (Score:2)
Nonsense. Precisely what do you think Apple uses for SSH?
IansPowerbook:~ ian$ ssh -v
OpenSSH_3.6.1p1+CAN-2003-0693, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090702f
Cheers,
Ian
Re:Remote hole!? (Score:3, Informative)
Microsoft and Apple [techworld.com] are mostly blamed for their "Keep silent and don't fix" policy.
Re:Remote hole!? (Score:4, Insightful)
neither would we have been told about it, nor would it be fixed for 23 more days?
Re:Remote hole!? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Dear SUSE (Score:3, Interesting)
This is not a troll- just an opinion. It is definitely a big gap, and good that it was identified early - possibly earlier than it might have been were it in the closed-source world?
Re:dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda (Score:2)
Re:No Inkscape?!!! (Score:3, Insightful)
Try as they have, it is still not possible for them to include every program that is out there. You can still install you favorite program, it just doesn't ship with 9.1
Of course there is also the possibility that SuSE or its customers think that Inkscape sucks and is not worthy of inclusion. I can't answer that as I have never heard of Inkscape, prior to you
Re:Sprock (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Yippie! (Score:2)
Re:Is it Legal?? (Score:3, Informative)
If you feel so inclined and have some time to wa
Re:Is it Legal?? (Score:3, Informative)