Forgot your password?

Comment: Containers (Score 1) 98

Run user sessions on linux containers (docker is getting momentum, may be the right option) that you can limit on the resources that they can use, while being far more efficient than VMs for that. Just a word of caution, they aren't as secure as VMs, they may be present or future vulnerabilities that may let hostile students to break their limits and/or access the main system, as they have more surface contact with the machine kernel than proper virtualization, mixing VMs for security with containers for efficiency could be a good compromise.

Comment: Just the start of it... (Score 1) 749

by gmuslera (#47452541) Attached to: Obama Administration Says the World's Servers Are Ours

What about foreing servers running Microsoft software, that Microsoft can somewhat control like when deleted Tor from Windows machines? If have the power to (even if done via security updates) retrieve information from remote servers, even not owned by them, should comply with obama administration orders?

Really owning your data is becoming thing of the past, at least for some markets.

Comment: Re:What was desirable about it? (Score 1) 71

by gmuslera (#47361693) Attached to: Improv Project, Vivaldi Tablet Officially Dead
For several of android tablets there are some working linux distributions (that may or not have working all hardware), even without counting ubuntu touch. But the point on that tablet was that it had open hardware too, ubuntu touch solves the drivers problem taking directly the manufacturer's android drivers, so closed hardware also leads to closed source running there too, with potential backdoors (like the ones found in samsung devices) builtin.

Comment: Re:What is this? (Score 5, Informative) 88

by gmuslera (#47208499) Attached to: Docker 1.0 Released

The point is that don't create a VM. Containers runs applications in their own isolated (as in filesystem, memory, processes, network, users, etc) environment, but just one kernel, no hard reservation of memory or disk, it consumes resources pretty much like native apps.Another difference is at it just need the linux kernel, it runs where a linux kernel (modern enough, 2.6.38+) run, including inside VMs, so you can run them on amazon, google app engine, linode and a lot more.

What docker adds over LXC (Linux Containers) is using a copy-on-write filesystem (so if i get the filesystem for i.e. ubuntu for an app, and another application also tries to use the filesystem of ubuntu, the extra disk use is just what both changed, also cached disk works for both), using cgroups to be able to limit what resources the container can use, and a whole management system for deploying, managing, sharing, packaging and constructing. It enables you to i.e. build a container for some service (with all the servers it need to run, with the filesystem of the distribution you need, exposing just the ports you want to give services on), pack it, and use it as a single unit, deploying it in the amount of servers you want without worrying about conflicting libraries, required packages, or having the right distribution.

If you think that is something academical, Google heavily use containers in their cloud, creating 2 billon containers per week. They have their own container technology (LMCTFY, Let Me Contain That For You) but has been adopting lately Docker, and contributing not just code but also a lot of tools to manage containers in a cloud.

Aren't you glad you're not getting all the government you pay for now?