Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

The 20th Anniversary of the Internet

Posted by michael on Tue Dec 31, 2002 09:44 PM
from the but-who's-counting dept.
Ross Finlayson writes "In a message posted to the IETF general mailing list, Bob Braden reminds us that, on January 1st, 2003, 20 years will have passed since "the most logical date of origin of the Internet [...] when the ARPANET officially switched from the NCP protocol to TCP/IP". And the rest is history..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Al Gore is celebrating (Score:2, Funny)

    by very (241808) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:47PM (#4992090) Journal
    as the inventor of the internet, Al Gore is celebrating by not running for President.
  • Correction Also Posted (Score:5, Informative)

    by tbmaddux (145207) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:47PM (#4992093) Homepage Journal
    The author of the original article followed up with a correction [ietf.org] in which he stated:
    In my recent message about the creation of the Internet by the conversion of the ARPAnet from NCP to TCP/IP, I incorrectly named Vint Cerf as the Responsible Parent at ARPA. Actually, the Responsible Parent at ARPA during conversion was Bob Kahn; Vint had left ARPA for MCI before that date. There are enough slightly-incorrect "facts" about the early history of the Internet floating around, without my inadvertantly creating a new non-fact!

    Bob Braden

  • T shirts (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:51PM (#4992103)
    There may still be a few remaining T shirts that read, "I Survived the TCP/IP Transition".

    And sadder still, some of their owners are still wearing them...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:51PM (#4992107)
    ...in the history of mankind was born!

    God bless 'em!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Ask /. (Score:4, Funny)

    by teamhasnoi (554944) <teamhasnoiNO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:52PM (#4992109) Homepage Journal
    Al Gore asked me how to FTP over TCP/IP using PCMCIA while singing 'YMCA' in full violation of the DMCA, angering the RIAA. What was I saying again?
    • Re:Ask /. by Phexro (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:18PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Who's old school? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mayns (524760) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:53PM (#4992114)
    So how many of you were on the internet in those dark ages? just curious.
    • Re:Who's old school? by bsharitt (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:57PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Who's old school? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:59PM
    • Re:Who's old school? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:28PM (#4992231)
      I was hanging around Berkeley learning Unix in 1983 (4.2 BSD). I remember losing all of my illegal accounts in Jan 1984 so I think it was 1984 before UCB was putting the whole campus on the Net and consequently tightening up security that year. But losing my accounts did seem like a dark 1984ish thing. I first saw the net in 1982 and had net access in 1983. In 1982 I saw Berkeley + MIT machines on the net so it definitely existed then. Computing was seriously fun then, learning Unix from reading the 4.2 BSD tech reports, Lyons and BSD sourcecode on pdp11 and vax. I remember the laminated Unix man pages in Cory hall -- it seemed so impressive.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Who's old school? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by MrChuck (14227) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:38PM (#4992265)
      Does it count that I was using whatever it was to send mail from my college to my brother's in 1983?

      Lesse, we connect to UMass/Amh who connected to UMass/Boston who connected to Harvard who connected to U/CT who connected to Wesleyan.

      You had to get the bang path just so.

      How many people had business cards with ! paths?
      Even "domain!uunet"

      Let's recall that the "Internet" was an agreggation of several nets, including Arpa-Net and that many schools were somehow attached. Bitnet gateways (@rutgers) to the Arpanet basically counted. Telnet over, login as guest/guest and go to the next stop.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Who's old school? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Gorobei (127755) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:44PM (#4992288)
      My first Usenet post was over 20 years ago: 1982-04-24.

      In the snow. Uphill. Both ways.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Who's old school? by jrst (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:16PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Who's old school? by viscous (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:29PM
    • Re:Who's old school? by zoomshorts (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:32PM
    • Ah, the good old days by kfg (Score:2) Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:47PM
    • Re:Who's old school? by SinceEBCDIC (Score:2) Wednesday January 01 2003, @01:53AM
    • Re:Who's old school? by zoloto (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @02:46AM
    • Re:Who's old school? by tep-sdsc (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @04:46AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • happy birthday... (Score:1)

    by BlackSnowUK (637485) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:54PM (#4992117) Homepage
    well happy birthday internet? Why is it, in website logs/stats 'Arpanet old-style' (or along those lines) pops up every so often? (Geeks stay in, celebrating the birthday of the internet, 'normal' people go out get drunk and wake up in a ditch with their best friend's mother)
  • Wow! (Score:5, Funny)

    by JayBlalock (635935) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:56PM (#4992123)
    Just one more year, and the Internet can drink! Think of the fun we'll have then!
    • Re:Wow! by Hugonz (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @04:08AM
    • Re:Wow! by jlagrue (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @05:12AM
    • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Cool! (Score:4, Funny)

    by Tablizer (95088) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:56PM (#4992124) Homepage Journal
    Let's celebrate by slashdotting something really big!
    • Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:01PM
      • Re:Cool! by Menkhaf (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:29PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • what was NCP? (Score:1)

    by jeffy124 (453342) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:56PM (#4992127) Homepage Journal
    What was the NCP protocol that was phased out that day in favor of TCP/IP? How did it compare to TCP?
  • and... (Score:1)

    by w1r3sp33d (593084) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:57PM (#4992135)
    it just keeps going slower and slower!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • WOO HOO!! (Score:1)

    by _ph1ux_ (216706) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @09:57PM (#4992137)
    First 20th Anniversary Post!!

    Sorry.

  • Next /. Poll!!!! (Score:1)

    by ZephyrQ (96951) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:01PM (#4992148)
    Where were you when the Internet started?

    --My Daddy says I wasn't even a twinkle yet...

    --Suckling at the teat of TV (yea Sesame Street!)

    --Programming in assembly on an Apple IIe!

    --Punching out cards for my latest programming project in college!

    --I was sending messages via ARPnet, you fool!

    --Wishing I would meet a dream geek like Cowboy Neal!!!!!
  • by Nonillion (266505) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:02PM (#4992155)
    To check out some of that history go here...

    Doug Engelbarts 1968 demo [stanford.edu]

    Engelbarts Unfinished Revolution [stanford.edu]
  • by Shuh (13578) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:04PM (#4992165) Journal
  • Oh let me get my popcorn! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by reaper20 (23396) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:08PM (#4992172) Homepage
    Too bad that the last five years have seen the decline of the original intent of the internet to degrade to a cesspool of spam, RIAA/MPAA crap, popups, overmarketization, the ZD "stupidity factor" and other pure bullshit that we put up with every day.

    Anyone else harking for the days of gopher and html 3.2? Sure, the "market capitilization" was horrible, but you know what, NNTP was actually useful back then. No google? Some industrous person on would point you to the right place, as a common courtesy. Sharing of knowledge. Ahhhh ... the good old days.

    Now we're deluged with a flash-crippled web with no regards to any kind of standards, where any moron can masquerade as a "developer" and make a ton of money for being an idiot. yeah, I may sound stupid in today's context, but someone like Alan Ralsky was impossible back in the day.

    Bring back the meritocracy of the internet - you remember? The place where you were entitled to an opinion if you were intelligent enough to actually learn and connect.

    Discriminatory? Hell yes, mod me down. Being more intelligent than the average Joe never hurt anyone....

    • Isn't that what /. is for? by DaveOnNet (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:20PM
    • Re:Oh let me get my popcorn! by Magus311X (Score:2) Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:23PM
    • Re:Oh let me get my popcorn! by plugger (Score:2) Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:31PM
    • Funny. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by mindstrm (20013) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:43PM (#4992284)
      If you mean the web.. fine.

      Nowadays though..
      you can route your PBX through a VOIP provider and get really cool phone service, and rates, from anywhere you can get bandwidth.
      We trade entire movies online like it ain't no big thing.
      Same for music.

      Videoconferencing. You may not have seen high quality video conferencing via the internet.. but I sure have.. and it is indeed impressive.

      Education. It's easier than ever to look up any kind of information now than ever before.. increased advertising yes.. but also increased information. Howstuffworks.com and it's type are awesome learning tools, for all ages.

      Open forums, debates, person info like blogs, are huge now. Don't care? Maybe not.. but it's fairly easy to see what othe rpeople really think. Go back to reading magazines if you want... think some guy who failed highschool, has an iq of 40.. you don't want his opinion on something? Don't want to know what he thinks? You should, because he votes.

      Etc.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Funny. by Arandir (Score:2) Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:25PM
        • Re:Funny. by jandrese (Score:2) Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:31AM
          • Re:Funny. by Arandir (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @03:17PM
        • Re:Funny. by mindstrm (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @05:14PM
          • Re:Funny. by Arandir (Score:1) Thursday January 02 2003, @03:49PM
            • Really. by mindstrm (Score:1) Friday January 03 2003, @07:48PM
      • Re:Funny. by WasterDave (Score:2) Wednesday January 01 2003, @02:18AM
    • Re:Oh let me get my popcorn! by miu (Score:2) Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:44PM
    • Re:Oh let me get my popcorn! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by evilviper (135110) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:58PM (#4992322) Journal
      Now we're deluged with a flash-crippled web with no regards to any kind of standards

      I'm not! If I come across a 'crippled' web-site, I won't use it, nor will I go there again.

      YOU make the web. So, next time you feel like complaining about how terrible flash is, uninstall it from your computer instead. Next time you get annoyed by a pop-up, (of if you, like myself, have the slightest concern for privacy and security) disable javascript and be done with it.

      If you don't like distracting animations, disable GIF animations, and you won't be bothered again.

      For all your complaining, you haven't accomplished anything. I was annoyed like you by many MANY things on the web... but instead of complaining on slashdot, I installed Privoxy (before it was even under that name) and wrote up a few regex filters that eliminate almost every annoyance I've ever come across. CmdrTaco (and most other webmasters) may not be smart enough to dump the white backgrounds (in favor of any other color that you can look at without feeling like your eyes are being crushed) but that doesn't mean I have to be forced to look look at it that way.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Oh let me get my popcorn! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by JaredOfEuropa (526365) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:49PM (#4992425) Journal
      "Anyone else harking for the days of gopher and html?"

      The Internet of those days to me is more or less the same as today's Internet: a means of data transport. For what it's worth, that transport now reaches much more people than it did way back when, and at greater speeds also. Don't fall into that delusion that many ISP's suffer from: that they somehow have to offer content as well as transport.

      "Bring back the meritocracy of the internet - you remember? The place where you were entitled to an opinion if you were intelligent enough to actually learn and connect."

      The great achievement of the Internet is that it has given a voice (or medium or whatever) to whomever needs one. Sure, that includes the crackpots, spammers, lousy web designers, Flash users, and so on and so forth. Internet is no longer the plaything of the elite at universities and defense organisations, as it was 10 years ago. As a result, there is more worthwhile stuff on the Internet than ever there was in the past, but there is a corresponding increase in crap, which one has to sort through to get to the meat. But the crap goes hand in hand with the good stuff... culling the crap would probably mean curtailing essential freedoms that leads to the good stuff.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Oh let me get my popcorn! by mocular (Score:2) Wednesday January 01 2003, @01:02AM
    • Re:Oh let me get my popcorn! by m00nun1t (Score:3) Wednesday January 01 2003, @06:15AM
    • Re:Oh let me get my popcorn! by Frater 219 (Score:2) Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:52PM
    • Re:Oh let me get my popcorn! by scrytch (Score:2) Wednesday January 01 2003, @04:43PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by troff (529250) <p DOT petroff AT qut DOT edu DOT au> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:10PM (#4992183) Homepage
    Would this mean (in an extension of the way 1 January 1970 is the beginning of the Epoch) that maybe someday kinda hopefully, this could be used as an origin date for a global (and beyond), cross-cultural, cross-creed/faith, cross-national, cross-whatever new Dating system?

    Not that it would probably take off; heck, Swatch never got anywhere with the Beat.

    But what with people arguing over the fact that Jesus Christ was probably born in 4 B.C. rather than the actually defined date... not to mention that I'm pretty sure all the Buddhists, Moslems, [insert your own religion here]s, Humanists / Atheists and the rest might get a fairer look-in this way. As Australian journalist Phillip Adams once said, "so it looks like the afterlife will be emphatically monocultural" (The Weekend Australian, June 23/24, 2001 - sorry, no online version I'm aware of).

    I picked up a copy of Greg Egan's latest, "Schild's Ladder" two days ago. I keep thinking with books like that, "Diaspora" and all of his post-trans-humanist books, surely those societies would adopt a new dating system that wasn't related to a single obscure cultural event that (some people debate never really even) happened on a planet most of their society had never even heard of...

    We can define standard units through physics - speeds in terms of fractions of c, distances and times in terms of (if you wanted to get REALLY precise) Planck Lengths and derivatives... except those units aren't really manageable for day-to-day social stuff. Dates for everyday common social usage probably have to come from a social event.

    What do we use dates for? To record history, to synchronise communication and society. Can you imagine what daily life would be like without clocks? Without any mechanism for measuring periods at all? Not even a frickin' hourglass?

    What better standard to use than the day the world became "officially connected"?

    And now back from the pie-in-the-sky, I remind myself that the Beat never took off and Swatch have got a bucketload more money and influence than I have.

    But then again, it worked - in a way - for the Epoch...
  • by SenorMooCow (541070) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:11PM (#4992187) Homepage
    I am relatively sure that the internet was first created by CERN (European Center for Nuclear Research) to exchange scientific data between different organizations. Proof here [web.cern.ch]. Damn I proved myself wrong under closer inspection but I will post for the sake of spreading information. They invented the Web not the internet.
  • Filk inspiration! (Score:5, Funny)

    by KC7GR (473279) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:11PM (#4992188) Homepage Journal
    I just can't resist. Remember what you all need to sing at midnight in your respective time zone...

    Should older packets become dumped
    and never brought online,
    Let newer packets take their place
    on all our T-1 lines!

    (I wonder if my older karma will be forgotten?)

  • by SupaYoda (531436) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:22PM (#4992211)
    ...Bernie Shiffman began contemplating a new way to get his resumee "out there".
  • by smagruder (207953) <steve@stevemagruder.com> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:24PM (#4992220) Homepage

    We will look back at the birth of the Internet as the beginnings of the death of privacy, for better or worse. My friends, we have entered the Transparent Age.

    We are quickly headed toward a time where economic advantage will be directly proportional to how much privacy is given up. Those who will work the hardest to keep everything in their lives private will become the new underclass.

  • by notque (636838) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:25PM (#4992222) Homepage Journal
    The internet may be 20 years old, but I miss the BBS.

    Sure, it wasn't graphically intense, and yes... I had to wait 3 seconds a charcters, but Violet was the first love of my life.

    She may have gotten around, but Seth would sing his stories, and you'd slowly work your way with Violet.

    I miss dialing for 3 hours to connect. :(
  • by wackybrit (321117) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:26PM (#4992226) Homepage Journal
    Rather conveniently, only those geeky enough to celebrate this anniversary get to learn this news, since everyone else is out on the biggest party night of the year.

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY INTERNET!!
  • January 2nd (Score:2, Funny)

    by E-Rock-23 (470500) <<moc.liamg> <ta> <tyhporptsol>> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:26PM (#4992227) Homepage Journal
    The day after the Internet was born is also a red letter date in the online world. It brought with it the following historical firsts:

    The First Blog.
    The First Troll
    The Basic Concept of goatse.cx was allowed to begin forming.
    A Synapse in Rob Malda's head fired, marking the beginnings of what would become Slashdot.
    The First Pirate dipped his toe into brave new waters.
    The First Internet Download Queen, Billie Jean King, was crowned.
    The Fires of Mount St. Helens rumbled in faraway Washington, signaling the rise of the Dark Lord Gates and the writing of the One OS
    Al Gore said that the second day of his greatest invention was going very well.
    The birth of the first newsgroup, alt.news.cultureclub (hey, it was the 80's!)
    The First "Stephen King, Dead at 35" Post
    One year later, George Orwell, You Do The Math

    Happy New Year, everyone. May your night be moderated +1(Kickass)
    • Re:January 2nd by ZenJabba1 (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:21PM
    • Re:January 2nd by John Hasler (Score:2) Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:25PM
      • Re:January 2nd by TheOnlyCoolTim (Score:2) Wednesday January 01 2003, @01:21AM
    • Re:January 2nd (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:51AM (#4992529)
      A Synapse in Rob Malda's head fired, marking the beginnings of what would become Slashdot.

      Jan 1, 2003: The second synpapse in Rob Malda's head fired, resulting in a duplicate article.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:January 2nd by Scudsucker (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @03:55AM
  • NCP eh (Score:3, Funny)

    by evilviper (135110) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:37PM (#4992260) Journal
    So, the internet left NCP 20 years ago... How long until Novell figures it out?

    Repeat after me... It's a Joke, It's a Joke, It's a Joke. And when you tell me about factual inaccuracies, guess what I'm going to tell you?
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • IETF info (Score:2, Interesting)

    by ScubaS (600042) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:38PM (#4992264)
    Bob is a great member for the IETF's mailing list. It is not everyday that people are actually watching out for special occassions such as the 20th aniversary of the Internet using the TCP/IP protocol. The NCP protocol is so old that it is basically unheard of today. I know that there will be more than one New Years Eve for us this week! Nobody can predict what the internet would be like if ARPANET was still using the NCP protocol for internet communications. All I can say about that is, maybe it is time for the Internet's Rebirth and phase out TCP/IP for something that is easier on the internet's precious bandwidth and high latency.
  • The next 20 years (Score:2, Insightful)

    by buttahead (266220) <tscanlan&sosaith,org> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:42PM (#4992280) Homepage
    So who can guess where we will be 20 years from now? Wide scale broadband using IPv6? Small scale super broadband using an IP replacement?

    What's going on with the Internet v2.0? Will it also be spun into a commercial media frenzy?

    Anyone care to venture some guesses? Now taking bets; I'm sure you will be able to track me down 2 decades from now.
  • Evolution rather than revolution (Score:2, Interesting)

    by wiggys (621350) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:56PM (#4992318)
    The last major net revolution was probably in the mid nineties. By then we had animated .gifs, jpegs, database-driven web pages, Flash, Java and Javascript.

    Has there really been anything new since then? I mean, since the WWW was born, the internet hasn't really advanced much. Sure, we've seen gradual improvements in bandwidth, HTML, CSS, scripting languages and so on, but there hasn't really been anything NEW.

    • Re:Evolution rather than revolution by Unregistered (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:15AM
    • Well, I hate to say it, but. . . (Score:4, Insightful)

      by kfg (145172) on Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:27AM (#4992489)
      that's generally a sign of maturation of any technology. It happens. There's only so much "new" to go around, and then you've used it up.

      You can see signs of it throughtout the entire computer industry too. They're starting to sell chrome like it's a technological feature. They only have to do that when they've run out of *actual* new technological features to sell. "Buy our OS, it's got prettier widgets and shit."

      There was that "smell-O-vision" thingy that someone said they were working on a while ago. Man, just wait to you get hit with a "popup" perfume ad with that sucker. Maybe nothing new is a Good Thing?

      KFG
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Evolution rather than revolution by xombo (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @01:04AM
    • Re:Evolution rather than revolution by TheOnlyCoolTim (Score:2) Wednesday January 01 2003, @01:23AM
    • Re:Evolution rather than revolution by Alien Being (Score:2) Wednesday January 01 2003, @03:46PM
  • The Internet was up well before 1983 (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Animats (122034) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:19PM (#4992364) Homepage
    The Internet was up well before 1 JAN 1983. That was just the date that the old ARPANET NCP people had to switch over. I had machines on the Internet more than 20 years ago, and so did others.

    Here's an Internet host list from 1981:

    • Date: 5 Oct 1981 1358-PDT

    • From: POSTEL at USC-ISIF
      To: mike.bmd70 at BRL

      27-May-81 16:52 JBP

      GATEWAYS

      • DCEC-EDN/ARPA
      • MIT-LCS/ARPA
      • BBN-RCC/ARPA
      • BBN-SAT/ARPA
      • NDRE-SAT/ARPA
      • COMSAT-SAT/COMSAT
      • UCL-SAT/UCL
      • UCL-SAT/NULL
      • UCL-UCL/RSRE
      • RSRE-NULL/PPSN
      • RSRE-NULL/PPSN
      • SRI-PR1/ARPA
      • SRI-PR2/ARPA
      • BBN-BBNPR/ARPA
      • Bragg-BraggPR/ARPA

      COMPUTERS

      • ALTA-COMA
      • BBN-UNIX
      • BBN-VAX
      • BBNA
      • BBNB
      • BBNC
      • BBND
      • BBNE
      • BBNF
      • BBNG
      • EDN-HOST1
      • EDN-HOST3
      • EDN-UNIX
      • ISIB
      • ISIC
      • ISID
      • ISIE
      • ISIF
      • MIT-DevMultics
      • MIT-Multics
      • UCLA-CCN 3033
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Reminising (Score:3, Interesting)

    by peterdaly (123554) <petedaly@[ ]netcom.com ['ix.' in gap]> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:41PM (#4992409) Homepage
    My first collection of bookmarks was scrawled on paper, and titled "Servers", since none of us had heard of "Bookmarks" yet.

    Anyone have an old copy of the Internet Yellowpages sitting in their shelf? (Or in their basement...)

    I remember how cool we though it was to download gif images of weather maps from University of Michigan. We didn't have to wait for the news to see an up to date weather map! Think of how commonplace that is today.

    -Pete
    • Re:Reminising (Score:4, Interesting)

      by zaren (204877) <holdthis@mail.com> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:53PM (#4992432) Homepage Journal
      My first collection of bookmarks was scrawled on paper, and titled "Servers", since none of us had heard of "Bookmarks" yet.

      My collection was scrawled on the labels of various 1.4 meg floppies. This was back when archie was still popular, and my primary method of Internet access was dialing into my college's Prime mainframe (before most people knew they could get Internet access through their Fortran programming account) with a 2400 bps modem. I still like the sound of a 2400 connecting the best :)
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Reminising by rorya (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @08:07PM
    • Re:Reminising by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:44AM
  • *toasts* (Score:4, Insightful)

    by kien (571074) <kien&member,fsf,org> on Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:00AM (#4992444) Journal
    Here's to free-thinkers...may they continue to retain the right to question things.

    Here's to academics...may they continue their research.

    Here's to the hacker ethic which played a large part in the creation of the Net.

    And here's to all of you /. people, whether friend, foe, or freak; you make me think.

    Happy New Year!

    --K.
  • Whoa... (Score:1)

    by qat (637648) <admin.pleaseeat@us> on Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:10AM (#4992461) Homepage
    Isn't it ironic that it was claimed to be created on the First day of a new year? I think that was done because people are lazy and it's easier to remember. Stupid people...
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Just 1 more year... (Score:3, Funny)

    by ThresholdRPG (310239) on Wednesday January 01 2003, @12:14AM (#4992471) Homepage Journal
    ... until you're old enough to drink, Internet!

    Until then, I guess you have to stick to what you're best at: porn and gambling.

    Happy Birthday Internet!
  • by mtec (572168) on Wednesday January 01 2003, @01:30AM (#4992661)
    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    And the earth was without form, and void; and there was no Spam.
    And the Spirit of God moved slowly through modems.
    And God said, Let there be speed: and there was speed.
    And God saw the speed, that it was good: and God divided the slow from the fast.
    And God called the speed true Broadband Internet, and the slow he called AOL.
    And the evening and the morning were the first day.

    (apologies)
  • by BlindSpot (512363) on Thursday January 02 2003, @01:04AM (#4997018)
    The CBC actually ran a TV report about this on the national news tonight! It included numerous mentions of TCP/IP and a quick "dummy's overview" of what it was, plus some reflections on what the modern Internet has meant for society.

    The online article is here [www.cbc.ca] along with a link to a radio report. Hopefully they'll put the TV version on there too.

    It was obviously a slow news day, but it was still nice to see such a geeky topic hit mainstream media.
  • by petersherwood (628129) on Thursday January 02 2003, @08:46AM (#4998010) Homepage
    The fall of 2003 will mark my 30th 'net b-day.

    I have no delusions of grandeur in regard to this event as I was only born into this medium cuz of many 'net predecessors.

    I directly owe my 'net b-day to John Cox, my geometry teacher, who had the where-with-all to acquire one of those computer teletypes with the 110 BAUD modem, paper-tape printout, sticky keys, etc. ... and had it connected to the UCSD mainframe.

    No one really realizes significance when it happens. It generally takes years to get that perspective.

    When I finally located John Cox and wrote to tell him a year or two ago to confirm my vague recollection (which he confirmed) he was quite surprised that it was so significant to me personally. [PS: take the time to say "thank you"]

    I was 'net born-again in 1983 when Lindsay Cleveland of AT&T Atlanta continually added my plethora of UUCP-connected XENIX and/or UNIX computers to his extremely well connected 'net systems from 1983 until 1985.
    I was a computer consultant and took the time to show my clients how to get connected to the 'net.

    Perspective: The 'net is the 'net cuz of all of us doing our small part to make it so.
    And if you didn't have the good fortune to have your 'net b-day or your 'net growth days back in the early years (1960's, 1970's or 1980's) you will not have the experience and insights as to why some of us old-timers long for the good ol' days and say "thank you" so much and try to give where credit is due (or where we think it is due). Please don't (virtually: - ) slap us though.

    Some of us may be the very reason some of you are where you are today much as we old timers have a gratitude for those who trod the path before us.

    I noticed some here are pointing to people like Vint, Gore and a few others as the reason why the 'net is the internet today. Most of them are quick to state it was a group effort and they were only part of what we know and (variably) love about our 'net today.

    Those who do, have perspective!

    Thanks for your contribution. I appreciate it.

    Pete

  • Last Post! (Score:1)

    by alpg (613466) on Wednesday January 15 2003, @12:21AM (#5085844) Homepage
    I was in this prematurely air conditioned supermarket and there were all
    these aisles and there were these bathing caps you could buy that had these
    kind of Fourth of July plumes on them that were red and yellow and blue and
    I wasn't tempted to buy one but I was reminded of the fact that I had been
    avoiding the beach.
    -- Lucinda Childs "Einstein On The Beach"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...
  • Re:NCP and TCP/IP (Score:1)

    by kurtras (65722) <kurt@raschke.net> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:03PM (#4992159) Homepage Journal
    No, actually this NCP stood for Network Control Protocol, and had nothing to do with Netware's NCP or IPX/SPX.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:NCP and TCP/IP (Score:1)

    by meshko (413657) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:05PM (#4992167) Homepage
    Troll?
    Just in case it's not (or someone doesn't realize it is): this NCP has absolutely nothing to do with Netware. It stands for Network Control Protocol and was invented long before NetWare came up with their NCP (I don't even know if NetWare existed at the time, most likely not).
    I don't know much about NCP, but I think it was a HOST-to-HOST only protocol, so unlike TCP it did not know about different networks.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:FUCK YOU ALL (Score:1)

    by w1r3sp33d (593084) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:05PM (#4992168)
    you see, this is what makes the internet soooo very wonderful. Happy anniversary to you also. Happy new years! Best regards, WORTHLESS.
    [ Parent ]
    • Re:FUCK YOU ALL by DarkKnightRadick (Score:1) Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:15PM
      • Re:FUCK YOU ALL by DarkKnightRadick (Score:1) Wednesday January 01 2003, @11:34AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:NCP and TCP/IP (Score:5, Informative)

    by Russ Steffen (263) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:09PM (#4992176) Homepage

    Ummm, no.

    While NCP can also mean Netware Core Protcol, in this case it means "Network Control Protocol", a much older protocol that dates back to the beginning of the ARPAnet circa 1970, and has squat to do with Netware.

    NCP is documented in RFCs 55, 60, 215 and several others.

    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Oh, come ON mods! (Score:1)

    by SupaYoda (531436) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:17PM (#4992199)
    This was insightful?
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:NCP and TCP/IP (Score:2)

    by AtrN (87501) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:35PM (#4992253) Homepage
    Others got NCP luckily and the "T" in "TCP" doesn't stand for "transfer". See,

    RFC: 793

    TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:NCP and TCP/IP (Score:2)

    by evilviper (135110) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:44PM (#4992290) Journal
    You know something, ships had ports for hundreds of years before electricity was even discovered.

    Electrical devices had ports decades before computers were invented.

    Computers had ports lone before TCP was invented.

    And don't even get me started on 'dongles'.

    And please allow me to point out the irony that you, yourself, are one of those people who are NOT "in the know".
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:FUCK YOU ALL (Score:1)

    by David Walker (618902) <`moc.ypareht-egalliv' `ta' `divad'> on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:47PM (#4992296)
    You all hate me anyways, you stupid asswhipes, so you can all go fuck yourselves!

    Especially you "In Soviet Russia" spammers. you are worse then fucking amobeas. YOU ARE WORTHLESS!

    Fucking whores.


    Hold on, what the hell do you have against amoebas!?
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:effect on efficiency (Score:3, Interesting)

    by markov_chain (202465) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @10:59PM (#4992323)
    I prefer today's Internet to the one 7 years ago, when I first tried it out, thank you.

    The amount of information available on the 'Net is incredible-- not to mention that it is also decently indexed and searchable. For example, suppose I decide, on a whim, that I would like to know what the Hungarians call linden trees. Search for the latin name for linden, then google for that together with the Hungarian country code: "tilia tree site:.hu." The result pops up as the first hit! This kind of detailed information did not exist in the early years.

    I am loath to think about what I would have to do to find this out without the 'net. I would need to find a pretty good university library, travel there, grovel to get access, and then spend time doing research. Thank goodness for progress!

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:OMFG!!! TERRORIST ATTACK IN NYC! (Score:2, Insightful)

    by HeyYou82 (519576) on Tuesday December 31 2002, @11:04PM (#4992335)
    this is not funny. in fact, i read that, and my heart dropped. i wish i had some mod points. get a friggin life.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:13th Post! (Score:1)

    by kmweber (196563) on Wednesday January 01 2003, @05:21AM (#4993086) Homepage
    That's what surprises me, too. This is too funny to keep to myself, that's for sure.

    (yeah, I'm the OP).
    [ Parent ]
  • 24 replies beneath your current threshold.