Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Multiple problems (Score 1) 113

Who can forget the Mid-2012 13-inch unibody MacBook Pros (and similar 2011–2012 models) where a design flaw caused the internal hard drive SATA flex cable to rub against the rough, aluminum chassis. Over time, normal laptop vibration wore through the cable's insulation, severing data traces and mimicking a dead or "loose" hard drive by causing random freezing, data corruption, or the infamous flashing question mark folder. While the physical drive remained securely bracketed, the inexpensive ribbon cable itself required replacement, often requiring a strip of electrical tape underneath to prevent recurring failure.

PowerBook Pismo: Display cable sliced by Airport antenna connector. PowerBook Wallstreet: Hard drive connector board attached by a single screw that didn't hold it in place, causing constant disconnects. The iBook G3 graphics chip disaster. So many mechanical design mistakes, so few column inches to write about them.

Comment Re:Happy cooling and triple redundancy. (Score 1) 94

The only theoretical advantage I can think of for a satellite ...

Come on, I can't believe you are that stupid. You can't think of any technical advantage of operating a power-hungry machine outside of Earth's shadow? Try harder.

You mean 24x7 solar power? Now calculate how many centuries an on-earth data center could go, even with having to use batteries at night, even with replacing the backup batteries every couple of years, before the cost would equal the cost of a single launch. In other words, that's not an actual advantage, at least in practice.

Besides, you can't repair or upgrade the hardware when it is in space, which is such a colossal disadvantage that the advantages would have to be almost unimaginably great to balance that out.

Comment Re: Happy cooling and triple redundancy. (Score 1) 94

Well, for things headed out, power supplies are the crucial problem. For things in the inner solar system, solar storms are irregular, but *will* happen. So I'm not really convinced by this test for anything but LEO (as those are temporary anyway).

That said, as long as it's intended for "special missions" it's reasonable. But AI is power hungry compared to fixed electronics, so that's going to be a continuing problem.

Comment Re:master race dreams (Score 1) 94

The problem with testing radiation hardness that way is that solar storms are quite erratic and severe ones are infrequent...but definitely not absent.

This test may work for things intended for low Earth orbit, as those are temporary anyway, but I don't think it's going to validate other uses. A better choice would be to send something to orbit Jupiter, where harsh radiation challenges are predictably present.

Comment Re:Happy cooling and triple redundancy. (Score 1) 94

In space you have to deal with cooling in vacuum without thermal convection but being exposed to sunlight for energy harvesting, triple redundancy to counter radiation (charged particles) induced malfunction, and slow data links compared to ground based communications, just to name a few of the challenges. And that is supposed to be advantageous somehow, while low earth orbits get fuller and fuller, and malicious countries demonstrate satellite hunting satellites?

The only theoretical advantage I can think of for a satellite would be that if someone launched one from international waters, if some random government wanted it to stop existing or stop doing something, they'd have to launch something to destroy the satellite, because from a legal perspective, it wouldn't be within their jurisdiction.

But in practice, as far as I know, nobody is launching anything into orbit from international waters, so this is entirely theoretical, at least right now.

Comment wrong person for the job (Score 1) 83

Rewriting legacy code in itself makes sense if the idea is to extend and improve the project, add new features, increase functionality. For this purpose, however, you need a person with access to all of the documentation and understanding of why the code exists, not a person who can ask an LLM to rewrite the code simply by using the existing code base as the documentation base. Before rewriting the code what needs to be done is documentation needs to be created (if it doesn't exist) and business requirements need to be collected, basically normal business analysis and product management, once you have that you can hand it over to a developer.

Starting with a developer is probably a recipe for failure in this case.

Comment Re: Root out the Root Corruption First. (Score 1) 28

Ever been on a college campus in the last 20 or 30 years? Lots of construction, lots of make-work. Lots of non-academic amenities.

It would be like a haircut requiring five people to work on you at the same time for five times the cost of the good old days when one person would snip here, comb there, while making idle chitchat.

Comment Who else is at fault for my failure to parent? (Score 0) 7

$other_political_party is definitely on the list. After all, they're actively trying to $culture_war_stereotype{$other_political_party} my kids in school!

Can't forget the $medical_bogeyman{$my_political_party}. That's all over my SnapFaceX feed!

Oh and the Jews. Somehow. I'm one of them but it's still their fault damnit!

Slashdot Top Deals

"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite." -- Bertrand Russell, _Sceptical_Essays_, 1928

Working...