At this rate, reality is going to put The Onion out of business by 2029.

I mean based on the president of the United states? Those are rookie numbers. Come on Google you can do better!

Go ahead and post some links to investigations. I'll check back.

You enjoying those gasoline prices?

Because he was the poster child for austerity politics and right wing economics in Argentina.

Argentina went a little crazy on the rent control without building public housing. Those two things aren't compatible. If you are going to do rent control you have to back it up with subsidies or direct public housing or you're going to have supplies shortages. Which they did.

On top of that droughts have absolutely wrecked Argentina's economy because it's mostly agrarian. It's a modern agrarian economy mind you but it's still in agrarian economy and basically the entire planet is in some stage of droughts thanks to that which shall not be named least I trigger somebody here.

So this means money was getting tight and it's easy to sell people on austerity politics when that happens. Basically slash government programs and services and promise big tax cuts and the miracle of trickle down economics. It's the same playbook we've been hearing since Reagan / Thatcher. Didn't work then doesn't work now but for some reason voters are always willing to try it again...

And for a brief period Of time it looked good. Cutting the rent control got some people back into the market that had pulled inventory off the market. And it takes a little while for the cuts to government services to show up in the economy meanwhile the tax cuts made everything look good and short-term deregulation brought in some capital investment and a little tiny micro bubble.

It didn't take long though for the bubble to burst and for the shit to hit the fan and when that happened as usual the right wing tried to hold down the power anyway they could. If I remember correctly they first tried to overthrow the courts and when that didn't work I think he was plotting an actual coup.

Mark Cuban seems to be a decent guy. He didn't start out rich and happily pays his taxes https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/1...

It worked for the president.

Just because you gave them some money doesn't mean you own the building.

How about the guy who is going to start WW3 at 8pm tonight? His opinion on Epstein? https://www.theguardian.com/us...

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,”

And

He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side

While the US just repaid a French company a billion dollar deposit to cancel offshore wind farms, China has constructed the largest wind turbines in the world for their newest wind farms.

https://kdwalmsley.substack.co...

This is the world’s largest offshore wind turbine. It is off of Fujian province, in South China. It generates enough power for 44,000 households, or over a hundred thousand people. It displaces 22,000 tons of coal per year. This unit is part of a large farm 30 km offshore, where there are already a number of 16-megawatt turbines, and when those were installed, they were the world’s largest.

It’s a breakthrough in engineering, that this much output comes from a single turbine, instead of a group of them working together, and experts say that it will inform future wind farms. That’s also a region that sees frequent severe storms.

This was all hard to do, then, and we’re curious why the Chinese bothered at all. It required a ship to be specially designed and built, just to get the turbine into position. Having it out there means that China can leave 22,000 tons of coal in the ground they otherwise would have hauled to the surface and set on fire . . .

In December, the Interior Department announced an immediate pause on offshore wind projects under construction in the United States, due to national security risks identified by the Department of War. The government found that big turbine blades create radar interference, and obscure legitimate moving targets and generate false ones.

It’s not great to learn that our money-no-object Pentagon has radars that can’t tell the difference between a supersonic bomber flying toward Washington, or a windmill floating off of Long Island Sound. And it’s also not great that the White House has just told the rest of the world that our radars are that bad. This should be in a super-top-secret Pentagon report, instead of a press release from the White House.

Oh God is stupid as he is I can't imagine he doesn't know that. If anything it would have been very very carefully explained to him by the other lawyers.

he's just corrupt. The Republican party has put a shitload of corrupt judges on the bench so that they could get them to rule in favor of large businesses and corporations against consumers and employees. Justice beer bro and that one girl that couldn't answer high School civics questions during her Senate hearing are probably the most famous examples but people don't like to think about how staggeringly incompetent they are. Clarence Thomas is another great example, George Bush was angry he was going to have to nominate a black man because he was as you might imagine kind of racist so he picked the most incompetent and corrupt black man he could find and rammed him through the Senate.

You are regulating them. That's why we have Las vegas. Dumbass young men can travel to Las Vegas and lose their short once or twice and then they have that barrier between themselves and their addiction. It also means it's much easier to regulate, serious addicts for example used to be able to contact all the casinos in Vegas and get put on a list and they would not be allowed to gamble anymore.

The problem with gambling is that it is legitimately and clinically addictive. Prostitution is a problem but again it needs regulation.

Basically you don't completely criminalize something because yeah it doesn't go away what you do is heavily heavily and systematically regulate it. You control access to it in a positive way that prevents the worst damage.

Problem you're having is you are stuck in black and white thinking. Everything has to be either on or off, all or nothing. Gray area suck and their unpleasant to think about so I don't blame you but still.

Currently hydrogen production emits methane as it's produced in the Untied States

FTFY

Electricity in China is less than half the price as anywhere in the US, and at that cost hydrogen production by electrolysis becomes viable.

The fact that we invaded Iran because the senile old man didn't understand that they would and could close the strait of Hormuz is huge.

Unless Trump backs down in the next week or so we are going to have massive food shortages. That will drive up the cost of everything everywhere as everyone competes for a shrinking food supply. This is because so much of the fertilizer goes through the straight and we are in the planting season and we need to get going and we can't.

One of the problems with this country is people aren't very bright. They can't extrapolate even simple things. The majority of Americans seem to think at about the level of a 12-year-old. So they can't figure out the difference between news and propaganda and they can't understand that just because they could afford to eat this week doesn't mean they can afford to eat next week.

On top of that you've got a good chunk of people who are over that edge already and when you are struggling for your next meal it's hard to think clearly. So even if you somehow made it over the hump of thinking like a 12-year-old a few years of poverty and the stress that comes with it will knock you right back down.

Which is exactly why the Epstein class keeps so many people in that state. Idle hands are The devil's plaything after all...

No, it has a GWP100 of 11.6, CO2 is the reference chemical so its GWP100 is 1. Methane is 81. So a kilo of released H2 has the global warming potential of 11.6 kilograms of carbon dioxide, while NH4's potential is equivalent to 81 kilograms of CO2.

https://www.nature.com/article...