Suburbs suck and this wouldn't be doing anything to alleviate this. But probably doing a lot to make 'em worse, since this presumably would take away from space for an ADU that would increase livable space. Suburbs are for performatively rural morons who can't stand the thought of actually living around other people, despite having no skills useful for rural life.

You know Republicans just have it in for anything that doesn't run on gas when they're proposing this bullshit and yet, we can't even guarantee cars are driven by anybody in this country, much less someone licensed and sober, and cars do a lot more damage. Must be the oil they tend to burn.

If you think spicy autocomplete is having a conversation with you in the first place, you're already on the downward spiral. You're the reason for the guardrails.

Like, literally ask any Republican voter if they want $20 and you have a test subject.

Biased in favor of reality. The only harmful minority in the world are billionaires.

Because this is feeling very pets.com

Google, Microsoft and Amazon are hella-overvalued and long-overdue to pop.

You say this like banks aren't holding everyone technologically back in finance.

Don't give them ideas. When America has bad ideas, Republicans put it on wheels.

I'll take "things that never happened" for $100, Ken. The bigger problem is that they get treated like shit and Republicans have had them blocked from being able to take any effective labor action since Reagan. Nobody's going to take a nightmare job with bad working conditions and bad pay without any reasonable expectation that the working conditions or pay will improve.

Ever seen someone on the spectrum play air traffic controller on the VATSIM network in FlightGear or MSFS for hours? More than a few of the good ones are just autistic stoners who got a little baked and locked in. Maybe encourage that.

Basically turnkey with Debian. But that's also the point with Debian.

Not only because headlines that end in a question mark are automatically answered with "no" but also because corrections and retractions are more effort and journalistic integrity than outlets using AI "writers" can manager.

That one failing sysop that chases everyone away for posting things he's not interested in, then blames the users for not being a bunch of bland suburbanites who blames their poverty on rich people not getting enough tax breaks.

It's like Doonesbury for people stupid enough to believe Charlie Kirk or Rush Limbaugh, but furry for some reason.