Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Why Didn't Anthropic Sue? (Score 2) 58

Think about when Trump activated the National Guard and ordered them into action in California. The courts ruled against him after the fact, but the courts refused to block the action because the governments claim was imminent harm could occur.

Which was the wrong call. The Republicans ordered the National Guard into California as a political act, Trump happened to be the stooge with the button. This was all obvious from the start.

Comment Most likely scenario (Score 1) 58

Anthropic ran a marketing campaign comprised almost entirely of bullshit with some hokey story that it's "too dangerous" to release to the public. The reality is that shit doesn't work but they need to pretend it does long enough to pocket people's money and run. Republicans, being too stupid to see their own game played by someone else, went apeshit for bullshit. Anthropic staff, not wanting to blow their grift at best, go to prison at worst, are now caught in a position where they either tip their hand to a terrorist group that happens to control the US at the moment and lose their freedom, or tip their hand to the world and lose their grift (and probably their freedom anyway. Republicans might be as stupid as they think the world is, and as easily manipulated as they are manipulative themselves, don't exactly care for having that thrown back at them in practice in such a high profile way.

Comment He's disingenuous (Score 1) 38

If Bluesky was actually serious about what they're saying, then they'd have adopted open standards, like ActivityPub, which was already ratified as the protocol for social networks before Bluesky even was dreamed up by Jack in the first place, as the protocol on which it runs. But no, they invented ATProto for the express purpose of outsourcing their hosting costs to idiots while retaining full moderation control over the whole thing.

Bluesky is part of the same problem they're trying to pin exclusively on GAFAM. All corporate control is the enemy of the public.

Comment Re:No more spyware (Score 1) 50

I'm not sure a single-cab half-bed is going to really attract an audience, because people who need a pickup tend to need a full bed. Suburban posers and other performatively but not actually blue-collar folks aren't going to like it because it doesn't seat as many people and doors as a sedan. And farmers are plenty happy with their imported Daihatsu Hijets and Honda Actys. It's also not 1980 anymore, people understand each car you own is a $10k/year hole in the road into which you pour money, so being a two-car household is only A Thing where so little investment has been made to undo the damage of dedicating every public space to the movement and storage of cars that staying is only slightly more viable to moving someplace livable.

They'd have been smarter to start with the 1990s Toyota Van as a starting place for a body design and going from there, since the only major difference between the family hauler and blue collar work versions was the family hauler version had two removable bench seats and four more windows, and the work version had a provision to put in the bench seats.

Comment Who cares? (Score 1) 162

Suburbs suck and this wouldn't be doing anything to alleviate this. But probably doing a lot to make 'em worse, since this presumably would take away from space for an ADU that would increase livable space. Suburbs are for performatively rural morons who can't stand the thought of actually living around other people, despite having no skills useful for rural life.

Slashdot Top Deals

May all your PUSHes be POPped.

Working...