
India Opts Against AI Regulation 24
India does not plan to regulate the growth of AI within the South Asian market, identifying the sector as a "significant and strategic" area for the nation. This stance arrives at a time when numerous voices are calling for increased scrutiny of the rapidly advancing technology. From a report: The Ministry of Electronics and IT said in a long written response on Wednesday that it has assessed the ethical concerns and risks of bias and discrimination associated with AI. The ministry said it's implementing necessary policies and infrastructure measures to cultivate a robust AI sector in the country, but does not intend to introduce legislation to regulate its growth. The expansion of AI will have a "kinetic effect" on entrepreneurship and business development in India, the ministry asserted. "AI is a kinetic enabler of the digital economy and innovation ecosystem. Government is harnessing the potential of AI to provide personalized and interactive citizen-centric services through digital public platforms."
It would be in their best interest to not. (Score:2)
If all the other countries are putting in a bunch of AI Regulations, then India will be at an economic advantage over the rest of the world.
Not really (Score:2)
India's major advantage over most other countries is a large, English-speaking, well-educated, poorly-paid workforce. AI would essentially eliminate that advantage.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Not really (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well-educated? The average is not even close. They have so many people that people see the outliers succeed and make that mistake.
Read again the parent:
India's major advantage (...) is a large, English-speaking, well-educated, poorly-paid workforce.
Oh, that too I guess (Score:1)
If all the other countries are putting in a bunch of AI Regulations,
Yes exactly what I was thinking!
then India will be at an economic advantage over the rest of the world.
Oh, that's what you meant. I was more thinking, the killbots would do India last. Your point applies too I suppose.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh great...the earth will die via Kwik-e Mart Terminators.
"Hasta la vista....and Come Again!!"
Re: (Score:2)
Regulations are almost always a very good thing for everyone, with just one exception: irresponsible people and businesses that act against the public interest.
If you like food that isn't contaminated, bridges that don't collapse, and rivers that don't catch fire, you can thank your good friends in the government for the many strong regulations that keep you safe.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: India is just "China with better PR" (Score:1)
If that were true ukraine would stop buying Chinese products and west and the world in general would have sent their manufacturing to India where IP laws are enforced and foreign tech countries are allowed to sell their products. That isn't happening of course, and that is because for all the rhetoric it is only money and blood that has any value in western culture. China enslaved its population so you guys looked the other way. India is a democracy, is poor and doesn't have "blue eyed white skinned" popula
AI is significant and strategic (Score:2)
People are going to make a lot of money in the short term with this AI stuff. In the long term it's going to destroy civilization, but clearly whoever has the most stuff at the end of this game of life is the winner.
Re: (Score:1)
Reminds me of a classic cartoon. [economicsociology.org]
Re: (Score:1)
You are a Projectican.
Re: (Score:2)
Unabomber, is that you?
Weighing options (Score:1)
When you are a poor nation, money speaks louder than creepy robots.
Policies are laws (Score:1)
COVID-19 in silico (Score:2)
It starts training itself on new techniques like adding fuzzing to its arsenal. It starts developin
Re: (Score:2)
That's pretty funny. Let me guess: in just 10 years, right?
The magical miracle AI is always just 10 years away. It's been 10 years away since the 60's.
Oh boy, I wonder why (Score:2)