for a change it s nice to see someone recognizable not giving in to the hype.
And the reasoning behind it is quite sound too.
Personally i would also add that quality or notion of actual handcrafted product/content increases it's value, just as it does for any other industry dominated nowdays by production lines, automation etc - worksmanship adds value in the eye of afficionados.
oh well, i exaggerated that last bit. AI agent at least will try to correct and knows where to look for answers when i point the mistakes it made. Still, it's the same as leading a junior. The only benefit is the hope of the company to have less payed employees i guess
Hear me out, the way all companies are pushing AI makes for additional, unwanted distraction. And i mean both - my company insisting on using the new fad just to stay hip, and all the service and tool providers pushing the product. It all adds overhead to daily work. I'm fine with AI being an improvement on search engine, but having to tell stuff to an AI agent is like babysitting an intern. An intern who majored in human scince at that.
Why does it have to be there in the first place, dummy! If anyone needs some AI they can opt it, as usuall, by navigating to a chat/slop service or installing chat/slop extension. WHY ON EARTH MUST IT ALSO BE INTEGRATED INTO A DAMN BROWSER?!!
well there's the entire multiverse of DOMs and can live happily in just one browser tab.
It's nice to have options, it just doesn't mean one needs to use all of them all at once
yea, it had it uses, but as always people decided to use it for wrong reasons, done it poorly, then blamed it all on the lang.
No one was forcing people to use applets for UI, UI could be written in HTML with some JS to interface the applet for actual heavy lifting, like reading smartcards via custom native code or some other wierd protocols.