Absolutely. Even companies that try to switch licenses to "protect" their code, like MinIO did, run the risk of people quickly switching to or creating alternatives. Like RustFS was created specifically to deal with the frustration of MinIO's change.

The fallacy is that throughout human history new forms of energy has typically been *additive* to existing forms. We're still burning about the same amount of biomass as we did 40 years ago.

The math gets very difficult very fast. Look up "Answers with Joe: Space Shades: Humanity's Last Hope" on youtube for a good overview.

All of it. What do you suppose swearing you will "help dismantle structures" really means?

Does it matter if the nation's elite schools only employ faculty from one political and ideological side of the spectrum? Maybe??

Please.. it says in the document big and loud "Search committees want to know that you are willing and able to help them make their department more equitable by working to dismantle structures and attitudes that make it more difficult for some students and colleagues to succeed."

tl;dr - They want to *know* that you will be dedicated to the DEI cause before advancing your candidacy. It's that obvious.

More gaslighting.. a "diversity statement" is literally a statement of ideological fealty to the DEI temple. Doubt me? https://www.cmu.edu/student-success/other-resources/handouts/comm-supp-pdfs/writing-a-diversity-statement.pdf

You are either living in a bubble or are deliberately gaslighting. Harvard, for example has just 3% of its faculty identify as conservative, as reported by their own Crimson. And that's not by chance. Just consider all the positions that required "diversity statements" as part of any application. Literally an ideological purity test.

I could go on and on but I suspect your views are your identity and are unchanging. And you'll resort to ad hominems to those who disagree, calling them "fools" who couldn't have made it into Harvard.

Are there seriously 0-day flaws in iOS that Apple doesn't know about?

Where does your "15%" figure come from? Do you dispute there's maybe 2C already locked in?

EEI is closer to 2 W/m^2
https://twitter.com/tonyezw1/status/1770039249921798313/photo/1

If the W/m^2 is closer to 1.4C as I believe Hansen suggests then we've theoretically got 3C of warming "locked in." Even if it's just 1C it's, well, borderline unthinkable.

the decision to switch to staking saves something like 99% of the energy vs bitcoin mining operations. no system is perfect but staking makes sense.

yep, I'm sure they've been backpedaling and adjusting tuning furiously.

It's the blatant anti-white racism that is built into Gemini.

Tell Gemini you're proud to be half black? "Oh yay, that's so awesome, I'm so happy for you."
Tell Gemini you're proud to be half white? "Geez, well we're going to need to talk about that problematic attitude."

Just like how it refused to make an image for "a strong white man" but gladly spits them out for "a strong black man."

ok but during this time global aviation essentially stopped, so did tourism, so did a lot of road travel. The point is it would be impossible to reproduce that level of "conservation" again and it made no apparent difference to the rate-of-rise of CO2.