This is Indian judiciary, which emanated from the British Crown, not the bureaucracy which emanated from whites serving the Crown.

The only punishment he is looking at is stern "observation" and maybe a life-long ban on promotion.

I want my tomb stone to say, I tried my best. - Naom Chomsky

Oscar is not the pinnacle of the world. She is Indian.

Your response is the prime example of

> tyranny of the arrogantly clueless

Aishwarya Rai, former miss world and one of the most sought after heroine, married to the scion of the biggest and one of the richest actors in the world.

"Known for red carpet appearance"

Americans ARE celebrating seeing less brown people.

All that is great. And irrelevant. The point is that democrats couldn't solve any real problems to decided to call everyone a bad person for a problem that most people don't face or care about. And doubled down, like they did last time, and are continuing to do.

> The reality is - it's just a vestige of sexual discrimination that you refuse to let go of.

Yeah that is exactly what is batshit crazy. You have done 0 study on this subject but you feel confident that parroting standard excuses must be making you truthful.

Here is an exercise - pick a year, or all the years - and pick a athletic sport - running, swimming etc. any. Then compare the records for women's and men's competition. You can pick any format. Now make any of that variable, keep rest of the picks constant and draw the records on a scatter plot.

Then tell me it is a vestige of sexual discrimination.

And to people saying this is such a small issue affecting maybe dozen people - apparently it was large enough to get Trump elected. Congratulations. You are a sly asshole, Trump is loud mouthed. That's all. As a non-white person your objectives are currently better aligned to me and that is all you care about. You are just as transactional as him.

Ah yes, the quintessential western urge to call everyone else a savage.

And to paper over lack of understanding with "superior" bookish definitions. That's not even just west, it is inherent to all abrahamic cultures to be honest,

Do you think everyone in venezuela is constantly standing in front of government office to buy clothes? Or do you think they are being distributed clothes as part of socialism. Or maybe they actually have shops and grocery stores? In Sweden you can apply for funding from government in return of equity, that's not the ownership of means of production?

I have already said that Sweden is closer to what Marx envisioned. So let me repeat - Venezuela's high margin business is owned by government because only government is allowed to have monopoly on violence. Venezuela's government is owned by violent thugs. I already told you why it is the case in Venezuela and not in Sweden. Or most rich western countries. The only reason this is brought up is because you do not want to acknowledge that the nice things in your life are only their because someone in your lineage supported looting pillaging and genociding. Instead we have constant regurgitating of hot garbage in the name of intellectualism.

It is not civilized to disagree with facts.

But what is socialism? What you describe as free-market policies of Sweden is much closer to what Marx wanted than what Venezuela has. So why is it that Sweden is free-market and Venezuela is socialism?

I will tell you why. Because socialism is an euphemism for what you don't like. Much like Nazism as a term. They don't have any meaning, your discourse just likes to throw around meaningless words to sound smart and keep arguing in circles.

The difference in Venezuela and Sweden is not socialism. It is corruption. Sweden has not been at war for a long time, hasn't seen economic hardships in long time and hasn't experienced cultural anxiety in a long time. They benefit from deep rooted connections to old-money by being an refuge for Jews when they were hunted in UK and then having free access to USA by creating colonies and later having visa-free travel (because they were white).

Venezuela is a colonized country where constant political meddling, being extremely poor, having sanctions and having revolutions - each of which lead to corruption. And unlike French, they couldn't outsource their misery and corruption to other people who were "different". What has socialism got to do with it? Nothing. There is no comparison between sustained wealth and long term poverty.

I have read 3 of your comments in thei thread and deflecting attention for a pedo is not only tiring, accusing "tech bros" of deflecting from and normalizing infedility in the same breadth is pretty telling.

Are you sure you are not jealous that you couldn't cheat your wife with an underage?

No that's how you feel about being cheated, otherwise you would have shot your wife. You Infact love cheaters.

You really thought it is always going to be one way!

Solar panels are cheap because of China, not because of "development effort" of the "decades-long research" done by rich nations. You are taking like that research was given for free and is not riddled with patents designed to make more money that it cost to make them, designed to make the rich nations richer.

This kind of stories always bring about the most bottom scrapping idiots who have zero critical thinking and ability to self-reflect right to the forefront. Each 1 positively modded comment is regurgitating outright lies like no one has ever actually looked at them and realized it is bullshit.

China makes solar cheaper. Not the west.

China makes it cheaper because it can - it has invested in being able to be cheapest.

China makes solar panel because that is what the "researchers" of the rich countries want.

It is Europe that is funding Russia and letting India take a fall instead, and India is happy because it is a poor country.

While the war goes into yet another year white idiots continue to fail getting educated.

If it did they wouldn't need a law