Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Bitcoin

Visa, Mastercard Pause Crypto Push in Wake of Industry Meltdown (reuters.com) 33

U.S. payment giants Visa and Mastercard are slamming the brakes on plans to forge new partnerships with crypto firms after a string of high-profile collapses shook faith in the industry, Reuters reported Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter. From the report: Both Visa and Mastercard have decided to push back the launch of certain products and services related to crypto until market conditions and the regulatory environment improve, said the people, who asked not to be named as talks were confidential.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Visa, Mastercard Pause Crypto Push in Wake of Industry Meltdown

Comments Filter:
  • Unsurprising (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Brain-Fu ( 1274756 ) on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:36PM (#63330239) Homepage Journal

    As has been well-established here on Slashdot, these cryptocurrencies were all scams to begin with. The technology is neat but the "unregulated finance" angle had crime as its primary purpose, with all the specious arguments about "economic equality" and "escaping the tyranny of the financial industry" being nothing more than grift.

    Now that everything is crashing, even people who fell for the grift before are realizing their mistake, so everyone is backing out.

    • I think we have reached the point where "crypto" doesn't even mean that any crypto coins are involved in any way, but it is pure fraud. I make the marks give me their money, then I promise them massive gains, and make them give me more of their money. Involving any cryptocurrency just makes it more complicated.
      • Governments regulate the use of money, and these cryptocoins try to get around such regulations...

        • Well with the globalized economy as it is, the world could use some effective transnational infrastructure and a measure of globalized standardization/governance of financial and contractual affairs.

          One aspect of this new tech area is the potential to fill some of those globalized economic roles, or at least be an enabler of them.

          Is this a bit of a threat to the totalitarian aspects of national government sovereignties? Absolutely. As it rightly should be.

          We don't want everything done/decided with globalize
      • Rewrote that article summary headline for you.

        These bad news stories are pretty much all about particular companies (a small but famous subset) that exist as secondary players in the overall blockchain technology landscape.

        Meanwhile, the fundamentals of the core tech is incrementally improving and addressing issues over the years.

        Humans are flighty, and, like flocks of pigeons, so are the established financial corporations.

        They thought there were some breadcrumbs to be had there, but got spooked again.

        Bette
    • The Title of the story deserves a Funny mod. The notion that ANYONE would describe cryptocurrency as an "industry" is a giant red flag that something is totally broken in that economic system. But Visa and Mastercard are basically in the same boat of toiling not, at least not in any field that makes an honest difference for the better for the average person on the average street. If cash wasn't broke, whey did they fix it? (Answer: Because it's part of the scam that keep stock prices so inflated. An even mo

      • But Visa and Mastercard are basically in the same boat of toiling not, at least not in any field that makes an honest difference for the better for the average person on the average street. If cash wasn't broke, whey did they fix it?

        Count yourself very lucky if you've never had to do a chargeback, then. Credit card companies provide a valuable line of defense against scams, and merchants with abysmal customer service.

        Don't get me wrong. Actually using a credit card as a means of long-term financing your everyday purchases is a bad financial decision, and credit card companies do make it easy to fall into that trap. It really only makes sense to charge what you can afford to pay off every month, unless you're making a purchase which

        • by shanen ( 462549 )

          You're making a rather different argument there. Now I live in a place where I can use cash because I don't have to worry that any person on the street might be hiding a gun and ready to poke it in my face for my cash. I don't need the "insurance" the credit card provided when I lived somewhere else...

          I do have a credit card and a debit card. I have to use the credit card once in a while to avoid an annual fee. I have used both cards for Internet payments, but mostly I've regretted those uses and I really w

    • Cryptocurrency was always a ponzi scheme where the new investors bought out the old investors. The underlying "currency" didn't have any real value like regular currency. Those regular currencies establish their value through the government requiring payment of taxes using their currency. There's no such similar establishment of value with cryptocurrencies.
    • The technology is neat but the "unregulated finance" angle had crime as its primary purpose

      Because only people with things to hide would want to hide things, right? This perception is so wide-spread, though, one might even suspect, the "regulated finance" — or even the regulators themselves — have helped creating it...

      • No, because the current creditcard system hides things good enough*

        *Maybe not in USA, but in most of the rest of the world.

      • Well no, I was thinking more in terms of defrauding investors, rug-pulls, Ponzi schemes, keeping wallets insecure so employees of the crypto exchange could steal from them, facilitating cons or other forms of theft due to the lack of regulation (though some exchanges did attempt to reverse transactions and recover pilfered property in some cases, causing cries of "hey wait that's regulation!"), enabling kidnappings by facilitating untraceable ransom payments, working around account freezes that would be par

    • You mean vendors aren't jumping at the chance to work with 22,000+ [coinmarketcap.com] shitcoins? Who knew! /s

  • after hitting $25k not too long ago. Because 20% swings in value over a few weeks is normal, right?

    There's every indication that a handful of Whales are manipulating the price. [businessinsider.com].

    You set a floor price buy buying at that price consistently, this draws in speculators who think they've found a safe asset because of the "floor" you set, their purchases drive up the price, you dump your Bitcoin for a profit, lather, rinse, repeat.

    It's probably illegal, but there's so much illegal activity going on with
    • It’s sitting at 23.5 right now [coindesk.com]. Bitcoin and Etherium both are unlikely to drop massively unrelated to other market movement. Really, lots of the loss is due to market forces, these kinds of “investments” are the ones stuffed with cash when it’s easy and flowing and it’s the first place it’s taken from when the cheap or free lending dries up. Thus it moves along with the rest of the markets.
      • "along with the rest of the MARKS".

        ftfy
      • by bn-7bc ( 909819 )
        Hmm 6% in 5 minutes, correct me if i'm wrong, but for any other asset traed on any normally regulated exchange would have been halted with that vol right. A all the financial news channels would have had their chart out and been preparing theit flash crash graphics.
    • The lowest price BTC hit over the past 24H on Coinbase was $23,109.06. It seems to be the case lately that there's some "the cryptocurrency sky is falling!" story on here, then I check the current price and it has barely moved. My guess is that the people propping up cryptocurrency these days are mostly true believers who ignore the news.

      As long as some legitimate companies [theverge.com] think it's still worth "investing" in this crap, and criminals keep using it to move their funds, we're stuck with it.

      • I'm going off what google reported. And I'm pretty certain it was $19k a few hour ago. I suppose they could just be wrong, but since the price of it is really just what you can get somebody to pay, and it has no actual connection to the physical value of the "product" (there is none, it's random bits and bytes on a computer) it's all much the same thing.

        Also an 8% drop following a 20%+ hike in the course of a few months isn't exactly something I want in my financial system. Do you want your 401k holding
        • Mostly I'm just saying the pump/FUD news cycle doesn't affect the price like it used to in the earlier days. Even Tesla managed to dump a significant portion of their holdings at one point, without crashing the market. This isn't to imply that it's a good investment, just that it's probably got more staying power than you're giving it credit for. It certainly could drop to $10k and you'd be pretty unhappy that you bought it at $23k, but it'll still be around.

      • My guess is that the people propping up cryptocurrency these days are mostly true believers who ignore the news.

        At risk of invoking a "no true Scotsman" here, it seems to me that a "true believer" wouldn't feel the need to "prop up" the value. If you're holding Bitcoin because you see it as the value exchange mechanism of the future, what's your motivation to try and peg it to an arbitrary fiat exchange rate?

  • They finally noticed?

  • The collapse in crypto prices and meltdowns absolutely has not shaken my faith in crypto. I never had any. Its tulips [wikipedia.org] and always has been.
  • It's not an industry meltdown. It's crypto's form of "industry consolidation & restructuring". /s
  • I stopped using PayPal and Fidelity as soon as they got in bed with crypto scammers. Visa and Mastercard is next. Any financial services firm willing to associate your assets with money launderers and pyramid schemes should be persona non grata.
  • I don't think they do. If you go to a retailer, and pay with a crypto card, the retailer gets regular currency, not cryptocurrency.

    The card company simply takes money from your crypto accounts, and converts it to regular currency, at whatever the exchange rate is.

    In any case, once you use Visa or Mastercard, you leave a money trail. So crypto would not be really fulfilling it's promise.

"Floggings will continue until morale improves." -- anonymous flyer being distributed at Exxon USA

Working...