Comment Re:"At the speed of light" (Score 1) 59
True, but it's almost always faster than the flow of electrons...well, if it goes at all.
Only over longer distances. Direct Attach Copper (DAC) is faster for runs less than ~10m.
Comment Interesting Rundown of the State of AI Math (Score 1) 174
Matt Parker, science/math communicator, put out a nice video on developments of AI-enabled proofs over the past few years: Has an AI discovered new maths?
It's interesting how AI has relatively quickly gone from a (very good) search engine to being able to string together a chain of reasoning to prove/disprove an open conjecture.
Comment Re: Eh, well, why not? (Score 1) 192
Comment Re:Ownership and the Next Check. (Score 1) 91
I'm more concerned about how it behaves when there is no need for a contract at all.
You don't have to guess - it is a remote kill switch that will be abused by governments everywhere to silence dissent.
You're being dramatic. There's already code in iOS to remotely lock a device when it's reported stolen. When can I expect the government to start shutting down my phone for saying mean things about them?
Comment Re:OFFS...OpenAI LOVES government regulation (Score 1) 160
Interesting take. I read your post as going in the direction of "it didn't act on its own because LLM-based models are categorically unable of anything that qualifies as doing so'".
That any other flagship model could do the same if unencumbered by guardrails or governing guidance is a big claim. That we haven't seen any widespread reports of such attacks that were carried out by open-weight Chinese models (jailbroken or otherwise) makes me question whether it holds water, but time shall tell.
But to the main point of whether this constitutes "acting on its own", I'd still say "yes". If I tell an exterminator to get the spiders out of my house and they do so by burning the thing to the ground, that certainly seems like independent action beyond what was requested even if they're ignoring the sorts of norms (and laws) that we'd expect others in the trade to take for granted.
Comment Re:OFFS...OpenAI LOVES government regulation (Score 1) 160
The point is...that's all it did. Carried out the instructions it was given. It didn't "act on its own".
I've not heard of an attack along the lines of what HuggingFace described being employed in the wild, and it seems very unlikely that an OpenAI engineer gave it the step-by-step instructions. So where did the instructions come from?
Comment Re:Being too wealthy really is sociopathic (Score 1) 176
Bullshit. Suburbans are the CHEAPEST way to construct housing.
I'm assuming by "suburban" you mean the classic American neighborhood with single family homes?
It's not cheaper if you include the costs of providing services to the suburbs. Installing utilities (water/sewage/electrical/internet), snow removal, waste collection, road construction/maintenance, and providing public transport (if you choose to do that in the first place) are all much cheaper to do in a higher-density environment.
If you're a local government trying to figure out how to house 100 families for the next 30 years, for example, it will definitely be cheaper to throw down a few 3-5 story apartment buildings than to build 100 single family homes. Especially if land in your area is expensive.
Comment Re:What? (Score 1) 176
credit card lounges are overrated.
Amex Centurion lounges are quite nice. But yes the few times I've gone into a Priority Pass lounge as a guest with a coworker, I've found them to be only marginally better than just sitting in the terminal with the common folk.
Comment Re:those are some expensive chips (Score 2) 25
I'm going to assume the adage about medication manufacturing applies here:
The first chip costs $29,500,000,000 in R&D and capital investment. The remaining 14,999,999 cost $30 each. And then you keep making them at that rate at the lower price.
Comment Re:Land of the free ... (Score 3, Informative) 127
True. Except for some wines, peanuts and almonds, I cannot think of a single US food product I could easily get here.
How do you survive without Doritos, Pringles, and Twinkies?
Serious response to a jokey question: they don't. You can buy Doritos and Pringles in pretty much any European country. They're manufactured locally with recipes tweaked to meet EU requirements and local palates. I've had both the American and the European version of both and couldn't tell the difference (though I'll admit that I'm not a snack food connoisseur).
Twinkies are trickier. I believe the only places they're commonly available are the UK and Ireland.
Comment Re: CostCo crap for a few pennies (Score 2) 127
The only way it ends up in food is when you overheat your teflon pan OR you scratch it and the coating starts coming off.
How does that all square with the petitioner's finding that PFAS were found in a number of food products, including "extremely high" levels in some milk brands, which presumably weren't first scalded in a consumer's non-stick skillet?
Comment Re: Bet against Elon if you like (Score 4, Interesting) 195
Military people need to run AI models in situations of compromised ground communication. Running, for example target identification and data selection in space makes 100% sense
That seems like a benefit of relying on satellite communication rather than a benefit of putting the data center in space.
What's the benefit over running the computation on the ground in a "normal" data center, beaming the results up to a satellite constellation, and then beaming them back down to those who need it? Starlink/Starshield already enable that.
Comment Re:Bloated, laggy, non-intuitive interfaces (Score 1) 32
Comment Re:Not a bright idea (Score 1) 216
The majority of gun owners are actually responsible people who follow the laws with the firearms they own. ( Compare the number of gun owners / firearms in this Country with gun " crime " and look at the overall percentage )
There are what, 300 million privately-owned guns in America? Very few are actually involved in "Gun Crimes"
I don't dispute that, but it's a meaningless figure unless compared against the societal benefit of having those guns in the first place (and I admittedly don't know whether anyone has actually tried to quantify that and don't have the energy to find out right now).
To use an analogy, if there was a drug/supplement on the market that a million people were taking and it led to a negative health outcome for 5 people, you could justifiably say that it's pretty low risk. But, if the drug/supplement only actually made a positive difference for 1 of those million people, it'd get pulled from the market because the costs outweigh the benefits.