The State of Digital Music in 2006 127
wh0pper writes "Designtechnica has an excellent article on the state of digital music in 2006. Digital music accounted for only six percent of total music sales in 2005. Yet even that is a massive increase over the year before, a whopping 194 percent, which is fiscally valuable as the sales of CDs continue to decrease (although even with digital sales, the record labels experienced another downturn in 2005). While the young, usually the first to adopt and adapt to new technology, have been downloading and swapping music for quite some time, there's been a ripple effect into the older, warier area of the population, one that will only increase. Thank--or blame--Apple and its iPod, or any of the many other makes selling like hotcakes in the stores.
Quality over Quantity (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Quality over Quantity (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Quality over Quantity (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Quality over Quantity (Score:2, Insightful)
Nice subject change! (Score:1)
Re:Nice subject change! (Score:1)
I prefer CD's only as I want quality and freedom. I like to have the right to rip them to FLAC and put them on my iAudio X5. DRM and compressed downloaded music just does not make sense. Quality over Quantity I always say.
It's true that he didn't say anything about patents, but it's rather obvious when you look at the language used.
and to be fairer... (Score:1, Insightful)
I don't see the booksellers demanding that a book can only be read by 5 people, then that's it
Damn it, why did you have to post AC? (Score:1)
Re:Quality over Quantity (Score:2)
Re:Quality over Quantity (Score:2)
? If you reinstall your OS is that another "machine" down the drain?
I would burn them first, then rip them in whatever format I choose.
If you have a different OS installed on another partition of your hard drive and want to play the files from there, does that count as "another machine"?
If I did that then it would certainly be an annoyance. I don't.
For that matter, I've never even heard of a player for GNU/Linux capable of playing iTMS files, and it's a pretty common operating system these days.
Th
Cost over Quality (Score:1)
Re:Cost over Quality (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Cost over Quality (Score:1)
Well, I even give money to homeless people sometimes, even though he hasn't made a single hit. If a penny or two goes to the artists for my song purchase, it can't be such a bad thing. She/he's got more talent than me.
Also, most the the CD's i've bought recently have been $15. You can often find old stuff for even cheapter, $10. I find that the quality and freedom are well worth the extra cash
Used CDs can be cheap, but I hate sc
Re:Quality over Quantity (Score:5, Insightful)
Quality over Quantity...
While Baby-Boomers are now part of this market it is still dominated by younger people who apparently don't care so much about quality. It seems the way people listen to music is changing parallel to the way the music is being distributed. People can now carry so much music in their pocket that they listen to music while doing anything and everything. Music is in essence background music for their lives. For that reason "quantity" is king for these people and "quality" is very secondary. Gone are the days where "listening to music" meant putting an album on in your living room and sitting through the whole thing while doing little other than enjoying the music.
So for that reason I think your point of view is unfortunately a minority, and a shrinking one.
-Oliver / TreasureTunes.com [treasuretunes.com]
Re:Quality over Quantity (Score:2, Insightful)
Then I started making good money and bought myself a really sick stereo, and I started having aural orgasms at the staggering detail I discovered in my m
Re:Quality over Quantity (Score:2)
So, the fish diet improves your hearing, then?
I'll get me coat...
AAC is a standard, dates back to 1997 (Score:3, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Codin
Re:AAC is a standard, dates back to 1997 (Score:1)
Re:AAC is a standard, dates back to 1997 (Score:1)
Re:And no OGG support (Score:4, Interesting)
Smart artists would do something like an oscommerce store (or whatever) where you can buy a flac/mp3 download for, say, 40 or 25 cents, two downloads allowed in case your hard drive dies and you're in the 99% of the world that sucks at backups. Cheaper for us, more profit for them, world+dog-riaa is happy.
Re:And no OGG support (Score:2)
April 1 == no fun (Score:2)
Oh well, at least there is still some OMG PONIES!!
It's been a long way coming (Score:5, Insightful)
The same can be said about the video distribution business - without Jobs and iTunes we'd still be in the dark ages - just look at the ridiculous blunder of Sony and the PSP - talking about not being able to see the forest before the trees! And in the case of Sony - they even had a content library they could have thrown into the equation. Well, I guess those higher rank managers must get paid those multi-million for their smashing good looks - can't be the types of decision they make or their vision...
Re:It's been a long way coming (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It's been a long way coming (Score:2)
Yep, it's right. It also gives me an image of Steve Jobs doing a crossword with one hand behind his back, the big show-off...
When did CDs become analog? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:When did CDs become analog? (Score:3)
Re:When did CDs become analog? (Score:2)
Re:When did CDs become analog? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:When did CDs become analog? (Score:2)
Re:When did CDs become analog? (Score:1)
That's probably the "Insightfully Funny" or "Imformatively Funny" mod. You don't get karma [slashdot.org] for +1 Funny, so generous moderators give the +1 Informative or +1 Insightful mod instead.
Feel free to mod +1 Hint, hint! for this post.
Re:When did CDs become analog? (Score:2)
Dude that's a scam! (Score:2)
Re:When did CDs become analog? (Score:2)
Nope, it's not LP, it's tape. So crank up your 8-track and boogie on down to the dance floor.
MP3 Blogs and Netlabels (Score:3, Informative)
This story isn't complete without mentioning MP3 blogs and netlabels. Millions of songs were downloaded last week from the tens of thousands of MP3 blogs and netlabels dishing out free music from mostly non-commercial websites. A quick look at a few of the best ones will reveal that a lot of the music being served up is top quality.
Re:MP3 Blogs and Netlabels (Score:2)
Re:MP3 Blogs and Netlabels (Score:5, Interesting)
Exactly my point. It's really a whole different ball-game now. I've been playing ball with a bunch of indie labels and artists, and we're achieving some pretty stunning distribution numbers. Some of the top features on my MP3 blog have been downloaded over 60,000 times each. My own music had a quarter-million downloads last month -- and this is for electronic music, where 10,000 record sales is considered a hit.
My friends in Taxi Doll [taxidoll.com] are just an indie group going it alone (as of this writing), and they've managed to got their music into films staring J-Lo and Harrison Ford. They're taking advantage of digital distribution and free downloads to help them get the word out, and they've got plans to expand the strategy in the future.
Why are people still talking about the music industry like it's 1997? Whole genres have broken off from the major outlets, and started hacking it alone. There are tons of indies on sites like Beatport [beatport.com] and CD Baby [cdbaby.com] selling digital downloads and CDs with no DRM. Imagine that -- music producers giving people what they want, rather than force feeding them crippled songs.
There's a huge undercurrent in the music industry right now, and the storm is brewing. The old industry is a sinking ship. Some of us have been saying it for years, but the day of reckoning is coming quickly, now.
Re:MP3 Blogs and Netlabels (Score:2)
Re:MP3 Blogs and Netlabels (Score:2)
Re:MP3 Blogs and Netlabels (Score:2)
Re:MP3 Blogs and Netlabels (Score:1)
Re:MP3 Blogs and Netlabels (Score:1)
Re:MP3 Blogs and Netlabels (Score:1)
Damn, that even rhymes.
CDs are a form of "digital music" (Score:1)
Re:CDs are a form of "digital music" (Score:1)
Does this mean it's over (Score:1)
Finally, now my brain can begin recovering...
*whew*
Re:Does this mean it's over (Score:1)
For all you DRM neysayers (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:1, Troll)
The music industry hates consumers. DRM, "copy protection" virus/malware, etc.
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:1)
The old LP's recorded quite a bit of both high frequency and low frequency information that digitization invariably throws out due to the pitifully low sample rates. No amount of digital processng or massaging can recover information that is entirely in between the actual sampling mo
Myths about digital audio limitations (Score:2)
Re:Myths about digital audio limitations (Score:1)
Re:Myths about digital audio limitations (Score:2)
Re:Myths about digital audio limitations (Score:3, Interesting)
Re microphones: see the specs for the Neumann U87 (a classical high-end microhone) on the manufacturer's website:
Where do you get the idea that in the old days, microphones could handle high frequencies
Re:Myths about digital audio limitations (Score:2)
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:3, Informative)
Cassettes sound a LOT better if you only use one side. (Of course albums were almost never sold that way.)
I have to admit, iTunes has temporarily killed my appreciation of music. Making playlists is a tedious task of sorting and searching for songs I like -- which means having to listen to songs I DON'T like in order to weed them out.
I have played all of my favorite albums to death... I don't enjoy any of them anymore.
It's much like a drug or any addiction -
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:2)
Not true [emusic.com]. I get a lot of good music from there, completely DRM free. Sure, there's none of the big labels, but that doesn't affect the quality at all. Just the names you recognise.
(Oh, and a plug for my program for Linux users: eMusic/J [kallisti.net.nz])
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:2)
320bps VBR MP3s:
http://www.audiolunchbox.com/ [audiolunchbox.com]
http://www.magnatune.com/ [magnatune.com]
http://www.bleep.com/ [bleep.com], who sells FLACs as well.
There are more.
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:2, Interesting)
What, exactly, are 320bps VBR MP3s?
For one, most lossy audio work around the 160-250kbps ballpark.
For two, the highest VBR preset in LAME, -V0 (--preset extreme before 3.97), has a target bitrate of just 240kbps. I don't see how you can get a 320kbps VBR mp3. Indeed, 320kbps was formerly known as the CBR --preset insane (now simply -b 320 in 3.97), and it is the highest bitrate defined in the mp3 standard[1] -- hardly something you can be variable about.
[1] Yes, in LAME you can force it up
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:1)
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:2)
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:2)
Not it's not. Very few people know what DRM is, let alone it's implications.
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:1)
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:2, Insightful)
Only until recently, all record companies sold digital, lossless, DRM-free music. All CDs that I buy are DRM-free, not because I have been avoiding DRM CDs (although I would), I just haven't encountered them from the artists that I am interested in. I doubt that the CD DRMs are hard to crack (just disable autorun?), but with their warnings stickers, that it may break my CD player, my CD drive, or my PC, and that nobody will
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:3, Interesting)
No, record companies are an unnecessary evil and will eventually die the way of all dinosaurs. DRM is one of the consequences of their death-throes, and will subside and vanish once the beast is dead.
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:1)
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:1)
You should be all right. Just make sure you're not standing next to them anytime in the late Cretaceous era.
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:2)
There are thousands of indie labels flourishing in online marketplaces like CD Baby [cdbaby.com] and Beatport [beatport.com], selling digital music without DRM. A lot of the bigger labels are just trying desparately to preserve the status quo long enough for them to get their bearings and remain competitive. I don't think it's working.
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:1)
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:1)
Re:For all you DRM neysayers (Score:1)
Re:Why use ITunes? (Score:1)
Re:Why use ITunes? (Score:2)
Re:Why use ITunes? (Score:1)
Apple is one step in the right direction. (Score:4, Interesting)
The RIAA is over. Apple makes it easy for people to spend their money on music but the RIAA way is not the future. Sales are only a small piece of the picture. More and more, reputations are not going to be built on radio play but on web play. Bands that understand this are going to be here tomorrow and the rest are going to look like slaves to greedy pigs. Portable music devices can hold more songs than the average radio station can afford to broadcast. To the user, it's all killer and no annoying adverts. The "Industry" is fighting back with satellite radio and FM crap flooding but it's not good enough. Players like Apple are going to help transition the industry to it's less centralized and less parasitic future. The free market forces and free software will move in and make life better for everyone, especially the artists.
The tipping point is near (Score:5, Interesting)
Not so fast, I hope. (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm not sure the death of physical media is that close and I hope local stores never go away. Pressed CDs are a better backup than the dye based things I can burn. Cheaper physical media might change that opinion, but I will still enjoy the artifact.
Here's a store to add to [louisianam...actory.com]
Re:Apple is one step in the right direction. (Score:2)
Yeah, most people think Windoze sucks like that. (Score:2)
Sure, it's not my opinion. Her perception comes from watching other people's computers fry when they play with music. I did not dig into her about it, the way people like you might, but I can imagine those computers fried due to a combination of RIAA vigilanti attacks on P2P networks and WMP performance. Whatever, it's a common view that has nothing to do wi
Wow, my biggest fan. (Score:2)
CDs are physical, downloads are digital (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:CDs are physical, downloads are digital (Score:2)
This keeps coming up. Note that the writers aren't calling CDs analog, but rather comparing the physical media of CDs to (digital) downloads which are delivered absent of a physical media.
So because CDs contain digital data that haven't freed themselves from the shackles of a tangible medium, they don't have the right to be called digital? It's surely going to confuse the public into thinking that CDs are analogue if the press constantly refers to them in terms of being opposed to digital media. Why not
Re:CDs are physical, downloads are digital (Score:1)
Just another question, what happens when you have a large collection of DRM restricted music files on a shared PC, but changes in your family situation mean the computer w
Works better? (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't buy that. What the consumers want is 95% of what Apple is already delivering. Consumers prefer ala carte music tracks to forced albums or subscription models by far. Consumers want ease of use and they want simplicity. They want an all-in-one solution. The only way you can beat Apple now is on price or on freedom (no DRM portability-type freedom). Apple probably has enough clout to beat most competitors on price and the RIAA simply isn't going to agree to any less restrictive DRM or DRM free solutions.
Its too bad "all bets will be off." Apple keeping their dominance is a bet I'd gladly take.
--
Elephant Essays [elephantessays.com] - Custom Ivy-league papers at community college prices.
Re:MOD KARMA WHORE UP ;-) (Score:2)
First it isn't fake. Its a real site, real US writers write real papers. Second, there are plenty of legimate uses for such a service besides cheating. Its basically the same as P2P, you can use it responsibly or irresponsibly.
Myself, I just like writing.
HAHAHAHA ROFL (funniest april fools joke yet) (Score:3, Insightful)
I mean look at the "news story" -- just a bunch of fluff sayng absolutely nothing new (or nothing that hasnt been repeated a thousand times on slashdot), nothing of any technical or scientific interest and designed merely to get a bunch of Apple fanboys to feel good about themselves to get Apple some good publicity and to get designtechnica (whatever the fcuk that is) some extra hits.
As if that would ever be put on Slashdot. I mean only stuff that matters gets shown here. But it makes for a funny joke. HAHAHAHA
Nothing to complain about (Score:2, Insightful)
F*ck the RIAA! Buy used CDS!
Come out from MP3 myth and hype (Score:2, Informative)
It is surprising to note digital music is only six percent of total music sales in 2005. So digital music is just starting and its a good time to come out of the hype see what professionals use.
Everybody now days use mp3. Is that the only music format available? No. There are other music formats available which are far more superior to mp3 but not widely known yet.
Ogg [vorbis.com] is similar to mp3, but its a completely open and free format. That is, if you want to create audio (eg. Music, podcasts, etc) create in
Gay, Ponies? (Score:2)
Error (Score:1, Flamebait)
Cool...I can get rid of my phonograph (Score:1)
Let's see...analog equals vinyl.
digital equals plastic
Okay...and I win what?
pretentious audiophile geeks (Score:1)
What the hell? How many of you guys have sat through a blind test to see if there's any difference whatsoever? Why should people fill their hard drives and their portable drives with useless junk that is flac or mp3 320 kbps? Enough already.
Re:Whew... (Score:1)