Microsoft Launches Blogging Site 286
Jeff Clark writes "In yet another attempt to take over all of the Internet, MSN has launched a blog service called MSN Spaces with the new version of MSN Messenger due out shortly. Features include comments, stats and trackbacks just like every other blog out there. Another built-in feature is also available where you can send pictures from your camera-phone directly to your Space. Now you can let Mom know just exactly what happened at that party last night!" Reader JDBaker adds, "Microsoft have released the first public beta of MSN Messenger 7. It can be downloaded direct from Microsoft, and carries the same build number as the recent private beta release. New features include: Winks, Set Status Before Login, Drag and Drop Backgrounds and Feedback."
Because thats what we all want. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Because thats what we all want. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Because thats what we all want. (Score:5, Funny)
Due to the clouds and haze, the pilot could not determine the helicopter's position. The pilot saw a tall building, flew toward it, circled, and held up a handwritten sign that said "Where am I?" in large letters. People in the tall building quickly responded to the aircraft, drew a large sign, and held it in a building window. Their sign said "You are in a Helicopter."
The pilot smiled, waved, looked at his map, determined the course to steer to SEATAC airport, and landed safely. After they were on the ground, the copilot asked the pilot how he had done it.
"I knew it had to be the Microsoft Building, because they gave me a technically correct but completely useless answer."
Onepoint
p.s. Just need to make you all laugh. Have a cup of coffee on me.
Re:Because thats what we all want. (Score:5, Funny)
"I knew it had to be the Microsoft Building, because they gave me a technically correct but completely useless answer."
Then then co-pilot says, "Gee, you must be a Linux user". "How did you know that?" says the Pilot. "Because here you are in a broken helicopter, you didn't know where you were, and suddenly now it's Microsoft's fault".
And I have no doubt... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:And I have no doubt... (Score:3, Interesting)
Does anyone want to tell me why Microsoft make both MSN Messenger, and Windows Messenger? And why Windows Messenger (The featureless version) was added into WinXP and now MSN Messenger?
Re:And I have no doubt... (Score:5, Informative)
MSN Messenger is the consumer version with more frills and contains advertising and other useless things. This version doesn't support Exchange messaging.
Re:And I have no doubt... (Score:4, Funny)
That would be illegal and unethical. This is Microsoft we are talking about here. Last thing they want is the DOJ investigating them and breaking them up.
Re:And I have no doubt... (Score:3, Insightful)
OMG MS is going to bundle it with Windows and kill the market. Well Media player is number 2 but still can't budge winamp and custom video players. IIS is not going anywhere either besides corporate America.
Re:And I have no doubt... (Score:3, Insightful)
Forget it.
Just about EVERYBODY i know who used a computer and isnt a nerd uses wmp, because thats with the computer when he/she gets it...
Installing a 3rd party media player is allready an act of deeper understanding of computers...
Re:And I have no doubt... (Score:2)
Or visiting a website the needs Real or Quicktime. Both install pretty easily through the web if you need them as a plugin.
Re:And I have no doubt... (Score:2)
An even better feature (Score:5, Interesting)
Seriously, does anyone really need the Nudge function? To all those of you who don't use MSN (whom I hold the deepest respect for, btw), all Nudge does is shake your window and the recipients window in some weird kind of internet seizure.
Looks like I'm going to migrate back to IRC.
Re:An even better feature (Score:4, Informative)
~phil
Re:An even better feature (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:An even better feature (Score:2)
~phil
The Nudge function is essential. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:An even better feature (Score:5, Funny)
Re:An even better feature (Score:2)
They all look the same (Score:2, Informative)
skins are nearly pointless (Score:2)
Forgotten new feature (Score:5, Funny)
They forgot to include the ability to have your system come to a crawl at an even faster pace with quicker ad and spam delivery
Re:Forgotten new feature (Score:2)
They might have made some upgrades to it, you know... take some market away from other computer hogging apps, the usual 'hit all markets' approach.
That isn't a feature. (Score:2)
Well, sure, if you want to call "architecture design" a feature.
Missing product for Google? (Score:5, Interesting)
How long do you reckon before Google launches such a thing, potentially pushing MSN Messenger out the market?
Re:Missing product for Google? (Score:3, Insightful)
But yes I was thinking of the same thing when I read the story. WHen MS does it they are evil and taking over the world and the net. When Google does it they are innovative.
MS has alot to fear with google. They are the number one threat probably over Linux if I were Billy Gates.
If Google makes inroads with the desktop then it would leave MS's a
Re:Missing product for Google? (Score:2)
Re:Missing product for Google? (Score:2)
Believe me, the minute there is Gmessenger, I'll be the first one downloading it and convincing my friends to do the same. Google is the only large company I semi-trust nowadays.
- Yolego
Re:Missing product for Google? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Missing product for Google? (Score:2)
Because we all know how Gmail completely knocked out Hotmail...
Re:Missing product for Google? (Score:2, Interesting)
There is a 'gmessenger' application being worked on. It is not named, 'gmessenger', but rather, something marketable.
It's interface is typical Google. Clean and uncluttered. It's very similiar in functionality to some of the more popular jabber/gaim clients (in both appearance
It uses targeted advertising based upon current text typed as part of any conversation (There is a middle text box used for this purpose)
Re:Missing product for Google? (Score:2)
No, I but I wouldn't expect that to be an option...
Presumably "Gmessenger" will/would be web based so that it'd be available everywhere and not require any desktop installation.
Spin... (Score:5, Insightful)
How about, "In yet another attempt to make the Internet relevant to the average person?" Why is this a laudable goal for everybody but Microsoft to strive towards?
To have a one-stop shop for communication is pretty much what it's all about. E-mail, instant messaging, fax, voice, photos, movies, TV, radio, and the blog (considered to be the future of websites) converging in a simple-to-use way. This should be something to look forward to.
Re:Spin... (Score:3, Insightful)
Agreed (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Spin... (Score:3, Insightful)
Becuase what you likely end up with is something from MS that does everything badly, is buggy and insecure. Plus, if it does kill the competition, they will stop adding anything new worthwhile.
Of course, maybe this offering from MS will be different.
I'm competition and I'm not going away (Score:2)
I use my own blogging site myself to keep family and friends updated. Thanks to User-Mode Linux hosting, I can keep it going even if I end up being the only user. Currently it's used by 5 households total, all people I know, but it's open to anyone who will pay $6/month. I'm not going to stop adding worthwhile features because I use it myself. Here are some of the worthwhile features already there:
Re:Spin... (Score:2)
Sorry, but Microsoft hasn't been interested in the "average person" since at least Windows 95. Windows has become so amazingly complex that just about every "average" user I know complains constantly about it. Don't confuse "average person" with "average person with a technical background" - there are a LOT more of the first type. Just about every time I get a call from a family member or non-technical friend these d
Re:Spin... (Score:2)
The aim is not to have one company insert things into the OS that force a de facto monopoly on one application.
Any system is most robust when it's heterogenous, but co-operative (i.e. wide variety of systems that understand each other and can happily transact between each other). This way, something designed to compromise one system will at most break only a part of the whole.
MS want everything
Re:Spin... (Score:2)
The problem is that this all-communication-converges-in-one-product thing was something that was available literally decades ago in the form of, say, Lotus Notes and similar products. What people then decided-- leading to this whole
All of your bloggers are belong to us! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:All of your bloggers are belong to us! (Score:2)
And leave that *goat* alone you prevert!
Comparing to blogger, it is very limited. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Comparing to blogger, it is very limited. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Comparing to blogger, it is very limited. (Score:2)
For each person
Re:Comparing to blogger, it is very limited. (Score:2)
Re:Comparing to blogger, it is very limited. (Score:2)
Destroying internet darwinism (Score:5, Insightful)
MS is trying to do it again. They're trying to break down any barriers to setting up a blog. Great. Now I can be chastized for not reading my 8 year old cousin's blog, or even better, my 90 year old grandmother's.
What happened to the days when there was SOME barrier to entry, that at least made you put a LITTLE thought and energy into feeling important enough that people should read your every thought?
Re:Destroying internet darwinism (Score:2)
You mean like signing up with Blogger?
Doesn't sound like much of an barrier compared to Spaces most likely being integrated with Passport, so after being logged in one would just have to say "I want a blog".
Re:Destroying internet darwinism (Score:2, Insightful)
Isn't that supposed to be a good thing? Why should only geeks be allowed to have blogs?
Reminds me of the typical attitude some phoney geeks had towards linux, that it should not be made easy to install and use.
Bwahahahaha (Score:2)
Too much freedom of information (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Too much freedom of information (Score:3, Funny)
Blogging Services useless to me. (Score:2, Informative)
What I do is this:
1) Go get a Custom DNS [dyndns.org] from DynDNS.org.
2) Go get a Domain Name from a selection of many [register.com] different [godaddy.com] registrars [yahoo.com].
3) Go set up a box running Gentoo, Debian, SuSE, or FreeBSD, and install Apache.
And then boom. I'm the master of my own domain, for the low-low price of $50 per year. thats an average of $4 a month for hosting, totally within your control.
I c
Re:Blogging Services useless to me. (Score:2, Troll)
You know, that is a GREAT idea! I bet no one else on Slashdot has ever thought of this!
Re:Blogging Services useless to me. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
oblig Monty P. (Score:2, Redundant)
And not forgetting... (Score:3, Informative)
And, as been mentiond, a huge amount of bloat. Plus 'buy emoticons', 'backgrounds', 'winks' etc spam littered throughout the program with direct links to MS sites to buy shitty little pictures which you can get for free. The "for sale" emoticons are more prominently placed and larger and in the way than the emoticons you actually use. The whole thing is just a way to sell that crap. A blantent sell out.
Re:And not forgetting... (Score:2)
Irrelevant Links (Score:3, Funny)
First Microsoft blog (Score:5, Funny)
HELLO. MY NAME IS ROB AND I AM A MICROSOFT ADVOCATE.
[insert MSN advertisments here]
Moderation? (Score:4, Interesting)
I think the question is more valid for Microsoft's blog service because there are more anti-Microsoft people than anti-Google people (or whatever). And many of the anti-Microsoft people would find it cute or ironic to post an anti-Microsoft blog on Microsoft's own servers.
Blogim (Score:3, Informative)
BlogIM [blogim.com] has allowed you to update your blog via IM for ages.
(Although the site is a tad stalled. And it remains, as is famously the case for all the author's projects, about 2 weeks from true completion).
Re:Blogim (Score:2)
Browser wars (Score:2, Interesting)
Yep! (Score:2)
Standards (Score:2)
If they can't unify simple HTML documents, how the hell the they organize code for an entire
Missing New Feature (Score:3, Interesting)
The only new feature I want to see is for MSN Messenger to stop fargin using IE even though I set my default browser to Firefox!
Even if I setup a new computer for someone and hide IE, and insteall Firefox, the minute they hit that damn "x new messages" email popup in Messenger, they're using IE and the viri/spyware starts rolling in.
Re:Missing New Feature (Score:2)
Re:Missing New Feature (Score:2)
Well, this works for the popup message, but the link in the top of the main messenger window still has the same problem, of even any link send in a message that you click on I believe.
blog = mirror for narcissist?? (Score:5, Funny)
I just don't get it. If you are so self-absorbed that you feel the need to publish every thought & whim about yourself on the web (as if the anybody on the planet actually cared about you), how/why would you then go searching for and reading other peoples mutterings?
As a previous person stated, there used to be a barrier to entry that prevented a lot of this drivel from poluting the electrons; but alas now it's easy to whine and pout in public.
I think Fight Club got it right: "You are not a beautiful & unique butterfly." We are faulty-carbon units that need a swift kick in the ass more then we are getting.
People please, get over yourselves. * If you agree with anything that I have stated here, please come to my blog at http://blah.blah/ [blah.blah] at sign my guestbook! **
*PS: I was not refering to any of the beautiful butterflies that visit
**PPS: For the humour impaired - I was joking
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:blog = mirror for narcissist?? (Score:2)
Sturgeon's Law, 90% of everything is crap. Unfortunately as the barrier gets lower the 90% becomes 95%, 99%, 99.9%. On the plus side there is more good stuff, you just have to be able to find it amoungst all the noise.
Feature missing from list (Score:2)
How often do they release without that gem of a feature? Hell, they even enhance and update it between releases!
In fairness, they're quite within their rights in doing so, but you'd think they'd break 3rd party clients PROPERLY if they were going to, eg require TLS with the right client cert. That way, third party products would have to bundle a cert that the MSN license said was only lice
Free Wordpress hosting (Score:2)
Weee!
The knee-jerk reaction might be a "huh-huh! MS sucks goats, Beavis!", but anything to add to the, ahem, blogosphere is probably a good thing for us all. 99% of it will be dross, but a handfull of good writing-type people (ie, not me) will appear on MSN Spaces, and we'll all be better for it.
Maybe.
Renaming messenger contacts locally? (Score:2)
Anyone knows if the new beta will finally allow one to locally rename its contacts, like you can with ICQ, for example?
I use Messenger for work communications, and it annoys the heck out of me that I have to live with whatever the other person decided to set their screen name this morning
Blogger (Score:3, Insightful)
MS has been /.'ed (Score:2)
Oh yeah! M$ knows the perverted morons out there (Score:2)
I don't think its going to be MOM who gets the picture. Get the picture? The party last night is going to be the peep show and the participants were unaware (and unpaid.)
And of course there will be something about it which makes it incompatible with the published standard but still work with M$ media center.
I used to think: "There ought to be a law."
Then I found out
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:3, Informative)
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:5, Insightful)
Not to sound like a Luddite, but why would you need a web-log in order to keep a personal journal? If you want a personal diary, you could just turn on your laptop/desktop and use your word processor. Or, you could just purchase paper and ink and start writing. Or am I completely missing the point somehow?
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:3, Informative)
Livejournal supports custom groups who can read your journal. This means your close friends, work associates, or your friends excluding your wife when you want to bitch about your relationship or work without certain people reading it.
Livejournal also supports communities you can hide for porn viewing....looks innocent.
I prefer an online portal like Livejournal because it has a ton of features
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:2)
Thanks for the explanation. Now I know that I am missing the point. I look at each of your reasons and I say to myself "So what?".
But, it's your blog. If you can justify the need for the feature, go for it.
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:2)
It seems to be a repeat of the trend from about 5-7 years ago when websites became accessible to people without some html knowl
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:2)
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:2)
OK. That sounds suspiciously like you were "documenting your work". I am sorry, REAL techies don't document!
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:2)
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:2, Interesting)
My blog is for me (Score:2)
Like a PnP journal, it will be nice to go back and see some of the things that interested me in 10,20 hopefully 50 years. The benefit to having it online is that I could post/read from my phone if I wanted to.
Personally, i'm not a 'phone talker'... So friends and family (whom most of which I live a g
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:2)
I tried starting a paper-and-pen journal, but I never got more than three days in before the entries got way too long. And most of the stuff I did got forgotten over the course of a day. My blog is a lot easier to use.
private SSL+password protected area (Score:2)
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:2, Informative)
You can check mine
Re:private areas to the blog (Score:2)
Re:yawn: another MS copycat product (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:yawn: another slashdot copycat post (Score:3, Funny)
I'm not saying no features is better, but I'm not certain how many people I'd trust with features like that. Some people can use it effectively, others... not so much. For Instances, how many the "geek" slashdotters forget to close the Italics/bold tags and type the remainder of the their message an annoyingly hard to read font?
Re:who cares (Score:2)
Re:Actually, that sounds cool (Score:2)