Slashback: Tenacity, Freedomware, Lem 338
Honest, I'm not dead. Again. silvaran writes "A clarification on CNet News indicates that IBM will not stop supporting or selling OS/2 as mentioned previously. Says IBM spokesman Steve Eisenstadt, 'As long as our customers want OS/2, we will support them... We don't have plans to withdraw OS/2.' The withdrawal notice lists several hundred components or software packages that will no longer be available, but OS/2 itself will still be offered."
Like Marshall MacLuhan in Annie Hall. tree writes "The Boston Globe has a really interesting interview with Stanislaw Lem, author of the 1961 novel "Solaris": he is a bit baffled about the latest movie adaptation. In any event, it's a great read for fans of Lem."
They win, GNU Win, we all win. Shwag writes "Last week I downloaded TheOpenCD after it was on Slashdot. I learned about all kinds of great free (as in speech) software. I then searched for more and found out about GNU Win which is a win32 free software cd but it has way more software! Yay! This is a really great way to show people the benefits of free software and get them ready for transitioning to linux."
A platform built from an Acorn. An anonymous reader writes "The (London) Guardian's Online section reports today on the new Ionix PC earlier Slashdotted for being the first desktop to run Intel's XScale processor. The Guardian concentrates on how the new machine may revive the fading fortunes of the once-pioneering Risc OS, but also makes mention of the fact it is ditching old proprietary Acorn subsystems."
Woe to the boonie dwellers, until enough balloons are in place. Avenger writes "Another DSL provider is getting out of the market. Hughes Electronics has announced that they will no longer be providing high-speed Internet services. Over 160,000 users will be affected. As it stands right now, they still will be providing connectivity via DirecPC."
But it seemed like such a great do-it-yourself idea! adagioforstrings writes "You may recall last year Home Depot announced they were deploying Linux at 90,000 point-of-sale terminals across the nation. Well, time went by and no more was heard about it...until now, when Home Depot announced they would be upgrading their POS systems with technology from NCR Corp., and 360 Commerce Inc. and ... Microsoft Corp."
So what about Home Depot? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:So what about Home Depot? (Score:3, Informative)
_-_-_
Re:So what about Home Depot? (Score:5, Funny)
Obviously.... (Score:5, Funny)
Wait... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Wait... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Wait... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Wait... (Score:4, Funny)
I guess I'll just amke a story item up, then:
"Home Depot To Migrate All PC's, Registers, and Forklifts to Windows 3.11"
Now *that's* what I call the Dark Side.
Re:Wait... (Score:3, Funny)
Home Depot hires a sith CEO: You underestimate the power tools of the Dark Side!
Re:Wait... (Score:5, Funny)
Home Depot hires a sith CEO: You underestimate the power tools of the Dark Side!
Mmmm, dark jedi circular saw.....
Re:Wait... (Score:2)
Didn't Yoda make it pretty clear that when one attains enough power within the Dark Side that they can hide themselves from the Jedi?
Afterall, if the information doesn't exist in the Great Archive, then it simply doesn't exist!
ATTENTION MODERATORS... (Score:3, Insightful)
"What happened to Home Depot and the Dark Side?"
Don't mod this guy Redundant or Off-topic. When the topic originally appeared it was missing that info. Don't burn his karma up just because he can't go back and update it now that the story is fixed.
Normally I wouldn't bother to post something like this, but I've been burned a couple of times recently over it. If you have karma to burn, mod up the funny posts or find people that really are trolling. Don't mod people down because an article was corrected after the fact. Its not like we can run back and edit our posts to coincide with the edit to the story.
I'll bite, Timothy (Score:2, Interesting)
Considering that OS/2 came out way back when Windows 3.1 was around, it's quite a remarkable OS. It supports multithreading as well as various other important and fairly advanced features, which is neat since it had these features nearly a decade ago.
It's important to remember that OS/2 is not Windows, nor does IBM want it to be. It is a very different environment that does take some getting used to. There are a lot of things I like about using OS/2, but there are a few things I like about using Windows too. One of the nicest things
about OS/2 is its ability to coexist with other operating systems on the same computer.
Now that really is a freedom of choice, one that many love about using Linux with Windows or *BSD with Windows or even dual-booting Windows/OS X.
Re:I'll bite, Timothy (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'll bite, Timothy (Score:2, Interesting)
IBM and Microsoft co-developed OS2/WinNT, but disagreed on where the interface should go. Microsoft saw dramatic uptake of Windows 3.x and thought that would be a good road to plod down. IBM wanted to do their own thing. As a result, the groups split.
Microsoft won.
And here we sit today. Perhaps if IBM had done things Microsoft's way, the world would be a different place. For better or worse, I cannot say.
No, I'm not a slashdot subscriber.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I'll bite, Timothy (Score:3, Informative)
An example of this would be an app written using Borland's Turbo Vision framework. These apps poll for keyboard input like no tomorrow. Under any flavour of Windows, you can get the CPU useage down to about 50%, but no better. On OS/2, you could get CPU useage down to 1% and still have a nice, snappy response.
I ran a 3-node DOS-based BBS package (RemoteAccess) for several years and enjoyed it most when running under OS/2. Most of my apps were DOS apps and running them there was a far better experience than using DOS and DESQview.
Re:I'll bite, Timothy (Score:2, Informative)
How on earth do you dualboot Windows with OS X? =-/
OS X can't run on x86 hardware.
Windows can't run on Mac hardware.
Unless you're speaking about dualbooting Windows with a Gnu/Darwin system.
But that's something completly different from OS X.
Re:I'll bite, Timothy (Score:2)
Re:I'll bite, Timothy (Score:2)
My only contact with OS/2 was maintaining a 3COM server with .. 2.1? We replaced the 3COM server with ass-kicking 486/25 servers and OS/2 (1990). It was a weird gig. It was easier to hire a new engineer than to get him (yes, 99% him) a computer and software. The budget fight eventually pared "workstations" down to a 386sx/16 with 4 meg ram, 40 meg HD. Resume, do your stuff! {On to a Delrina death-march project...}
Correction: Newest OS/2 was released in 2002 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Correction: Newest OS/2 was released in 2002 (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I'll bite, Timothy (Score:2)
You mean like one that could be Kasparov or something?
Re:I'll bite, Timothy (Score:2)
Tease! (Score:2)
Home Depot and M$ (Score:2, Redundant)
The Home Depot thing (Score:5, Interesting)
Home Depot used to be one of those Java poster children that they trotted out at JavaOne, but I never saw any of it show up in the stores. To this day their systems, except for the actual registers, are straight out of the 70's. I think they're terminals connected to an HP/UX box.
Re:The Home Depot thing (Score:3, Funny)
this is pretty funny. i wonder if by cross-platform she means dell vs. gateway. really though, there is alot of support for linux (ibm, redhat) if you want it.
Re:Er, I think you miss his point. (Score:2)
Re:The Home Depot thing (Score:5, Funny)
Stopped into my local 7-11 the other day to use the ATM there. Rather than the expected greeting and prompt to insert my card, I see... a Windows desktop. 2K, IIRC. I just about bust out laughing right there in the store.
Re:The Home Depot thing (Score:3, Informative)
All About The Home Depot thing (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes, the registers, and practically all of the store systems, are connected to one of many different types of HP-UX boxes, depending on how old the store is. I heard tales of SSC (store support center, the HD headquarters just outside of Atlanta, GA) IT employees opening up those boxes and finding them totally packed with dust. As in, no more dust could fit in the case of the HP-UX box. But it still worked!
When I worked there, Java was all the rage and HD had lots of employees churning out millions of lines of shitty Java code that did a whole lot of nothing. Much of the real work was still done on MVS (that the IBM mainframe) in JCL, assembly, and whatnot. The UNIX work was in HP-(S)UX in, of all things, Informix 4GL.
When I was leaving, HD was seriously flirting with Linux. They had lots of cool linux machines running in one of the labs. I felt bad about leaving, but not really, since I was leaving to go work at a Linux shop doing Perl. HD hated Perl, or anything else that was "unsupported."
HD IT managers actually did a purge of all rouge Linux machines they found on the network maybe about a year or so before I was hired.
In my opinion, any flirting that HD has done with MSFT is due to the new CEO, Bob Nardelli. Talking to my old HD friends has revealed that he's making all sorts of really stupid changes, such as trying to turn 50% of all store employees into part-timers. (What? How are you supposed to have SMEs with so many part-timers?)
But before anyone forms any real opinions about HD, remember: HD is a retail shop, not a technology shop. People in IT there were, every few months or so, demanded that they "prove their worth." As far as the head retailers were concerned, IT was nothing more than a "cost center." If you want to work in technology, don't choose retail. You're going to be disappointed.
ha! Lowes doing things right (Score:4, Interesting)
Much of the real work was still done on MVS (that the IBM mainframe) in JCL, assembly, and whatnot.
The other day, I had a look at a new looking terminal in the Lowes. It was some kind of IBM box, running X. The main aplication seemed to be .... a 3270 emulator. Ta-da! the sturdy old background process continues to run but they now have a reasonable desktop to add other applications if they feel like it. No hideous CompUSA adverts blaring, just a nice clean window manager. The terminal, by the way, looked to have all the expected IBM toughness. It was pleasing to see.
Re:All About The Home Depot thing (Score:3, Funny)
In Soviet Russia rouge linux is the standard Linux distro...
TROLL? WTF? (Score:3, Insightful)
How, exactly, is this is a troll? My guess is that the moderator didn't get the joke. So, for the cosmically clueless, here it is:
The parent poster misspelled "rogue" as "rouge." This misspelling actually resulted in a different word, properly spelled. "Rouge" is French (and other languages, including English meanings) for "red." Therefore, when Alomex commented on "rouge linux" being the standard distro in Soviet Russia, he was actually being quite witty: Red Linux is standard distro in Soviet Russia.
Sheesh. Give some clown mod points, he turns off his brain.
And that is why... (Score:5, Interesting)
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why Home Depot will never be as big as Wal-Mart. Home Depot thinks of IT as a hole that the company is constantly pouring money into; Wal-Mart relentlessly uses IT to further its goals of getting the lowest cost from suppliers. (The definitive article on Wal-Mart and technology. [technologyreview.com])
Home Depot will never be a leader in the industry if it continues to view IT as an expense rather than an investment. Your post was an excellent example of how retailers tend to forget that technology, when used properly, can not only form the core of the business, but strengthen existing product lines. Home Depot's executive staff most likely looks at Wal-Mart and ask "How do they do that?" The answer lies in Wal-Mart's aggressive stance on technology adoption.
In fact, Wal-Mart and Home Depot are even compared here [business2.com], where Wal-Mart's CIO is asked whether or not it will make a difference if competitors use RFID tags. (RFID tags are Wal-Mart's next big frontier.) "The challenge is to keep innovating faster than the competition can copy us," he says.
If what you're saying really is true of Home Depot, expect Wal-Mart to keep swallowing Home Depot's business. Wal-Mart has never labeled itself as "just a retail shop," as you label Home Depot. Home Depot doesn't have the competitive advantage, nor does it sound like they know where to spend to get that advantage. I expect that Wal-mart will remain a leader for some time to come in the retail space. This quote [cisco.com] sums up what you're seeing nicely:
"'I think Wal-Mart views technology in a different light than most retailers,' says Peter Abell, retail research director at AMR Research. 'It's not only an integral part of the company, but it's where the leaders of the company can come from.'"
This is the direction in which Home Depot must go in order to become truly successful at lowering costs and increasing productivity. Unfortunately for Home Depot, Wal-Mart is already there, and getting further and further ahead...
Re:And that is why... (Score:2)
Finally they are really looking at making their IT work for what they want at the lowest cost.
Home-depot = the wannabe of the home improvement wearhouse. and will more than likely become the next Home-quarters (HQ as they were known before filing Chapter 11) if any indication of the levels of incompetence their upper management has been demonstrating.
HD and Wal-Mart (Score:3, Informative)
Agreed! To view IT as a cost center only is to blind oneself to the advances that we can make to "mere retail."
In fact, Wal-Mart and Home Depot are even compared here
You have no idea! The Home Depot concept IS the Wal-Mart concept (mostly). The common managerial question at HD upon considering a new idea was, "Has Wal-Mart done it?" The Home Depot cheer was a carbon copy of the Wal-Mart cheer. Giving stock to all company employees was an idea HD copied from Wal-Mart as well. So was the "Inverted Pyramid" idea (read: lie).
The differences between Home Depot and Wal-Mart are why HD will shrink and Wal-Mart will grow. 1. Home Depot has a service element which is much, much more difficult to quality and inventory control. 2. HD is much more limited in what they can sell than Wal-Mart is. Many Wal-Marts now have grocery stores.
If what you're saying really is true of Home Depot, expect Wal-Mart to keep swallowing Home Depot's business.
It's inevitable. Wal-Mart and Home Depot will eventually be competitors, and HD will lose that battle.
I expect that Wal-mart will remain a leader for some time to come in the retail space.
I expect that Wal-Mart will be the defining force behind retail until the retail concept becomes obsolete.
Re:All About The Home Depot thing (Score:2)
HD employees make that place different from other large supply megalostaurs. Trying to convert half the workforce into temp slaves is going to turn the HD experience and franchise into shit.
Re:All About The Home Depot thing (Score:2)
And no doubt all the eyeliner and lipstick ones too.
Re:All About The Home Depot thing (Score:3, Interesting)
Cheaper, yes. And also deadly to a key element of Home Depot's concept. Home Depot is as much a service company as it is a retail company. If you want to do a diy home project, say, tiling your kitchen walls (which I have done), then you can expect to go into Home Depot and talk to a subject matter expert on tiling. Making 50% of the store employees part-timers greatly weakens the number and effectiveness of providing this crucial service.
I agree in cutting costs, and I think changing (and, in this case, weakening) the core concept of the company is a bad idea.
To all those people complaining about home depot.. (Score:2)
platform out of at home depot.
dilemma (Score:3, Funny)
-rw-r--r-- 1 zdzichu users 170 gru 16 22:25
-rw-r--r-- 1 zdzichu users 220958640 gru 16 22:26
-rw-r--r-- 1 zdzichu users 170 gru 16 22:26
watch it or delete it?
Home Depot upgrades point-of-sale systems (Score:5, Informative)
story [computerworld.com]
Re:Home Depot upgrades point-of-sale systems (Score:2)
Yea, we all know who well Windows runs on big-endian boxes. Except for x86 is there anything else that Windows can run on?
And, I'm not talking about 'Pocket PC' on little ARM PDA's - AFAIK you still have to manage menory manually with Pocket PC. That shit became passe when Max OS 9 died.
Re:Home Depot upgrades point-of-sale systems (Score:2)
As for support, they could have just talked to Redhat/IBM whoever and gotten them to support it. POS systems are a narrow, reasonably well defined task. They could handle that.
I'm betting there's more that we aren't being told. Three to one someone wanted to go with the "safe" bet and ignored any arguments against Microsoft. Oh, well. I guess I get to make fun of Home Depot's computers when they bluescreen in addition to the blue screens I've seen in train stations. How do you bluescreen displaying a train schedule??? Anyway, that's another comment. I just hope Home Depot's prices don't get driven too high when their POS system starts suffering from vendor lockin effects. I wonder how often they'll need to "upgrade" the software on them.
Re:Home Depot upgrades point-of-sale systems (Score:2)
Bafflegab cybercrud excuses. Bullshit Baffles Brains. My guess, they could get a freight-car of VB programmers cheep. (I saw a tor.jobs ad for VB programmers in California. "Embeded" VB in healthcare apps. Scarey stuff!)
Re:Home Depot upgrades point-of-sale systems (Score:3, Informative)
Like everything else, POS systems are more complex than they look. The peripherals they have to support include bar code scanners, scales, magnetic card readers, touch screens, operator ID tags, customer displays, EFT devices, smart card readers, security alarms and POS printers. In more specialised areas you might attach fuel dispensers, liquor dispensers, loyalty devices, token (eg car wash) programming ... the list goes on and on.
Someone made the comment about "how hard is it to drive an ASCII printer"? Well, if it just prints ASCII, perhaps not hard hard at all. But POS printers may also print logos, bar codes, cut their paper, print Credit Card signature slips, have multiple colours, warn when the paper is getting low and occasionally contain more than one print head. And no, they don't support Postscript or PCL. Usually it is some proprietary encoding scheme that is peculiar to the make and model of printer. The situation is exactly the same for the other devices for the other devices - the scanners, EFT devices, and so on. There are lots of different models. They all perform roughly the same functions, but they are all have to be driven differently.
So a few years ago Microsoft came up with OPOS [monroecs.com], which defined a standard interface for each type of device and left it up to manufacturers to write device drivers that adhered to it. In theory we POS software writers did not worry any more about how we had to drive each device - we just wrote our POS's around the OPOS spec.
This admittedly old concept is brilliant, but in OPOS's case somewhere between the drawing board and the delivered drivers something went badly wrong. Your average driver did not work or had to be installed in some peculiar way, so you ended coding around each drivers idiosyncrasies - once you figured out what they were. Personally, I think it was easier to do it the old way. But that is irrelevant as I did not make the purchasing decision, nor did company that produced the POS software. The company buying the POS peripheral did - in this case Home Depot. And if you don't have to use it OPOS makes perfect sense - something you would include in your requirements list.
Linux does not have OPOS. In fact its worse then that, Linux has no language neutral object system that allows something like OPOS to be developed. So unless something changes drastically, Linux will never have drivers for POS peripherals that can be used by any developer, whether they use Gnome, KDE, Python, Perl, C++, or whatever. The situation could best be described as a mess. About the only out you have to to code in Java and use JavaPOS.
Re:Home Depot upgrades point-of-sale systems (Score:2)
But none of this is new ground. Back in 1995, Pizza Hut (and their other chain which I forget) was using QNX for their POS. (Licensing fees were a bitch, but they downloaded that onto their franchises.) This problem has been previously solved.
As I've said, the real answer is that they could buy truck loads of VB programmers by the tonne.
Time for her to take a toke from the clue bong (Score:4, Insightful)
So now they get to pay licensing fees on all of those POS systems forever. What happens when Microsoft no longer supports the OS on your registers? Now you HAVE to upgrade, and outlay even more in support costs.
Good thinking... really...
In reality, I guarantee that this decision is the old, "nobody lost their job choosing microsoft", the more modern version of the same phrase that was applied to IBM originally. IF they went with Linux and it was a failure for whatever reason, the person who made the decision is SCREWED. IF they go with windows and it's a failure, they won't take the heat because they went with Microsoft.
Granted, if the Linux option succeeds they have the potential to look really good, but oh well...
Correction on Lem article (Score:4, Informative)
From his offical website [cyberiad.info]
DirecWay NOT shutting down (Score:2, Interesting)
Lem does get a lousy deal (Score:2, Informative)
of his Western audience. What's the big mystery?
I encountered plenty of American snobs in college who "liked"
Stanislaw Lem because, well, because he has the decency to NOT be an
American. Just thank God he is not an American science-fiction writer,
such as Heinlein (that Fascist!), or, well, any of those other guys
(Phillip K who?) that write science-fiction that can't be any good
because they are Americans so they can't be literary or
throught-provoking. Lem is foreign, so he just has to be deep.
I'm sure there was plenty of backlash against that kind of snobbism.
The poor guy never had a chance to get a quality audience in the US.
Include User Mode Linux! (Score:3, Interesting)
Just an evil thought I had.
The Whole is the Sum of its parts (Score:2, Insightful)
It would be simmilar to microsoft saying that it will still sell windows, but if anyone has a problem with any of the components (IE, Control Pannels) they are out of luck.
It seems that IBM dosen't want to say that they aren't stopping, but they want to. They should bite the bullet and go one way, the other, or the GNU way.
Re:The Whole is the Sum of its parts (Score:2, Funny)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Microsoft already operate that way?
Lack of drivers..... (Score:2)
Excellent example of warm and fuzzy (Score:5, Informative)
The problem with the statement she makes is that they would have a lack of drivers if they went cross-platform. So that means they have all the drivers on the i386 platform. Hence right now they are locked into i386. So since they were "locked" they might as well get locked totally and use Windows. Why, because at least it is supported!
To Jill Taylor this logic makes sense. However, to people outside it makes little sense since either route would end up at the same destination. The problem with her logic is that she is associating Linux with cross-platform and failure to do so as a strike against the platform. In other words in her mind Linux 1 Windows 2, when in fact the score is Linux 2 Windows 2.
It is funny when I am on panels and I make these comments on the bad logic within corporations many people take a hissy fit. The reality is that most people decide on funny logic like this.
A conversation at Home Despot (Score:4, Funny)
"Why! I'M PAYING CASH!"
"My Supervisor told me that a "Crib Kitties" in the Maker? No, Servicer! Yea. He said that Norton would fix it and that he would give us a "lice update" when he was done. I think."
"Here, catch this hammer. Oops. Missed. Sorry.."
This could be a good use for P2P apps, to update drivers and make sure the lastest and bestest is on all machines....
Perhaps not (Score:4, Interesting)
Either that, or they will realise that it is not Linux that is providing this 'great software', but GNU, and it is also available on Windows. So why bother to switch when they can have the best of both worlds: Good GUI, and all the same free GNU software thats available under Linux.
Re:Perhaps not (Score:2)
I have X crash on me a hellava lot more than XP. In fact, I don't think Ive ever had XP crash. But hey, everyone is claiming how unstable it is, so I guess I'm just lucky (?).
Sure you can run some of the cool GNU apps under Windows with this, but quite likely not all of them.
But you can run all of the windows apps under Windows- something not really possible under Linux. I guess my point is, under Windows you can run the Windows apps and most free/open/ported apps. Under Linux, you can only run the free/open/ported apps.
its not just the apps that one uses to decide whether to go with Linux and GNU free/open software
No, but it is a very major factor. In fact, for a lot of people, it is the deciding factor. They use a computer to use the applications - so those applications need to be available and up to standard.
Well, now we have proof (Score:5, Informative)
The DirecTV deal has nothing to do with rural customers. Rural customers couldn't get DSL from them before they went out of business, either.
The DirecTV story does not apply to their satelite-based system (DirecWay/DirecPC). This is what the people in the boonies use. The article clearly states this.
The Cyberiad (Score:5, Interesting)
While Solaris might be the most famous book from Lem, I much prefer "The Cyberiad". The book is a mixture of Douglas Adams and Monthy Python, but at a higher level. Science fiction meets Guildernstein and Rosencratz.
Here are a few quotes:
"Everyone knows that dragons don't exist. But while this simplistic formulation may satisfy the layman, it does not suffice for the scientific mind. The School of Higher Neantical Nillity is in fact wholly unconcerned with what does exist. Indeed, the banality of existence has been so amply demonstrated, there is no need for us to discuss it any further here. The brilliant Cerebron, attacking the problem analytically, discovered three distinct kinds of dragon: the mythical, the chimerical, and the purely hypothetical. They were all, one might say, nonexistent, but each nonexisted in an entirely different way
Pastoral poem on love and tensor algebra (with a little topology and higher calculus):
"Come let us hasten to a higher plane
Where dyads tread the fairy fields of Venn
Their indices bedecked from one to n
Commingled in an endless Markov chain."
"One day Trurl the constructor put together a machine that could create anything starting with n. When it was ready, he tried it out, ordering it to make needles, then nankeens and negligees, which it did, then nail the lot to narghiles filled with nepenthe and numerous other narcotics. The machine carried out his instructions to the letter. Still not completely sure of its ability, he had it produce, one after the other, nimbuses, noodles, nuclei, neutrons, naphtha, noses, nymphs, naiads and natrium. This last it could not do..."
Re:The Cyberiad (Score:3, Interesting)
I think my favorite story from that book is the one where Trurl creates the world's stupidest, most stubborn thinking machine that insists 2 + 2 = 7, and tries to kill Trurl when he won't agree that it's not 4.
*Excellent* translation! (Score:2, Informative)
The Cyberiad is also a testament to the breadth of Lem's talent. I would love to see more work in this vein, but alas, there is no more...
A few more stories appeared here and there in Polish compendiums, but as far as I know they have not been translated into English (yet).
In case you were curious, these new stories do not expand on the Trurl and Klaupacius per se.
Jan
Re:*Excellent* translation! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The Cyberiad (Score:2)
On a side note, it was amusing to see (in the Globe article) the true colors of cold warrior hack Jerry Pournelle come to light. His characterizations of Lem as "boring" and someone who "embraces communist egalitarianism" says far more about him than about Lem.
Re:The Cyberiad (Score:3, Interesting)
One of the big problems with Lem's novels is that the characters tend to be cold, intellectual cardboard cutouts with no personalities. I can't motivate myself to read a 300-page novel about characters I can't even tell apart. The robots in the Cyberiad, ironically, are a lot more interesting as people.
Re:The Cyberiad (Score:3, Informative)
yes, Lem doesn't have the incredibly well developed characters of someone like Dick, the silly alien interactions of Asimov, the wars and battles of Pournelle, or the geekness vindication of Stephensen or Gibson.
he doesn't try to make fantasy out of sci-fi, he doesn't try to give us a warm fuzzy about technology or society, or excite us with explosive plots. his books provide a mental challenge, paradoxes, psychology, and stark reality that most popular science fiction completely ignores. there are tons of people who used to say j.r.r. tolkien is boring. they don't anymore because JRRT is in the mainstream now, but c'mon, reading LOTR and the Silmarillion was a lot like reading history books with an occasional plot! (btw, i'm not knocking JRRT, i've always loved his work)
now, i'm a native Polish speaker (and reader) so of course i've read Lem in Polish and maybe a lot is lost in translation (actually, i think Solaris' translation isn't all that bad, i've read it in both Polish and English). give his other works a chance: Return from the Stars, Eden, Fiasco, the short stories of Ion Tichy (Star Diaries), the essays of One Human Minute...
read my epinions review of Lem [epinions.com] for more, if you're interested.
frankly, i'm really disappointed that slashdotters would be so ignorant of Lem's amazing insights in the rest of his works...
OS/2 should open itself (Score:2)
Re:OS/2 should open itself (Score:4, Informative)
Re:OS/2 should open itself (Score:2)
If my guess is right, the shared-with-Microsoft code lies mostly within the kernel, the core libraries, and the Presentation Manager. I've always wondered, though, how much MS code do the Workplace Shell and SOM contain, specially since those are the parts that really distinguish OS/2 2.x+ from the earlier releases. Does anyone here know anything about it in this context?
Real Windows Code, Not an Emulation (Score:3, Informative)
Freeware (Score:3, Insightful)
Sorry for rambling on like that.
Why I no longer frequent the Home Despot (Score:4, Insightful)
Sure, a little bit of me didn't like shopping at a US firm when there was a Canadian firm, but at 2 AM, you don't have much choice, and for some reason I always seem to end up going and getting lumber and crap for things I'm working on at 2 AM.
Then one day, HD announced they were going stock only from 2 AM to 5 AM. Fine, I thought. No biggie. I'll just try to get there earlier.
Then it was midnight to six.
Then ten to six it was closed. Now it's the same hours as Revy.
Then they "expanded their aisles to make shopping better". Nice doublespeak for "we dropped twenty percent of our stock"!
Creature of habit that I am, I kept going there. I'm uncomfortably reminded of "how to boil a frog"... but one day, I wander into Revy on a quest for the holy rivet.
OK, not that holy. I just needed some damn copper rivets. HD had nothing. I go into Revy, and they have not just one or two but dozens of types of rivets. I realized then how bad I'd been getting it at HD. Never going back there again!
Re:You have to work there to shop there? (Score:2)
Occasionally, when I'd got smallish items that they couldn't find the SKU for, they just gave 'em to me for free.
They're also closer by a large margin than any other hardware store. Well, big ones, anyway, there's a small Ace a bit closer.
"GNU-win" name (Score:3, Funny)
RMS dislikes the use of "win" to refer to the MS Windows platform because he regards using MS Windows as a loss [tuxedo.org], not a win [tuxedo.org]. So in the GNU Emacs source code, all variables and functions in the MS Windows port that had been named win32-* were changed to w32-*.
Additionally, In the Emacs manual, "MS-DOG" is used to reference MS-DOS.
~PhillipRe:"GNU-win" name (Score:2)
MS-DOG - ahaha! What a riot. Those true believers, huh?
Re:"GNU-win" name (Score:3, Funny)
Just a typo. :-)
By GNU in the Emacs manual or by Microsoft when they named MS-DOS? ;-)
~Phillip
Sun's flagship teetering? (Score:5, Funny)
It's no Home Depot... (Score:2, Informative)
So I had a look at the screen, and was suprised to find a Red Hat icon instead of a Start button in the lower left hand corner.
This turns out to be old news [computerworld.com], but still a pleasant surprise.
I'll never shop at Home Depot again! (Score:4, Interesting)
They're evil because they're cash registers run an OS I don't like!
</SARCASM>
What's that about freedom of choice again?
Here's a corporation that actually considered the alternative, and for whatever their reasons, right or wrong, decided it was inferior.
How about instead of condemning them, the community looks to the reasons that linux lost a fair fight and addresses them?
Re:I'll never shop at Home Depot again! (Score:2)
Re:I'll never shop at Home Depot again! (Score:2)
With a pink slip when the audit rolls around?
Two things at once with Microsoft? (Score:2)
The last time I bought something at Home Depot, I got caught in line at the register for like 25 minutes. The woman ahead of me had to get something price checked (was taking forever), and all the other lines were real long. While waiting for the price check, I asked the woman at the register whether she could ring me up while they waited. She said no. Her register could only handle one transaction at a time.
How in the world is Microsoft software going to allow them to do two things at the same time?
Something I noticed at home depot. (Score:3, Informative)
On the labels it specifically tells them not to remove the label either.
Re:Something I noticed at home depot. (Score:3, Insightful)
Thanks for the heads up.
"considering the switch..." (Score:4, Insightful)
Another case when corporate HQ's "We're considering transitioning to Linux..." turns out to be biz-speak for "Gimme a discount, Ballmer!"
We'll know Linux has won this battle when the shoe's on the other foot and HQ mulls over "transitioning to Windows" until, I dunno, some widget-manufacturer agrees to release open-source drivers that work on the latest RedHat release... or something.
-renard
Jill Taylor @ Home Depot (Score:2)
Looks like good ol' Jill is either on the dole or is susceptable to MS FUD. Either way, I wouldn't want her working for my company. That's too bad for Home Depot. That just cost them a buttload of $$$. Looks like the cost of my do-it-yourself remodel isn't going down anytime soon....
Linux on POS registers (Score:3, Informative)
The difference in science fiction (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The difference in science fiction (Score:3, Informative)
http://lib.ru/TRANSLATION/ [lib.ru]
Prisoners of Power is a good one also.
Not the London Guardian (Score:2)
if they were POS's before.... (Score:2, Funny)
So they are upgrading POS systems to great big whopping POS systems! (same TLA, but use your imagination)
-My
Now Home Depot... (Score:2, Funny)
Microsoft gives a whole new meaning to the acronym POS.
Entire statement by Lem (Score:4, Informative)
At the official Stanislaw Lem Web site [cyberiad.info], they have the entire statement made by Lem about the new movie version of Solaris [cyberiad.info], written on December 8th.
He seems to have a negative view of the typical Hollywood ending, saying that
Lem "Interview" (Score:4, Insightful)
The "interview" part consists of a single quote, taken from the public statement he published elsewhere about the criticisms to the North American version of Solaris.
The article is pretty good, though. I was unaware of some of the details of PKD's involvement in the SFWA debacle.
Home Depot and Microsoft? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Home Depot? (Score:3, Funny)
They need to get the materials for their Imperial Starships and Death Stars somewhere, right?
Hughes != DirecTV (Score:3, Funny)
Hughes > DirecTV
DirecTV > (DirecWay || DirecTV DSL)
DirecWay == (DirecPC * 2)
DirecWay != DirecTV DSL
If not:
--Hughes is the company that owns DirecTV, they are not equivalent.
--DirecTV sells services called DirecWay and DirecTV DSL.
-- DirecPC offered satellite-based internet downloads only, and used a separate modem connection for uploads; DirecWay (finally) allows 2-way satellite communication for internet access and requires no modem.
--So, DirecWay is a completely different service from DirecTV DSL; DirecWay is 2-way satellite-based internet access, while DirecTV DSL is 2-way phone-line-based internet access.
Here are a few useful links to clear up the confusion (I only understand this already because I've owned a DirecTV dish for 5+ years and see the DirecWay ads all the time):
Hughes Network Systems Page [hns.com]
DirecTV Internet Access Page [directv.com]
DirecTV's DirecWay Page [direcway.com]
DirecTV's DSL Page [directvdsl.com]