Rural communities could deal with the problem by selective enforcement - i.e. the local sheriff chooses not to be a dick. But this seems a problem better solved with different license types.

If some states can give a junior license with restrictions on nighttime driving (w/o licensed supervision, etc) they could make it easier to get a basic license w/ road restrictions based on verified id + online test.

No, no, non you don't understand. AlphaFold demonstrated serious artificial intelligence could help solve real, expensive, research problems with provable results and quantifiable value.

That is the worst thing you can do in the current environment; why would you want provable results? The moment you can prove which type of problem you can solve, everybody only asks about the 100 problems that have no line of sight to production and the 1000 problems you can only prove this cannot solve. That's how you get into ROI conversations in the first place and a single millions-lives-saving problem cannot justify trillion dollar valuations

But if you are *pre-solutions* and stick to demos and trustmebro benchmarks - you can say its all about AGI, baby! You're a pure potential play.

Its not what your tech can do, its about making promises large enough the investors can't risk to ignore the opportunity, and get them to invest large enough sums they can't afford to let you fail

TFA from Techcrunch is basically "creative editorializing" the original reporting of other sources (axios mainly) to justify the clickbait headline. But it you click through to the original sources the story is more nuanced and more interesting.

The surface dynamic is anthropic is in a delicate position and struggling to manage a "temperamental" regulatory power *and* strategic customer shortly before their IPO.

The background dynamic is multiple sources close enough to the matter in the exec branch felt so strongly this was an unnecessary escalation and that anthropic was the party who could and had to fix it, that they're talking to axios reporters the next day.

  In an administration that is proudly punitive of leaks, don't assume multiple people are spilling the tea to reporters this quickly out of civic interest or a strong belief in the role of free press.

Its not just who remains after the bubble pops - its we dont know yet *which product* will pay the bills, and *then* who remains selling that product.

OpenAI has more users overall, but they have mainly "sold" a free / loss leader product. Anthropic has become more popular on the enterprise "maybe eliza doesnt pay the bills" business model. OpenAI pivots but if this were "search" its too early to figure out if either of these is google or they're yahoo and altavista.

Nvidia seems to be betting this is the PC + MPC redux and all these folks are trying to be IBM selling mainframes; which is less of a "worst timeline" but they're biased since their valuation already priced in the "mainframe" market. Democratizing AI is a larger addressable market for a chips seller whether its a real market or not.

Or the real business model could be elsewhere altogether - I still remember the early aughts when the future of growth for the interwebs was telecoms and iTV and Netflix was shipping CDs and the video streaming business was licensing codecs.

Or the site hallucinated it had been slashdotted, like the claudius vending machine bot

e.g.: the agent tasked as web admin has been trained on a couple decades of detritus from the interweb, and its convinced if its on the slashdot frontpage the site should be down like its 2004.

That was back when slashdot had more daily users than /r/breadstapledtotrees

The problem is a market exchange that is pliable to manipulation is by definition a strong predictor of its market movements.

If its purely 'stock markets', its all fun and games until the speculative assets infect the core economy. If you have any memory if 2008 that should be a concern, and that was a "could have gone terribly worse" scenario.

Polymarket brings speculation and feedback loops with consequences far out of the financial world. The risk of insider trading reaping "undeserved riches" is real, but the non-financial consequences of reckless insider trading influencing IRL policies is even greater.

Epistemicological is the study of the nature of knowledge that occurs spontaneously when you consume the right type of mushrooms

Isn't that what Kotlin and Scala and the half a dozen new JVM languages we see per year are all about? Take the decades of investment on the JVM and the lessons from java, start clean and keep interoperability at bytecode level...

The small bit of nerd news is shadowed by the press release as comment.

This.

Whoever came up with this strategy has not traveled since the pandemic or is rooting for appletv. If I have to setup a netflix profile on my hotel room / airbnb before I can relax after several hours stuck in a plane watching netflix - suddenly finding *anything else to do* has less friction. Even trying any other streaming app seems less cumbersome.

I think Jonathan Coulton made a song about Elon Musk's venture on this area

Was the cop in a backwards baseball cap carrying a skateboard and asking "fellow youths" where to get drinks?

And in terms of the median they're not wrong...

The problem is the government folks assume they are the exception to the rule

Against the federal government, where every agent and federal employee has qualified immunity for any actions without extremely, ridiculously specific, established precedent at scotus level? For civil damages only, because there is no right of private prosecution in federal law as ruled by scotus back in the 80s? Damages paid by the federal government which prints the money, years if not decades after the case crawls the appeals all the way to scotus?

Good luck collecting damages against the federal government, but the frontline agent has zero reasons to care - their chain of command has zero reasons to care, they are immune from accountability. Legally literally, career wise practically - they are too insignificant to be worth throwing under the bus even if things go sideways at that level.

The problem is not about legal recourse - the problem is how incentives and deterrents translate to day to day actions on the ground