
Microsoft Starts Legal Fight Over Lindows Name 670
actappan writes: "Whether or not Lindows is real, this article on CNET News.com indicates that Microsoft intends to sue them into oblivion. Looks like supression remains the best way to promote innovation." cyberlawyer adds: "Some of you may remember that MS originally had great difficulty obtaining a trademark for the generic term 'Windows' but was eventually able to pay off those who had filed letters of protest to the granting of the mark including Sun, Oracle, and Borland. As a trademark lawyer I (unhappily) have to admit that Lindows probably has a weak case. Of course it's never too late to bring a cancellation action based on genericide ;-)" CodeWheeney contributes a link to coverage at Yahoo, too.
Innovation (Score:5, Funny)
<tongue-in-cheek>
There's nothing quite as innovative as an operating system with the sole goal of reimplementing APIs from other operating systems until it can run their binaries.
</tongue-in-cheek>
Nice of Microsoft... (Score:3, Insightful)
Microsoft is making sure this company gets a lot of publicity.
--
The U.S. government causes problems, then pretends to solve them by creating more: What should be the Response to Violence? [hevanet.com]
Re:Innovation (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's see, first the guy founds MP3.com despite the fact he had nothing at all to do with the definition of the MP3 spec. Then they get into an amazin mess after they launch their BeamIT! service despite the obvious legal problems. Then they agree to a multi-million dollar settlement only to realize that they paid off the worng people, the ones who own the mechanical rights and not the performance performance rights...
This is not the type of person I would exactly want to tie my colours to...
Microsoft appear to me to have a very good case. The point is that they were the first company to come up with an Operating System called Windows. X11 is not an O/S. Lindows is trying to trade on the reputation that Microsoft has built up.
Beyond that however the guy is attempting to trade on the Open Source concept while developing something that will be closed source.
It all sounds so much like MP3, the business model is entirely clueless. Who do they expect to pay money for a sad copy of a Windows clone? It will always be at least one release behind the Microsoft article. Nobody is going to test software on an O/S with 0.1% market share or less. Windows is not just a set of APIs, it is also a kernel that has completely different semantics to the Linux kernel. The best you can hope for is something that works as well as the Windows NT POSIX mode - which is to say not well at all really.
It also sounds like MP3 in that the idea is to somehow make money by lowering a hook loaded with bait into a trendy scene where the basic premise is not to pay for anything. I suspect that the markets are not as happy with companies whose 'business plan' is less important to them than their 'exit strategy'.
new name (Score:2)
"I'm running eLindows.tv on my computer; it's great! I can run Mikrosoft Office XB, Itneret Exploder, and, uhmm, all those Linux programs I run too!"
Re:Innovation (Score:3, Insightful)
But with VMWare you have to buy/own a Windows license, which kind of nullifies the price advantage.
Re:Innovation (Score:3, Interesting)
AFAIK, Lindows runs Windows on top of Linux (just like Win4Lin?), instead of emulating a whole i386 machine. Obviously, this will perform much better than VMware on a low-end machine.
I haven't tried Lindows or Win4Lin, but I have tried both VMware and Wine, and for obvious reasons, Wine is a ton faster; after all, Wine is just another implementation of the APIs.
Now tell me, if you're stuck on a 550 as I've been (until tomorrow, 1600+, w00t!), wouldn't you be happy to hear that there's a native Win-on-Linux solution supposedly in the works so you can stop faking a whole other machine?
To me it's fair (Score:3, Insightful)
Therefore I see no problem in the name, if Microsoft were truly believers of free competition and innovation they'd leave this alone. The only time to complain is if they try and con people into thinking this project has a connection to Microsoft.
I think windows should be a generic term anyway, whether I'm running Windows, X or BeOS I call those boxes on the screen 'windows', therefore any derivatives of the name should be allowed I think.
Re:To me it's fair (Score:2, Insightful)
The name is not "Windows" but "Lindows" which gives the impression that it's not Windows but somehow connected to Windows.
Isn't this the problem? Windows doesn't want its brand name to be associated with something that's not Microsoft, so naturally they're going to fight it.
if Microsoft were truly believers of free competition and innovation they'd leave this alone
Who besides Microsoft ever said they were such believers? (And have they ever even said this???)
I think windows should be a generic term anyway, whether I'm running Windows, X or BeOS I call those boxes on the screen 'windows', therefore any derivatives of the name should be allowed I think
That'd be nice, but I wouldn't expect it to happen anytime soon.
Re:To me it's fair (Score:5, Insightful)
That's exactly the point behind the legislation, and I'll have to grudgingly agree with Microsoft on this thing. "Windows" is such a ubiquitous name, and "Lindows" is so phonetically close, that the only thing the Lindows people could be doing with a name like that is riding on their coattails, so to speak. (Whether or not they meant to is not an issue.) This lawsuit is exactly what trademark law is for.
Another issue is that Microsoft doesn't want the tech support calls for Lindows (and you know it would happen). Yet another is that people would automatically associate Windows with Lindows, and that's not something Microsoft wants either. Trademark law is also meant to protect against these two problems.
Whether or not "Windows" is a strong enough mark is a completely different issue. They've got the trademark, and, by law, they can protect it.
Re:To me it's fair (Score:2)
Oh, I thought not..
Re:To me it's fair (Score:2)
If you said it, would it make the common computer user think of Windows?
Re:To me it's fair (Score:3, Funny)
Oh well.. i thought it was funny.
Re:To me it's fair (Score:5, Funny)
No really, maybe not that, but I think that this lawsuit is the best kind of publicity they could possibly get. They should capitalize on it by changing the name to something subtle that jabs at microsoft but still makes clear what it does. If only Sun was behind it- they could call it "Sunroof".
Howzabout "windshield"? "Glass Joe" (Include MAME with punchout standard
Wait, I've got it. "MirrorGlass" Have a picture of a mirror on the box, with the reflection of a window tinted with microsoft colors in the background, and a penguin waving in. How cute is that?
Mr. Robertson, this idea is mine but you may take it and run with it. Hell, I'll sign papers and even let you take it proprietary. I'd love to see that image on a shelf and have some clerk at Compusa have to explain what it means to a customer. "Well, that's tux the penguin, and he's looking through some windows at you, but they're not *microsoft* windows, because microsoft sued the company, so they're just regular old windows. Well, not really since Windows(TM) is a registered trademark of Microsoft. But anyway, it runs programs built for windows, even though it's not Windows(TM)"
alternate name? (Score:4, Funny)
Nah, too subtle.
--LP
Re:To me it's fair (Score:5, Funny)
Aintdows - no this is clearly not m$
Bindows - all your
Dindows - gungas client
Eindows - scary physics edition
Findows - Sharks gotta have an OS too
Gindows - Shaken, stirred...
Hindows - new religious sect
Jindows - straight up moonshine version 1.0
Kindows - the deep south hillbilly OS
Lindows - err.. oops thats taken
Mindows - Ho Chi's apple based abicus
Nindows - Trent Reznor enhanced edition
Oindows - complete with matzah balls
Pindows - an OS so simple your PHB could use
Qindows - soo bloated you need five beowulf clusters just to boot
Rimdows - the ass lickers edition
Sindows - the ultimate pr0n OS(aka Pr0ndows)
Tindows - the only os without a shrinkrap
Unindows - what you really want to rm -rf
Vindows - aint this one taken too?
W.. ahh f them
Xindows
Yindows - Fengshue cosmic edition
Zindows - a narcoleptic edition (formerly known as Win95)
yuk yuk...
Re:To me it's fair (Score:2, Insightful)
It's obvious they're not Microsoft with that name. The only problem I'd see is if people thought it was a typo.
There were a few different DOS's when MS-DOS was popular, there was DR-DOS (then became Novell DOS and the Caldera OpenDOS) and PC-DOS. This didn't confuse people, so perhaps the full title of Lindows should have something prefixed to it so it's clear it's not MS.
More MS bashing [monkeyontoast.com]
Re:To me it's fair (Score:2)
I'd laugh
Re:To me it's fair (Score:2)
My view is the same... I don't see a problem with Winux or Lindows but if they lost to Microsoft then they could face the same thing with Torvalds. However I only think torvalds would exercise this right if he thought it was going to affect the name of Linux.
Lawsuits. (Score:3, Funny)
--saint
Torvalds sueing next? (Score:3, Insightful)
If not Lindows.. (Score:4, Funny)
Oh, wait...damn...
Re:If not Lindows.. (Score:2, Funny)
Or even "Winux". As in "Shhh... Be vewy vewy quiet. I'm hunting Winux." You think Elmer Fudd would sue?
Oh my God, they are such a threat to Microsoft ! (Score:2, Funny)
Microsoft is in grave danger of trademark dilution here. I mean, if they were a monopoly and the vast majority of OS users ran Windows, I wouldn't say, but as a fragile company with such a small name recognition, it's important that potential new customers don't get confused by a sneaky new startup who just wants to make a free buck out of a competitors honestly earned and well deserved success ...
Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:4, Troll)
Anyways, Microsoft's claim is entirely legitimate. 'Lindows' is in the same "industry" as 'Windows', and is intentionally abusing the popularity of Windows for its own benefit.
This is the same as coming up with an electronics company called Panasoanic -- there is the potential for legitimate consumer confusion.
I know it's unpopular to side with Microsoft on something, but for once they're in the right here.
As a copyright/trademark lawyer, I'm hoping the courts make the right decision and force Lindows into a name change.
- Dave Brennins
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:5, Insightful)
The guys there should have picked something like Winux. After all, it's running windows on linux. Not the other way round.
zoot-2.2.20-SMP
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:5, Insightful)
The right decision would be to invalidate Microsoft's Windows trademark because it's a common word.
Panasonic, on the other hand, is not a common word, so that's a pretty stupid comparison, isn't it?
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:5, Funny)
Well... Apple is a pretty common word too, but i don't see that one being invalidated either.
No, they should rename it to "I Can't Believe It's Not Windows!"
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:2)
The question is, are they really abusing it, or just using it. Is it inherently wrong for me to frame my product in terms of its benefits over another product? I really don't see how. Is their a name a reference to Windows? Of course! Will it hurt Microsoft? Probably - if they have a good enough product. Should Microsoft be able to quash that type of thing in court? Probably not.
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:2)
Probably not. But if you replace "frame" with "name" and "inherently" with "legally" then I would probably say yes.
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:3, Insightful)
If a trademark holder does not "reasonably" protect its trademark, it will fall in the public domain. The trademark "Aspirin" was actually once awarded to Bayer if I remember correctly.
http://www.inta.org/basics/aspirinbrand.shtml
So pending the victory of this case, which may not line the coats of Microsoft that thick, it is a step to protect a trademark. If Microsoft let this go, some other product could come up calling itself Bindows. Sooner than later, the Empire of Redmond(R) would have lost Windows(tm) to the public domain.
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:3, Funny)
Now anyone can use it...
- Robin
How about Sony vs Sanyo? (Score:2)
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:2)
Yeah, but not in the way you think. They allow windows programs to run on linux. I don't think I would call that abusing, though.
Frankly, this is silly. (Score:5, Insightful)
Remember MS's defense over the Internet Explorer trademark suit? "Internet Explorer" is too general and vague to be a trademark. "Windows" is just the same. Ditto for "Office," "Word," "Access," "Visual BASIC," and any number of similar names used by MS (I have no idea which ones they claim as trademarks by themselves). You seem to be completely ignoring this aspect.
Now, if they were making something that sounded confusingly like "Microsoft Windows," MS would have an airtight case. However, MS should never have had a hope of holding "Windows" alone as a trademark, and that they do is a serious failure of the legal process.
Now, as a lawyer, you are certainly better qualified than I am to predict failures of the legal process; in some areas, I'm sure that common failures are more imporant than the letter of the law. I can't argue with you if you claim that MS will win this, but it is absurd for you to claim that they should win, that a court upholding their exclusive right within the industry to use a standard industry term as a name for the most visible component of their system would be fair and proper.
There should be no problem with having "IBM Windows," "Sun Windows," etc. let alone "Lindows."
Now, this last bit has nothing to do with current law, to the best of my knowledge, but I remember hearing a principle of trademarks that I really wish was law: all linguistic trademarks should consist of a proper noun followed by a descriptive term. Nobody should ever own marketing catchphrases, fictional character names, or descriptive terms as trademarks by themselves. (I don't recall the source)
Whither X? (Score:3, Insightful)
X Windows, the GUI layer sitting on a lot of different operating systems (including, at one stage, MS Windows) has existed almost since MS Windows 1.0. There doesn't seem to have been a contest there.
MIT plus Digital and a few other companies were behind the first version and it has spread to be an industry standard. They don't seem to have any problems.
Lindows is a fantasy name composed from Linux and windows, which is already genericised with respect to computers. It is distinctly different. However MS will win. IP law in the US depends upon one thing, the dollar. If you have more of them, you win, whatever the merits of the case.
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:3, Informative)
Claims "Dave Brennins" aka "gayrod" aka dave@davebrennins.org
whois -h magic davebrenninslaw.orgCrsnic.net hasn't heard of davebrenninslaw.org
Whois Server Version 1.3
No match for "DAVEBRENNINSLAW.ORG".
traceroute davebrenninslaw.org
Error - davebrenninslaw.org doesn't exist
Sure, YAAL, whatever. Neat piece of whoring though.
Re:Panasoanic isn't Lindows. (Score:3, Insightful)
Besides, it doesn't matter. It's close enough that, by the "reasonable man" standard, it's nearly exact.
Hrm. (Score:2)
Anyway, these windows people should change their name because its stupid if nothing else.
Re:Microsoft's Claim is Legit (IAAL) (Score:2)
Obviously you've never worked in PC support
PC Mag hit it on the head (Score:5, Funny)
It's software that combines Linux and Windows without violating any trademark or copyright--although I bet Microsoft will sue at some point.
Guess they were right!
Great publicity (Score:2)
Oh my God! (Score:2)
How you can fight back. (Score:5, Funny)
Hopefully this will cause Microsoft to lose the trademark name 'Windows' because it will become generic from over usage.
Who would be confused? (Score:3, Insightful)
Murchinson said Microsoft considered legal action a last resort.
I'm still laughing!
On Murchinson's comment, it can't be a 'last' resort because they don't stop. When you play monopoly do you just plain give up?
I don't think suing them will be the last step - it's their first. They can sue easily, they have lawyers. It's like a Soviet Tank rush in Red Alert 2.. hit your enemy before they can build anything, then they can't get back at you; kill slowly from there.
Windows has become a product of it's own. Not an 'os' anymore. Instead of changing people to linux, change their flavor of windows.
Yes (Score:2)
Coming to America (Score:2, Funny)
They're Mac Donalds; I'm Mic Dowell's.
They've got the Golden Arches; We've got the Golden Arcs.
They got the Big Mac; We got the Big Mic.
We both have 2 all beef pattties, special sauce, but they have a sesame seed bun. Our buns have no seeds.
What about MS??? (Score:2, Funny)
Think about it, Michael Mann could make The Insider, Part Two. Instead of taking on tobacco companies it would be about monopolizing software companies. Anthony Michael Hall can play Bill Gates again, and we can bring Russel Crowe back and have the two go at it in some kind of virtual reality gladiator thing.
Re:What about MS??? (Score:2)
heh. "Any press is good press" (Score:5, Interesting)
They dont even let the product launch! (Score:2)
Already attacking the competition before the competition even exits the gate.
Must be Microsofts new strategy, kill all companies who have threatening names!
The Solution ! ? ! (Score:2, Funny)
;)
Just look at Killustrator (Score:2)
how paranoid can you be? (Score:2, Interesting)
Not saying i agree with it though. And as logical as it seems, if they win, they're proving that they stifle competition through any means available.
The suit asks the court to order the start-up to stop using the Lindows name and also seeks unspecified monetary damages
How can they sue for money? has Lindows actually damaged them in someway? If they want them to change the name, fine, let them try, but how much can they really ask for?
Maybe i'll sue all the Jason's in the world for using MY name. No, i'll sue anyone who's name ends with -son. get them to change their names AND give me money for my effort.
Pronunciation (Score:2)
Lawsuits (Score:2, Interesting)
Speaking on the topic, M$ seems to just sue their "potential competitors", in fact small companies with (for most) great ideas. Theses companies can't afford the costs for the lawsuit and are forced to close. After that, M$ stole a good idea (mabye from that company), put the Microsoft name on it and sell it.
M$ is going to be everywhere (this is their dream). From PCs to game consoles, telephones, etc. I expect TVs soon (Heh, they should try vacuum cleaner... a good way to suck...). Can we call that "monopoly" ? Will they sue the dictionnaries because there is the words "Windows" and "office" in it ? Do people will wake up when they will live on planet "Windows Earth" ?
how bout Linopoly (Score:2)
In unrelated news ... (Score:2, Funny)
Similarly, Microsoft Corp. has decided to sue the cattle industry for allowing their cows to graze in meadows[tm], and the sun for casting shadows[tm].
omg! fake comments! (Score:2, Interesting)
michael robertson has a comment on december 10th
and then all comments are from a user called "reply"..
they're mostly posted on the same day..
they pretend to be from lost of various people
praising the upcoming system..
if you check reply's profile
the email is "comments@lindows.com"..
i have not seen as ridiculous in a long time!
Even if Windows is a TM; It is Generic (Score:4, Insightful)
Microsoft dug their own hole right off the bat. A good test: "What is [it] called?" If the mark is [it] then it is likely to become a generic term. Trademark attorneys have done a great job applying this test by combining additional terms to a potentially generic mark. For instance, perhaps Apple wanted to call their notebooks, "Books." Instead, they merely attached the "i" and the mark became unique.
Windows? Wthelse are these things to be called? That's generic. And Microsoft has lost any unique attributes to the mark.
Re:Even if Windows is a TM; It is Generic (Score:2)
Note that Bayer also held another trademark at that time: Heroin. But I digress.
Bayer still holds the trademark aspirin in countries that were not signatories to the Treaty of Versailles.
On one hand, Bayer's aspirin is not a good example of trademark abandonment because of the Treaty. On the other hand, at the turn of the last century, Bayer was the pharma equivalent of Microsoft (600 kilo gorilla).
What I'd like to know is why there's no namespace conflict between Windows and X-Windows. Was there a deal done at some point?
k.
List of Generic Marks and Depends on Consumer (Score:5, Interesting)
So, the test would not be whether Microsoft or a particular judge considers that a mark is a generic term, but if the mark becomes a generic term in the minds of consumers. Perhaps a party could present evidence such as surveys or the online and published usage of a term in a generic sense as a means to describe the thing?
Context of Tradenames and Trademarks (Score:2, Informative)
Having the exact same name is not always automatically a trademark infringement; it depends on the nature of your business, the uniqueness of the name, and whether your product could reasonably be confused with the product of the other guy.
I assume MS's lawers are going after the fact that Lindows is offering a product that is likely to be confused with an Operating System. If Lindows was a hamburger chain the suit wouldn't fly.
Examples:
Apple (Records of Beatles fame) and Apple (Computer); Royal this and Royal that; and as someone pointed out NT (Microsoft) and NT (Northern Telecom, which we know know as NorTel); you could probably add "XP" everything lately.
Apple Computer actually had an out-of-court settlement with Apple Records agreeing not to enter the "music" business. At the time Apple was a small company and a little gun-shy about being threatened with a lawsuit by the Beatles, of all people, so they came to an agreement instead. When the time came for multimedia on the desktop, they just went ahead; Apple Records declined to pursue it.
This is a GOOD thing (Score:2)
Until now, I'd guess that about 1% of the computer using population has heard of Lindows. What better publicity is there than getting into a lawsuit with Microsoft? Making CNET and ZDNET headlines is a dream come true for them.
This lawsuit also legitimizes the development work they've done as far as the public is concerned. After all, Microsoft wouldn't sue them if they weren't a real threat.
And finally, they're going to be forced to ditch the knock-off name. That surely wasn't helping them any.
Re:This is a GOOD thing (Score:2)
I wonder.. (Score:2)
"Lindows" WOULD confuse most people (Score:4, Insightful)
a) Microsoft's version of Linux
b) Linux for Microsoft Windows
c) Microsoft Windows for Linux
or some other permutation thereof that implies an official connection with/endorsement by Microsoft.
Cheers,
IT
What about the Kompany? (Score:2)
Last Resort (Score:2, Funny)
Murchinson said Microsoft considered legal action a last resort.
"Clearly we prefer to work with them to resolve this problem voluntarily. Their product name infringes on our trademark," Murchinson said. "We hope they will work with us to resolve this problem without the need for legal action."
Sobbing, he continued: "Oh why do they Force us to sue them! It hurts me right here, (Murchinson placed his hand over his heart and looks to the heavens) whenever we have to sue them."
Murchinson then, with the tears still streaming down his cheeks and shaking his head, pushed a lonely red button on his desk.
Moments later, cruel hordes of fur clad lawyers on enormous horses, gravely swinging rusted and blood stained battle axes, thrusting their hardened leather shields toward the brooding skies, with packs angry mastifs biting and growling at their hideously spurred heals, rode ravenous toward yet another glorious conquest.
Murchinson listened as the horrible clamor of the viciously armed force recedeed in to the wind. Finally he concluded the interview, "if only they hadn't forced me to do this, if only we could have worked something out..."
Thinking of that poor man, Murchinson, nearly brings tears to my eyes as well. It's just tragic how he so truly didn't want to sue them, but had to... sigh... It just breaks my heart.
Ya have to hand it Michael Robertson... (Score:2, Informative)
It appears MS has made a tactical error however, at least MP3.Com had money in the bank to pay the settlements. Lindows is just getting off of the ground. Another one to watch is windux.com [windux.com]
Next up: Jesus to sue MS for rights to "XP" (Score:5, Funny)
"The monogram of My Name, formed of the two first letters when written in Greek, "X" and "P" [Chi and Rho], has been in use for well over a thousand years in numerous countries. I am therefore insisting that Microsoft cease using "XP" on its products, as that is tantamount to Taking My Name In Vain."
Added Christ, "I mean it. Don't make me come down there..."
Sue them into oblivion? (Score:4, Informative)
this article on CNET News.com indicates that Microsoft intends to sue them into oblivion.
Umm, no...
Fucking slashdot editors... I'm through. I contribute to slashdot no more. This is my last post.
Re:Sue them into oblivion? (Score:2)
Italics is the submitter.
Would you rather the editors alter your words?
Re:Sue them into oblivion? (Score:2)
Italics is the submitter.
Repeat after me:
Slashdot is the publisher. Send Slashdot anything, any infantile ranting will do as long as it slams Microsoft.
I'd say fuck it, but slashdot continues to amuse me and occupy my attention occasionally. This is however the full extent of the esteem in which I hold this place though.
Ahem...(coff...clueless...coff) (Score:2, Interesting)
Fucking slashdot editors... I'm through. I contribute to slashdot no more. This is my last post.
reply to from bankey:
Repeat after me:
Italics is the submitter.
Would you rather the editors alter your words?
Thus spake the Moose:
I only have to say, the one article out of 30 that was accepted was of the title: Microsoft article on Salon.com those were my words.
and the "this article on salon.com" were mine as well. Everything after that I was *grilled*, *filleted* and *slow roasted* for words that were not mine. (I said "interesting idea"..editors says "extensions of MS further monopoly"...granted it was alluded to in the article, but WTF. For the most part, editors don't get grilled on
Clearly "bankey" has no clue what an "editor" does...edits, mangles, destroys, clarifies, distills and after all that puts all the above adjectives in a blender and then diseminates it to a readership.
All I can say to ya'll submitting to
If your article is not thought provoking, inflammitory, the cause of a flame war, MS bashing, Linux bashing or in any way counter to any type of groupthink, RI/MP aa hating...well, I seriously doubt you will utter the words "What was I thinking/smoking" when I submitted *that*.
.
Re:Sue them into oblivion? (Score:2)
I have an idea... (Score:2, Funny)
Another idea (Score:2)
Re:Another idea (Score:2)
Oh, wrong industry...
On another note, it's the "X Window System", not "X Windows". That's why your favorite client/server bitmapped display manager's name doesn't infringe on a Microsoft trademark.
Re:Another idea (Score:2)
X is older than MS Windows. That suit wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
Re:Another idea (Score:2)
Licrosoft
Licrosoftion
Lictosuction...
OH MY GOD. They stole all the fat and put it into their products. That explains the bloat.
Counterattack... (Score:2)
Lindows got what they wanted. (Score:2, Insightful)
They probably would have used something like Winux if they hadn't wanted to be a target. How could they not be advised by someone that this would be trademark infringement when naming their company?
In other news, microsoft sues death. (Score:2)
Death sued for sounding too close to Microsoft's flagship product's name.
Steeve Ballmer (CEO): A lot of people on the internet do jokes about blue screen of DEATH, when people die, we hear about Widows, people KILL their systems after installing non-certified drivers, DEADLY VIRUS are crippling our systems, all this will change. You know how our stupid our userbase is, If people are stupid enough to buy an OS for 300$ instead of going for an OEM version, these same people could be associating death with our flagship product, Windows, we fought really hard to get the trademarks for that name, heck, I even had to look like a complete monkey to get public awareness on our side, Death will either have to cease to exist or change some of it's naming convention. Microsoft will fight death.... to the death if we have to god damn it!.
Concerning Partial Use of w-i-n-d-o-w-s letters (Score:2)
I've often read that in order to maintain a copyright, one must actively defend it. Of such things are MacDonald's "cease and desist" cases against restaurants in Scotland run by someone with the last name of MacDonald.
Such non-prosecution of a known commercial company using just such a partial name link-in can only damage their case in prosecuting someone else who only proposes to also use some letters to do the same thing.
Thoughts?
Bob-
Windows has become a generic term. (Score:2)
Although the name is really XFree86 the common name is X-Windows. How many OSs now run X-Windows? How many platforms?
Can you say damn near all of 'em boys and girls? I knew that you could.
MS has failed to vigorously defend the name Windows. I think the case could be made they've lost rights to that trademark.
The real question is... (Score:3, Insightful)
For example, what if Microsoft created and was marketing a product called Minux, which was intended to provide the same functionality as Linux and used unique only to Linux technical and architectural concepts?
Would this not be infringement? Microsoft is dead-on here, and although the Windows trademark is ambigious, you all should remember that it was granted in the first place because the name 'Windows' is in fact unique to the computer industry (whereas a company selling Windows it wouldn't be). When you think of Windows and a computer, you always think of Microsoft.
The real question remains -- is this an attempt to gain the needed press via the Microsoft hypemobile or does the former MP3.com CEO really think he has a chance of winning ala Napster? His remark in the article regarding Microsoft's guilt didn't seem to bright and didn't address the real technical question of is it in fact infringement.
We'll have to see on this one, although I do think this will be good to get Linux in the public eye again and possibly get some major userbases/corporations to look seriously at Linux as a viable alternative.
Aimster vs "AIMster" all over again (Score:3, Insightful)
It's obvious (to me, at least) that "Lindows" is intended to associate the product with both Linux and Windows. It is a good name for the product (though perhaps more than a bit tacky), much as Aimster was a good name for Aimster back in the day. However, the cleverness of the name has the downside that they're also piggybacking on all the work Microsoft has done to establish and protect the Windows trademark, so they'll probably lose, and I think it's probably in their best interest to simply change their product and domain to something else. That's what I suggested to John about Aimster, but of course I was ignored.
Then again, Michael Robertson isn't quite as naive as John, and has a lot more credibility and business sense, so maybe I don't know what I'm talking about at all.
Call it LNW ( Lindows is Not Windows) (Score:3, Interesting)
Hell, call it Windows! (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, the Great Grey Lady from the Big Apple objected strenuously to this, so the Infocommies started a contest for a new newsletter name. One contributor suggested, "Call it the New YORK Times. Let's really piss 'em off!"
Millions for defense, but not one penny for tribute, I say!
This is just Wine with a price tag, right? (Score:4, Interesting)
>>But with VMWare you have to buy/own a Windows
>>license, which kind of nullifies the price
>>advantage.
>Use Wine [winehq.com] then.
I'm betting that's exactly what Lindows is. A friend and I were discussing Wine's license recently, specifically wrt the percieved lack of contributions from Transgaming's WineX (a DirectX centered fork from Wine -- http://www.transgaming.com/) back into the original codebase.
It appeared to us that Wine has a pretty open license much like X11's (http://winehq.com/source/LICENSE). The only real stipulation is the following:
15 The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
16 all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
So how tough would it be to wrap up Wine in a box with a $99 price tag (price from Lindows' FAQ page: http://www.lindows.com/lindows_products_faqs.php)
So to sum, take open sourced but not "RMS Free" (aka, GPL'd) code, name the result something Microsoft will have a problem with for the free press (as has been mentioned about a million times already), and *poof*, you've got the makings of a 90's style IPO.
Re:I bet (Score:2)
Re:Anyone remember X-Windows? (Score:2, Informative)
there is and has never been anything called X-Windows (AFAIK - anyway MIT's X window system is not called X-Windows).
there was X11
then XFree
Sometime along the lines they merged.. and im not sure of exactly what its called now.. i just know it is a mix of both systems.
Re:Anyone remember X-Windows? (Score:5, Interesting)
Bill Gates is the God of Innovation (Score:2)
Why? Well look at his website and see why.
Gates is GOD [microsoft.com]
Hes the true founder of open source.
The creator of the GUI.
The creator of the first web browser.
The creator of the instant messager.
The creator of the word proessor.
The creator of C++, Visual Basic, J++.
The man who literally fuels the success of the world wide web.
The man who helped steve jobs create MacOS.
The Creator of DOS.
And Finally the man who created (x)indows.
So before you go starting any corperation which steals from this mans innovation, think twice, or you might just get sued.
Open Source people, watch out, because you are next. Just wait for the launch of Microsoft Linux and the original founder of open source Bill Gates will take Linux as hes done with everything else into the mainstream.
I know (Score:2)
Re:M$ is wrong again, duh. (Score:5, Informative)
Second, this isn't about copyrights. It's about trademarks. And if someone pops up in your market with an extremely similar name and a product that aims to subsume the functionality of yours, it is not unreasonable to consider that an infringement of your trademark.
You're splitting some pretty fine hairs if you consider these products to be in different markets.. they're both operating systems for x86 computers, and the entire point of Lindows is to offer the same functionality (and then some) of Windows.
Sorry, but MS is in the right on this one.
Re:idiots (Score:5, Insightful)
No, this is more analagous to you opening up a fast-food hamburger chain called "McRonald's" with a clown named Donald McRonald for a mascot and a big golden "R" as your logo.
"indows" constitutes nearly every letter and sound in "[WL]indows", and the product is ridiculously similar by intent.
Re:Idiot! (Score:3, Informative)
Second, a trademark is a trademark. Whether it's a company name or a product name is irrelevant. Even if for some reason you think it should, in some alternate universe where logic is based primarily on coin flips, be relevant as a matter of degree, you might recognize that Windows is Microsoft's flagship product. Calling your OS "Lindows" is tantamount to naming your company Nicrosoft.
And incidentally, I don't think "Lindows.com" is going to stay in business for very long, and one could make a very sound argument that Microsoft has "earned its place".
See you in hell, dinner plate.