Intel Gets PA-RISC Engineers 224
Doctor_D writes "Well it looks like Intel has done it again. They have absorbed more processor engineers, this time from HP. Alpha is gone, PA-RISC is going, what's going to be left? MIPS? SPARC? AMD? Crusoe? "
I'll just say what an intel exec told me... (Score:1)
NO DEC did but they bought it (Score:2)
Power4/PowerPC (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:1, Interesting)
Considering that this move was pre-announced in *1994* by Intel and HP, is anyone really shocked?
(Well you might be shocked at how bad Itanium sucks, but oh well....)
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:2)
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:1)
But AFAIK there was no "snake", but many of the 700s were named after snakes, maybe you mean one of these: Bushmaster (710/50), Cobra (720/50), King Cobra (730/66), Coral (750), Coral II (755)...
(I wonder if the HP engineers were fans of Elite (the game))
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:2, Interesting)
It will be a shame to see it go, but maybe I can get some of those HP workstations cheap soon.... 8-)
The following is just a sig.
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:2)
Yeah, at my old job we had older HP boxes (K-class, D-class, G-class and a 712/60 workstation.) I liked the design of the workstation, but it was *slow*...but I have a feeling that it's problem was only having 32 megs of memory. I still remember the consultants we had were trying to load a web server on that box. They weren't successful...mainly 'cause it didn't have enough memory or disk space. Mainly that fell to whoever's fault that when they ordered it, they didn't config it right. I'd imagine with a decent sized disk and at least 128megs of memory, that workstation would still be in use. But instead of upgrading it, it was replaced with a linux workstation.
Also at my old job I had to do an analysis at the time between Sun and HP's products. And I was hard pressed to get a fair comparision between the two. In order to get fairly equal expanability with same number of processors and memory, I wound up comparing the V-class HP box and a Sun Ultra Enterprise 3500. As we all know pricewise these boxes are in different leagues. (No, the N class wasn't available at the time I did the comparision.)
We eneded up buying a Sun 3500...but not for the reason I was told to do my comparision...we needed something to run Solaris for the web application server that the development team picked out.
I also remember getting a quote from HP for a 4.3gig hot swappable Hard Drive to go into a Model 30 disk array. When the quote came in at $1,200US per disk, I was shocked. I wound up going with a reseller and buying the disk *used* for about $600US. At least with the Sun boxes I could just buy a scsi disk, but the rails on it, and dump it in far cheaper.
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:2)
Now, the PA-8700, just officially released with a top-speed of 750MHz is a bit of a disappointment since over a year ago they were claiming 1GHz+ in the lab and at least 800MHz for delivery to the real world, especially in light of the Power4 (and we all knew the Power4 had been coming for way over a year now). But the PA-8800 has potential (comp.arch rumours that it is dual-core like the Power4 -- the engineers leaving likely won't effect that design as it probably mostly done with by now) but I doubt we will see a PA-8900 with those guys gone.
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:1)
> the first commercially shipping RISC implementation.
This is not true, first was Acorn with its ARM (first working silicon 1985, first available products with ARM CPU 1986), then MIPS (June 1986), then PA-RISC (October 1986).
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:1)
First working sillicon in early 1981, first products (IBM RT) announced January 1986.
(See http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/ibmrt/f
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:1)
Re:Power4/PowerPC (Score:1)
At least someone is (Score:1, Funny)
what we need are (Score:3, Insightful)
Hell, I think we should bring back the 6502 core, but that is only because I am fixated on 6502 assembly code. dont mind me, I'm a freak.
Embrace reality PLZ (Score:1)
Re:Embrace reality PLZ (Score:1)
Re:Embrace reality PLZ (Score:2)
DB
Re:Embrace reality PLZ (Score:2)
In the realistic near future, I could see something on the order of a large university system (University of California perhaps?) sponsoring a chip line and having all its schools with computer engineering programs participate in the development then making a run and giving it to the EE departments to play with. That way you might cobble enough educational value out of the exercise to justify the cost and you would turn out graduates that can justifiably say that they were part of a chip design team.
Re:Embrace reality PLZ (Score:1)
Re:what we need are (Score:1)
Go play with the ARM -- smells like a 6502...
Re:what we need are (Score:1)
Bruce
Re:what we need are (Score:2)
I don't know for sure one way or another, but I've heard talk of it before. Basically an invalid opcode that triggers a bug in the CPU which causes it to overheat this catching fire. It may be an urban legend, but I wouldn't count on it.
It is true that you could physically damage some early core memories by entering into a tight loop, thereby accessing the same location in memory repeatedly for an extended period of time. This was unfortunate, since busy timing loops were pretty common at that time.
Re:what we need are (Score:1)
Zilog, of course! (Score:4, Funny)
Zilog, of course! The greatest CPU to ever go without MUL/DIV intructions. It's a wonder it's not used in more modern computers. If it's good enough for your Gameboy and you calculator, it's good enough for your desktop, I say.
...Now If only I could find a Linux distro for my TRS-80...
Re:Zilog, of course! (Score:1)
Re:Zilog, of course! (Score:1)
Re:Zilog, of course! (Score:2)
The z80 also has a couple of index registers and zero page, as well as 12 general puropse registers (2 exchangable sets of of 3 pairs)
Re:Zilog, of course! (Score:2)
Re:Zilog, of course! (Score:1)
The Gameboy Advance is perfectly matched in power to the 2D gaming heyday machines (back when the PeeCee _really_ sucked) like the Amiga, Archie, ST, SNES, MegaDrive - games companies have a massive back catalogue of 16 and early 32-bit games suitable for porting to GB Advance, such as the entire SNES library, the entire Amiga library, etc, etc.
Now you know why games companies were still suing people distributing the "old" roms and disk images - they want to sell them all to a whole new generation of punters, but on handhelds.
I actually like seeing amiga and snes classics on a teeny tiny handheld, with the gfx, sound and gameplay intact...
Re:Zilog, of course! (Score:2)
I probably should have done research on the GBA cpu, but at least I got the TI-89 right. Symbolic integration that's smaller than my keyboard... *drool*
Re:Zilog, of course! (Score:2)
The Gameboy Color uses a z80 workalike, and the TI-82, TI-83 and the TI-86 all use geniune z80s.
Re:Zilog, of course! (Score:1)
Re:Zilog, of course! (Score:2)
The 6809 was a dream to program for, even if you constantly wished for just one more register, but it was Motorola's last great random-logic decode processor. And it even had a Unix-like OS in the form of Microware's OS/9. In the end, the microcoded 6811 won out because it had a big customer: the automotive industry. The 6811 was designed for anti-lock braking applications.
But then Motorola came out with the 68000, which was like a 32-bit PDP-11, and IMHO that was the greatest instruction set of all time. I bet lots of you reading this even have one in your pocket or on your desk (PalmOS runs on a 68K).
And Sega even came out with a machine that had both a Z-80 and a 68000: the Sega Genesis. Forget Linux for the TRS-80, how about Linux for the SegaCD?
Re:Zilog, if you don't have a 6809, of course! (Score:1)
I've got a couple of Qix arcade boards kicking around that I should do something with: Dual 6809's (one for game logic, the other for video), a 6802 for sound, and strangest of all, an RS232 port on the board.
Perhaps it's time to sacrifice my Atari ST colour monitor and actually build a Qix game.
6809 was the best! (Score:2)
ZiLOG lives! (Score:2)
Intel says... (Score:2, Funny)
all your brains are belong to us
Re:Intel says... (Score:2)
All your brain are belong to us.
They didn't know plurals.
Can someone explain... (Score:2, Insightful)
-Berj
Re:Can someone explain... (Score:2)
Absolutely nothing.
The page has three stories on it, but they didn't clearly indicate when they go to another story. They did something like 'Doctor in the house: Venture capitalist Heidi Roizen has been known
They also get the link to the VC firm wrong. It's sbvc.com NOT sbc.com.
Very sloppy website.
Re:Can someone explain... (Score:1)
Re:Can someone explain... (Score:1)
Er, is this really a surprise? (Score:1)
How about.... (Score:1)
or what about the PowerPC and its variants?
2 VERY nice architectures, and arguably the only ones other then sparc that dont seem likely to get gobbled up by chipzilla
Re:How about.... (Score:2)
or what about the PowerPC and its variants?
2 VERY nice architectures, and arguably the only ones other then sparc that dont seem likely to get gobbled up by chipzilla
Interesting that you refer to the Power4 and the PowerPC as two seperate architectures. They're basically variants on the same architecture; IBM makes both of them, and Motorola also makes PowerPCs. This is why you can run the same Linux distribution on an RS/6000 as an iMac.
Re:How about.... (Score:1)
. PowerPC has some elements of the POWER architecture, it is like a subset of it, but not 100% compatible. The Linux version running on the POWER4 is a custom port by IBM, not the plain linuxPPC. Just as a clarification.....
There are 2 lines of RS/6000 one is POWER based and the other is powerPC. Althought most of the newer models are POWER based, IBM seems to regard the PowerPC arch for embedded systems....
Re:How about.... (Score:2)
Re:How about.... (Score:1)
Carly on "The HP Way" (Score:3, Interesting)
``Dave Packard would say, `The most important thing is for a company to be profitable, period,' '' Fiorina says. ``He also was fond of saying, `This is not a democracy.' ''
It looks like Carly is turning out to be just another golden-parachuter. With an approach like that towards managing HP, she wants to turn it into a glorified Dell. Unfortunately for her, the Dell we already have is pretty darn good and commodifying HP's business is not doing what is best for the company. Don't be surprised to see her making that golden sky-dive in a year or two, while HP's share price continues to make that bright-red sky-dive we've seen for the last year or so...
Re:Carly on "The HP Way" (Score:2)
Re:Carly on "The HP Way" (Score:1)
Heh, I was thinking the same thing...but you forget that Gil Amelio an J.L Gausse should be given a chance...just have to hit the reset button to bring HP back to its pre Carly dayz.
Oh, and IIRC Itanium == IA64, before *ntel bought the Alpha, the IA64 was not happening because of IP conflicts (disputes of some sort).
My memory may be fuzzy on the chain of events but it seems to home in on this:
IA64 can be read as "Intel's Alpha"64.
All your RISC are belong to us (yeah its a running gag, still funny at times...like here ya ninny)
Moose.
Re:Carly on "The HP Way" (Score:2, Informative)
At the time, I was very, very proud to say I worked for them. I bragged about the fact that I was employed by a company that had, in the 1970s, decided to give everyone an across-the-board pay cut rather than go through the ordeal of layoffs. And I should point out, that decision was made based on a survey taken of the employees by upper management. Hey Carly -- what was that you said about HP "not being a democray"? Yeah, right. You don't even know your company's own history!
Today, I am no longer with HP. But if I were, I'm sure I would no longer be proud to say I worked for them. You are absolutely right, Fiorina is nothing but a golden-parachuter. She doesn't give a damn about running a solid company with long term prospects, which is the way HP has always been run. She's just like every other CEO these days. She just wants to get those big, fat bonuses, even if she has to destroy the company to do it! HP is just another line on her resume as far as she's concerned. Hell, the American economy was much worse in the 1970s than it is now, and HP decided not to lay anyone off. These days, Fiorina is laying people off left and right! And does she have any sort of long term strategy for the company? No! HP is running around like a chicken with its head cut off, darting from quarter to quarter with no eye toward the future.
I'd sell all my HP stock, but it's pretty much already worthless anyway, thanks to Carly Fiorina. Ugh.
Re:Carly on "The HP Way" (Score:1)
HP has (had) no reason to look outside their company when they hired a new President. Fiorina was from Lucent, and probably played a big role in their current troubles. Why would any sane company hire a President with NO COMPUTER EXPERIENCE?
Re:Carly on "The HP Way" (Score:2)
That's something to be proud about? Laying people off is a good opportunity to get rid of the weakest employees across the board and the least productive (middle management specifically).
An across-the-board pay cut is mostly a strategy to get rid of the best and most-productive employees who can get a full-paying job elsewhere.
Don't forget the little chip that could (Score:2)
Hey, They NEED it (Score:1)
I think if HP cannot feed them anymore, its best to hand them over to somebody else that could ensure their welfare, eventhough handing them to Intel. Remember, we're in an economic downturn, so don't blame 'em for this... Slandering them just doesn't help... The only unfair part was:
What raised some eyebrows is that the workers weren't given the choice of applying for other jobs at HP.
Something's fishy here. Now, people would assume that this is one of the things they're up to after the merger... This could damage their reputation, apparently...
Hmm... This seems familiar... (Score:1)
But seriously though, I think the processor market is tougher to get into than the software market. And it's pretty tough to create an open-source, GPL microprocessor. And breaking into the market would be tougher than breaking the open-source OSes has been so far.
If Intel were to become a very-near-monopoly, would they exert the same pushiness that Microsoft does? I think so.
Anyway, just some things to consider when you're buying that new computer...
Re:Hmm... This seems familiar... (Score:1)
HP did not sell PA-RISC to Intel (Score:5, Informative)
The group that was transfered to Intel worked on chipset development for some of HP's servers and workstations. Because of the economic conditions, it was deemed unfeasible to keep that group in HP, so instead of laying them all off, a deal was worked out to give them jobs at Intel. I'd say the engineers in that group are in a lot better shape than many of my other co-workers across the company who just got layed off in August.
Anyway, my point is that PA-RISC isn't dead. There are still a lot of people working on both CPUs and chipsets. We will be doing a number of iterations yet of the PA processor family before HP transitions to using IPF in the long term (we're talking years from now). Ignore the classic
Re:HP did not sell PA-RISC to Intel (Score:1)
of PA-RISC? Need I say more?
Re:HP did not sell PA-RISC to Intel (Score:1)
Re:Let's be clear: PA-RISC is following Alpha (Score:2)
Intel is pulling PA-RISC components out of IA64 in preferance to Alpha designs (SMT). Binary compatibility is endangered.
What does that mean? Like I said before, where are your facts? IA-64 has been in development for more than 5 years, completely separate from PA-RISC. What "PA-RISC components" are being exchanged for "Alpha designs?" I'm dying to know.
While there might/will be further iterations of PA-RISC, all acknowledge that the end-of-life is in sight, constantly presented on the map.
I think that's exactly what I said. Every architecture will become obsolete eventually. PA-RISC is on the way out in 5 years or more, but saying that it just got sold to Intel is incorrect. 5 years is a long time in this industry.
HP is farming out PA-RISC production to IBM, hoping that copper and SOI gives it enough boost to reduce R&D costs.
So you're saying that, because we started fabricating our chips in a better process, it means we're giving up on the architecture? Yeah, that seems pretty logical.
The porters of HP-UX to IA64 in NJ have been terminated.
...how much more evidence do you need that HP-UX/PA-RISC (and perhaps IA64) is doomed?
Don't know what that has to do with PA-RISC.
So your theory is that HP has decided to forget about the enterprise computing business entirely? I guess you're entitled to your opinion.
Re:Let's be clear: PA-RISC is following Alpha (Score:2)
Well, this is the big one: http://www.theinquirer.net/14090103.htm (although this is pretty threatening to IA-64 too): http://www.theinquirer.net/13070103.htm
You seem pretty bullish about IA64. All the rest of the world can say to you is that the architecture is years late and fails to meet several design objectives (x86 performance at the very least, granted that FP is stunning). Perhaps if you had designed a better chip, you wouldn't be in this mess.
It is if HP cuts R&D efforts into further iterations - making this the last gasp of a dying line, falling into the grave a little sooner than any of us expected as the Tru64 acquisition accelerates the collapse. Oh, and you're also handing your designs to IBM, and I assume that the team that designed Power4 has now had a long opportunity to examine and be "influenced by" your work. AMD managed to implement copper in-house; Microsoft's decision to abandon OS/2 for Win95 in-house also shows a company mastering their own destiny; your choice is very telling: your destiny is controlled by others.
IA64 is the stated future of HP-UX. Why are we not to believe that Carly is terminating HP-UX with the termination of the NJ staff?
As I said, get out now. IA64 has too many problems to be a viable architecture, and the bloodbath that you are facing in competing with Hammer/Power4/Sparc will be the downfall of Intel/HP/Compaq/DEC.
It will all end in tears.
Linux jobs, HP-Intel partnership (Score:5, Interesting)
Before you protest too much: They are adding Linux positions, and the money has to come from somewhere.
HP has been transitioning its processor operation to Intel for years. HP partnered with Intel to develop the IA-64 architecture. Did anyone think that PA-RISC would continue in parallel to that forever?
The world has some very serious single-source issues regarding high-end silicon in general. The fabrication lines have become so incredibly expensive as chips become more dense that most companies have given up on new CPU fab construction. And you can't make new chips with those old FABs. Perhaps we'll be lucky and there will be a revolution in microfabrication technology, but I've not heard of one on the horizon.
Another place where this hurts us is in high-end graphics, where we are down to two manufacturers.
I'd like to see more work on Open Sourced processor designs that run in field-programmable logic. This is a place where we can innovate without the expense of a fab, and then when we have good ideas that get proven, people can fab them.
Thanks
Bruce
Re:Linux jobs, HP-Intel partnership (Score:1)
The fabrication is merely expensive.
But the reasons the two are related is purely political - it's got nothing to do with complexity or electron gap widths or anything else in the physical realm... (c.f. Transmeta Vs TAOS)
I've said in the past I'm a hardware prostitute - as long as the hardware keeps getting faster I just don't care who the vendor is.. I'm gonna concentrate on the software because that is where the interesting (geopolitical) battles lie for me: Reliability and functionality...
Anything else is just dollars and posturing -
the consumer just plain doesn't benefit...
So I'm happy for Intel to swallow the processor design market - PowerPC is still viable in my opinion and will remain so for some time. As far as I can tell, the production side has long been dominated by nepotism and greed and is boring to boot...
In contrast, the design side seems to benefit from economies of scale - a quick look at the patent libraries tells more about the politics of the situation (which in my experience tend to trump the design complexity issues) than a comprehensive look at the design decisions do.. (4 Chips for a CPU - WTF???)
--ShunScene
Disclaimer 1: My company receives funding from intel
Disclaimer 2: I'm not speaking for my company.
Re:Linux jobs, HP-Intel partnership (Score:1)
Scott McNealy was right (Score:5, Insightful)
I remember seeing McNealy speak some years ago at a tradeshow (I don't remember exactly when or where). He explained some of the economics of CPU design and predicted that in a few years there would be only three major architectures: SPARC (Sun), PowerPC (IBM), and Intel. It's kind of creepy how his predictions have come true.
His arguement was based on financial analysis of how much it cost to develop and maintain a competitive architecture, and how much revenue each of the big players could expect from their designs. HP was doing comparitively well at the time, but McNealy figured they were using revenue from printers to subsidize their chip business, and that couldn't go on forever.
Alpha was still a viable competitor at that point, but again it comes down to volume. You might get a team of crack engineers together to design a beautiful CPU, but if you don't get the volume (or high margins like IBM mainframes) then you can't afford to keep the architecture competitive.
Re:Scott McNealy was right (Score:1)
Even if you don't have a lovely O2 sitting on your desk, your playstation(1|2) and N64 are both MIPS machines.
What's funny is (Score:1)
McNealy can say the same about Sparc's future (Score:1)
Re:Scott McNealy was right (Score:1)
Why the anti-Intel tone? (Score:4, Insightful)
I for one congratulate Intel for giving these talented engineers jobs.
Re:Why the anti-Intel tone? (Score:2, Funny)
They get more page hits that way.
I used to take
Where does HP fit now? (Score:3, Interesting)
HP is getting out of the chip business. HP is getting out of the OS business. They are acquiring Compaq, who is also leaving the OS and chip businesses.
My question is this: What now differentiates HewPaq from say, Dell? The only thing I can think of is HP's printer business, but I don't think that alone would be enough to keep them afloat. I'm genuinely curious. What is HP doing to keep themselves relevant?
Re:Where does HP fit now? (Score:1)
Re:Where does HP fit now? (Score:2)
Re:Where does HP fit now? (Score:1)
Re:Where does HP fit now? (Score:1)
When does the FTC start caring? (Score:1)
Re:When does the FTC start caring? (Score:2)
Just my opinions...
Re:When does the FTC start caring? (Score:1)
I only now of SPARC (SPARC v7 instruction set), MicroSPARC (I,II[e|ep]), TurboSPARC, SuperSPARC, HyperSPARC (all four v8), UltraSPARC (I,II*,III*) and SPARC64 (both SPARC v9).
Re:When does the FTC start caring? (Score:2)
Re:When does the FTC start caring? (Score:1)
Re:When does the FTC start caring? (Score:2)
Oh, okay... it's UltraSparc III. But there's not been very much "Ultra" about those for quite a while, and the (late arriving, slow) III hasn't fixed this.
What is going to be left (Score:1)
Re:What is going to be left (Score:1)
Just curious (Score:1)
"HP transferred an entire server-chipset group there en masse in exchange for undisclosed considerations."
How did Slashdot ended up with this title: "Intel Gets PA-RISC Engineers" ????????????
The article clearly says 'server-chipset group', not 'PA-RISC group'
Re:Just curious (Score:2)
Might be good for Sun and IBM (Score:2, Informative)
Well, there have been many in product management that were dismayed at HP's feet-dragging commitment to hteir own platform. HP has been yoyo-ing back and forth between WindowsNT and HP-UX a bit too much, and this might be the nail in the coffin, as far as our platform of choice is concerned. We'll probably standardize on Sun computers. If it happens, I must say HP really did it to itself.
PA-RISC and HP-UX (Score:1)
The HP9000 are expensive, but made to last. The Sun Netra t1 aAC200 are cheaper, but the failure rate so far has been abysmal (maybe we where unlucky) and performance sucks (barely overperform a P2-400 and cost about 4000$).
For HP-UX, while I have to agree that HP-UX 9.xx and before did suck, it's been quite a while that it's not supported anymore and 10.20 is out (1994). They don't have the latest toy, but are reasonably up to date, managable, predictable and so far the Unix the more stable I've seen.
The Itanium had been made by HP and Intel, it currently run HP-UX and can run HP-UX applications from PA-RISC systems without recompile. The transition was IMHO planned, maybe it could have been called IA64/PA-RISC3.0...
This sucks (Score:2)
Scary.... (Score:3, Insightful)
If they can manage to sell some stuff over 2 times the price of an "equivalent" AMD part, what's going to happen if AMD dies or has a major problem with the next product cycle in a year or 2 from now? Forget about crusoe, I'm talking high-end CPUs, x86 renderfarm nodes, etc...
Anyways I do my part, I buy only intel when *really* needed, i.e. when I'm instructed to, or when the programmer needs an SSE2-capable CPU to do his optimisations. Else I try to support AMD the best I can... I am about to build another renderfarm and it'll be using TigerMP an AhtlonXP processors. They need support, and Intel needs to see that it's pricing scheme is bad.
Re:Scary.... (Score:2)
There are only two choices of motherboard at present with the Palomino chips. There's the Tyan Thunder with everything on the board (eg dual scsi, dual network, requires a 460 Watt power supply), and a cheaper Tyan Tiger motherboard. IMO the Tyan Thunder is a big waste of money unless you absolutely require two onboard SCSI controllers and/or the onboard network.
Next iNTEL (Score:1)
The chip business is an expensive diversion... (Score:1)
They're offending some of their best people (Score:2, Informative)
And, well, that's probably going to do a great deal of harm to HP. Because if this is how they treat their some of their best line employees, how will they treat the rest of them? HP, historically, has been an unusually good place to work. But I think this is a public sign of the end of that.
I wonder how long before all the high-tech manufacturers are unionized?
(Anonymous post because it is entirely possible that Intel keeps blacklists. It's not cowardice, it's caution, and it's going to become more common.)
*cough* (Score:2)
*cough* PowerPC *cough*
IBM is still running quite hot with the power4, and motorola, though they have their heads up their asses, is assisting them with the next gen PowerPC.
yes, there's still MIPS and SPARC.. and even AMD (though they're essentially an x86 clone).. and what do they all have in common? they're not controlled by Intel, for one, but they're also all.. wait for it.. RISC
even the next gen intel chips are going risc-ish.
okay, no more martinis in the early afternoon for me...
what's left (Score:2)
Y'all forgot about PowerPC. It's not only alive and healthy, but actually growing!