Your CPU Will Explode 238
Crowdpleazr1 writes "In case any of you were still opening up email from people you don't know, the Weekly World News is reporting that you could now be killed by a malicious email virus that will alter the molecular structure of your CPU, making it explode!! Of course, as a person who understands these newfangled computer things, even I can not imagine what evils those hacker people can come up with. I think I'm going to go hide in my Y2K compound now. "
This story is not a laughing matter (Score:1)
It's all fun and games until you realize that these are the same people who vote, and write letters to Congress demanding harsh legislation to throw all hackers in jail because they are imminently in danger of inflicting bodily harm.
Because of this WWN story, I guarantee you that at this very moment, an angry letter is being drafted demanding that the government step in and monitor all email so that the deadly computer viruses can be stopped. Now how funny is it?
Where are the geeks going now? (Score:1)
THIS IS A HOAX!!! (Score:1)
Before all you linux lamers go around thinking you can
blow up people's CPU's, let me burst your bubble. This is not possible.
Trust me, i'm a MSCE and i know about this stuff. well, MAYBE it's
possible, but i dont think so it would probably just make
a spark or something.
i'm suprised all you supposed "nerds" didn't notice this
before posting it.
Re:Uh Oh (Score:1)
That wasn't half as funny though as the guy who called our oem dept (we outsourced)claiming that he had our chip in his head. The tech put him on hold for 5 minutes then came back and said that since the chip was out of warranty he'd have to call Intel.
Speaking of Explode... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:A poor and late April Fools joke? (Score:1)
Is it law that... (Score:1)
They're gonna start calling this place "TrashDot".
No it's not. Re:WTF? (Score:1)
They will stand by it and are willing to lay the jurnalistic integrity of the publication on the line over this.
ha,ha,ha (Score:1)
Old Motorola chips used to exhibit this behaviour (Score:1)
Not quite as spectacular an effect as when the co-guitarist in my band failed to correctly calculate the new impedance of his rewired speaker cabinet correctly (2 ohms instead of his calculated 8 ohms). Applied a slight volume boost during a solo, and "pop!", followed by "what's that burning plastic smell?" =)
Re:Old Motorola chips exhibited this behaviour (Score:1)
Ric "the memory's the second to go, but i can't remember the first" Dude.
Re:Disassembly of Core Destruction Code (cDc) (Score:1)
10 PRINT "DIE";:GOTO 10
Software altering MOLECULAR structure? (Score:1)
I am not a chemist. I am not a physicist either.
But I did not sleep during my college level science courses, therefore, I am wondering HOW IN THE WORLD CAN SOMEBODY ALTER THE MOLECULAR STRUCTURE (of anything) using SOFTWARE?
I mean - altering molecular structures require A LOT, - and I mean A HELUVA - JUICE !
Fission and fusion are the TWO processes known to men (and women) that can alter molecular structures of _some_ substances - not all, _some_ !
Can someone please enlighten me if that story isn't an April Fools' thingy?
Re:Safe from the Virus...but not The Demon! (Score:1)
If your computer was built after 1985, then it has enough hard drive space to accommodate one of Satan's minions (and that doesn't count any stuff from MS).
The Register has a little something [theregister.co.uk] gleaned from the Weekly World News. One Reverend Jim Peasboro, author of an upcoming book, The Devil in the Machine, says that demons can possess anything with a brain. Apparently that now includes computers. According to the Georgia clergyman, "...many members of my congregation became in touch with a dark force whenever they used their computers", (and again I emphasize that he made no mention of Microsoft). That Print job you thought was screwed up by the wrong printer driver may have actually been "...a stream of obscenities written in a 2,800-year-old Mesopotamian dialect!" This happens right after the spontaneous Turing test.
Re:This is neither news for nerds... (Score:1)
Re:Safe from the Virus...but not The Demon! (Score:1)
Please... (Score:1)
Thanks.
But Seriously... (Score:1)
Prequisite: 2.3.x linux kernels have P6 microcode upgrade device driver option. (module).
Description:
Since at microcode level, subsytem interfaces may not have idiot-proofing, it may be possible to
corrupt the P6 microcode dump leading to some kind of subsytem breakdown.
Any thoughts ?
-ak
Re:HEADLINE: Slashdot reaches new lows (Score:1)
However, it's a problem all over the place at the moment - we're all starving for decent stories. I think we're in the shadow of Y2k, with no medium term projects having been started in the second half of '99, so nothing's happening / being released now. In Australia we're all holding our breath for the GST (which is going to be one huge balls-up). Or perhaps it's the popularisation of the Internet. Millions of clueless "AOLers", corporations and lawyers are grinding our wonderful 'Net to a halt...?
I haven't even been able to find anything to buy for weeks - my bank account is at an all-time high (meanwhile my moral is getting pretty low, but not as low as the rest of the company I work at).
It's a depression without the lack of money, at least here...
Re:And if you use windows... (Score:1)
Re:let's see (Score:1)
Re:Its true, and heres what you can do! (Score:1)
Re:This *is* possible... (Score:1)
Re:And if you have a soundcard it swears at you! (Score:1)
Re:NO WAY, BS (Score:1)
Re:Chain Mail (Score:1)
Seriously, we had a monitor burst into flames last Monday. The guy thinks he'll need therapy because it was so traumatic (!?). Oh, and we found out that the only fire extinquisher on the floor is in a locked plant room.
(On display, in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet, in a disused lavatory, with a sign on the door saying "beware of the leopard".)
Re:My Dual Celeron (re: Atari Jaguar) (Score:1)
Otherwise, stop taking the tempature of the computer and use the thing!
Did this "feature" run on saturday? :-) (Score:1)
Hemos, NTP!!! (Score:1)
April Fools is *only* on the first, you brat!
Yes way! (Score:1)
modern day geek. [dhs.org]
Re:Exploding CPU Not Unheard Of. (Score:1)
The irony being... (Score:1)
"Warning! Email attachments could make your computer explode! Please read the attached article to find out more!"
Hmmm...
No no no! (Score:1)
So to recap, use different straws (for god sakes dont use storebought! The CIA owns all the stores!) And use Alcan aluminum foil. Make certain your pyramid is secure and you should be safe.
Now if I could only find out how to get the alien tracking devices out of my teeth.....
NO WAY, BS (Score:1)
Halt Catch Fire (Score:1)
meaning a virus really _could_ overclock/overheat/kill the processor?
of course there used to be certain motorola processors with a Halt Catch Fire (HCF) instruction [uregina.ca], but that wasn't quite what it did.
In two years, it'll be possible (Score:1)
As you've probably heard, Linux 2.4 has the /proc/microcode [slashdot.org] device. Well, 2.6 will have the /proc/explosives device that lets you access (or write to) the self-destruct charges [slashdot.org] in your computer. MicroApps (the applications division of Microsoft after judge Jackson splits the company) will write apps for Linux, and you know how much Microsoft loves "active content" (whereby programs treat data as executable code). It's only a matter of time before someone sends you an email that writes all 0xFF all over the explosives device.
---
CPU thermal stress tester (Score:1)
And remember, an overheated CPU's molecular sturcutere does change - atomic diffusion makes the metal atoms that the silicon is doped with mover around, eventually destroying the p-n junctions that make the CPU work.
Re:CPU thermal stress tester (Score:1)
Re:reminds me... (Score:1)
---
Re:Software altering MOLECULAR structure? (Score:1)
Fusion and fission are examples of changing things at the nuclear (atomic) level, which is significantly harder.
Kevin Fox
Re:let's see (Score:1)
sub pick { $_[rand $#_] }
Re:Its true, and heres what you can do! (Score:1)
Re:Quick! (Score:1)
A: maybe he was dictating.
Re:Exploding CPU Not Unheard Of. (Score:1)
Re:HEADLINE: Slashdot reaches new lows (Score:1)
Rick
Re:HEADLINE: Slashdot reaches new lows (Score:1)
While the April Fool's stuff is always excessive and tedious, this is obviously humor and is even more amusing since it was published (even if it was in the WWN).
This story isn't really much different from the Good Times hoax from a few years back, and we all know how many people believed that. Just sit back and have a chuckle. I'm sure the editors of WWN do.
As always, if the story doesn't interest you, skip over it.
Rick
this is a Good Idea(tm) (Score:1)
This isn't funny. (Score:1)
Laypeople, for lack of a better word, aren't able to read Slashdot, ZDNet, or any other intelligent or discerning medium for tech news. Many can't even be bothered to watch the CNet show, for what that's worth.
Where are they getting their tech news? MSNBC, Reuters, AP -- most of which are more inclined to rebroadcast Bill Gates' speech than any random geek's criticism of Microsoft.
Who are the tech pundits? People like ESR or Rob Malda or even Spencer F. Katt? No, the tech pundits are people like Ira Magaziner, Steve Case, and the CEO of (insert other large tech company here).
Perhaps WWN doesn't have the direct pull that MSNBC has, but don't pretend that the titillation and FUD that this story makes won't spread by word of mouth.
Let me ask you: How many copies of the Good Times warning do you have in your old mail?
Don't think older media is that much better at coverage of this field. Did anyone see the Boston Herald story on the GPF last weekend? It began with the sentence:
About ten years after most of them took their sisters to the prom,
Need I say more? Neither us nor our field get covered well at all. It's not so funny; in cases like these its downright damaging.
When no one will let you use their computer for fear you will add the "cpu bomb bug" to their computer, give me a call.
(A little Geek Pride now and then doesn't seem so bad to me.)
Re:Exploding CPU Not Unheard Of. (Score:1)
I had an IDE HD give up its magic smoke once. Someone made an extension power cable which mismatched the +5 and +12. The result was a couple of blown chips.
Not that this is in any way interesting, or even on-topic.
Re:Wow... that was close... (Score:2)
Re:Exploding CPUs (Score:2)
No idea how accurate that is, though it'd be a bit hard to do remotely.
Re:Hmmm not an explosion, but what about melting ? (Score:2)
Re:Safe from the Virus...but not The Demon! (Score:2)
Ahh. That would explain why I've never seen a Georgia clergyman possed by demons.
Jargon File: HCF (Score:2)
Firewalls won't help (Score:2)
Re:Exploding CPU Not Unheard Of. (Score:2)
Re:Old Motorola chips used to exhibit this behavio (Score:2)
A matter of opinion. (Score:2)
You will notice that the frontpage post has a foot next to it. That means that the link/story therin are to be considered funny. I thought it was so hilarious I emailed it to all my friends, some of whom will actually BELIEVE it. That makes me laugh even harder.
Everyone has different taste in humor. (I know some people that don't find Monty Pyton funny... They SCARE me.)
You may complain that slashdot is getting worse. Maybe it is. Every thread nowdays has a few posts in it lamenting about how slashdot has gone downhill. Really? Slashdot is just a linking system generated buy the COMMUNITY'S submissions. If that is the case, then we, the internet (or perhaps to some degree the free software) community are the ones going downhill.
Slashdot is just an indicator. Something to think about at any rate.
I guess the best point to make though is that if you don't like something on slashdot, just stop reading those parts.
This *is* possible... (Score:2)
MWAAHAHAHAAA (Score:2)
"central computer"? somebody remind these people the FAA's air traffic controller system is still using 1970s equipment based on vacuum tubes..?
::laughs until he cries::
the quality of these tabloids has really gone down.. Back in the Day there was an article in WWW about a dog that had been specially genetically engineered to be used as a mop. It was really, really shaggy, and its hair was exactly like mop fibers (they had a "picture"). The idea was that you'd pour soapy water on the dog, and it would walk around the house and clean the floor behind it.
But that was a long time ago. Now things are a lot harder for the tabloids in the Post-Lewinsky Era. What with the mainstream media these days posting regular front-page stories about Oral Sex and tech articles so blatantly clueless and inaccurate it boggles the mind, the tabloids have really had to stretch to keep up with a respectable level of relative trashiness. Which is how we get this-- in order to appear even more clueless and inaccurate about technology than an average newspaper, they've had to stoop to writing that would be unsurprising to see in the Onion.
Shows what the Weekly World News knows. (Score:2)
--Shoeboy the microserf
Re:watch out (Score:2)
If they say a virus can blow up my CPU, hey, I'm unplugging my LAN from the Internet pronto....
Screw the email virus - this is more serious! (Score:2)
Quick! (Score:2)
Kevin Fox
UPS virus. (Score:2)
That's why I cycle the power on my UPS every night and let any unauthorized excess charge drain off.
--
Don't laugh, it's on MS's BUG LIST (Score:2)
Q170817 Windows NT Causes APC Smart UPS Battery to Discharge
Isn't this just crazy?
Backfire (Score:2)
Clarification (Score:2)
The above statement is a little misleading. It is not saying that there is a feature in Windows that does not require a reboot to take effect. After it alters the CPU, you still need a reboot. Obviously it can't ask you to reboot or you will be suspicious, so it just runs the BSOD code (which, contrary to public belief, is not always caused by a bug, but is also a way to trick you into doing a reboot after one of Microsoft's surprise upgrades.)
let's see (Score:2)
Re:Exploding CPU Not Unheard Of. (Score:2)
Re:Exploding CPU Not Unheard Of. (Score:2)
Anyway, the smoke you refer to is called "magic smoke". It's trapped in side each chip and is what makes chips do what they do. When you see the magic smoke escape from the chip, it magically no longer works.
--GnrcMan--
Re:Old Motorola chips used to exhibit this behavio (Score:2)
Motorola didn't talk about it much, but the speculation at the time was that the feature allowed testing portions of the CPU chip before committing them to the expensive process of putting them into actual IC packages, by merely applying the proper combination of voltages to the data lines and starting the processor.
The "Halt and Catch Fire" mnemonic was a minor joke based on humorous compilations of bogus IBM assembler opcodes (JAA = Jump Almost Always, et cetra).
On the other hand, in that era it was rather easy to commit Stupid Computer Tricks like telling a floppy drive to seek track $FF and run the heads hard off the end of the ballscrew, or destroy monitors by writing the wrong sync timing to a video controller. The latter can still be done with a fast video card and low frequency monitor, of course.
It was neat watching early EPROM chips actually glow when the processor or program timing the programming pulses failed.
Re:This story is not a laughing matter (Score:2)
//rdj
Its true, and heres what you can do! (Score:2)
So I am telling you all to take care not to let this happen to you. Now here are a few more things about the virus you must know....
1) If you have a AMD K-7 or Intel P3 ( 600 Mhz and above ) you are at the highest risk! I mean you have the fastest chips that take the most power and are they huge!!! So if you have these chips and would like to protect yourself please contact me and I will be able to help get these things off your hands!
2) All other hardware is also at danger and i can help get rid of that stuff too!! Specially U2W SCSI drives.
the Forward goes pop culture (Score:2)
Hard drive just got wiped (Score:2)
Let's not forget... (Score:2)
Re:NO WAY, BS (Score:2)
Speaking as someone who has blown up 10 555 timer IC's in the last couple of weeks, YES YOU CAN. Only the low power kind, though. And electrolytic caps blow up reeeal nice, too...
Re:popular entertainment and computers (Score:2)
Re:Exploding CPU Not Unheard Of. (Score:2)
whoa, deja-vu . . . (Score:3)
I regularly told people that he was writing a virus that would alter the internal wiring of their cpu, causing it to melt or possibly explode after a significant period of exposure - thus, explaining the occasional crashes of our system
Man, seeing an email virus that does the same thing really takes me back . . .
Re:reminds me... (Score:3)
On an unrelated note... (Score:3)
Right after she left, a man came in and wanted to speak to the "browser administrator." The girl at the front desk asked him, "you mean the website administrator?" and he said "okay."
I used to think the stories about people like this were fake. Like the people who, when asked who their ISP is, reply "Netscape!" But now I know that they are real.
I mention this only because these are the types of people who would believe a story like this. Like the guy I used to work with, who was bragging about how smart he was, because on December 31 before he left work, he unplugged the computer and the monitor from the wall. He was bragging, you see, because he had "saved" the computer from Y2K.
Ya really gotta be careful around these people and technology...
__________________________________________________ ___
Email this story to a friend? (Score:3)
But watch out for the semaphores! (Score:3)
Re:NO WAY, BS (Score:3)
Outraged,
U. R. Rube
--GnrcMan--
Re:Well, this is obviously fake. (Score:3)
Want to work at Transmeta? Hedgefund.net? AT&T?
Re:let's see (Score:3)
sub tabloid
{
my $c1 = pick(qw(World National Super Hollywood));
my $c2 = pick(qw(Weekly Daily Informative True));
my $c3 = pick(qw(News Scoop Info Secrets Insider));
"$c1 $c2 $c3";
}
print "The " . tabloid() . " is running a story today, about ";
#...
Well, this is obviously fake. (Score:3)
Right?
Memo to All Department Heads (Score:3)
"Instead of blowing up a single plane, these groups will be able to patch into the central computer of a large airline and blow up hundreds of planes at once."
It seems clear to me that Yabensen is referring to the Realtime Online Flight Logistics (ROFL) system we developed for Vultee Aerospace. As several of us who were involved in the PLC coding for the FADECs recall, there is extensive logic embedded in the onboard systems governing how fuel is supplied to the engines. If this Yabensen has guessed that the Denial of Realtime Kerosene (DORK) features that permit fuel starvation (on ground, I might add) he may be aware of the firmware issue raised by Ross Scott during final rollout.
Public Relations:
Ted, I want your people to find out who this Yabensen is. I've never heard of him, although the paper seems to think he is a credible source. It is crucial that we head this story off at the pass--divert the press with another story. I like the "air ambulance for sick kids" story you mentioned a couple of weeks ago, but if this story looks like it is going someplace--particularly someplace like network TV newsmagazines--I am willing to authorize another remote fuel starvation incident of a TV news helicopter.
Software/Host Systems:
Ed, I want you to contact Dave Stearns at Vultee and mention, gently, that somebody has been talking about ROFL and DORK. This is a good opportunity to pitch the Phase III enhancements to ROFL that Marty Eisenreich and his team have been working on. We don't want to scare him (Stearns is *such* a ninny) but this is something we can use to move that project along. The simplest solution to this whole exercise is starting Phase III of ROFL--it will give us control of the entire code base, as well as the source code repository system. Any legacy code that might conceivably trigger the Dump Overboard Hydrogen (DORK-DOH) logic can simply be excised, and the problem gets excised with it. If Stearns starts whimpering feel free to contact George Demetrios directly. We need to move on this!
Hardware/CMOS Systems:
Joanie--what was the name of that little nerdy guy who wrote the EEPROM code for DORK? Could he be Yabensen's source? Find him. Ensure his compliance--or his silence.
Legal:
Arnie, we are innocent as lambs. There is no problem, there is certainly no legal problem. We have contractual protections, we have statutory protections, we have constitutional protections. Or we'd better. Review our position on this, list our options in the event that this becomes public, and be prepared for five minutes in the Thursday meeting (and *only* five!).
Everybody:
No matter what, we have to stonewall this. Nobody talks to anybody, except to scoff at the source. It didn't happen, it can't happen, it's not possible. No reputable company would do such a thing. We're a reputable company, ergo it could not have happened. If word of this leaks onto the Internet, we are doomed.
I want status reports and memos from all dept. heads at the Thursday 3 o'clock.
John
P.S.: Sue tells me that Arnie, Mike E., Ted, and Sylvia have not yet sent in their travel requests for the "Ethics in Corporate Business" seminar. This is required in Q2, people. It's important that we set the ethical example for our employees.
Re:Wow... that was close... (Score:3)
You would check 0-9, get 9, then 0-9 (stopping when you got 8, etc)...
So the hackers had at most 20 more codes to check, and E[X]=10...
Phew!
Alex
CPU Kaboom Haiku (Score:3)
But then your box exploded
Pity the poor fool
Erm... 5-7-5... that looks about right to me :-)
Does it bother anyone else that this story is right to an account of a kidnapping perpetrated by a "real-life Zombie"? [weeklyworldnews.com]
--
Exploding CPU Not Unheard Of. (Score:3)
Ok, so this is just something some guy at work told me, but supposedly, his 486 overheated and exploded. The chip was mounted in a platic socket with some space between the plastic and the chip which sealed air-tight. The heating caused the plastic to burn enough so that the smoke had nothing better to do then build up pressure and pop! off went the CPU a few feet. I assume that the soccket design was later revised so that it didn't seal. Can anybody corroborate? Does anybody really know how to spell corroborate? I think I'm going to have a corroborated beverage now.
Very Real hardware-damaging programs (Score:4)
5/21/94 - While engaging in the "Make Money Fast!" program back in college, an angry mob of Academic Computing staff stormed my dorm room and took out my computer with baseball bats. I'm afraid to do the chain letter thing anymore.
4/7/96 - I was caught by my coworkers while sending out copious amounts of spam endorsing the Barney the Purple Dinosaur fan club. My managers took out my machine with liberal applications of their baseball bats. I'm afraid to touch anything plush and furry anymore.
2/15/98 - While viewing pr0n on my notebook in the Deep South, a preacher ripped it out of my hands and beat on it mercilessly with a baseball bat. I'm afraid to jerk off anymore.
12/21/98 - I had gotten my AV up and running on my home PC, and was showing a special episode of Pokemon which had recently been withdrawn in Japan. I was showing this to some neighborhood kids, all of whom entered epileptic fits when watching a random sequence of flashing lights. That afternoon, several irate parents came over and smashed my computer with baseball bats. I'm afraid to watch cartoons anymore.
1/1/00 - While watching DVDs on my notebook, a bunch of DeCSS fanatics got upset because I was supporting "The Man". After losing my portable to a swarm of swinging baseball bats, I quickly developed an adverse reaction to the Movie Industry.
4/1/00 - I secretly set my roomie's X Server's scan refresh rate to 200 KHz. The monitor caught fire after he came back, and he spent the rest of the night hitting the machine with a basball bat. I guess this virus also affects Linux.
Now, I know that no one likes an alarmist, so I'm going to talk about it like calm rational creature...
WARNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This VIRUS seems to culminate in the *imminent* DESTRUCTION of one's computer via baseball bat!!! Don't let it happen to you! *SEVERAL* people have had their computers PHYSICALLY DESTROYED. You can protect yourself by giving out 100 copies of this letter, and fortune may smile on you; just add your name to the list below and send $500 to each person on the list.
1. Bill Gates
1 Microsoft Way
2. Paul Allen
1 Microsoft Wy.
3. Warren Buffet
3864 Skaru Yew Ave.
4. Solomon Kevin Chang
2107 W. Commonwealth Ave. #414
Alhambra, CA. 91803
When I receive payment, I will send you your very own Anti-Virus kit: a genuine 9mm Smith and Wesson Sigma Enhanced with two Hi-Cap Magazines filled with hollow point bullets. Instructions for use are an extra $60. Don't wait! Act now!
Skevin
What about the children? (Score:4)
I hear new cars have computers in them. I oughta visit my local dealer and have him remove the computer from my car. I'm sure the hackers can use my cell phone to 'download' a program to my car that could cause it to blow up. If the dealer won't remove it, I'll get a paint scraper and shave all those funny little black rectangles off the circuit boards myself!
I sure am glad the Weekly World News is on top of this threat. They report all the stories that the other newspapers won't touch, but that's because they aren't afraid of exposing the truth! I'd better get back to the supermarket, there might be some stunning new development in the Jon-Benet Ramsey case (last I heard, it was the mom!) or biblical prophesies my pastor hasn't told me about. Glory!
I was just attacked by this! (Score:5)
Atari Jaguar (Score:5)
Microsoft confesses responsibility (Score:5)
Microsoft confessed responsibility today for the epidemic of exploding CPUs, which they attribute to a bug in their new "Hardware Upgrade Wizard." CEO Steve Ballmer explained in an interview today on MSNBC:
"Microsoft has recently been severely criticized for 'bloatware,' or large, resource-intensive programs which require modern, high-performance systems to achieve adequate performance. But we at Microsoft are devoted to bringing our customers new, innovative technologies, to take users 'where they want to go today.' And since the hardware exists today, giving us the opportunity to work out our new visions for twenty-first century computing, we feel it is our obligation to use it to the maximum degree possible."
"However, we're fully aware that this trend toward greater functionality, and hence toward greater complexity and size of the code, might leave our customers with 'legacy systems' in the lurch, so to speak. So we have spent over three hundred million dollars in a secret project to develop our unique and patented 'Hardware Upgrade Wizard'. With this exciting new technology, we can remotely rewrite the traces in the silicon substrate of you CPU chip while it is running!. The 'Hardware Upgrade Wizard' is capable of engraving components in-situ right upon the silicon chip of your own old, obsolete CPU, with a feature size of less that 0.07 microns. Thus, even on the relatively small chip in a 386 CPU, we can fit the entire circuitry of an up-to-date Pentium III chip; and since the trace size is so small, that new re-engraved chip, with over eight million components, actually runs cooler and with a smaller current consumption than it did, pre-re-engraving, when it was a 386 with a mere 360,000 components. Thus any putative problem arising from the yeast-like growth of our code base becomes, simply, 'no problem.'"
"And we decided, rather than releasing this new application for download from our website [microsoft.com], instead, in the playful spirit of April Fools, we would surprise all our faithful customers by remotely upgrading their old, slow PCs without their knowledge, so that the next time they turned them on, the lucky users would discover that they now enjoyed, absolutely for free, the sizzling performance of a new, state-of-the-art system!
The method we used to remotely install the 'Hardware Upgrade Wizard' was a variation on the standard "Melissa" email trojan-horse, using the exclusive 'Virus Propagation Wizard' built in to every copy of our popular, best-of-breed Outlook email client software. Our engineers started sending out our little surprise gift on Sunday, March 26, 2000."
"To our dismay, reports started filtering in over the next few days about a small, unforeseen bug in the 'Hardware Upgrade Wizard,' somehow un-caught in our extensive beta testing program, where the energy released in the course of the in-situ re-engraving, rather than being released slowly and being drawn off and dissipated by the heat sink, instead is released all at once over a period approximately equal to time it takes photons to cross the width of the chip, in a fashion similar to a Q-switched laser, resulting in a violently exothermic burst of hard radiation."
"All of us here at Microsoft are deeply sorry about the property damage and loss of life caused by this unforseeable software 'glitch.' However, I would like to make one thing perfectly clear. We at Microsoft explicity deny any legal liability for any unfortunate side-effects of the 'Hardware Upgrade Wizard.' Anyone who was affected by this software malfunction clearly must have clicked through the license agreement for Microsoft Outlook. You will see, in section 114A, paragraph 32, line 178, of the license agreement for Microsoft Outlook, a clear disavowal of any responsibility 'for damages or injuries arising from the use of the Software.' Thus we are clearly exculpated from liability for any resultant damages."
"In other words: You bought it, now you eat it! Suckers."
Recklessly courting a libel suit, I remain,
Yours WDK - WKiernan@concentric.net
watch out (Score:5)