The students with on IQ problems will learn to read as expected.
The gifted and skilled will learn to read.
The average students will learn to read as set out by their nations education system.
Smart people have no problems.
They test well and have the IQ to learn and teach, recall.
The average students learn at a rate expected by their nations education system on average and can "read" when tested on average for their level of education.
They can keep up with their teacher and the reading work given to them.
That has happened for decades and generations. The skilled and people with the IQ needed to learn... learn.
Average students keep up with the rate of education set and pass their tests and exams, showing they are learning.
Education experts see the results every year and over a decade.
The gifted, smart, the average and a number who cant/wont learn..
In an average nation, with a set number of smart and average students that should not change much as a set percentage over a nations population.
A few do really well learning to read early. Most learn to read. Some need a lot of extra support but learn to read. But the later enjoy reading.
A few cant and wont learn to read due to very low IQ, a problem, many other problems... They get the extra support they need too.
So what is the real problem with education now?
What is happening that teachers cant teach and results show a lack of reading ability?
Years of seeing and working with an alphabet, images, letters and words and "nothing" expected shows as any new academic ability in later tests and exams?
Are the teachers not teaching for hours? Why not and do they have the ability to teach? Why are they allowed to be teaching if they cant educate anyone?
Are the students not learning for hours? The IQ numbers should be the same average nation wide so "most" should be "learning" words and reading...
Given years and hours of reading education?
Is the method wrong? Then the entire nation would not be reading in a decade and a generation. Good students with skills, ability and the needed IQ are still reading.
Are the smart all only learning at home? Parents are putting in hours to teach reading in some "old fashioned" way? It has to be the wealthy and their ability to pay for tutors?
So its not the teachers, not the lack of hours of reading, not the rest of the nation...the average and very poor are learning to read?
A move to theology? Communism? Has a monarchy totally altered education methods? No? Not some outside nation wide change to "reading" education?
Not the teachers, not the teaching, no the reading, not the alphabet...?
Reading from a computer vs a book? Then that would be nation wide and tests would show "everyone" lacking in skills...
A nation wide drop in IQ for everyone?
Whats the one factor few test and look for?
What can change if its not teachers, testing, the teaching and learning of reading, IQ, poverty, wealth? Having access to a tutor, having smart parents with time to to teach reading?
A generational change in the numbers of low IQ students...
Who cant learn and wont learn...
How does a nation go from world leading to 3rd and 4th world levels of education in a generation?
Something changed and its not the teaching, reading side, education, wealth, computer side of education.
Too many low IQ people are not learning.