The average drag coefficient of an American ICE sedan is between 0.25 and 0.30. The drag coefficient of a Tesla Model S is 0.21; other Tesla models are similar. Non-retractable door handles are estimated to increase the drag coefficient somewhere between 0.001 and 0.01. Assuming Tesla has competent designers as indicated by the cars' already very low drag coefficients, they could probably come up with a design that falls somewhere in the middle of that range, say 0.005, which would represent a drag coefficient increase of roughly 2.4%, which would yield an estimated decrease in range of about 2 miles. There are lots of other factors that have a much larger impact on range, including temperature, speed, acceleration, terrain, wind, tire pressure, and HVAC use. My guess is, any range increase gained by retractable door handles is completely swamped by those factors, particularly temperature and driving habits.

Disclaimer: the figures cited above regarding the impact of door handles on drag coefficient and range are based on Google AI's response to the query "how much to car door handles contribute to total aerodynamic drag?" No doubt an expert in aerodynamics would be able to come up with a more accurate estimate.

Thanks for sharing your personal opinions and preferences. You may be surprised to learn it is possible - even likely - that other people may have different opinions and preferences, and even more surprised to learn that this does mean that they are wrong or ignorant.

Alternatively, the fraudster should be elected to the highest office in the land.

It was an AC who claimed to have known "several" people who supposedly died from the vaccine. I was just remarking on the issues associated with applying mass statistics to individuals. Speaking for myself, I don't personally know anyone that died between 2020 and 2023, from any source, but I do know one who came very close to dying from COVID early in the pandemic. And I think that blaming the vaccine for a death that occured after the individual was vaccinated is like blaming a recent oil change for a flat tire.

That isn't the way statistics work, and you probably know it. That's like saying if you flip a coin twice, you'll get one heads and one tails. All you need is to know the one person that died, not the 999,999 who didn't.

Oh yeah? Well, My car had a flat tire a week after I had the oil change, so obviously the oil change made the car run over that damn nail! No more oil changes -- it's all a Big JiffyLube conspiracy anyways. MAGA!!

How do you feel about "berried"?

People who started their trip when the sun was high and end up continuing in the dark without headlights on do so because they're absent minded - it's an example of the "boiling a frog" phenomenon. Most of the instances I see occur in the evening rather than the early morning before dawn.

That's a quote from TFA in TFS. BeauHD's opening paragraph in TFS is where the word "object" is inappropriately used. Odd, because as we all know, screwups by Slashdot editors are vanishingly rare.

Will they run Linux?

That was EditorDavid's egregious error. The quote from TFA is fine.

Annual operating cost for the Deep Space Network is about $200 million to $215 million. So no, the actual cost to NASA is not zero.

If you had read TFA (yeah, I know), you'd know that serving as a comms relay for the rover is a background task for MAVEN. MAVEN launched in November 2013 and entered orbit around Mars in September 2014. The spacecraft’s primary science mission is to study the planet’s upper atmosphere and interactions with the solar wind, including how the atmosphere escapes into space. That is intended to help scientists understand how the planet changes from early in its history, when it had a much thicker atmosphere and was warm enough to support liquid water on its surface.

Most of the people I've talked to vote for the candidate they view as "the lesser of two evils". When I point out that they're still voting for evil, they tell me it's better than wasting their vote by voting for someone that has no chance of winning, or worse, not voting at all.

Personally, I think voting for anyone I consider unfit for office is a bigger waste than voting for a 3rd party candidate or not voting at all. Yes, I know - "People like you are why Trump won." Of course, I live in a state that hasn't been carried by a Republican since Reagan, so my "protest" is lost in the clutter. I would prefer to be offered a choice between (or better, among) qualified candidates whose differences revolve around policy. Fat chance, but I keep hoping.

Trump or Hillary? Hillary had two things going for her: it was "her turn"; and "I'm not Trump". Trump had two things: "I'm an asshole, like you!" and "Lock her up!" Enough assholes and Hillary haters turned out to elect Trump.

Trump or Biden? Biden had two thing going for him: "I've been doing this stuff for my entire adult life", and "I'm not Trump". Trump had one thing: "I'm an asshole, like you!" Not enough people hated Biden to keep him from winning despite a huge turnout of assholes who would spend the rest of their lives chanting "It was rigged!"

Trump or Harris? Neither of them could speak coherently for 60 seconds without a teleprompter. Harris had one thing going for her: "I'm not Trump". Trump had one thing: "I'm an asshole, like you!" So the people who thought Harris was even more incoherent than Trump teamed up with the assholes to elect him to his second term.