Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Re:On regulation of AI development (Score 1) 72

Before you are allowed to put a driverless car on the market, you must demonstrate that a prototype can drive so many miles under a range of typical circumstances with a limited number of accidents.

More specifically, such a robocar should meet the same requirement that human drivers must meet:.
That is, pass a standard driver's test in every state and province where it is licensed, day or night,
and in every kind of weather that is likely to occur in that area.

Comment Re:Arrow of time (Score 1) 119

It is unclear how sophisticated the observer has to be, but a machine will not do.

Horseshit.
In physics, an "observer" is just something that causes waveform collapse.
Anything that absorbs energy at the given wavelength will do.
It could be a person, a machine or a lump of coal.

God, gweihir, you and your fantasy science.

Comment Re:He does have a point... (Score 1) 251

Would a better connection between humans and machines be beneficial?

Sure, that's where GUI's came from.
Brain-machine interfaces will first be developed to aid disabled people (e.g. locked-in syndrome).
Then, as they get better, the military will use them to get faster response times from aircraft, weapons systems, etc.
Finally, ordinary (although wealthy at first) people will covet the advantages these
super-soldiers have (faster reflexes, seeing outside the visible spectrum with 200/20 accuity, etc).

Slashdot Top Deals

Live within your income, even if you have to borrow to do so. -- Josh Billings

Working...