Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Tenth Anniversary of First Commercial MP3 Player

Posted by Zonk on Monday March 10, @09:14PM
from the now-they're-implanted-at-birth dept.
Pickens writes "The first commercially released personal music player capable of handling MP3 files was launched in March 1998 — the MPMan F10, manufactured by Korea's Saehan Information Systems with 32MB of Flash storage, enough for a handful of songs encoded at 128Kb/s. In the US, local supplier Eiger Labs wanted $250 for the F10, though the price fell to $200 the following year prompted by the release of the Diamond Multimedia Rio PMP300. The Rio was released in September 1998, but by 8 October had become the subject of a lawsuit from the RIAA which claimed the player violated the 1992 US Home Recordings Act. It was later ruled that the Rio had not infringed the Act because it was not responsible for the actions of its customers. Thanks to its lesser known name, the F10 avoided such legal entanglements, but at the cost of all the free publicity its rival gained from the lawsuit."

Related Stories

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Tenth Anniversary of First Commercial MP3 Player 25 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • Lame (Score:5, Funny)

    by Kesch (943326) on Monday March 10, @09:20PM (#22710796)
    No Wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.
  • by aleph42 (1082389) on Monday March 10, @09:21PM (#22710810)
    At about 10,000$ of damages per song, 32MB doesn't seems that small!

    In fact, it should be "engough for everybody" ;)
  • And to think.... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TFer_Atvar (857303) on Monday March 10, @09:25PM (#22710842) Homepage
    What if the RIAA had won that lawsuit? Where would we be with music today?
    • Re:And to think.... (Score:5, Informative)

      by Arguendo (931986) on Monday March 10, @10:42PM (#22711360)
      Actually, the case (RIA v. Diamond Multimedia [cornell.edu]) was surprisingly limited and there's still a lot of debate about what it meant. Which is why we're still debating this stuff today. The Ninth Circuit simply held that MP3 players were not "digital audio recording devices" because they didn't actually make the digital copies (computers did). There wasn't much discussion of copyright issues.

      However, the Court did reason that its ultimate holding was consistent with the purpose of the Audio Home Recording Act, which supposedly was to "ensure the right of consumers to make analog or digital audio recordings of copyrighted music for their private, noncommercial use." 180 F.3d at 1079 (citing S. Rep. 102-294). And then the Court said the following:

      The Rio merely makes copies in order to render portable, or "space-shift," those files that already reside on a user's hard drive. . . . Such copying is paradigmatic noncommercial personal use entirely consistent with the purposes of the Act.
      And then the company that made the Rio went into bankruptcy and Apple made a gazillion dollars. Sometimes it's good to be second to market.
  • RaveMP (Score:5, Funny)

    by Jafafa Hots (580169) on Monday March 10, @09:27PM (#22710862) Journal
    In the obsolete technology museum otherwise known as my house, I have two RaveMPs, one of the first MP3 players... and they both have the expansion chip to expand the memory to a full 128 meg! Almost enough for an entire CD! And the expansion chips only cost me like $150 each! (I got a good deal.)
    • Re:RaveMP (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Jafafa Hots (580169) on Monday March 10, @09:30PM (#22710876) Journal
      Forgot to mention that it only took 30-45 minutes to transfer enough songs to fill up all that 128 meg via the serial port interface, its sole method of connection - with proprietary transfer software.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 10, @09:30PM (#22710886)
    It was an innocent time on the internet, when you could download mp3s from the web, and nobody cared if you didn't upload.
  • I got my MPMan... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by greg_barton (5551) * <greg_barton.yahoo@com> on Monday March 10, @09:30PM (#22710888) Homepage Journal
    ...about the same time I signed up for my slashdot account. :) I couldn't wait to buy the thing, but I eventually got an MP3 CD player to replace it. Couldn't beat 650MB of MP3's at your fingertips.
  • Liars (Score:5, Funny)

    by martinX (672498) on Monday March 10, @09:31PM (#22710896)
    The iPod hasn't been out for 10 years. Stop trying to rewrite history.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      The iPod hasn't been out for 10 years. Stop trying to rewrite history.
      Surely the Apple name and Steve Jobs reality distortion field helped the portable players gain popular acceptance faster than they would have otherwise, but the technology was already on the market and improving, and the blatant advantage over cd players
  • by nebaz (453974) on Monday March 10, @09:32PM (#22710902)
    Does that mean it is established that it is unlawful to rip MP3's yourself?
  • And now you can get 32GB flash (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rolfwind (528248) on Monday March 10, @09:41PM (#22710984)
    for under $200!
    http://www.pricewatch.com/flash_card_memory/usb_32gb.htm [pricewatch.com]

    An increase of capacity at around roughly 1000x in a decade. I don't know if the trend will continue.... but if it does we'll be at 32TB in another decade.

    I guess even those who don't use music players can be thankful for those devices as they, along with digital cameras, were really were the commercial products on the market that really sold and pushed the flash envelope. Sure there were PDAs/GPS units and other stuff, but in comparison they really niche markets that were happy with 256MB or whatever in most cases. Now things like the airbook (and all the SSD notebooks to follow, yes there were earlier ones I know), iPhone and the convergence of devices will further drive the market for more space.
  • I Used To Have A PMP300 (Score:3, Interesting)

    by szyzyg (7313) on Monday March 10, @09:51PM (#22711044)
    I always was under the impression that it had been the first portable mp3 player (well I guess technically my laptop was portable ad it could manage to play mp3, but you know what I mean) I read this article today and suddely felt a little less forgiving to my old player and the hoops I had to go through to get music from my linux box onto the player. Oh well

    I remember it was one of the perks given to early employees at a dotcom called myplay which let users store their music collections online and access it from anywhere in the world, as long as you had an internet connection, it was of course another portable media player - the iPod which let people take their music collection (or at least a decent part of it) anywhere, regardless of interet connectivity.

    Funnily enough I now work at imeem which lets users upload their music collections and share them with other users, the more things change, the more things stay the same.
  • by Ransak (548582) on Monday March 10, @09:52PM (#22711056) Homepage Journal
    Through a friend I was able to get my grubby mitts on a Diamond Rio 300, which I still have (and it still works). I paid close to $300 for it for one singular reason: lawsuits. At the time Sony and a few other of the RIAA mafia were trying their hand at court proceedings to stop the manufacture of MP3 players (while, all the while developing their own behind closed doors).

    Of course they lost [virtualrecordings.com], but if they had won, it would have been an 'illegal' item, which would have brought me no end of satisfaction.

    What's that old adage, when guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns? It wouldn't have been much different.

  • I'm still using my MPMan (Score:5, Interesting)

    by siddesu (698447) on Monday March 10, @10:18PM (#22711194) Journal
    to study foreign languages. I had (from the ages before the internets) lots of language tapes, which I compressed about the time I got the thing. Since they sound a lot like bad phone anyway, compressing them to a low bitrate doesn't relly matter much. So, don't look down on 10 year old technology. Even in this age it can be put to good use ;)
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      $250 to carry around half an album. Genius! You really had to be a gimmick fan to be an early adopter for mp3 players.

      Hey I had one and to be honest I loved it, running with a mp3 player versus running with a CD player, which would you choose?
    • Re:Crippleware (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Mechanik (104328) on Monday March 10, @10:09PM (#22711138) Homepage
      $250 to carry around half an album. Genius! You really had to be a gimmick fan to be an early adopter for mp3 players.

      Or a jogger.

      I remember at the time most CD players (and MP3 CD players eventually) had a bad problem with skipping if you ran with one strapped to your belt. There was so called "anti-skip" technology (just a buffer that in theory would get you through the period you skipped the disc), but it didn't work very well. Vigorous joggers (or rope jumpers, etc.) would find that their players still skipped. I had a few friends that were early adopters of flash based players because flash just didn't skip. It was better to listen to half an album than it was to have a full CD and be constantly annoyed by the audio cutting out.
      • Personal Jukebox (Score:3, Informative)

        From Wikipedia:

        The Personal Jukebox (also known as PJB-100 or Music Compressor) was the first commercially sold hard disk digital audio player. Introduced late in 1999, it preceded the Apple iPod and similar players. The original design was developed by

      • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

        You're one step ahead of yourself. You need to marry a gf before you can get a DIVORCE.