Slashdot Log In
How Computers Transformed Baby Boomers
Posted by
Zonk
on Sun Sep 16, 2007 01:41 PM
from the horrible-cyborgs dept.
from the horrible-cyborgs dept.
theodp writes "Newsweek's Steven Levy takes a look at how the baby boomer generation formed our tech landscape. Many of the realities boomers grew up with are today's metaphors, including cut-and-paste, the origin of which the 56-year-old Levy had to explain to 20-something Google employees. Levy cites two texts as crucial in pushing the boomers' vision toward power-to-the-people computing — Ted Nelson's Computer Lib/Dream Machines, which inspired Mitch Kapor, and the January 1975 Popular Electronics, which got Bill Gates jazzed. You kids might want to check out Dad's bookshelf — used copies of Computer Lib are going for $130-$225 at Amazon."
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
How Computers Transformed Baby Boomers
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 182 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I've got a copy (Score:4, Interesting)
I wonder why it's so expensive? The book is terrible, virtually unreadable. Ted Nelson is a nutcase by all reports. Look at the repeated failures of his Xanadu idea.
I guess I should probably sell it; it has no value to me and $150-200 would be pretty nice.
Re:I've got a copy (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.earlconsult.com/)
being well ahead of it's time. Heh... Some nutcase-you're using the same stuff he's talking about
in that flip-flop book to make the post calling him a nutball- it's just not the full monty as it
were. Hyper-G was closer, much closer, but they made a mistake in making the reference implementation
proprietary, whereas NCSA made the first HTTP server effectively open source and the child of that
implementation is the #1 web server right at the moment.
Scrollbars (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.squarefree.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday August 09 2003, @09:27PM)
Re:Scrollbars (Score:4, Funny)
(http://members.virtualtourist.com/m/51ebe/ | Last Journal: Monday August 20, @09:15PM)
Re:Scrollbars (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.creimer.ws/ | Last Journal: Friday January 26 2007, @12:40PM)
Re:Scrollbars (Score:4, Informative)
(http://360.yahoo.com/patiencead2001 | Last Journal: Wednesday January 31 2007, @10:58PM)
The title is reversed... Sheesh, editors. (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:The title is reversed... Sheesh, editors. (Score:4, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org???? | Last Journal: Saturday August 12 2006, @03:06AM)
This Just In-- (Score:3, Funny)
I've *done* cut-and-paste... (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.cowlark.com/ | Last Journal: Friday March 18 2005, @05:12AM)
...and it works spectacularly well.
The modern version works like this: you need a photocopier, your source material, a pair of scissors, and a stick of solid glue. Photocopy all your source materials. Cut them up. Stick them onto a blank piece of paper in the order you want. Photocopy. All the seams miraculously vanish, and you end up with an extremely professional-looking end result.
It's a great deal easier than scanning and using a DTP package, it's faster, and it can also produce better results depending on your photocopier and scanner. I wouldn't use it for anything that needed to be stored for long periods of time --- your template is fragile and will fall apart if stored --- but for quickly putting together posters, exam questions (I inherited the technique from my father, who was a teacher), simple fliers, news clipping collections etc, it's first rate.
Don't get glue on the photocopier plate. It'll never come off.
In other news (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Tuesday May 08 2007, @05:37PM)
I call "B.S." on the "cut-and-paste" example... (Score:2)
I call B.S. on this one. Anyone dumb enough not to figure out where "cut and paste" came from doesn't deserve a job (must less a promotion to second grade).
Re:I call "B.S." on the "cut-and-paste" example... (Score:5, Interesting)
Well, I can't speak to 20-something google employees, but when I acquired a 1930's Underwood typewriter a couple of years ago, the 12 year old son of a friend looked at it and asked what it was. I asked him what it looked like, and he replied that it looked something like a keyboard. He didn't know what a typewriter was.
Admittedly the kid is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I suspect that he's reasonably representative of his peer group.
Now that I think about it, the second graders might do better than a 12 year old. They're not heading into that teen recalcitrant thing and their imagination hasn't been spiked yet.
Bullshit. (Score:1)
Ralroads and electricity were much bigger (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.animats.com)
Railroads and electricity made much bigger changes in people's lives. Before railroads, most people spent their lives within 50 miles of their birthplace. Before electricity, it was, well, dark at night almost everywhere. Huge amounts of effort went into activities like basic cooking and cleaning clothes.
The changes between 1850 and 1900 were far, far greater than those between 1950 and 2000. In communications, in 1950 we had radio, television, teletype, and telephones. Even newspaper delivery via broadcast radio fax, although that never really caught on. Most important info was getting to its destination fast. Most of the communication things you can do today, you could do in 1950, but more expensively.
levy (Score:5, Insightful)
Time to feed Mr Fusion... (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.telegraphics.com.au/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 06, @03:35PM)
A Naughty Word (Score:1)
And I walked uphill to school both ways (Score:1)
Not your fathers' boomers (Score:5, Insightful)
Let me get this straight... (Score:3, Insightful)
Sell Dad's back issues?? (Score:2, Informative)
(http://varrqnuht.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 30 2004, @11:22PM)
Just for the record, kids - you try pulling this shit and Dad will spank your arse, no matter whether you're bigger than him now or not.
It is clear (Score:1)
confusing title (Score:1)
Maybe it's just that I'm tired, but the poorly worded title caused me to take much longer than I would have liked to read the blurb for this story.
With that in mind, wording these titles correctly isn't just an issue of pedantry; it's a readability problem.
Can't resist... (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Tuesday October 30, @10:59AM)
I wonder if Gates realizes how much this might apply to his company (old guard) versus open source / open standards (next generation)?
Meh. I imagine he pays someone to write his crap, anyway. He could certainly afford it, with what he spends trying to hold progress back.
Oh my. (Score:2)
I guess all that drinking 19th century wines and fucking whores on piles of $100 bills must have erased their memory of kindergarten.
when will telephone numbers die? (Score:2)
most people bored my "old stuff" (Score:2)
Slide Rules - why did we bother? (Score:2)
(http://www.networkessentials.net/ | Last Journal: Saturday August 28 2004, @09:19AM)
He looked at it for a few moments and then asked, "Why didn't you just use a calculator?"
Re:As a member of "GenX" let me say ... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:As a member of "GenX" let me say ... (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Thursday November 08, @06:00PM)
I had the same thought while reading that article.
Where does Steven Levy think transistors came from? Or electricity, or math?
Re:Baby Boomers/Bummers - a Useless Generation (Score:2)
Most of the people who _did_ stuff_ on that platform were Xers. Yep, I are one, right at the front of the wave.
Technologically, you're wrong. Now, in terms of finance and multigenerational ethics [msn.com] I might be more inclned to agree with you.
Re:Baby Boomers/Bummers - a Useless Generation (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Baby Boomers/Bummers - a Useless Generation (Score:1)