Comment Re:because (Score 1) 132
It would have added Tom Bombadil, which is as sufficient as anything to add to something.
It would have added Tom Bombadil, which is as sufficient as anything to add to something.
How are we delivering Iranian people from tyranny if it's a guy with the same name and same politics still leading the country?
The guy "leading the country" is likely either a vegetable or outright dead.
He has killed thousands of Iranians, cost the global economy trillions of dollars, cost the taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, ruined the US's reputation as a dependable and reliable partner, and effectively made the rule of law meaningless... but the exact same regime that does horrible things to Iranians is still in power so... winning?
Would you apply the same asinine justifications if Biden or Obama would have done the same thing? Starting a war that throws the global economy into reverse while increasing average fuel costs for US citizens by at least 30% and climbing, and you would have been just peachy with it, because of the poor downtrodden Iranians?
People don't seem to have any clue of the extent of the oppression in Iran nor are they aware of the extent to which legitimacy has been irrevocably shattered. Saying shit like "because of the poor downtrodden Iranians" is a manifestly ignorant assessment of the situation.
As opposed to your anecdote of zero (you are obviously lying).
I live in a country in which 96% of the population would be considered "nutbar" anti gun extremists in the US and I've literally never heard anyone say such a thing. Ever.
What happens is this. Someone makes a product with a 0.1% reliability.
This is a fallacy.
What happens is it'll be incredibly obvious in tests (which you can afford to do with cheap missiles) if the reliability rate is that low. Why would it be?
Everything about it screams these are a new cheap, almost worthless missile. Particularly the use of the word 'hypersonic' to describe a missile that the US would never call hypersonic (we reserve that word for advanced, hard to hit hypersonic cruise missiles, not hypersonic ballistic missiles that are easy to destroy)
Quantity has a quality all of its own.
Never mind that hypersonic is not a military term, but an aerodynamic regime. You (or pretentiously "we") don't get to reserve that word.
Mass manufacture of cheap propeller cruise missiles is enough to overwhelm the production capacity of expensive interceptor missiles. And hypersonic ballistic missiles aren't easy to intercept, they are possible to intercept. But, much harder than low speed missiles, so you need fewer to overwhelm the stocks of interceptors.
Wikipedia defines a humanoid as "a non-human entity with human form or characteristics". So given how utterly inhuman Trump and his sycophants are, it seems that the sad and cringe-worthy 'Robot-and-Melania' episode came very late to the 'Real Humanoids of Washington' unreality TV show.
Plus they hired a military contractor to waste money making stupid ugly delivery vans that are way way behind schedule
Those vehicles are everything the administration hates: they're much safer for vulnerable road users, e.g. pedestrians and cyclists and much more accessible than trucks, with low floor, easy entry and so on.
It irks many of the anti-gun people greatly that shooting is part of several Olympic sports.
I live in a country with strict gun control that a large of the population support, and I've literally never heard anyone say such a thing.
let me disappoint you, that was one of the dumbest pieces of crap that one could watch that year.
To counter from the authority of the dude: that's just, like, your opinion, man.
I saw two robots.
We're gonna win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you'll say, Please, please. Its too much winning. We can't take it anymore, Mr. President, it's too much.
Indeed. The sooner, the better.
It'll distract us from the war and gas price caused inflation.
How about a Muppet babies version. All the characters you love, but they are toddlers.
"The only way for a reporter to look at a politician is down." -- H.L. Mencken