Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Can AIs read? (Score 1) 54

Oh, you poor deluded little troll. You can believe whatever nonsense makes you feel better. There are, however, a few facts that you can't change that clearly infuriate you. Let me point them out for you:

1. You used to admire me, until ...
2. ... I embarrassed you when I exposed your deep ignorance and lack of proper education.
3. I was only able to do that because, unlike you, I have an actual education.
4. I'm the same person I was when I was your hero.
5. You're still the same sad little troll you were then, aspiring to things well beyond your reach.

This is the big one:

6. You are still obsessed with me. It's sad, really.

every single fucking thing you've said over the last 5 years has shown to be wrong

Even you don't believe that. You're still fuming over the time I exposed your unfathomable ignorance! Seriously, seek help. You're unbalanced.

someone with your kind of attitude can't possibly produce useful scientific work

That's ... an interesting take. You don't know many educated people, do you?

Who am I kidding? Of course you don't!

Keep crying, little troll. Maybe someday you'll get over it.

Comment Re:We need more, smaller ISPs. Not big ones. (Score 1) 10

Doubt it, their operating costs are always going to be higher than cables laying in the ground, it will always have lesser total capacity, the latency, even if good, will always be higher and it will always be subject to more interference issues.

The idea that Starlink is anything close to a replacement for a dedicated fiber line is a pipe dream. It can both be a marvel of technology with amazing capabilities and providing amazing service for people who need it and still not be comparable to dedicated fiber and that's OK, these things do not compete, they complement eachother.

The idea it just has to be a replacement is Musk making his personal insecurities everyone elses problem yet again.

Comment Re:IDIOTIC! Has Japan hired an American policy mak (Score 1) 33

WTF!? The time to ban them was in the 90s. Now they do it? It is much safer, well known, and we have modern replacements some of which can't practically become a serious threat.

Personally I think they should go further to limit power banks. There is limited value in allowing them.

Solution: fireproof bags and marginally trained staff. Hell, tell the passengers where the bags are and they'll do it.

Commercial airlines already do.

We've had the 90s to engineer the jet fuel away from the floor... other critical parts; well how many accidents or crazy people will even know and be able to burn those? So rare it's not worth us bothering to talking about it. We let far more people die every year in acceptable risk, even ones we profess to care about preventing.

Not such a rare problem and only getting worse.
https://www.faa.gov/hazmat/res...

Laptops have more power than most every powerbank.

The point seems to be making reasonable tradeoffs to mitigate risk rather than eliminating it entirely.

Hate to think of when they figure out a nutjob can harm more people attacking a bullet train. People wanting to harm society have already found the answer thanks to global media and our desire for outrage porn. (To save you the thought: it's killing children, who are easily concentrated in schools. If you want to change that everybody needs to fake outrage and promote some other target in a way that appeals to a deranged mind. Maybe a bunch of AI virtual Trumps?.)

TFA is about malfunctioning equipment.

Comment Re:Might Be Something, Maybe (Score 1) 23

I presume this wont appeal to normal chumps who promiscuously install social media and other garbage apps.
For people who just want a phone, this is very welcome.

I'm pretty sure I'm an outlier, but I do know factually, there are many people like me who have zero social media, zero garbage apps, no games.
i.e. all my clients. Other than base utilities, I just have web browser, email, a few messaging apps and even a regular mobile number and sms. Bam. I'm done.
Fairly sure that's what a lot of people want... and this will give it to me without the technical challenges of defeating a locked bootloader.

I don't need an app store. F-droid had everything I needed and plenty more horrible junk, I'll never ever want or need. Droid-ify I found quite useful. But if I had to sideload every app, that would be fine too. You don't need an app store to have a functional phone for communication.

Comment Excue me? (Score 1) 26

but reporting from The Block indicates liquidating that much value from the holdings would have proven difficult due to market dynamics.

How is this supposed to be a replacement for cash if this small amount changes the market dynamics by selling it? Transactions far larger than that take place thousands of times each day without issue using real money.

Comment Re:Right, stop that -- it's silly (Score 1) 30

Dear Lenovo,

Thankyou for your cool new AI assistant. Now, how do I disable it?

Love, a user.

You needn't even read the summary to answer your question. It's right there in the title - "attachable" implies "detachable", right?

That said, I agree with your basic sentiment. I use a Lenovo because it has a Trackpoint and a great keyboard, and it's Linux-friendly. I'd have about as much use for a cute AI add-on as I have for Windows 11.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.

Working...