You can get a huge amount of good code out of LLM 's if you know what you're doing. An experienced programmer can just fly.

This does not appear to be holding up in practice, at least not reliably.

https://developers.slashdot.or...

Clearly the value being generated is very large. Not just my perception but in the opinion of the most wealthy investors.

You may have thought tulip bulb growing was generating very large value too...

The machines are already able to do most coding and in some cases all of it.

Again, not my experience. I'm inveterately lazy, and have tried it repeatedly. It's... OK I guess. Definitely faster for some stuff, seems more to actually slow me down on others. Trouble is you never know which in advance.

Ack, dang unicode quotes got me!

Youâ(TM)ve got to take care of the floors. You know the floors of the forests, itâ(TM)s very important.
Finland is a forest nation. And they spent a lot of time on raking and cleaning and doing things, and they donâ(TM)t have any problem.

Sure, Jains have an entirely different reason. But the other religion I was referring to was some schools of Buddhism

What's the problem? ML is AI.

The Applied Optical Materials.journal article referenced in TFA/S describes the stability testing setup:

Why the timid language? Call it utterly dumb, greedy and immoral, because that is what this is. Just some assholes trying to get rich quick and damm the rest of humanity.

Just a guess here, and I could easily be wrong. But maybe that's 8500 hours of direct and strong sunlight?

I mention that because solar panels also produce low-but-still-useful levels of power when it's cloudy, as well as during early morning and late afternoon. In those cases of lower levels of sunlight, I suspect that that the UV levels are disproportionately lower; witness the reduced incidence and severity of sunburn on cloudy days and in the early morning and late afternoon.

Indeed. Which is why it is so excessively stupid not to support them a lot more, even if you completely ignore all other angles.

What makes you think they can be fixed?

Not a bad characterization either.

Indeed. But that requires looking more than 3 months ahead.

Some. But a few other religions don't eat onions and garlic. My understanding are these hot and tasty foods arouse carnal desires in those that eat them. But for some practitioners the are not supposed to fulfil their material desires.

It's the red coloring in the onion skins, which is extracted and bound with cellulose from wood pulp. From TFA:

I'm guessing it'll be too meager a meal for termites... :-)

I apparently am the layest of the laymen here.. This may help a bit though. Thank you.
So you can use the image but you can't re-animate it to perform depraved sex acts or even make it blow rainbows out of a unicorn's, umm, orifice... both of which seem likely to happen knowing the internet.
I'll rephrase that. You could use a still image of public domain character X, but you couldn't start selling "Steamboat Willie's Pre-Cooked Wieners" ...oops, it's happening again.
So still images used in your advertisement would be fair use of the character.
but creating a brand around it would not.
That's my takeaway.
I'm still having difficulty fully understanding the differences.
No matter, I'm not going to be doing any of that stuff.

For some reason, and is this just me, but even as a child I thought Mickey Mouse was pretty lame.
Give me the Thunderbirds anytime... IR, International Rescue with puppets and spaceships and machines that drilled into the earth and a secret hideaway that looked like a cross between a Club Med and a James Bond hollow mountain, seemed way more interesting to me than, a mouse with a deformed head, giant feet, and a voice like he's on helium.
<ducks>