it is profoundly unfair to discriminate against women at the workplace because of their biology.
That women give birth is as unfair as gravity, which keeps us from realizing our dream of flying. But it is not wrong to acknowledge it. The point was — and remains — that this biology is inconvenient. Why is acknowledging the inconvenience "sexist"? Can a true statement ever be unfair? How about these:
Are these two racist and sexist respectively? And if they aren't, why an equally correct statement about employee's pregnancy being an inconvenience is?
By stating that this is an inconvenience to employers, Trump is stating that this unfair state of affairs should continue.
Stipulating for a second, that "unfairness" equals "discrimination", is he even stating that?
While a tortured interpretation is required for Trump's words to appear remotely sinister, Hillary Clinton's dismissal of rape-accusations as "Bimbo Eruption" is Ok with you... The hypocrisy is so thick, you can cut it...
It was racist primarily because there was absolutely no basis in fact
But there was basis! His father was from Kenya and traveled there with his pregnant mother. Whether she returned to States to give birth or not was not at all obvious.
people claimed, despite contradictory evidence, that he was born in Africa
I haven't seen such claims — certainly none by Donald Trump. The evidence — still posted on White House web-site — only appeared in 2011.
and was a Muslim
A son of a Muslim is a Muslim — fact. And converting to any other faith, as Obama has done, is a capital offense under Sharia — but Obama's religion is a different topic, let's not get distracted.
as if either condition disqualified him from being a US citizen
No, his citizenship was not in doubt. Whether he was a natural born citizen was questioned. And McCain faced similar questions — which, for some reason, have never been denounced as "racist".
Once you start taking money from customers, you can't go around lying about what the product will be. And it wasn't "we want to put in X", it was "Yes, the game will have X" (sometimes with gameplay footage).
Plus, there were bogus screenshots on the Steam page too, but that's almost beside the point.
It was direct conversation. "Will the game have X?" "Yes, it will have X" (sometimes with gameplay footage). But no X.
Games can get away with some of that, if the game is actually good, as we all know sometimes a feature get removed at the last minute because it just isn't working out. But NMS basically delivered nothing beyond the engine. It was a tech demo, with no actual content.
I have no complaints with FedEx, but UPS has always been a shitty vendor.
Hard to understand how we have not applied historical norms of Monopoly to Amazon
Because there are thousands of mail-order/online-shopping businesses in the country? Amazon isn't anything like a monopoly.
And I'm sure they won't drop the already ridiculous price of a Prime membership either.
If you do regular business with them and think that price is "ridiculous," then you're a fool and shouldn't use math for any other important tasks in life.
Only after it happens.
But before it causes any problems. Heck, I had a washer that would spin down, shake things up a bit in hopes of better distribution, and spin up again. Most just stop and alarm.
Any washing machine that is so shoddily built that it can actually "explode"
It didn't explode. It broke apart from overload.
Thus "explode" in scare quotes. Totally unacceptable for a washing machine to conduct "unscheduled rapid disassembly" because of such a common problem.
Manufacturers cannot predict every use for their product. Such a prohibition on sale of anything that can be mechanically overloade
We're not talking hypotheticals here. We're talking about the single most common failure mode for a washing machine. It's not "fit for purpose". Selling it as a washing machine is, frankly, fraud.
You do know that is was Hillary's campaign team that started the whole "birther" thing, right? From when she was running against him?
We say it a lot during the Brexit campaign
Still upset about that, I see. Fills me with joy.
endlessly repeating that people *feel* crime is up, even when the stats clearly say otherwise
Trump isn't the best speaker, but it certainly matters that crime in a particular voter's neighborhood is up, regardless of what national stats say. If your neighborhood went from "no one locks their doors around here" to "bars in the windows", crime is up around you, national stats be damned. And you're going to vote to fix that, and you're not going to vote for the fucker who tells you "there's no problem, just shut up you racist".
It's racist in both cases.
If you're a progressive, everything is racist. This is why sensible people have stopped caring about accusations of racism. The word has lost all meaning, due to overuse.
If Fred Terman could see your company now, he'd kick Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard out of EE school and then shoot himself.
FWIW, Bill Hewlett and his son fought tooth and nail against gutting HP of everything except the computer and printer businesses, and the merger with Compaq. (Dave Packard died in 1996 before these shenanigans began.) They lost. The board and Fiorina won, and "succeeded" in turning HP from a high-tech company into a computer/printer parts reseller (buy tech developed by other companies like Intel, Samsung, Nvidia, and assemble them into a computer to sell to the general public).
Hydrogen does not have to be shipped as a liquid or gas (more to the point, it wouldn't persist as a liquid without a significant cooling system). By mass, water is 13% hydrogen, hydrazine is 14% hydrogen, polyethylene is 17% hydrogen, lithium borohydride is 18% hydrogen, ammonia is 22% hydrogen, and methane is 34% hydrogen. Most of those compounds (and others) are useful to have on a ship regardless. And any sort of effective radiation shielding is going to have to be hydrogen rich no matter what; there's nothing that moderates down neutrons to easy-to-capture energies anywhere near as well as hydrogen.
The fun part of it is that the hydrogen enters and leaves the rocket in exactly the same form; it's simply there to function as a working gas for the lithium fluoride.
I'm actually somewhat of a fan of metalized propellants, although that one is certainly extreme.
I think CloudFlare's comments are accurate, but I'm no expert.
I'll play an expert. CloudFlare are lying. Though it is correct, that "a simple DNS reconfiguration" would allow the pirates to continue to exist, their bandwidth requirements will go much higher and they would not be able to do as much damage to the intellectual property owners.
Think, for example, of banks blocking money-laundering — it does not stop whatever activity generates the criminals' profits. But it makes the criminals' lives (much) harder.
The reaction and attitudes of Slashdot and other crowds will, once again, boil down to those towards the original activity. People frowning on copyright infringement will denounce CloudFlare. Others will celebrate the pirates getting off for a while longer.
But technically CloudFlare's arguments are bullshit — and they know it.
The answer to the question of Life, the Universe, and Everything is... Four day work week, Two ply toilet paper!