My bike goes 20 MPH on throttle, full battery power. Pedal assist works up to 28MPH.

No KPH spec.

In Arizona e-bikes are explicitly identified as NOT motor vehicles. In law. Not even Class 3 bikes.

And it is not permitted to identify them as such, nor attempt to apply motor vehicle law to their operation{.

Nope. This is a common problem, and one that should not so really happen.

Just a confirmation message, like 'this will permanently delete all of your data. Do you wish to continue?'

That presumes the ChatGPT team both actual knows how it all works, and that they care much at all.

And do not walk anywhere, in footwear, until you acquire those leather-soled boots you recognize as the preferred style of the elites. Handsewn and all...

Government does not belong in the AI management business. Government intrusion does not improve the market, it distorts and damages it.

Leave it alone. AI will or will not do things. The US Federal government has not been serving the citizens best interest for some time now, and will take time to be corrected. Not in time to do any good in the AI revolution in progress.

Leave it alone. Government rarely can be trusted to do anything good. The best work of government is usually so obvious it would have been done somehow, anyways.

The prevalent opinion seems to be that mass immigration, for some time now, had or has anything to do with employment.

It does not.

The '2008 market crash' was a market dip? You have a warped sense of proportion, I think.

I only took a 15% pay cut, and managed. One of my tenants moved in when his adjustable mortgage went from $1200/mo to $3500/mo. And eventually he left us with 3 months rent unpaid when his commercial tiling busi9ness went to zero, and residential tiling stopped dead.

A market dip? I'm guessing you describe a hear attack as 'discomfort'.

Then again, you seem to consider being of a different political persuasion than you are to justify all manner of bad things. After all, we disagree, and 'we' deserve harm. "You' are above all this.

Fark misses you.

It's clearly ' a form of birth control'.

You mistake the why for the what. It doesn't matter much why to the fetus.

"MORE access to abortion would encourage them to get pregnant"

You are so close, so close.

And all this time I thought rapid increases in tuition etc., costs were a result, mostly, of free for all student loans. Free as in lunch, of course, but 'guaranteed' federal student loans, I thought, encouraged the high school graduates to choose a school not for affordability, but pure attraction.

I forget, economics is truth.

The Saturn project began in 1960. Most accounts describe it as engineering-intensive, focused not on iteration but attention to detail and getting it right before going too far down a set path. Von Braun allegedly considered Jupiter rockets as the concept tests, and the engineering effort paid off. Saturn never had a mission failure. Saturn innovated so many things, big engines to control systems to navigation from before launch.

US Rocketry went through many failures, predictably, there was so much to learn. All of it went into Saturn.

Mercury and Gemini were steps. Huge (in today's $ terms) investments. Doing things for the first time is expensive.

Why do I seem to love this so? I was alive at the time. I've got scrapbooks of that stuff. Many. I was even more annoying then, correcting my teachers and sneaking a radio into class. Not just newspapers, magazines and listening to report after report. NBC I thought had the best science, but CBS had better visuals. I only had one TV.

What SpaceX is doing is different. There's a lot of history and knowledge. They seem to be trying to optimize each facet. And they did figure out booster return, which was sci-fi until they did it. Like Saturn, really. Ask the Russians about their N1. I think they ran out of money, that's all, but we could print ours.

NASA, back then, was engineering focused. That continued through the exploration eras. The Shuttle program eventually made NASA management lose it's taste for risk, I think, but STS was probably a good choice. Management failed, ultimately.

I'm a fanboi for SpaceX, yes. They are doing it. I'm so in on success. If SLS works, ok, actually good. Let NASA develop the Moon, let SpaceX figure out Mars. Let the rest of the world watch.

Any you might not want to play the seniority card. I've kinda been into the Internet before it was the internet. Took a few detours to make money. This here, /. Is a hobby. Woot.

Thanks for the info. I was under that I was a cult member... Of any popularly denigrated cult-ish thing.

But you don't know me. At all. Keep guessing

Oh, and I forgot. Fail fast and iteration was NASA's plan to go to the Moon the first time(s). SpaceX uses similar strategies. It seems.

No, perhaps you're butthurt that SpaceX seems to get so much credit, but I recognize that he's organized a company that has achieved great, and not long ago unthinkable, goals. I wait to see NASA regain it's focus and achieve the great goals it espouses.

Please, give it a rest. SpaceX is successful. Why is that such a painful thing to you?

Oh, crap. That explains how SpaceX developed the Crew Dragon...

SpaceX blew through 23 cargo missions with the Dragon 1, failing faster and faster.

Then SpaceX blew through the Dragon 2 testing, only 3 test flights to get to a crewed mission, which was successful.

NASA, on the other hand, took 5 years to go from the scheduled first test of SLS to an actual launch. Hey, space is hard.

4 years later, Artemis II is the first crewed launch of the Orion capsule. They launched the unmanned lunar orbital mission 3 or so years ago.

And now, the first manned mission, Artemis II, the lunar flyby. Incremental testing - hey, why rush things...

And you are taught an important lesson. Bring the work *to* you.