So it about 200k for each farmer ... in theory, as 90% of that will go to lawyers.

Which import tariff actually prohibits importing German gear? No idea, are European/German or Japanese tractors "not good enough"?

Unix (that includes Linux and obviously Macs) have a command called "lsof".
"ls" is short for list and "of" is for "open files. List open files.

A port is considered a file, and depending how the device tree mapping to names works, they are also in the device tree.

The output might be overwhelming, but if you only want to see open ports and do not care about extra firewall features and user interaction, then lsof might be enough, especially considering the many command line options.

The coins he might have spent are not marked "previously owned by Satoshi".

They are marked by a 26â"62 alphanumeric characters string.

While you can trace every transaction, you can not simply conclude from an address to an owner.

Well considering he predicted that Apple would make touchscreen MacBooks by 2025 and that has not happened yet, this might be another miss.

One of the main problems that foldables have right now is their screen aspect ratio is square whereas a lot of content is either tall (YouTube shorts, TikTok shorts) or wide (movies, YouTube). Having more screen means little if most of it is used for black pixels.

The real enemy of evil criminals is TRUTH and even a flawed media has some truth. This is why they are at war with media, science, education, academics, facts, etc.

Every mistake, every lie from not being 100% perfect just allows them cover for people wanting to believe their lies and even 100% perfect, the audience makes more mistakes and will judge from their flawed judgement to rationalize what they like. So you they just have to maintain some ridiculousness to trigger people's irrationality; like being outrageous and constantly contradicting themselves.

You like Google use the term "RCS" to mean Universal Profile AND Google RCS to mean the same thing. That is the lie you are spreading. They are not the same thing.

What is the "rant"? I posted "features like encryption". I suppose in your world that is a rant. The fact of the matter is Universal Profile does not support encryption and other features that iMessage and Google RCS have. You seem not to understand the word "features" or "other".

The default base protocol for that is called MMS. Please look it up. The problem with RCS is that since every carrier and device used their own version of RCS in the beginning, why should Apple implement dozens of incompatible versions of RCS again? Again MMS is the default fallback.

And Apple has never whined that Google didn't follow iMessage. Like you are whining now.

Please describe how Apple is supposed to decrypt Google RCS encrypted message then without adopting it? Google RCS uses the Signal Protocol however their implementation is incompatible with the Signal app. You don't know? What a shocker.

What are you talking about? Apple did not support RCS for years because every device used a different version. Your argument is Apple should have publicly announced the reason when it was apparent to anyone in the industry? Again, you did no research did you?

I'm looking forward to using this. The subject wasn't even on my radar - to my eternal shame - but now that it is I'm happy about the opportunit to lock down my laptop.

Microsoft specifically denies windows certification to any device that doesn't allow secure boot to be disabled and custom keys loaded, and they have since the release of Windows 8.1 (13 years ago). There's no Windows RT devices on sale, and even Microsoft's own first party Surface Pro Snapdragon devices give you, the user, complete control over secure boot process and custom key loading.

But if the best you can come up with is criticising a Windows version that flopped so badly it nearly took an entire idea of using arm as a desktop computer architecture with it, that was used by so few people that Microsoft abandoned ideas to develop an ARM based system for a full decade, then I'm sorry but you are advertising a huge win for Microsoft there.

Now, have you got anything to say that actually impacted users, preferably something from this decade?

I used to use this https://learn.microsoft.com/en...

Not when Trump does it. You'll change your position when Trump does it; like everybody else still stuck up his ass. Those children deserved to be raped by Trump, they should be grateful.

Your lack of understanding doesn't make something bullshit.

You forgot one. I had root on your box. That made me an evil-maid, and you just said secure boot protects against that. There's a difference between malware at a point in time, and achieving residence. Maybe I don't want your shitty dick picks in your mounted volumes, maybe I'm after your bank account details. Oh I know how about a key logger. But what if you attempt to remove said key logger? Well we have the perfect solution, since you don't know about persistent malware and choose to leave secure boot disabled I now have fucked your system beyond your repair. We thankyou for your ignorance and lack of security.

Maybe you should look up the word "secure" in the dictionary. You just described data in its *most* secure state. Nothing is more secure than something inaccessible and unrecoverable. Even if your case were true (secure boot has zero to do with your data) the result would still be more secure not less secure.

At this point it's clear you don't even understand the basic terms being used in the discussion.

As a Canadian, I always do my best to vote for the least of evils. However, here in Canada we're often stuck with "strategic voting".

In this system, we often have to choose between voting for folks who stand for what we want but who have zero chance of holding even the balance of power, and voting for the lesser of the other evils. In a vote where who's going to win is effectively preordained, I vote according to my conscience. In a vote where the lesser of evils could win, I hold my nose and vote for them.

And every time I'm faced with that choice, I so wish my country had pushed harder for electoral reform and implemented some kind of proportional representation. Alas, we have our own brand of Republicanism at play here; since Trump came to power we've taken to calling it "Maple MAGA".

You're speaking in circles. You remove all the things you claim you don't want and then you complain that there's nothing left and that you may as well run Linux? Please don't ever advertise for Linux anymore you make it sound horrible.

No it's a conspiracy theory. They admit to specific things, calling it "your data" is FUD. What is actually taken is known and agreed to in ToS, so not only is it not "your data" it's not "stealing".

They don't do anything by default. They force you into a choice screen which is not able to be bypassed by an X. And even if you blindly click okay because you don't want to read it backs up only specific folders on your computer, and does so with big bright green visible tickmarks leaving no doubt.

Yeah nah, no data is being stolen there. They aren't taking all your data, just a database of mistakes that are miscorrected. You can thank me for participating for your spellchecker working better than ever before.

I may have told you before you have no idea how security works, but in case you tried to educate yourself in the mean time you clearly failed. VeraCrypt addresses precisely zero, nada, NIL, none of the issues you list or complained about. It has no ability to hide any data from Microsoft what so ever other than the data that you never access.

Please get some help.

And herein are the lies. 1) Google's calls their protocol "RCS" which they used interchangeably with GSMA RCS (Universal Profile) in all their arguments. 2) While Apple did not adopt Universal Profile, which other carriers and devices supported standard Universal Profile? None of them. They implemented their own incompatible versions of Universal Profile. Why? Because Universal Profile did not have features of iMessage. It was not until Google developed Google RCS that had features like encryption that carriers and devices used a common protocol. Unfortunately Google RCS is still proprietary and controlled only by Google. The default fallback for messaging over cellular radio is MMS.

The facts like always do not support your arguments. I could assume you do no research as this seems to be a habit. Or you simply do not care that you post misrepresentations.