Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Pinky Swear! (Score 1) 56

If you think Jesus was a moderate you are too stupid to bother with. I'll turn my other cheek your way...my ass cheek.

People not lifting a finger over something easy that results in many preventable deaths is WORSE than purposely murdering people. You have reason and motive to kill "bad" protestors. To kill innocent random people simply because you don't want to change habits or pay pennies more... that is worse despite being more soft. think about it (other people not the parent.)

I find Iranian mullahs no more weird in their evil than the christian nutjobs; not that the difference matters at all.

Comment Re:Oh, please, not again. (Score 1) 74

Agile software development is the _solution_ to the problem of clients not knowing what they want and developing a piece of software that isn't military, medical, space, aeronautic, nuclear, mission-critical embedded or some other hardcore stuff.
That is wrong.
The area has nothing to do with it.

Agile actually means what the word implied to mean: being agile to change direction, up to canceling the project if it is clear we are going nowhere. Fail fast, fail early, instead of burning a lot of money and time.

Has absolutely nothing to do about the segment of the software development.

And web development - seems to be an anathema for "real developers" - certainly does not really require any "agile" mind set. Because it is rather simple and there are no challenges that imply that you have to adapt "agile" to.

Comment Re: I installed software... (Score 1) 142

And they silently install additional software Y a decade after you installed software X. You installed software X many years before software Y even existed.

They silently installed a spell checker at some point. A canvas and drawing API. A native JIT compiler. A WASM VM. I know we didn't scroll through a change log and hit an accept button at the bottom, that is not how software updates work.

But this has us clutching pearls and talking about the environmental impact of the download. Can anyone convince me this isn't picking something you want to be upset about and working backwards. Hate "models" all you want, but don't try to rationalize it so poorly.

Comment Re: I installed software... (Score 1) 142

A lot of companies limit AI model access. That means Google doing this in secret is considered a huge InfoSec red flag. At least one company I know will have Chrome ripped off ALL corporate assets

Most companies limit access to online services and untrusted software, not "models". I'm sorry but this is such a twisted take on things, like twisting the removal of Java from desktops into "limiting access to virtual machines". It's not even wrong.

And ... chrome the free web browser that makes no money from your business. Go ahead and vote with your wallet on that one. Ow, this thread is testing my eye rolling limits.

Comment Re: If the asset tax passes, he'll owe 1.5B (Score 1) 167

So drop it down in scale: if you get a home equity line of credit does that mean you should pay an asset tax on the value of your home? Sure, it is just for billionaires. Just like the Alternative Minimum Tax.

Something needs to be done with income inequality but I'm not sure this type of strategy will work as intended.

Comment Re:Why is it a Extremely Dangerous Concept? (Score 1) 159

It doesn't matter if it is new or existing; if you need 200A of continuous load you have to install a 600A electrical service... and never load it over 200A. All the Span panel can do is work within your power envelope to leverage that excess capacity... but you can't avoid the 30-40% cap on sustained load vs service capacity.

Submission + - MAGAs Are Fuming After Email Confirms They Will Never Get Their $500 Trump Phone (ibtimes.co.uk)

ArchieBunker writes: Nearly 600,000 Trump supporters paid £74 ($100) each towards a gold smartphone that, nearly a year on, does not exist.

The Trump Mobile T1 phone was announced in June 2025 by Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump as a patriotic alternative to Apple and Samsung, retailing at £370 ($499) and promising a 'Made in the USA' build.

An estimated 590,000 buyers paid a £74 ($100) deposit to secure one, collectively handing the venture roughly £43.7 million ($59 million). As of May 2026, not a single confirmed customer has received the device. Now, a fresh wave of anger is spreading across MAGA forums after buyers received communication making clear that their money is, for all practical purposes, gone.

Trump Mobile launched on 16 June 2025 at an announcement at Trump Tower, headlined by the president's two eldest sons and timed to coincide with the 10th anniversary of Donald Trump's 2016 campaign launch. The T1 was marketed as a gold-coloured Android handset bearing an American flag on its back and bundled with a monthly service plan at £37.50 ($47.45) per month. Initial delivery was promised for late summer 2025.

That deadline slipped to November 2025, then December, then the first quarter of 2026. A mid-March 2026 T-Mobile carrier certification deadline also passed without resolution. By April 2026, Trump Mobile quietly redesigned its website, removing the release date entirely rather than replacing it with a new one.

NBC News, which placed its own £74 ($100) deposit in August 2025 to track the story, called Trump Mobile's support line five times between September and November 2025 and received inconsistent answers each time. A representative said in October that the phone would ship on 13 November, but it did not.

In January 2026, a call centre operator said the T1 was 'in the final stages of certification and field testing,' with a ship date 'sometime in Q1 2026.' That quarter has now passed. At one point, customer service representatives blamed a 43-day federal government shutdown for the delay, an explanation analysts quickly dismissed as irrelevant to a private-sector hardware company.

The clearest signal yet that buyers may never see either a phone or their money came with a revised terms of service published on 6 April 2026. The updated document states explicitly that paying a deposit 'does not constitute a completed purchase and does not create a binding legal contract.' The payment is described as 'a conditional opportunity to buy the device if Trump Mobile eventually chooses to sell it,' with the company retaining all control over whether a phone is produced at all.

The terms confirm that deposits will not accrue interest, are non-transferable and carry no independent cash value. Buyers who wish to cancel must submit a request through customer support before any final sale is completed. If Trump Mobile cancels the project outright, it says it will issue refunds of the original deposit amount. The fine print adds, however, that the company bears no liability for delays caused by 'parts shortages or hold-ups with regulators,' and that buyers waive any right to pursue claims beyond the original deposit figure.

Investigative journalist Joseph Cox of 404 Media, who attempted to place a deposit when pre-orders opened, found the process immediately chaotic. His card was charged the wrong amount, no shipping address was ever collected, and a confirmation email arrived promising delivery notifications that never came. Cox called it 'the worst experience I've ever faced buying a consumer electronic product.' He subsequently reported unauthorised recurring charges being levied against customers' cards.

Android Authority, which placed its own deposit in 2025 and has tracked the story since, wrote in January 2026 that it fully expected to 'never get a phone' and 'never see the $100 deposit again.'

The T1 was sold from day one on the strength of a single, politically loaded promise: it would be built in America. Within days of the June 2025 launch, that language vanished from the Trump Mobile website. 'MADE IN THE USA' became 'American-proud design,' then 'Brought to life right here in the USA,' language that supply chain experts noted was legally and commercially meaningless.

By February 2026, company executives confirmed to reporters that the T1 would not be manufactured in the United States. Final assembly of roughly the last ten components would take place in Miami, while bulk production would happen overseas. In the meantime, Trump Mobile began selling refurbished iPhones, made in China, and Samsung devices, made by a South Korean company, under the same 'American' branding umbrella.

In January 2026, Senator Elizabeth Warren and ten other Democratic lawmakers wrote formally to the Federal Trade Commission, asking the agency to investigate 'bait-and-switch tactics involving deposits for products never delivered' and to determine whether Trump Mobile's 'Made in the USA' advertising constituted false claims. The letter, co-led by Representative Robert Garcia of California, also asked the FTC to confirm whether the White House had communicated with the agency about the venture. 'The American people deserve to know that consumer protection laws apply equally to all businesses, regardless of political connections,' the lawmakers wrote.

As of May 2026, the FTC has not publicly confirmed whether a formal investigation has been opened. Trump Mobile has not responded to multiple press inquiries. California Governor Gavin Newsom's office weighed in publicly, describing the T1 project as appearing to be 'FRAUD.'

For nearly 600,000 Americans who trusted a brand built on the Trump name, the gold phone has become the latest entry in a long record of ventures that took their money and delivered nothing.

Comment Re:One behemoth isn't a trend (Score 1) 74

"Managers are actively trying to slow you down." Managers might be, but if they are I suspect is from sheer ignorance rather than any design to get more workers underneath them. The reward system favors using as few people as possible so they can claim x savings at the End-O-Year Roundup.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you push the "extra ice" button on the soft drink vending machine, you won't get any ice. If you push the "no ice" button, you'll get ice, but no cup.

Working...