My American friends who live in Spain came to the US purposefully leaving behind their phones. That in itself raised some eyebrows at the airport immigration control booth %^)
They did bring their SIM cards, and had pre-ordered an Android phone drop-shipped to an Amazon box here in Phoenix (AZ), and had hoped to just pop in the SIM and everything would work. But no - even GMail wasn't working right. Ended up taking days to sort it out, and had to overnight one of the SIMs back to Spain for a neighbor to take to the phone store and help sort out the issue. Apparently, once the carrier was convinced that there was no fraud going on, then they were able to get the phone running.
Sounds like a pain, but it's easier for me to carry my regular camera across the border and use a burner.
What if some clever business owner can recognize the incoming AI call, and answer with an interesting prompt? Could the AI eat itself?
Back in 2023, both Samsung Display and China's BOE were filing multiple suits against one another, each concerning alleged theft of technologies. As part of this, Samsung Display also filed a complaint with the US International Trade Commission (ITC), and that regulator has now made a preliminary ruling.
According to ET News, the ITC has sided with Samsung over the allegation that BOE has violated trade secrets concerning the manufacture of OLED screens. Specifically, the ruling says that Samsung Display "has proven by a preponderance of evidence" that BOE has been making OLED panels through "misappropriation of trade secrets."
The ruling is preliminary, however reportedly the ITC rarely overturns its initial findings in its final judgement. That final judgement is currently expected to be issued in November 2025, when as US President, Trump will have two months to decide whether the exercise any recommended ban.
If the ITC follows its preliminary recommendations, and those are approved, then the ban would cover the import of products, such as certain iPhones, which use BOE OLED panels.
The lesson is an old one: Don't trust China; China is asshoe.
"Pittsburg"? You must be from California. %^)
If it is a passive signal, it seems like the only thing preventing that is a lack of transmit power, at least to within the limits of the curvature of the earth (or, depending on frequency, maybe not even beyond that limit).
It's 220 MHz. Not super fancy. 5-15 mile (7-25 km) range.
And it's hard to overestimate the potential for financial loss if someone remotely cracked into a SpaceX satellite and manipulated its SDR to send such a signal from space.
No, that ain't gonna happen. You'd need a huge amount of signal (kilowatts for many minutes?) delivered from low-earth orbit to overcome a fairly high-power signal generated only a few miles/km away.
Even if the attack requires two-way communication, the attacker still wouldn't need to be close to the train; the signal generator would. Nothing prevents someone from maliciously dangling a battery-powered or solar-powered, cellular-capable pod off the edge of a highway bridge that crosses a railroad track and being half a continent away when actually triggering it.
Give me a break. An evil-doer would have to dangle a lot of battery-operated jammers everywhere along the line, and then all it'd do is slow the darned train down, safely.
On the flip side, the fact that this hasn't been exploited yet is a pretty strong indication that nobody is trying to attack us, making it likely a pretty low risk.
This I agree with.
All it hurts are the beancounters and the unionized on-board crew who have to deal with it.
US Positive Train Control (PTC) systems puts the life-safety-critical functions into a computer on-board the locomotive, parallel to the train engineer/operator. PTC needs, just the the meat-bag engineer, to know what's going on in front of the train (what the signals are set to, whether the track ahead is occupied by another train, etc.). While a lot of the more static information is canned into the PTC computer and updated occasionally, real-time stuff are information messages transmitted by radio every 6(?) seconds from the equipment along the tracks. This radio range is generally 5-15 miles (7-25 km). These messages are not (currently) encrypted, but are capable of being authenticated by the on-board computer. If the PTC computer doesn't receive any of the necessary authenticated information in something like 20-40 seconds, the PTC computer will sound an alarm to the meat bag, start to slow the train down and eventually bring it to a stop within a specific distance. The meat bag will get on the two-way radio, tell dispatch that the PTC is acting up, and that it's not their fault. Which it isn't.
Sounds like there are some folks out there just jamming the receiver on the locomotive. This requires someone to be alongside the tracks and transmit a strong jamming signal on specific radio frequencies. Alternatively, someone could jam the GNSS signal the locomotive uses to know where it is. Yep, it can happen, but it would be hard to invent a scenarios where there'd be any loss but a little time.
I've never even played Candy Crush.
125000 GB/s = 1000000 Gbps
1000000 Gbps/4000000 = 0.25 Gbps average speed.
Is the average US broadband speed really 250 Mbps?
I did just check mine via measurementtestlab.net and got about 350 Mbps down and 50 Mbps up. But I'm in a major city with beaucoup resources.
A formal parsing algorithm should not always be used. -- D. Gries