the war broke,
Typo: the war broke out
This was not the action of 'a western democracy' but the action of a criminal, which said western democracy is now prosecuting him for.
If he succeed to provoke NK to attack and the war broke, then nobody will charge him -- that's his whole plot. It is Kim who stopped the plot and led Yoon to be charged.
Oh... every time the west done something terrible, it is the fault of some individuals or a few companies, whereas NK, China, Russia etc did (or didn't actualy do but accused of doing) were the fault of the regime, the country, and their culture.
Considered these:
1. millions of Native Americans were killed under the laws of US which has been a continuing regime marketed as a "democracy".
2. Hitler was elected into power by a democratic process and then went rogue
3. all except one South Korean presidents have been jailed or assassinated -- what kind of democracy is it?
4. Donald Trump has been elected twice by this democratic process -- the second time was even after his clown performance during the COVID pandemic
I don't know what to say... more winning?
No, you should instead admit that the so-called western "democracies" are actually more evil than you are told to. You should ask why the western democracies have decayed into populism and probably soon Nazi
Example 1: relating to Huawei and Canada, China detained two Canadians after the "kidnapping" of Huawei CFO and accused them spying. The western governments and media widely criticized Chinese government for falsifying charges and taking hostages (even though arguably the US+Canada were the one first doing that.) But after these two Canadian returned to Canada, they sued their government for leaking the fact that they spied for Canada and the Canadian government settled the case with C$1m. So what do you see? The Chinese government was actually not making up the charges, Canada was not clean, and the western media was totally biased.
(I tried to post this which is totally relvant to
Example 2: this was what I tried to post on
Ex-South Korea President found to Provoke Pyongyang with Drones
Former President Yoon Suk Yeol of South Korea, a democratic nation, tried to provoke North Korea, an authoritarian state, into mounting an armed aggression to justify his December 2024 martial law declaration and eliminate political opponents, a special prosecutor said on Monday. The prosecutor has confirmed an elaborate scheme allegedly masterminded by Yoon and his defense minister, Kim Yong-hyun, going back to October 2023 to suspend the powers of parliament and replace it with an emergency legislative body. "To create justification for declaring martial law, they tried to lure North Korea into mounting an armed aggression, but failed as North Korea did not respond militarily," special prosecutor, Cho Eun-seok said. The South Korean military flew drones over Pyongyang in October at the order of then Defense Minister Kim. North Korea responded the provocation by blowing up a symbolic road to the South to avoid starting a war. Yoon may have been compelled to act in part because of the unrelenting political pressure he was under stemming from allegations of bribery against his wife, but there was no evidence to suspect Kim was involved in the conspiracy, Park Ji-young, a spokesperson for the special prosecutor's team, said. North Korea has for long time been labeled North Korea as a great threat to world peace.
So you see: the "democratically elected" president of a so-called democratic country SK was trying to provoke a so-called authoritarian regime NK to attack SK, and only stopped by the so-called dictator Kim Jong Un. The Nobel Peace prize should be awarded to Kim but instead awarded to someone who is now trying hard to kiss the ass of a real dictator.
Or perhaps to compete with Tesla 3.
Just to let you know: about 70% of Chinese EV exported to Canada in 2023 were made by Tesla in its Shanghai factory.
The problem is we don't treat people poorly enough and we don't let companies make cancer villages so nobody is going to try to compete on that cost.
Really? Or you're living in a bubble?
In contrast, China has been moving toward more environment friendly mining practices:
Through this upcoming regulation, China intends to protect its national interests and industrial security as well as prevent activities, such as illegal mining, destructive mining, unplanned and over-planned production, illegal trading of rare earth products, and destroying the ecological environment, among others.
Of course, the western critics, like yourself, will only emphasize the national security aspect which China should also protect especially as a response to the western sanctions on semiconductor products.
It is also well known that the western world just shift their pollution to the developing world, including China.
Westerners have such a mentality that only paint itself as victim never thought about what the other side has contributed (or suffered) from the relation.
What ever you want is going to cost a little more than it is worth. -- The Second Law Of Thermodynamics