No.
In one case you have an effective API between the two separate address spaces.
They are not comparable.

I'm not familiar with the exact implementations, but it's actually not hard to imagine a scenario where 1 is needlessly vulnerable, and 1 is not.

For the "secure" model,
What immediately comes to mind is a multi-process design (which I know that Chrome does use, but not to what extent).
The ability to read/decrypt passwords would be kept in a separate process from whatever handled rendering the website and runnings its javascript (since that's the most exposed to security challenges).
The head process would only feed passwords to worker processes when they had a reason to have them.

For the insecure model- single process. Done.
Any compromise (or even the ability to leak locally mapped memory) of the renderer or javascript engine means easy access to all passwords.

Hah, I'd definitely agree it's probably recommended practice by any legitimate (my definition, not the DEAs) practitioner.

The normal rules require an in-person visit, but the post-COVID rules (extended again this year) allow for telehealth "visits", even to receive scheduled drugs- at least that's what I've been led to believe.

That's been my overall take of the situation with the guys I know.

I have no doubt there's a legitimate practice in there for people with legitimate problems. Ketamine is serious shit. You can really fuck yourself up with it, permanently, if you misuse it. Actual doctor supervision seems like a good idea if you give a fuck about your life.

Ya, absolutely. IVs are almost guaranteed to be administered by a physician.

Home care (for us normies) are tabs and lozenges. I have several friends doing it completely legally (Telehealth is still a wild concept to me- who'd have thought you could ship Schedule 3 drugs to some guys house legally). It's all the rage, currently.
I've even heard tell of nasal sprays becoming a thing for it.

What I said was entirely accurate based upon my reading of the ambiguity.
Any "authoritative sound" you gleaned from my words is a psychological dysfunction of yours, not a problem with my words.

An assertion was made, it was interpreted, and it was responded to- correctly- in kind.
They meant something else, which invalidated the response. It's that simple.

So yes, you are the fucking stupid one.

Not one Democrat in a position of power to do anything about it has ever advocated for anything approaching "open borders."
Controlled immigration is not "open borders."
Belief that a wall is bad policy is not "open borders".

I'm not going to try to gaslight you into believing that there aren't people who believe in "open borders", but it's very much not at all a mainstream thought. It's a conservative bogeyman.

I can't help but think that you are basically calling any policy that isn't racist as fuck "open borders", because there is no fucking real-world analog.

It definitely takes a truly fucking bizarre person to take Musk at his word.
Brockman doesn't earn any favors in "trustability" from me, but still- he's not a known "Musk-level" pathological liar.

This part is incorrect. Many schedule 3 drugs are taken at home, legally.
Ketamine in particular has no special statute governing it, and there are at-home therapy programs.

That being said- absofuckinglutely your ability to make rational, correct decisions is ridiculously disrupted on ketamine.

Are you stupid?
I said it was ambiguous. I interpreted it one way, he meant it another. That is the nature of ambiguity.
His claim was literally copy-pasted, word for word, from a source online. I found that source, and even it resolved the ambiguity (though he left that part out).

This is the problem with you Eurocentric fuckstains. You don't realize how fucking stupid you are.

You need less adderall. Nobody asked for a comparison. You were asked what you were comparing to. Nothing more.

If you had replied simply with, "the monthly output of some other country", then it would have been clear that your original ambiguity was resolved differently than you intended, and you could have saved yourself a fuckload of words.

Not matter of reading comprehension.

The sentence was: "China doubled their exports of solar in March to 65GW."
It's ambiguous as to whether that means YoY, or "from the last month", and "from the last month" would be the very much non-standard reading of it.
Obviously, if the claim was 65GW/mo, then you can ignore my math entirely.

Being you consider any Republican who hasn't fellated Trump at least twice this week a RINO, and any Democrat that doesn't have 8 dicks and 14 different gendered bathrooms in their house a DINO, why, yes. He was. Just like every other Democratic president in the last 100 years. But that's because you're a fucking idiot, nothing more.

He has always been anti-immigrant, with a particular focus on H1-B holders. For years and years.
Otherwise yes, staunchly liberal.

You may be surprised to find that peoples political opinions don't actually have to perfectly align with your caricature of them.

*state benefits