Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Protecting any business model should be illegal (Score 1) 14

Simple. Because the dealer model enforces at least a semblance of a competitive landscape where the dealership would otherwise simply not sell them inventory for the purpose of reselling- not honor warranties for third-party sold cars, etc. That kind of bullshit.

Dealership model laws are a form of anti-trust. And they worked.

That being said, I don't think manufacturers should be restricted from selling directly to customers. Rather, I think they should have to compete fairly with dealers. Keeps both sides honest.

Comment Re:why do we still need car dealerships that are n (Score 1) 14

When you pose the question as an either-or, it's definitely hard to make a choice.
Fortunately, one doesn't have to.

You allow the manufacturer to have its own dealers, and you statutorily force it to sell inventory to independent dealers in a non-discriminatory way.
That way, if either party becomes an unethical shitbag, you go to the other.

Comment Re:When... (Score 1) 64

Technically, the one who would "have standing" to file criminal charges would be the prosecutor who is assigned the case after a careful investigation.

Technically, just The Government. The Prosecutor merely acts as their agent- but ya. I wouldn't hold your breath, either.
Even though it's a pretty clear violation of the CFAA, they really only enforce that against solitary kids that scrape research papers.

Submission + - Terrifying new Plague backdoor quietly infects Linux systems with undetectable s (nerds.xyz) 1

BrianFagioli writes: Thereâ(TM)s a sneaky new threat targeting Linux systems and itâ(TM)s called Plague. Itâ(TM)s not just another piece of malware. This thing is designed to live inside your authentication system and give hackers the keys to your server, all while staying hidden from antivirus tools.

Plague operates as a malicious PAM module. If you donâ(TM)t already know, PAM is what Linux uses to handle authentication. By tapping directly into that layer, Plague can let attackers log in via SSH without ever entering a valid password. Itâ(TM)s silent. Itâ(TM)s persistent. And itâ(TM)s extremely hard to detect.

The scariest part? Security researchers say not a single antivirus flagged it. Dozens of samples have been uploaded to VirusTotal over the past year, and none of them triggered a warning. Thatâ(TM)s not just rare. Thatâ(TM)s almost unheard of.

To stay under the radar, Plague wipes environment variables like SSH_CONNECTION and disables shell history logging. It literally scrubs any evidence of the attackerâ(TM)s activity. Your logs will look clean even when your system is compromised.

It doesnâ(TM)t stop there. The malware hides behind string obfuscation, antidebug tactics, and multiple encryption layers. The latest samples use a triple-decker encryption approach that includes XOR, a stream cipher, and a DRBG layer. Static analysis wonâ(TM)t help much. This thing is built to mess with analysts.

Submission + - The uproar over Vogue's AI-generated ad isn't just about fashion (techcrunch.com)

SonicSpike writes: Sarah Murray recalls the first time she saw an artificial model in fashion: It was 2023, and a beautiful young woman of color donned a Levi’s denim overall dress. Murray, a commercial model herself, said it made her feel sad and exhausted.

The iconic denim company had teamed up with the AI studio Lalaland.ai to create “diverse” digital fashion models for more inclusive ads. For an industry that has failed for years to employ diverse human models, the backlash was swift, with New York Magazine calling the decision “artificial diversity.”

“Modeling as a profession is already challenging enough without having to compete with now new digital standards of perfection that can be achieved with AI,” Murray told TechCrunch.

Two years later, her worries have compounded. Brands continue to experiment with AI-generated models, to the consternation of many fashion lovers. The latest uproar came after Vogue’s July print edition featured a Guess ad with a typical model for the brand: thin yet voluptuous, glossy blond tresses, pouty rose lips. She exemplified North American beauty standards, but there was one problem — she was AI generated.

The internet buzzed for days, in large part because the AI-generated beauty showed up in Vogue, the fashion bible that dictates what is and is not acceptable in the industry. The AI-generated model was featured in an advertisement, not a Vogue editorial spread. And Vogue told TechCrunch the ad met its advertising standards.

To many, an ad versus an editorial is a distinction without a difference.

TechCrunch spoke to fashion models, experts, and technologists to get a sense of where the industry is headed now that Vogue seems to have put a stamp of approval on technology that’s poised to dramatically change the fashion industry.

Comment surprisingly stable? (Score 4, Informative) 66

I mean given I'd maybe expect it to be marginally stable at LN2 temperatures, that doesn't imply it's particularly stable. More stable than expected is more like survived long enough when treated with extreme delicacy to take a few measurements.

And for rocket fuel you don't generally want something that will happily donate the entire fuel supply with the slightest provocation.

Really this sounds like it would make another fun article in the "things I won't work with" blog under the category of lunatics destroying lab equipment with hilariously unstable compounds consisting of far too much nitrogen.

Props to those lunatics for making it!

Comment Re:Just another reason.... (Score 1) 82

Yes, it is. The best I can describe it is that it is some combination of installed base, commonality of parts among model years and an insanely loyalty customer base. The Jeep Wrangler platform is supported by a huge quantity of third party vendors that cater to this market. You can buy COMPLETE BODIES for models that are 30, 40, 50 years old - for example.

OK, that explains it, well, half of it! Jeep don't IIRC have the best reputation for reliability, but if you can basically replace everything forever, and often with better parts that's a different ballgame.

I had never done anything like this, not being a mechanical type, so I learned A LOT!!!

High five! I genuinely mean that. I wasn't born knowing how to fix my bike, I had some help, then had a go, watched videos, learned and kept doing it until it worked. It's also deeply satisfying, saves money and ultimately saves time, or maybe reduces uncertainty which is arguable more important.

I snapped a gear cable recently. I stopped by my local bike store, picked up a replacement, and replaced it before setting off on my commute the next day. Honestly I think the repair took about as long as chinwagging with the talkative guy in the shop.

With all of that work completed, the thing drove better than new. I mean, it was incredible!!

That is a fun feeling I can share. Having the vehicle work better than new from your own work is deeply satisfying. You also get something customised to your tastes, something that wouldn't exist or be affordable otherwise. And unobtainable anyway because you wouldn't have known what to ask for even with a much larger budget.

Slashdot Top Deals

"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll

Working...