...and gave them substitutes for love and family.
 
Everything except motherhood for girls (career first, girboss, be promiscuous and don't settle down), and everything except responsibility for boys (porn, online gambling, women who will sleep with you but not have kids with you).
 
There's a real change happening though with Gen Z - they are going to church, they want to get married, they are quicker to have kids. Maybe this gets better?

The Big Lie (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie) worked in the 3rd Reich (and many other places and continues to work) not because the Nazis were a lot better at using it. The Big Lie works because, generally, people are dumb and without insight. Present the average person with anything where disagreeing might incur a cost, and they will readily agree, regardless of what they agree to and regardless of how evil that makes their action.

You know, most ACs seem to be far dumber than the typical LLM. Which is quite an accomplishment.

Actually, no. That just seems to be the primary motivation to create companies in the US. It is not the only reason and, for people that are not total greedy scum, it may not even be a goal besides financial viability. Profits a entirely optional and there strong evidence that running a company with a primary motivation of generating profits is detrimental for its survival. And society, incidentally. You have fallen for some thinly veiled religious fundamentalist propaganda.

Oh good, more surveillance software disguised as a crowdsourced public resource. Is anyone fooled by this stuff anymore?

As usual, you are without insight. Your usual mode.

Defects don't matter until they are discovered by someone. A CVE represents an issue that's been discovered in public.

Then you are probably a mealy-mouthed milktoast guy with no balls or real beliefs. People have a right to hate whoever they want and in this country (USA) they can express that freely. That's a VERY GOOD THING. When people can talk about why they are upset, it can lead to a resolution or greater understanding and more dialog. When you simply censor folks, you end up with a pressure cooker and with enough time and grievances it'll explode. For example, do the people in the EU experiencing problems with mass migration (rape, robberies, and gang violence increases, problems on mass transit, problems with housing, problems in schools) not have the right to express their dislike of the newcomers and their shitty culture? If you are in the UK, France, or Germany you sure as hell do not have any free speech and saying you dislike migrant policy or migrants will get you JAILED. You guys have censorship, you seem to love censorship, and you are censors.

Those "basics" are from 1980 and they are wrong. Do you have rainbow books still, too? We have a lot more IT history to look back on and when you *do* look back what you see is that less popular niche operating systems get fewer attacks (certainly fewer successful ones). There is a reason the French don't want to rip out their train routing system that runs on VMS and replace it with Windows. There is a reason why the USAF Nuclear Missilers don't want to upgrade launch systems to Android or something equally asinine. The facts are clear, less popular operating systems have fewer known flaws.

No argument.

Possibly. Or they want to demonstrate strength. A nuke test does that. Remember that North Korea even faked one to look strong.

Find it hard to believe the "why" of an invasion is even relevant. I can see China invading the western seaboard of the US telling Americans hey no worries we do not "claim ownership". As if any living person in the US would give a flying fuck about such utterances.

Front lines are too diffuse for tactical nukes to have much of a strategic effect. Unless Russia plans on lobbing strategic nukes at major population centers which sure as heck is not the "same result as surrender" even nukes are unlikely to result in surrender and may well backfire.

I don't see the relevance WRT invasion claims.

"Nothing to lose" rhetoric is not credible. Relevant differentiation is lack of threat to state survival. In an alternate reality in which Oct 7th attacks sufficiently threatened the survival of Israel I have little doubt Gaza would be converted into a glass parking lot. There were voices in the government calling for it in this reality and of course daily voices calling for nuking Ukraine and the "west" from Russian state media.

It's not difficult - Iran must be balkanized if Israel is going to conquer the Middle East and expand its proper borders to "those promised by God". They will demand a regional empire beyond their borders as a "buffer zone".

The Eschatological Christian Zionists want them tp destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque and build the Third Temple so Jesus can come back. Much of the Senior Brass at DoD (or Department of War Crimes) believes in this.

Is it all absurd and crazy? Doesn't matter, it's what motivates the people with nukes.

That and Trump being blackmailed with Epstein Tapes. The news says it's specifically an audio tape of a phone call between those two.

This is what the people who want peace in the world are up against. We can't counter what we deny.

> when your investigative toolkit is journalism

Exactly. The English Majors went where other investigators have previously gone and ruled out.

The stack of blockchain, Merkle Trees, halvings, etc. show a level of insight a quantum above Hashcash.

There's noting wrong with being "quite good" but "engineering genius" is something different.

Besides, Satoshi would never have stood for not funding mining with txn fees. The BTC chain is in danger of being unmineable very soon.

You are deranged. Wiregard and TOR are FOSS. It is basically impossible to hide a "master key" in that. And no, that is NOT how Tor works.

I have no idea why you are trying to spread lies, but please stop doing so.