Comment Re:All part of the Elite's agenda. RESIST IT. (Score 1) 85
It has nothing to do with the technology, the technology is entirely sufficient, the problem is people.
It has everything to do with technology.
Just because people are refusing change does not mean there is a problem with the technology, it means they are ignoring the external costs.
When you refuse to do the required research to understand capabilities and limits of technology this failure is only on you and nobody else. I've spent years designing solar systems and running numbers. Most northern off-grid nutters (no offense intended) burn things (often wood) during the winter.
When the consequences finally bear fruit, the whole lot of you will wail about how wrong it is and that it needs to be stopped, not for the sake of other people but because you will feel inconvenienced.
The most critical issue with renewables there exists no storage technology that would allow the energy produced to be efficiently exploited at a feasible cost. It simply doesn't exist. The only thing current technology is able to do cost effectively is provide short term buffering.
And you are basing this on what exactly?
Not only is there a significant difference in insolation between seasons easily running into 6x territory, seasonal temperature gradients are immense. In summer you are looking at a 30F differential, in winter it is easily twice that. In summer peak cooling occurs a few hours after peak sun. In winter it is dead of night. This doesn't just mean you need twice the energy in winter it means you need to double it again to account for the extra energy required to work across a much larger gradient. You are looking at over provisioning of well north of an order of magnitude and even that is comically insufficient to ride through crummy overcast winter weather so you still need to burn things even with a stupidly enormous system that costs as much as your entire house.
Say what? Where is this coming from? I made a single statement about renewables/solar not being up to the task.
Then by all means, factor in the consequences of climate change. It only becomes more expensive to deal with as times goes on.
You failed to answer a simple question about what the heck your statements were responsive to in the first place. Now instead of answering you appear to be making additional statements also lacking a nexus to anything I said.