Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Great, I'll take a dozen (Score 2) 71

Guess you haven't seen the news lately where Ukraine is running out of troops in the South, and Russia's attacks on infrastructure are plunging large parts of the population into deadly cold and darkness here in Winter.

Lately? It is hard to believe invincibility points and the hamster video were three years ago. Have you been asleep all this time or did you now just start paying attention?

Ukraine is also on the verge of collapse, and it absolutely loses this war unless the EU or the US put some boots on the ground eventually.

Tankies have been continuously spouting these same imminent collapse predictions for years. You never know... at some point in the future there may well be a nutcase wielding an end is near sign that "eventually" turns out to be right.

However if nothing changes Putin absolutely will achieve at least Pyrrhic victory.

WTF does Pyrrhic victory even mean when the purpose of living is to die in service of the czar?

Don't kid yourself. Also don't kid yourself that the NATO powers understood this from the start.

Everyone assumed Ukraine would lose in a few days including Russian military planners.

They saw and continue to see this conflict as a way to finishing the complete defanging of Russia and
making a ton of bank for the MIC friends while they are at it.

Regardless of merit and circumstance propagandists always do the military industrial complex and proxy war thing.

Of course the real price tag is innocent Ukrainian civilians and poor Russian conscripts.

You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. Russians are not conscripting men to fight in Ukraine. That only happens after you've made an affirmative decision to sign a contract. While there have undoubtedly been cases where conscripts have been sent to Ukraine these were relatively isolated incidents in contravention of Russian law (for whatever that's worth).

There are EXACTLY two possible outcomes, NATO troops on the ground defeating the Russian forces, or an impoverished Russia capturing at least the eastern 1/3 or so of a ruined Ukraine. At this point its just a question of how many more months and what the total body counts will be.

Did I miss the part where you provided an objective basis for your predictions and proclamations or did you not even bother?

Comment Re:Two big reasons for the politeness (Score 1) 165

Between $65-per-year and the fact that a costco run is at least a hundred bucks. Haha. 200. Who am I kidding? This means that the bottom socioeconomic 2/3 of society is mostly excluded. The tweakers and drunks go to Walmart, along with almost all the poor people.

Yearly cash back from having a Costco card more than pays the membership fee. It hurts to grocery shop elsewhere due to insane shrinkage normalized over the years. Prices elsewhere are insane when compared by weight.

I'm not judging it or justifying it. Just pointing out that Costco is basically running the country-club of retail shopping. Is anyone surprised that there's more good behavior?

I just don't understand how anyone can come to this kind of conclusion.

Comment Re: Feel free to ignore the facts.... (Score 1) 162

What other examples are there of states based on ethnicity that we find acceptable? The notion of an Islamic State would never be accepted, but a Jewish State?

Israel is no more a Jewish state than DPRK is a democratic state. They are a democracy with a secular legal system. A quarter of their citizens are not even Jewish yet have all the same rights. They do have some weird ethnic shit on the edges with regards to military service and right of return.

The notion of an Islamic State would never be accepted, but a Jewish State? And isn't the implication that Jews need their own country because they can't get along with anyone else

Well this is certainly an interesting framing. Others might think of the concept as more of a "safe space" for Jews following certain....events.

, as proven by the fact that Israel practices apartheid?

Bibi is a corrupt leader with high levels of disregard for human life, loves subjugating Gaza and probably never in his life wanted peace. For its part Gaza is governed by a fundamentalist death cult. I personally find it extremely challenging to give two shits about either party.

Comment Re:We know what comes next (Score 1) 162

FWIW Marjorie never said "Jewish Space Lasers", and Sarah Palin never said "I can see Russia from my porch". I don't agree with either of them politically but I think it's important to be fair and not make bad faith attacks against them, "for the lulz".

I disagree with the assertion this characterization was unfair or otherwise made in bad faith. MTG did indeed speak of Rothschild satellites causing forest fires in California.

"oddly there are all these people who have said they saw what looked like lasers or blue beams of light causing the fires"

"If they are beaming the suns energy back to Earth, Iâ(TM)m sure they wouldnâ(TM)t ever miss a transmitter receiving station right??!! I mean mistakes are never made when anything new is invented. What would that look like anyway? A laser beam or light beam coming down to Earth I guess. Could that cause a fire? Hmmm, I donâ(TM)t know. I hope not! That wouldnâ(TM)t look so good for PG&E, Rothschild Inc, Solaren or Jerry Brown who sure does seem fond of PG&E."

People read her remarks and condensed it into Jewish space lasers... I don't see a problem with that. The overall context was not altered in doing so. She literally invoked Rothschild satellites shooting laser beams as the cause of California forest fires.

Comment Re:Subjective anyone? (Score 1) 281

When an Indian who is just as smart but has more education, a deeper knowledge base and a superior work ethic shows up, why would you blame your employer for hiring them?

Competition is NOT the purpose of the H1B system. This mechanism is intended only to fill specialized gaps in the countries labor pool.

Comment Re:Pure Racism (Score 1) 281

Look, no one steals jobs.

This is a semantic word game akin to arguing nobody steals music they illegally copy it. Language belongs to everyone, definition of words are very much dependent upon the context they are used. It is unlikely people don't understand the underlying conceptual differences between things like actual theft, stolen music and stolen jobs even if the same word is used to describe all of them.

Jobs are a privileged not a right.

H1B visas are a privilege not a right. Every government in the world has every right to selfishly manage inflows of foreigners subject to the sensibilities and whims of the government and its people.

If the company you work for can not make a good profit, you are almost certainly going to lose your job. If the business can hire cheaper people that can do the same or better job, they will.

The systematic abuse of H1B system is well established. The goal of the system is to attract foreign labor to fill specialized shortages in the countries reserve labor pool. It was never intended as a vehicle for enabling global competition for jobs. I don't support this and I don't think most of the country does either. Nobody wants to compete globally for local positions and they have every right in the world to petition their government to keep it from happening.

They are not doing anything wrong - in fact they are not doing anything you would not do in their circumstance. They are not bad, nor evil.

I agree, this is really a rules rather than players issue. The other side of the coin is those participating in informal labor and H1Bs tend to be subject to abuse and exploitation by employers.

Comment Re:Starlink? No. All satellites? Yes (Score 1) 140

So you have absolutely no idea what this thing is, but feel qualified to dismiss it anyway.

What is there to know? It's an IRBM without a nuclear payload... rather ancient technology.

IRBMs are not the "fastest hypersonic missile". ICBMs are way faster.

It does not have "destructive power equivalent to nukes".

For anyone interested here are the before and after satellite photos of the "devastating" Oreshnik attack on Dnipro after the Oreshnik doomsday weapon delivered its devastating payload "equivalent to nukes".

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/...

I must say I'm just a little surprised to see that from a 5-digit UID, I would have expected a comment like that from a five million or so.

It's one thing to simp for Putler or bless us with your fucked up ideology. When you start arguing against reality itself and making assertions that are not just incorrect but absurd on their face it just makes you look like a nutcase.

Comment Re:Fundamental Truth (Score 1) 63

Secondarily, there will be tasks for humans as long as there are tasks humans are not willing to delegate to AI. Examples of tasks we probably would be loathe to entirely delegate to AI: raising children, adjudicating disputes, hospitality, caregiving, etc.

I don't even think this is true. In Japan alone robotic caregiving is a multi-billion dollar industry, AI in hospitality globally is a 20+ billion dollar industry both with steeply increasing trendlines. From what I've seen parents don't seem to have much of a problem letting technology raise their kids.

Comment Re:Fundamental Truth (Score 1) 63

Considering the state of machine learning and LLM, neither of which are "artificial intelligence" in any way serious people define it (it's being used as a marketing term) this is quite a thing to presume.

I agree presently the presumption is unwarranted. I disagree with sentiment LLM is not even AI. Such statements are clearly absurd.

Using the MIT definition "Artificial Intelligence refers to the development of systems that can perform tasks typically requiring human intelligence, such as reasoning, learning, and problem-solving."

LLMs can do these things especially 0-shot ICL which out of everything is the capability that impresses me the most. You can quibble over the reliability, definitions and capabilities yet the blanket not even AI sentiment is patently absurd at this point.

But it's not AI,

Yea it is.

Comment Re:Let's Not Romanticize Windows 10 (Score 1) 39

Let's not romanticize Windows 10. It was shit. That Windows 11 is currently more shit doesn't change that.

I like Windows 10. It was a huge pain in the ass and time investment especially disabling malware and medic watchdog to make usable but at least it could be made to work with assistance of numerous external programs, hacks and tweaks.

My biggest issue is the half assed "modern" settings and intentional sabotage of old ones. I'm using rasphone to manage VPN connections now because the native interface is completely unusable. There have been BSODs from their borked UASP driver. NVIDIA driver bugs occasionally cause system lockups when using VLC but only in direct3d mode. Easy fixes otherwise no OS issues.

If you'll pause to reflect for a moment. You'll come to realize what Microsoft has known all along. That is; whatever version has been the version for a few years becomes the favorite and the new release is hated. This has been the case since the upgrade from Windows 2000/XP to Vista. Everybody "loved Windows 7. Would you trade Windows 10 for Windows 7? No, you would not.

I still use Windows 7 daily and still regularly use Windows 2000 in a VM for compatibility testing. I personally would go back to win7 it if that was an option despite occasional zombie process issues and lack of nifty features like memory compression. This however isn't possible due to software and hardware compatibility limitations.

Windows 10 is the end of the line for me. I'm never switching to Windows 11 and MS culture is such that I don't think they will ever be capable of creating a usable operating system in the future. Too many bean counters and sociopaths running the show and it is ONLY getting worse.

There have been only two universally hated Windows versions. To the point that no one would use them. Windows 98ME and Windows 8. Both of which have been declared as war crimes by the U.N.

Windows itself 8 wasn't terrible even if the default UX was. There were numerous tweaks to render UX basically indistinguishable from Windows 7.

Comment Re:Fundamental Truth (Score 1) 63

"Technology will take our jobs" is as old as the industrial revolution. The lesson from the Luddites is: "Yes, it may take YOUR job. No, it will not take away jobs in general."

I'm sure the various AI support roles cited in the article have plenty of inherent fluff, but humans are fairly inventive in figuring out something else to do when a machine can do what they've been doing in the past better. The world still needs ditch diggers, even if that doesn't mean grabbing a shovel. Today, a ditch digger is driving a machine. Tomorrow, they may just be telling a computer where they want the robot to dig the ditch. There are a lot fewer ditch diggers today than there were when it was a bunch of guys with shovels, and there will probably be even fewer when it's just a guy with a computer.

The reasons behind this age old inductive argument breaks down with sufficiently advanced AI. When you presume an AI can do everything a human can you've effectively closed the loop enabling "dead labor" to live forever directly competing with living persons in all endeavours in perpetuity. Even getting close is sufficient for massive disruption.

In the past value of human labor that went into the production of a hammer or a factory that makes hammers was fixed in some way. While the value of the hammer or hammer factory lives on and could be leveraged to produce factories that churn out even more valuable widgets hammers have a fixed function and value.

When you reach a point where any and all additional opportunities enabled by technology can themselves be performed by technology you've fundamentally changed the equation. Human evolution even when augmented with tooling is a fixed quantity. Machine intelligence if you assume it will be able to reach human intelligence would surely exceed it in short order. This results in a situation in which any and all labor is performed better and cheaper by machine than any living human.

I believe currently the transformer craze has created interesting and useful technology however that advancement is nowhere near closing the loop. AI is currently being wildly overvalued by loud marketing from AI firms and C suites who don't know any better. It is going to take some time for the noise and nonsense to subside.

Comment Wait isn't AI more empathetic than humans!? (Score 2) 63

"Our review indicates that generative AI chatbots particularly GPT-4 are often perceived as more empathic than human practitioners in text-based interactions, a finding consistent across various clinical contexts though with notable exceptions in dermatology."

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/a...

Those desperately pushing AI on everyone everywhere to delay inevitable bursting of the AI bubble should at least coordinate their stories. Apparently there is no lapse in human judgement in decisions to deploy LLMs to "empathetically" communicate with hospital patients. Yet somehow we are supposed to believe warm bodies are necessary to calm all these being trapped inside of robotaxis?

When one finds themselves promoting the benefits of employment in order to mitigate blatantly illegal and unacceptable failure modes best resolved by lawsuits it is probably best you stop talking and think about what you are saying.

Comment Re:Starlink? No. All satellites? Yes (Score 1) 140

Ukrainian first responders at the time said that four underground levels of the factory were destroyed and that they couldn't access the levels below that. Keep in mind this was with inert payloads (some reports claim tungsten, others iron), the destruction was exclusively from kinetic shock damage.

No credible evidence provided, no fucks given about your nonsense.

Comment Re:Starlink? No. All satellites? Yes (Score 1) 140

So they've reopened the factory then? No? Why would that be? Perhaps because facilities four and five levels below ground, which were designed to resist a direct hit by American nukes, were destroyed, as Ukrainian bloggers at the time reported.

I have no idea what internal damage the facility took nor do I know the current status of the facility and neither do you. The only thing I know after Russia began waging war against Ukraine business dried up and they are flirting with bankruptcy.

If you have credible objective evidence to support any particular disposition or conclusions then by all means produce it otherwise stop wasting everyone's time with nonsensical Russian propaganda.

Slashdot Top Deals

Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it.

Working...