Comment Why now? (Score 1) 101
Couldn't the sell-off have waited until just a few moments after the Anthropic IPO?
Couldn't the sell-off have waited until just a few moments after the Anthropic IPO?
Ah yes I forgot that in right wing nutjob land one isn't allowed to use powers of observation, and find out facts that way. Tell me: how is life in special snowflake fantasy land where you're too delicate for the truth?
Your powers of observation are highly resistant to falsification. You are merely starting with a presumption the reason for everything is ***ism and then backfilling with evidence you interpret as comporting to your presumption. There is a complete lack of any credible attempt to disambiguate causation through any sort of logical process.
So like Trump, but less bad. Like I said for literally every complaint from the RWNJs about Harris, Trump was worse. So not as bad as Trump who sounds completely demented and rambles incoherently completely off topic when he's not just sort of grunting weird sounds because he lost the plot entirely. Ah yes, the RWNJs thought age was the most important thing until Trump was the senile demented octogenarian at which point it didn't matter.
In other words people were faced with a binary choice between two bumbling incompetent idiots and chose the one that said they would fix a pressing problem while the other stated they would continue the status quo.
It does. You're clearly either lying or self-deluded about your motivations for voting because you prefer someone who is obviously worse in the areas you care about.
I voted for Harris and advocated for others to do the same. I'm merely shitting on baseless assertions of ***ism as the answer to everything.
Compare your spewing of unfalsifiable rhetoric with those who show up and at least try to actually do the work:
"The top reasons voters gave for not supporting Harris were that inflation was too high (+24), too many immigrants crossed the border (+23), and that Harris was too focused on cultural issues rather than helping the middle class (+17). "
This is not even approaching a coherent rebuttal to my factual post.
It is a complete rebuttal of your nonsensical argument. The people who coined "defund the police" made a conscious decision and knew in advance how it would be widely interpreted yet went ahead and did it anyway.
If they meant "an expression of protest, anger, and defiance against police brutality and systemic harassment" they could have chanted "improve the police" yet they went with maximal shock value and provocation and got what they deserved
Then as icing on the cake is people like yourself crawling out of the woodwork to gaslight the rest of us by asserting commonly understood language doesn't actually mean what we understand it to mean. Language belongs to everyone. If your job is communicating with the public or building consensus amongst the public for a policy goal you don't get to hide behind that's not what I meant. The real world doesn't work that way.
She was a black woman she never stood a chance no matter what.
Gotta love the presumption of ***ism from leftists as the reason for everything rather than the simple fact she was incompetent, sounded like a bumbling idiot despite not having Biden's excuse of advanced age and was wildly unpopular. Harris was after all the first to drop out of the race in her initial presidential bid.
None of the Republican complaints about her held up at the time never mind hindsight.
Well this settles it... rolls eyes.. what is the Clinton crime families body count up to these days?
Quite a lot of people are exist, quite a lot of racist and quite a lot were hurting a bit and wanted someone who'd hurt someone else publicly. No campaign form Harris could ever do anything about that.
I mean this isn't to say yes, good grief Biden should have stepped down, the Dems should have kicked him out from the race a year before and had a proper primary. But nonetheless, people voted for Trump knowing exactly what he was like. Nothing excuses that.
The elephant in the room was infinite uncontrolled migration via asylum backdoor democrats seemed only to pay lip service to while Harris failed to read the room. What was unforgivable is the fact Biden stepped aside for the good of the country while Harris refused to do the same. She knew the stakes at the time and knew other people polled better than her against a matchup with Trump yet she kept going anyway. Nothing excuses that.
When NWA shouted "Fuck the Police!" they did not literally mean they wanted to have sex with police officers.
"Fuck" like many words has a number of different meanings contingent upon context in which it is used. Nobody reasonably presumes "Fuck the police" has anything to do with sex in the first place. That would be absurd. If this confuses you I recommend Adam Sandler's "Uses Of The Word Fuck".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
"Defund the police" likewise does not mean "Abolish police forces."
Not at all likewise. "Defund the police" clearly indicates a desire to not fund police. It reasonably has no other meaning in the context in which it is chanted. The obvious consequence of not funding police is no police as police are unlikely to continue to work without funding.
This is a problem already solvable by FIDO2 and webauthn, both completely open standards already widely in use. I personally carry a fido2 card in my wallet and a yubikey on my keychain. Some banks have finally started implementing it. The card works great with my phone via nfc, and doesn't rely on device hardware, and the bank can require that it's locked with a pin, which is baked into the standard, making it a true 2fa authentication, unlike that annoying, insecure SMS code crap they like to rely on.
While nothing is truly phish proof, to phish this you're literally talking about needing to convince the mark to hand over their session keys. Possible on a PC web browser, but not easily done. But on a native application? Forget about it.
The issue of PCs being seen as less secure cannot be fixed with a fido card. Neither is there a need to poorly reinvent the wheel by using a fido card. Bank cards already have embedded security chips. If the real issue was authentication (It most certainly is not) at worst all you would need is a cheap card reader that costs $15.
This just seems like a pretext for the bank to stalk their customers. The single purpose chip embedded in the card and isn't connected to a global network 24x7 is way more secure than a phone.
I mean, we only need 12 Republican Senators say fuck it, and vote with the Democrats to convict. I'm not sure we have 12 Republicans that will do that, but it could happen. Especially if Trump does something even dumber in the next 90 days
I don't see the point of getting rid of Trump if it makes the 48th president of the United States JD Vance.
Why are you pretending Muslims don't do both?
Remember children in 1978 the age of marriage in Iran was 18. In 1979 it was 9. The guy who took over the country wrote openly about the sexual things men are permitted to do to babies. Let me be clear I don't mean to teens or young children but to actual babies.
Yes there are murders and rapists everywhere but don't pretend it holds a candle to 7th century Islamic barbarism.
As many as needed to protect me from christian nationalists. Which is worse, islamic sharia law or christian nationalist sharia law? Seems the same to me.
The imposition of "morality" into legal systems is itself a shit idea. It is far worse when this imposition takes the form of imposing religion on others. That said Christian bullshit doesn't hold a candle to the barbarism of Islamic bullshit.
The oil deal with Russia and the threats to Ukraine about it were also one of the most brain dead things I have seen in a while. Siding with our enemies for something petty. The people who would overlook the Iran war would have a problem also overlooking this.
This is merely agent Krasnov's pretextual excuse for adhering to the enemy.
Interesting to finally see something that more credibly resembles recursive self improvement even though this was just low hanging fruit and they didn't technically complete the cycle. Still way better than the crazy rhetoric I've heard in the past out of AI companies who think AI generated code constitutes RSI.
And, in closing, I predict we will never achieve mostly total security. Too many risks, too many bad actors. We will, perhaps, raise the bar so that the bad actors will require resources beyond the reach of even dedicated individuals. What's that saying, there's always someone faster than you on the road...
Well north of 90% of real world compromises already don't work by exploiting security bugs they work by exploiting people. Even if one could snap their fingers today and all of the security bugs in the entire world are magically fixed it would have no substantive real world impact.
1) it's expensive
2) the false-positive rate is very high
I do it for free on my own computer. The lack of signal rendered AI bug hunting pointless having attempted it continuously over the last three years. With current models (e.g. GLM-5.3 754B) both quality of findings and volume of nonsense have in my experience been quite reasonable. I am willing to suffer way worse for the types of results AI has already provided.
This reminds me of the early days of valgrind where it was almost unusable at first and a few years later improved to the point you take literally everything it says seriously. Obviously AI isn't that but the step change is similar.
In the past if you gave models a focus or enough leading questions they might figure it out but never when left to itself. Seems a lot of the recent gains are a result of post training behaviors to act more systematically
That all being said, you're not wrong.
Each LLM is going to be better or worse at finding different bad patterns, and incorrectly identifying certain patterns as bad that are fine.
But the fact is- if you let that LLM throw its head against the wall for long enough- if you burn enough tokens- there's a good chance there will be a couple of diamonds in the sea of bullshit- and that's the problem.
The first time I run code through the model the top line is almost always useful. You have to scroll down to get to the bullshit. Even rerunning the same model against the same code is useful.
Its not the physically changing the clocks thats the issue you idiot, its the general pointless hassle of it.
Pretty fucking obvious to anyone with a normal brain aspie.
It is obvious to you because you were thinking it and you believe it. To someone who doesn't know what you are thinking and has a different value judgement of what constitutes a hassle and therefore no reason to infer it refers to anything other than changing clocks your remarks are nonsensical.
Personally I see no hassle with non-clock related processes involving optionally going to sleep a little earlier once a year and since what "it" means is outside of the subject of the sentence and was not qualified in any way it is unreasonable to expect others to guess your thoughts.
There is no opinion so absurd that some philosopher will not express it. -- Marcus Tullius Cicero, "Ad familiares"