The fact that you think many gov't "scientists" are either making weapons, poisons, or stifling innovation tells me you know very little about what actually goes on.
You're reeeeally just gave me that stick to beat you up with? Wow, okay... let's go there. The U.S. biological weapons program, active from 1943 to 1969, involved government "scientists" at facilities like Fort Detrick weaponizing agents such as anthrax, tularemia, and botulinum toxin: poisons designed for mass harm. That was government "research". They stockpiled seven bio-agents and researched over 20 more, including smallpox and ricin, all under secrecy that hid the truth from the public. Post-WWII, the Chemical Corps produced nerve agents like Sarin and Tabun, importing Nazi samples for study and production. Most of this type of "research" continues or is even worse and scarier, including a quite real possibility that CV19 was the result of government funded research (CIA -> Ecohealth Alliance -> Wuhan Institute of Virology -> World -> Your Grandma). Thus quite a few deaths can be laid at the feet of government "scientists" doing "research". Of course that's not even scratching the surface since we didn't talk about The Manhattan Project creating nukes or the Tuskegee Syphilis "research scientists" and "doctors" running that program. The list is very very long, but sure, mock me as if the government isn't stealing from me to do some of the most evil shit on Earth against my wishes. When it comes to innovation... government intervention routinely hampers scientific progress by imposing bureaucratic hurdles, politicizing funding, and favoring cronyism over open competition. The FDA's lengthy approval processes, for instance, have delayed life-saving drugs like those for ALS and some cancers. So, yeah, weapons, poisons, and innovation beat downs are definitely a government "scientist" creed and not something decent folks should accept without a fight.
The industry scientists and gov't research scientists I've worked with are indistinguishable in terms of skill, dedication, and productivity.
My experience with academics has been mostly with scientists at NASA or at university/government research projects with various schools like Virginia Tech, Cal Tech, and (many) others. I would say that in niche fields like Astronomy where most of the jobs are academic anyway, I've found a few really brilliant folks. I attribute that mostly to there not being as strong a place to exist in the private sector for them. However, for computer science I'd say it's mostly a dumpster fire with 90% of innovation being driven by the private sector, open source, or motivated loners. CS Profs are still trying to find a use for LISP or hustle some other niche bullshit.
my 200+ publications with 40,000+ citations show that it's not all bureaucracy.
Maybe. It depends on what those citations and publications actually resulted in. As a taxpayer, I think we have too many laws, too much government, and I remain unconvinced of the utility of my government's efforts in anything the private sector could do (and would likely do much better and more efficiently). So, are there currently products or services available to US consumers that resulted from your long employment with them? I have several patents on useful products to show for my personal engineering efforts. Those products are not weapons or poisons. Can you say the same?
It's not at all clear that the government's "scientists" do anything but create barriers for others to innovate around.
The Wayland devs said X11 was unmaintainable so it didn't make sense to keep working on it
They did (what else would Wayland devs say?), but plenty of unmerged patches on Freedesktop.org say they didn't just express their opinion in a vacuum. Others were trying to fix and update XOrg and were being stymied and blocked by Red Hat / IBM Employees who control the Freedesktop.org governance structure and police the Code of Conduct. The X11Libre project was a reaction to that overt political power grab after Red Hat employees rejected over 140 patches and merge requests for Xorg and Freedesktop components. They wanted Xorg to die (they even said so straight out) and didn't appreciate folks like Weigelt trying to fix or update it.
created an inferior system which is unreliable
Unreliable, unstable, and lacks several important and not-at-all-obsolete features they simply claim to be obsolete. Well, guys, simply claiming isn't really gonna cut it. However, alternatively, the commits in Wayland related projects are about 3x that of X11Libre RN. Wayland bits and pieces (wlroots, mutter, etc..) now pack in more LoC. Newer features like HDR support are mostly concentrating on Wayland and the Wayland folks are getting less shit-stupid/strident with their anti-XDMCP stance and putting some work into the X11 compatibility service.
has performance that is about on the same level at best
There aren't a ton of measurements I've seen, but from what I can tell, many features are simply missing. I'm not sure one could even *do* fair 1:1 comparisons. However, I think as newer cards land Wayland support faster than X11, the performance edge start tilting toward Wayland overall.
it did in fact take them fifteen years to get here
It did. It also took a lot of very nasty politics and shitty behavior by Red Hat and IBM using a Code of Conduct to lock out Weigelt over his political views (he's a vaccine skeptic). Would have been nice to let him continue to fix and update Freedesktop and Xorg components without the "We want this to die so stop working on it!" stance or the "we want to censor your politics so we won't let you code here" stance. Would also have been nice if Wayland evangelists didn't go around judging/trashing people's opinions about XDMCP and what's useful to them "If you want XDMCP you're stupid and you should fuck off, troglodyte" was 2015. 2026 should be "Hey, we're almost done with XDMCP support and it'll be a pleasure to complete that important feature and keep it maintained."
AKA "my conservative media diet has convinced me a gasoline burning engine must be central to my personal and political self definition"
So you bash the "culture war" but open up with partisan slander and worn-out culture war talking points? How extremely disingenuous.
You're doing exactly what the powerful want: fighting sideways instead of looking up. You intake so much media that they have you convinced it's "the other guys" that are "the problem". It's not. It's the powerful elite who control the media and use it to marionette people like you into wasting your energy so they can enjoy the status quo and gain even more power.
To downgrade the human mind is bad theology. - C. K. Chesterton