The Wayland devs said X11 was unmaintainable so it didn't make sense to keep working on it
They did (what else would Wayland devs say?), but plenty of unmerged patches on Freedesktop.org say they didn't just express their opinion in a vacuum. Others were trying to fix and update XOrg and were being stymied and blocked by Red Hat / IBM Employees who control the Freedesktop.org governance structure and police the Code of Conduct. The X11Libre project was a reaction to that overt political power grab after Red Hat employees rejected over 140 patches and merge requests for Xorg and Freedesktop components. They wanted Xorg to die (they even said so straight out) and didn't appreciate folks like Weigelt trying to fix or update it.
created an inferior system which is unreliable
Unreliable, unstable, and lacks several important and not-at-all-obsolete features they simply claim to be obsolete. Well, guys, simply claiming isn't really gonna cut it. However, alternatively, the commits in Wayland related projects are about 3x that of X11Libre RN. Wayland bits and pieces (wlroots, mutter, etc..) now pack in more LoC. Newer features like HDR support are mostly concentrating on Wayland and the Wayland folks are getting less shit-stupid/strident with their anti-XDMCP stance and putting some work into the X11 compatibility service.
has performance that is about on the same level at best
There aren't a ton of measurements I've seen, but from what I can tell, many features are simply missing. I'm not sure one could even *do* fair 1:1 comparisons. However, I think as newer cards land Wayland support faster than X11, the performance edge start tilting toward Wayland overall.
it did in fact take them fifteen years to get here
It did. It also took a lot of very nasty politics and shitty behavior by Red Hat and IBM using a Code of Conduct to lock out Weigelt over his political views (he's a vaccine skeptic). Would have been nice to let him continue to fix and update Freedesktop and Xorg components without the "We want this to die so stop working on it!" stance or the "we want to censor your politics so we won't let you code here" stance. Would also have been nice if Wayland evangelists didn't go around judging/trashing people's opinions about XDMCP and what's useful to them "If you want XDMCP you're stupid and you should fuck off, troglodyte" was 2015. 2026 should be "Hey, we're almost done with XDMCP support and it'll be a pleasure to complete that important feature and keep it maintained."
AKA "my conservative media diet has convinced me a gasoline burning engine must be central to my personal and political self definition"
So you bash the "culture war" but open up with partisan slander and worn-out culture war talking points? How extremely disingenuous.
You're doing exactly what the powerful want: fighting sideways instead of looking up. You intake so much media that they have you convinced it's "the other guys" that are "the problem". It's not. It's the powerful elite who control the media and use it to marionette people like you into wasting your energy so they can enjoy the status quo and gain even more power.
“Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau.” Irving Fischer 1929
I sound angry? lol. You really are a fucking moron.
Yeah, you sound perfectly rational and calm, lol. I'm sure when you say "No scientist ever said that" then I quote one for you who happens to be the head of the CDC you're perfectly sanguine about accepting the L and backing down from your stupidity... oh, wait...
"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines." -- Bertrand Russell