Comment Re:On "That's Capitalism!", we say: that's capital (Score 0) 26
Not sure who you mean by "they", not sure you do either.
Not sure who you mean by "they", not sure you do either.
"You mean to tell me lying to the public has consequences? Weird.
Well, not legal consequences. They gots that liability shield, so even if they did turn out a product which harmed/killed people ( young men specifically ), they're completely immune."
It's clear right away that you're well aware that lying to the public does not have legal consequences. You are exploiting it.
Nor is there anything wrong with that. I'd wager saving lives isn't your purpose either.
Training AI models isn't "stealing" or "theft", nor is that training claimed to be the "innovation".
Current intellectual property laws simply don't work, making dishonest claims about that law doesn't work either. We need new law, billionaires won't allow it except to protect their wealth and power.
"...there's competition for every product Adobe sells, and not having to deal with Adobe is reason enough to consider it."
That is true, but it does not support the claim that "most of what Adobe does is shit." Adobe is an industry leader in a number of areas, Photoshop is definitely NOT shit.
"Many buysiders see no reasons to own software no matter how cheap or beaten down the stocks get"
Doesn't say much for "buysiders" then.
Isn't AI itself software property?
No it is not. Ozempic is made by a Danish company, that doesn't mean it is "100%" made in Denmark. Ozempic is produced in the US as well, wonder where US demand is satisfied from?
But we will know those price increases are coming when the Trump family makes an investment in the competition. That's how we knew about fraudulent COVID treatments, Trump bought into those medications first, then SuperKendal and team stupid started repeating the lies. Haven't seen that here yet.
Trump and the family are clearly taking GLP-1 medications, like they all took COVID vaccines.
And there is no risk of this unless you are predisposed. If so, a doctor will NOT even prescribe it to you.
This is what you get when children, and those of similar emotional development, pretend to be experts online.
Putin still paying for shitty comments like this? Hard to believe people will still chase this money after everyone in the world sees the result.
And there is no known possibility of "thyroid tumours" for you if you are like the vast majority of the population. It's a genetic issue that is screened for. These are lies made by
You searched just enough to post an inflammatory comment then. Ozempic should not be taken by people with a predisposition for a particular kind of thyroid "tumor", that is well known and tested for. Ozempic is not known to cause "thyroid tumors, including cancer", although it could do so in YOU; that's a YOU problem and that's why doctors are used to regulate its application.
" Most people go off the drugs eventually and wind up fatter than they were before..."
This is mostly speculation based on other forms of dieting; it is neither known nor is even the same issue.
My sister lost a lot of weight on Ozempic, then discontinued when she moved to a state that doesn't allow the injectable form. She has not regained the weight in a year. But then, "eventually" is open ended. Funny thing about aging, weight management becomes harder and harder.
There is no "thyroid tumor" "side-effect" of Ozempic, there is a possible genetic sensitivity that must be screened for. And Ozempic isn't a "weight control pill", although there is an undesirable pill form for areas that don't allow injections.
It's good to see you are so well informed on the subject. Classic
"This is the second story about the "benefits" of Ozempic on Slashdot."
Why, that's what it is. We all love your salty tears.
"They have no natural right to exist, no corporation does as they are all legal fictions which only exist on paper and in the legal system. "
People consistently fail to realize this. Corporations only exist because of government. We the people have the right to decide whether they exist or not.
"I pay now to check an overnight bag (which I used to be able to carry-on), but some 500 pound person can get a middle seat and make two people miserable."
Your overnight bag is a choice, but let's not pretend your comment has any merit. It does not, it's motivated by pure hatred.
"There's an airline that flies to some pacific island that has an obesity problem and they weigh the passengers and charge them appropriately."
Citation please. Not that local airlines don't weigh passengers, they do, but because it has "an obesity problem". Again, you post pure hatred, something you are known for.
"This should be a standard operating procedure on all airlines if they wish to continue to reduce the side of passenger seating."
They should make this a law! My hatred should be forced on all people, because "small government".
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein