Oregon Government Supporting Open Source 124
amountlad writes "In a pair of articles released today on N4N.org, Oregon continues to lead the way in government open source adoption in the USA. The Oregon State University's Open Source Lab will host a Government Open Source Conference in October. The GOSCON has strong support from within the state government. The State's Department of Administrative Services released a white paper detailing their use of Asterisk for audio conferencing for more than 500 conferences a week. The set-up includes a web-based interface for judges to manage recording the hearings. In doing so the State joins Metro, a Portland area regional government which uses Asterisk along side its Beowulf Cluster."
I wonder... (Score:1, Interesting)
...whether proximity to the state of Washington has anything to do with it.
Re:I wonder... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I wonder... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I wonder... (Score:2)
Its mainly due to budget issues and the community that wrote congress and requested that they look into OSS. Oregon is, unfortunately, heading the way of California.
Re:I wonder... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I wonder... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I wonder... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I wonder... (Score:2, Insightful)
I know. I'm from Oregon. Oregon is just a liberal place. And, yes, admit it, Open Source/Free Software is very liberal.
There's a lot of Open Source activity here in Oregon, anyway, without the government. For example... what's that guy from Finland? You know, the guy who founded some big Open Source project? Whatever his name is, he lives here.
Then again... Washington and Oregon are both on the west coast (and blue states). So if you mean, by proximity, "on the west coast", you're right.
Re:I wonder... (Score:2, Informative)
I'm from Oregon as well, and I don't think just calling it "liberal" is quite correct. There are Oregonians supporting various types of ideals; the main thing they have in common is the fervor with which they support them. So you'll see strong liberals, but you'll also see one of the larger libertarian contingents in the US. (Also note that while Oregon was just barely blue, Portland was
What's conservative? Crime? Debt? Lying? Violence? (Score:2)
I agree with the sense of what you said. However, I think it is not useful to use the terms "liberal" and "conservative". They no longer have significant meaning because those who want government corruption have been pretending that they have a legitimate political view, and calling that view "conservative".
Check out the government debt [hevanet.com] to see who is conserving the quality of government. The Bush administration is borrowing more money than any entity has borrowed in the history of the world.
Is dishone [doonesbury.com]
Re:What's conservative? Crime? Debt? Lying? Violen (Score:2)
Open source + no hardware innovation: reusability? (Score:4, Interesting)
One of the great things about open source is that it offers a way for business and non-business organizations and individuals to leverage the power of existing equipment for very little additional expense (to wit, additional peripherals or upgrades necessary to run the software) rather than investing the money into a solution they're just going to have to throw away shortly down the road.
With the increasing price of oil, I can't help wondering what the face of computing is going to look like five or ten years down the line. The average computer uses as much as seventeen swimming pools worth of coal to run on any given day. Much of this is spent on wasteful peripherals we could do without, such as fancy 3D graphics cards or optical mice, but even more is being spent on processing power well beyond the needs of the average user.
Inefficiencies in microcomponent fabrication mean that a great deal of the electricity that goes into your computer is given off as heat. Techniques such as reversible or quantum computing hold much promise in the future for putting more energy into computation but today it is up to the consumer to safeguard the environment.
In a way, the argument is the same as with vehicles -- most people don't need a SUV or a top-of-the-line system but many choose to get them to compensate for inadequacies or because of marketing -- but with computers at least it is impossible to argue you are "safer" for having a faster system. Indeed, you are more likely to run viruses or worms without realizing it because you don't notice the hit in operating performance.
I've noticed that, between the advances in open source and the levelling off of true innovation in hardware design, I've been holding on to computer equipment longer and longer these days. Oh sure, I have to fix a power supply here and a fan there, but besides slack engineering standards from software companies there is little reason to keep up with the hardware treadmill... and at least one compelling reason not to.
17 swimming pools a day? (Score:2, Insightful)
Uh, I think you're off by a few orders of magnitude there. Care to post some supporting evidence to that silly statement?
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:5, Informative)
No, it doesn't. Not even close. Please, for the love of God, don't pull "facts" out of your [thin air].
For those of you who aren't complete idiots, a computer uses about 300 Watts. 300 Watts in 24 hours is 7.2 kiloWatt-hours. That's a little less than 17 swimming pools worth of coal in energy.
*burying face in hands*
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:3, Informative)
I don't know where the hell that statistic is from either. My AMD64 3500+, Geforce 4 ti4200, and 2 sticks of PC3200 RAM uses about 200 watts of power. I recommend trying this thing called the kill-a-watt from thinkgeek, it really is nice for finding out how much power stuff uses. I am not going into anymore of a promo-mode besides that today though :)
Anyway, a hair d
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:1)
No. I shut my computer down when I'm not using it. If you care so much about energy conservation, maybe you should too.
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2, Funny)
Their system of measurment suggests so too...
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
I seem to remember that you can figure about 1.5 kW of generation per ton of coal, though I don't know how many to
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:1)
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
-matthew
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:3, Informative)
Out of pure boredom and a little curiosity, it seems that with complete combustion or fission, you get approximately 8KWh of heat out of 1kg of coal [euronuclear.org].
There seem to be about four different kinds of coal (Anthracite Solid and Broken, Bituminous Solid and Broken), and the previous link doesn't specify a type of coal, I'll go with the average of the cleaner burning two Anthracite coals (+-1300kg/m3) [simetric.co.uk].
The GPP doesn't state what kind of swimming pools we're talking about, but a single olympic swimming pool is
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
That's a little less than 17 swimming pools worth of coal in energy.
Olympic or paddling?
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
I saved more enegery going to more efficient light bulbs then I did going to a less power hungry pc.
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:4, Insightful)
I'd like to see the math behind that point please. Show all your work, and include just how much tonage a swimming pool is. I don't know what the conversion ration of tons of coal to kilowatts is- so include that as well. You might also want to compare it to the hydropower and wind power we enjoy out here on the left coast.
I do know that the computer I use most of the time can run on it's 900mah battery for up to 2 hours straight without a recharge while playing full motion video.
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:5, Informative)
1 ton of coal produces 2,500 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity
1 pound of coal produces 1.25 kilowatt-hours
From:
http://www.teachcoal.org/lessonplans/how_much.htm
It looks like an hour of active computer use should use no more than 200 watt-hours in an hour.
From:
http://michaelbluejay.com/electricity/computers.h
200 X 24 = 4800 = 4.8kwh/day = Under 4 lbs. of coal.
I think the grandparent post got the words "day" and "year" mixed up. Easy mistake. Half the time I get carded, I tell the bartender I'm 22 days old.
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
Amount of coal needed to generate one kWh:
10,500 BTU/kWh / 13,000 BTU/lb. coal =
Assuming 1/3 kW to run your computer, that's 8 kWh/day, or 6.48 pounds of coal. The VAX 6000 in my garage would consume about 120 pounds per day - about 2.3 cubic feet.
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:3, Informative)
24' x 12' x 4.6' pool = 1295 cubic feet
17 pools = 22015 cubic feet
Density of broken coal = 52 lbs/cubic foot
So that's 1144780 lbs of coal in 17 (small) swimming pools. At the aforementioned
Again, this is assuming smallish swimming pools. If we're talking Olympic sized swiming pools, figure 50 times that.
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
We can't, remember? [slashdot.org] Perhaps you're talking "international sporting event taking place two years after 2010 between the summer and fall" sized pools.
Barbie Doll Swimming Pool (Score:2)
A new unit of measurement! (Score:2)
So now we have a new SlashMeasurement of energy - a swimming pool worth of coal. How many of those will it take to illuminate a Library of Congress worth of data?
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
OMGZ! That's equal to a Library of Congress of natural gas! It's almost 2 Volkswagens of Uranium! Won't someone THINK OF THE CHILDREN???????????????
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
That's assuming 8,500 BTU/lb of coal and system 30% efficiency from the coal pile at the power plant to the plug in your wall.
You either have very small swimming pool or real inefficient computer.
If you were to put the electical power from burning 17 swimming pools of coal a day into an electrical load in your house, it's a safe guess that your house would burst into flames in a matter of seconds.
Re:Open source + no hardware innovation: reusabili (Score:2)
Actually virtually all of the electricity used by a computer is given off as heat. That's true of most other electronic devices as well and it doesn't have anything to do with "Inefficiencies in microcomponent fabrication".
Woo Hoo! (Score:3, Funny)
Next up: Iowa! Yes!
Re:Woo Hoo! (Score:1)
[Sidenote: I actually live in New Hampshire.
Re:Woo Hoo! (Score:2)
Re:Woo Hoo! (Score:1)
Oh wow, man, I'm sorry that happened. Thanks for the warning, though (that was a close one!)
I wonder about Microsoft's opinion of this? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I wonder about Microsoft's opinion of this? (Score:2)
The usual threats would be "ohsnoes who will guarantee it against IP lawsuits" (just don't read the microsoft eula kthx) and "what about terrorists omgwtfbbq".
I don't see this project lasting long, its mere existence is an affront to everything microsoft stands for.
Re:I wonder about Microsoft's opinion of this? (Score:3, Insightful)
"shut it down and replace it with 100% microsoft products... or else we will audit your microsoft licenses."
unless you're 0% microsoft already, almost everyone will capitulate.
Re:I wonder about Microsoft's opinion of this? (Score:3, Interesting)
pulled a new smile out of thier slimy assholes when an army of volunteers showed up to convert the district to linux...
K12 Linux? (Score:2)
Maybe you mean the Riverdale School District [k12.or.us] in Portland, Oregon? Very impressive project, great guys.
--
Bush lied, many died [iraqbodycount.net].
Not ALL of Oregon Govt. (Score:5, Informative)
What's even worse is that there's a lot of alternatives in use between counties. For audio recordings in the court, most counties use either FTR or CourtSmart. My court uses Office products, even though the "official" standard is the Corel suite. It makes it difficult at times when working with other counties.
I think it'd be great if we went with Linux and Open Office, but that'll never happen.
Re:Not ALL of Oregon Govt. (Score:1, Interesting)
Drop by your datacenter and see what your techs are using.
(Well, walk up carefully and quietly or they'll scurry away before you get too close...)
At our Agency (in the State or Oregon), we use open source mostly for web services and security tools.
We have alot of Apache around. Mostly set up and working before we casually mention to management that it is open source.
Although, being a Novell shop, it's much easier now that we can say we are ordering another fully supported Novell server.
B
Re:Not ALL of Oregon Govt. (Score:1)
Re:Not ALL of Oregon Govt. (Score:1)
Re:Not ALL of Oregon Govt. (Score:1)
Re:Not ALL of Oregon Govt. (Score:2)
Oh well, now I'm in Germany doing GS work.
Re:Not ALL of Oregon Govt. (Score:1)
I disagree (Score:3, Insightful)
My advice, on your time, think about what Open sourse products could replace the ones you have. Then set up a test enviroment in your home.
Once you confirm, to the best you can, that it does work write a paper then sit on it. The very next time someone in managment complains abouit cost, tell them:
"I can write you up a document on products that do they same work, but for less money."
Then tune
Too bad this is so far down (Score:5, Informative)
Coralized links trouble (Score:2, Informative)
Open Source (Score:3, Interesting)
Looking at the list, I was thinking, education is first step. Not many managers know about linux (even if they knew, they may be sacred of using some unknown OS). These kind of seminars should help them. Instead of charging money for these, why not linux vendors(like RedHat, Novell and others) offer these things for free.
Whats up with the flamers? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Whats up with the flamers? (Score:2, Interesting)
Don't take it too hard though, you should see the kinds of things they say over at gotdotnet. Over here they try the old "I really like linux but it's not ready for your grandma" or "I am not a Microsoft fan but XP never crashes" approaches which are designed to be less confrontational.
Inevitably they will all call you a zealot if you disagree with them th
Re:Whats up with the flamers? (Score:2)
Im not affiliated with Microsoft, Im not a consultant for Microsoft or its products, Im not a vendor of any software at all. Im an inhouse Unix and Windows developer for a car fleet management company in the
Re:Whats up with the flamers? (Score:1)
MS Team99 [msdn.com] is re-forming. This time it is focusing on blogs. With a little effort you can find out what it was doing before. A few weeks before and after the announcement, there were basically no pro-MS / anti-OSS rants. Coincidence. Sure! I believe that. Really.
Although MS has been more careful not to get caught (or squelch news of getting caught) there have
Re:Whats up with the flamers? (Score:2)
I am glad you don't care because I don't believe you. I find it hard to believe that any person who is normal and sane would go around praising corporations or products without getting paid for it. I like my washing machin
Re:Whats up with the flamers? (Score:2)
People defend corporations not because they are shills but because their experiences with that corporations products have been positive, and contrary to your belief, not everyone is in it for the money which is why recommendations happen. I
Re:Whats up with the flamers? (Score:2)
Of course I have. But if my friend said "I didn't like that movie" or "Those shoes aren't comfortable" I would not call them a zealot, communist and then go on a tirade about how great the movie was. DO you see the difference?
"People defend corporations not because they are shills but because their experiences with that corporations products have been positive, and contrary to y
(ob) Imagine.... (Score:1, Offtopic)
First FOSCON and now GOSCON (Score:2)
Not even close (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Not even close (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Not even close (Score:2, Informative)
Just because Microsoft chooses to "smackdown" (to use your term) doesn't mean that many of us within state government won't be recommending the use of OSS when and where it's technically appropriate and cost-effective. Does this mean OSS will always be used? Of course not.
Re:Not even close (Score:2)
I have yet to see a penguin or a devil doing any of the work in anything associated with this work, though.
Re:Not even close (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Not even close (Score:1, Troll)
Bill and Steve (Score:2)
From an Oregonian... (Score:2, Insightful)
Maybe this will also lead to lo
Open Source In Oregon (Score:2, Informative)
http://cooper.stevenson.name/open_source_cd/ [stevenson.name]
When will OSU start using Moodle? (Score:2)
Re:When will OSU start using Moodle? (Score:1)
I've never had any experience with Moodle. Is it worthwhile? Easy to use for fuzzy academs? I'm sure she'd like an alternative, and as the OSU cs dept is in no short supply of undergrads who live to set up
Moodle's good stuff (Score:2)
Great user community too [moodle.org], helpful, inventive, worldwide.
And it has more cowbell than any of it's competitors.
No s$#! Mr. Holmes look at http://osuosl.org/ (Score:2)
Re:No s$#! Mr. Holmes look at http://osuosl.org/ (Score:1)
Staying under the radar is often the an effective way of sidestepping the politics (FUD) and getting the job done. Show non-technical executive management a feature-rich, technically-sound and cost effective system with a nice low TCO and they're a lot less likely to care whether it's built upon open source software, commercial/p
Go Beavers!!! (Score:1)
Re:Go Beavers!!! (Score:1)
Re:Go Beavers!!! (Score:1)
Re:Go Beavers!!! (Score:1)
We might as well be leading the way in something. (Score:2)
On the other hand, we do have some leaders in new market innovations [eugeneweekly.com] (hint: look at the first entry under "Alternatives").
Re:We might as well be leading the way in somethin (Score:2)
Karma Whore, right here fellas! (Score:2)
Boy, imagine a Beowulf cluster of...those Beowulf...er...oh, damn.
Oregon (Score:1)
Re:Oregon (Score:1)
Re:I'm a lawyer, and there is a hitch (Score:5, Informative)
"Furthermore, after reviewing this GPL our lawyers advised us that any products compiled with GPL'ed tools - such as gcc - would also have to its source code released. This was simply unacceptable."
Replace your lawyer--he can't read. The GPL does not require you to license things under the GPL simply because they were compiled with gcc.
If you don't believe me, read it [gnu.org] yourself.
Re:I'm a lawyer, and there is a hitch (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'm a lawyer, and there is a hitch (Score:4, Informative)
http:www.lsb.org [lsb.org]Linux Standard Base
is an standard, supported by all major linux distros, which ensures that even proprietary software can be developed using it's components as a framework. When it comes down to compiling with GCC it is just bullshit and FUD that this imposes any license restrictions. As you can surely see onhttp://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGP LToolsForNF [gnu.org]
gnu.org
the copyright on the editors and tools does not cover the code you write. Therefore it is possible to compile even proprietary applications with GCC.