Step 2, Groceries 291
prostoalex writes "Fortune magazine runs an article on New York - based FreshDirect, provider of high-quality groceries. Unlike Webvan, which failed with $1B of venture capital, FreshDirect seems to make pretty good money off online grocery sales - revenues of $225M are projected by 2004. The minimum order is set at $40, the company also charges $4 for delivery." If you want to check out their store, try zip code 10022.
This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:3, Insightful)
-dameron
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:2)
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:3, Insightful)
If things posted on
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:5, Informative)
I am the one who submitted this story, and you're correct about my Russian origin, although currently I live in WA state. Now, Slashdot lists me [slashdot.org], as submitter of 58 stories total. They're related to different events, as well as different companies, including Intel, Microsoft, Sony, etc. If all my postings went through some crooked schemes that included fat checks those companies sent me to submit stories to Slashdot, I'd have my own island.
I learned about FreshDirect from Fortune magazine today and I cannot use, let alone have incentive to advertise, their service.
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:2)
I found the article linked to very interesting, no doubt so did Michael, and thats why he posted your submission. Maybe those posting from the "Advertisement" stance hadn't actually followed the link..
As an answer to the "how to I advertise my company on
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:3, Insightful)
I had to look up an "Upper East Side" zip code in the phone book in order to check out their store.
And what percentage of Slashdot readers actually live in the Upper East Side of Manhattan? A hundredth of a percent? I would guess that Fresh Direct lines up most of their customers in the "traditional" NYC manner: littering their delivery area with flyers.
For all the stories that we post, there are so many which better fit the "advertisement" criteria - ones involving technology products that are available nationally, for instance.
Ingenious (Score:4, Insightful)
Ad Placements^H^H^H^HStories are a little harder to block.
Other news sites do this already, you just likely don't notice it. CNN does it all the time. I know CTV Newsnet in Canada does it on the air more than once per day.
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:3, Funny)
huh? (Score:2)
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:2)
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:2)
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:2)
You click this link. [slashdot.org]
-
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:3, Informative)
Also, I hear this dot.com thing might really take off. I think I'll start selling books online, yeah that's it!!
Re:This sounds much like an advertisement... (Score:2)
Under what rock have you been living for the past several years?!
Hell, even here in the backward UK we have had online grocery shopping for years.
http://www.tesco.com
http://www.iceland.co.uk
http://www.asda.co.uk
http://www.marksandspencer.com
the list goes on and on.
So what exactly is new about this story?!
Re:RAISES the question (Score:2)
Unfortunately for you, the AC is correct. To raise a question is to do exactly that. To beg a question is to commit a logical fallacy of circular reasoning, usually by assuming X, then reasoning your way towards proving X is true. However, the reasoning depends on X being true already, thus the fallacy.
Here's a good directory, as it were, of failures of logical thinking, and the names given to them: http://gncurtis.home.texas.net/index.html (uses frames). It points out the exact mistake you persist in defending.
I suspect you don't actually own a copy of the OED, because in my experience people who do are sticklers for correctness. I would sooner believe that the AC (modded down by a moron, more's the pity) owns a copy.
I truely am frightened (Score:3, Interesting)
Next thing you know we'll be able to order our dates online [singles-on...dating.com]
Re:I truely am frightened (Score:2)
one word - decaf [freshdirect.com].
Um, you've never lived in New York, have you? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Um, you've never lived in New York, have you? (Score:3, Funny)
Believe me, in New York, even when you DO have a car, you never use it because you don't want to lose your parking place.
No, I'm not joking.
Car independant (Score:4, Informative)
-A taxi cab?
-Calling your friend for help?
-Mass transit?
-A bicycle with a rear storage bin?
-Buying your groceries as you need them?
For me a trip to the grocery store is almost a daily occurrance. If I can't walk or bike to where I want to go I get a bus, or if I'm in real need a taxi. Of course this means you have to keep a running inventory of your groceries so you know what you need before it runs out.
My solution to this problem was to write a little app that allows me to record what I have and when it entered the system. From there I generate a report that I can print out for myself that includes information on useage frequency, average quantity purchased, average price, item importance and critical low stock notification. Yeah, I spend more time sorting my stuff when I get back from shopping, but I don't often run out of anything and the system was capable of supporting at least four people.
New features I might add are an internet-based interface and WAP device capabilities so If anyone else goes to the store I can get a new report on my phone or before I leave work thru the net! (Also, since I buy a lot of the same products over and over I could monkey around with a barcode reader maybe).
So to sum all this junk up:
Just because you don't have a car doesen't mean you aren't allowed to use your brain to solve a problem
Re:Car independant (Score:3, Insightful)
Friends? I would never impose on anybody for helping out with things like this, especially when I am able bodied. If I needed a large object moved, found it crucial for someone to assist me taking an arrow out of my arm, etc., then I'd call on friends. But for this, this is only robbing them of their time. What kind of a friend would I be then? And no, I never drive other people cars, especially for my benefit.
Mass transit? "Luckily", there's a bus that travels in a direct route from Kroger to my apartment. Unfortunately it does this only twice a day, during working hours. Not only would I have to take much time, now losing income is factored in. Plus, a bus ride here costs 1/3 of what FreshDirect is charging in NYC. And even if I did take the bus, 2 paper bags (and a backpack's worth) would be my encumbrage limit.
Bicycle? I'd been using my bike for this for 2 years, until just recently someone felt they needed it's rear wheel more than I did (yes, I'll lock that wheel as well next time). Truthfully, I enjoyed the biking, as I could get exercise AND quicky get the food. I've been investigating adding such a basket to my bike.
Buying as I need? That would just rob me of time. It would be more efficient fiscally for me to work more to pay the minor delivery fee than to spend time going back and forth just for sustenance. Not to mention the added cost of buying the smallest portion for items. One example is sugar. I'll buy a 10 lb bag. Now that will take me 3 months to use (I love lemonade).
It's not the effort that is my problem. I'm not slothful. But food gathering should not take 7 hours of my life each week, as one poster above thinks it should. When I had my car, this was an activity that I did monthly, and it took 1 hour, at the most, WHILE waiting for clothes to dry at the laundry. Even then, I'd still ride my bike for the perishables that would not keep for a month and had to be bought fresh.
I've done the logistical math. For my particular situation, a service like FreshDirect would be great for me, not because I'm lazy, but it would cut this chore to a mere fraction of the time it would take me now, given my current vehicle situation and location to the store. And like I said, if it costs $4 in NYC, it'll probably be $3 here in Memphis.
Re:Car independant (Score:2)
While I disagree with him on some points, his post is thoughtful and well argued.
Definitely worth more than a +1!
Re:Car independant (Score:2)
By the way, you might want to check out Schwans [schwans.com] which does grocery delivery here in Memphis. It might not suffice for all of your needs, but it might cut down on the amount of items you have to carry on the bus.
Just trying to help.
-9mm-
Re:Car independant (Score:2)
There are also nifty tow-carts for bikes, which I'd think would pretty much solve the size of load issue -- they'll hold about half the volume of a regular grocery cart. How much weight you can tow is your legs' problem.
Anyway, as you say, there are workarounds, at least for relatively short distances and in urban areas. Tho I wouldn't want to be riding a bike to *my* nearest grocery -- that would be the Costco, at 15 miles away (and coming back is all uphill and against an average 35mph wind).
Re:Car independant (Score:2)
I saw a guy in a Vespa blast by me carrying a 27" television. I have no idea how he was doing it, but he had a precarious grasp on the box by the side, he was leaning, and still managed to be so accurate as to almost mow my American backpackin' tourist-ass over.
Re:Car independant (Score:2)
Re:Home Inventory Tracking (Re:Car independant) (Score:2)
Re:Car independant (Score:2)
Must be something to see. Especially if he uses a seeing eye dog...
Um, you've never lived outside the US, have you? (Score:4, Interesting)
I have not only done my shopping without a car for a full month, but for, say, ten years. Sure, it's a ten-minute walk to the store. So what? It takes me longer to get to and from the garage anyway.
The real killer is grocery stores in the subway stations, where you can pick your stuff up on your way from work without a minute of detour. I haven't used them, though, as I prefer to walk to a store, even if it's a mile or so away.
Actually, yes. (Score:2)
Re:Um, you've never lived in New York, have you? (Score:2)
$4 for a delivery is a good deal. Yeah, it might suck for the "really poor", who can't even afford that, but it is a decent deal for those just above that who would prefer to pay for someone to deliver groceries once a week than have to arrange carrying home several tons of bulk foods from the local market.
Incidentally, it looks as if the prices these guys charge beat those at my local Andronico's. Maybe this is because I live in California (where everything costs twice as much as anywhere else) but it means it's as cheap to buy from them as my nearest story.
Come on guys, invest here. I'll buy in a jiffy!!!
Re:Um, you've never lived in New York, have you? (Score:2, Insightful)
Unless the store is literally within 4 blocks
I have been wracking my brain, and I cannot think of a place in Manhattan where you are more than 4 blocks from a grocey store.
More to the point, this service is really not in the best position. I'll use it, but I'm probably atypical. Almost every grocery store in Manhattan will deliver -- You can go, get your cart, wander around, squeeze the canteloupes, make impulse purchases, then when you check out, you just say "deliver this to 234 W 71st St. Apt 1A." Walk home without your 150 pounds of groceries, and still have them in about 60 to 90 minutes. Best of both worlds.
I'm aware that the "people like physicality when purchasing" argument is a pretty tired one, but I think it applies to food, particularly.
Re:Um, you've never lived in New York, have you? (Score:2)
Well, if you include absurdly high-priced bodegas with terrible selection and no fresh stuff to speak of, then maybe. But otherwise . .
-the entirety of Manhattan east of Avenue B
-most of Inwood (a few places here and there but terrible)
-parts of Harlem (even C-Town has areas they won't cover)
-the area around Wall Street (yep, quite a few people living there these days; they converted a bunch of old office buildings in the late 90's)
-all those huge housing projects along the edge of the Loisada (such as the eastern edge of Confucius Park or whatever they call it now) and otherwise most of the eastern edge of the city starting north of South Street Seaport and south of 11th.
-some stretches of Fifth Avenue (after all, 5th and Park forbid grocery stores and Madison is sketchy)
In other words, the poorest sections, those with huge housing complexes (some quite middle class now), and the wealthiest areas when "esthetics" have won out.
Of course with Chelsea Market, C-Town, and (ironically) the 131st Street Fairway, the blank spots have shrunk a lot but if you've got the flu, are older or infirm, or simply aren't up to a significant walk on a miserable winter/summer day, there are plenty of reasons that getting groceries could be a big deal.
Also, keep in mind that for a lot of us we may be getting home at 2:00 in the morning for days or even weeks at a time. If Gristedes, Food Emporium, and Associated end their price/feature war (which is quite likely given what's happening to New York's economy and what happened to the CVS/Rite Aide/DuaneReade/Love Stores price war) then all the stores that have started having late night hours will probably stop doing so and we'll be thoroughly screwed. Much easier to shop online and just answer the door for the delivery person while getting dressed in the morning then to have to find shopping time during conventional hours.
Frankly, for me, I'm all over the city anyway, always have a copious shoulder bag, and am used to carrying heavy loads. So I do my shopping mostly in Chinatown or on 32nd Street. But I remember my consulting days well and wish that this had been around then. I was very marginally involved in one of the online grocer attempts a while back (mostly not in the U.S.) and was very much hoping that they would get their act together.
I'm thrilled to see the Fairway folk step in as (other than Western Beef) they are far and away the best at entering new markets with excellent quality, good prices, and superb selection. And, of course, how could I be unhappy to see somebody online actually turning a proper profit?
Sitting here looking out at the cold, windy, rainy, dark Manhattan weather (with, by the way, dangerous levels of traffic and high speed drivers even on this, a Sunday afternoon) and wondering why people are having so much trouble understanding the viability of this,
Rustin
Re:Um, you've never lived in New York, have you? (Score:2)
You might try shopping for a family rather than just for yourself. Might increase the amount of food you have to buy on foot in 15 minutes on your way home.
Me, I'd consider a service like this even living by myself -- I value my time enough that the nearly 2 hours a week I'd spend getting food your way is a bigger price to pay than a $10 delivery charge for a week's worth of groceries.
Re:Um, you've never lived in New York, have you? (Score:2)
Speaking as somebody who has been paid for his knowledge about food AND somebody with regular access to restaurant supplies AND somebody who has GROWN significant parts of his food for over ten years IN A MANHATTAN APARTMENT AND somebody who almost certainly knows more then you do about where to get fresh produce in this city, Fairway and anything run by them is bound to have fresher, healthier options then anything near where most New Yorkers live, from veggie burgers to flash-frozen greens, to fresh fruits to soy milk to baked goods to olive oil to steak.
You wanna claim that Hain's is unacceptable? How about Health Valley? Ecover? Amy's? Seventh Generation? Artisanal bakeries? Fairway has all of them. With better variety then Healthy Pleasures (on average), Commodities, or whoever your local store may be.
Welcome to slashdot. Here we learn that you should have FACTS before you expect to be taken seriously.
Stop knee jerking and get a damned clue.
There. I feel much better now.
Rustin
You must be the luckiest guy around. (Score:2, Interesting)
Plus, on the way home from work for me involves crossing the street, it's not like I can just pick up stuff on the way.
JIT for necessities (Score:3, Insightful)
We have here short term fresh foods, medium term storage "normal" grocery foods, and very long term stored food, in addition to our vegetable garden. and I've always had that-more or less-since my late teens,including times of no vehicle and either walking or taking ten speed every where. It's doable. Modern delivery and being able to use the internet for food is a good thing, and you can get excellent quality food delivered to your door, from major urban to out in the boonies, anyplace a fedex or ups or a UPS person can make it.
The deal is you can do both, it doesn't have to be either/or. You can do daily light shopping for fresh, but for sure don't neglect basics and have at least some weeks or a months worth-a realistic month-on hand at all times.
Re:JIT for necessities (Score:2)
I also agree, heartily.
Our scoring/moderation system needs a severe revamp.. it's become increasingly difficult to wade through the crap to get to what's worthy.
Even +2 isn't cutting it anymore.
Re:I truely am frightened (Score:2)
Then again I can't walk, or drive a car, I've been sitting on my ass literally since I was 8 years old. I guess I should find the "ability" in my "disability" like those happy happy ads keep telling me about.
shit, I should stop being so lazy and get out of my wheelchair and go buy some groceries on my own two feet.
--
My apologies to no one in particular for the flame bait.
Re:I truely am frightened (Score:2)
You're right, this is frightening. Because, of course, the acme of virtue is to put the maximum effort possible into one's grocery shopping and bill paying.
Step 2? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Step 2? (Score:3, Funny)
Yahoo just realized that if they actually charge for their services, they make money.
Boy! that'll screw with their stats! (Score:5, Funny)
fyi (Score:5, Informative)
the thing with them, though, is that they already have a ton of locations and are in no rush to scale up their web orders: they already are in the black on the retail front and want to slowly and cautiously roll out the web strategy
they also have an edge over the online start-ups through name recognition: it's a lot easier getting somebody who already shops at your store to try something new, rather than risk it on some company they've never heard of.
i couldn't find the link at the Newsweek site, but the issue may still be on shelves at stores around the country until monday or tuesday
I've tried similar (Score:5, Interesting)
After ordering and waiting a couple of days, It was delivered and what impressed me was that I could pay by EFTPOS by use of a mobile EFTPOS terminal.
It was cheap, fast and I didnt have to go outside. Perfect for the geek that I am.
Re:I've tried similar (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't get me wrong, when I order something like a TV or DVDs or whatever, I can wait the few days/weeks they take to deliver. On the other hand, when I'm ordering *food* I want it here within 2-3 hours, tops.
Re:I've tried similar (Score:2)
I think you're underestimating what it would take to be able to provide a service that delivers within 2 - 3 hrs. First where I was living, it was an hour from the centre of the city by car (Depending on the Traffic), then there's the actual packing of the groceries, you think it would be cheap if they had to drive across the other side of the city just to deliver to one person? They'd have to deliver to a fair few people just to cover the cost of transporting the goods. On that alone would blow out the delivery time.
So there you go, a couple of days isnt long to wait.
Re:I've tried similar (Score:2)
A company can't provide such a service when it doesnt have get the funds to cover the cost of providing it.
The internet shopping industry may be big in london, that isnt the case in sydney.
Re:I've tried similar (Score:2)
Re:I've tried similar (Score:2)
I don't use it to order tonight's dinner. If I need a steak or a pound of mushrooms, I'll pick that up at the little supermarket on the way home.
I do use it for all the bulky stuff I need to buy regularly, and things that last a long time. Tinned and frozen food, soft drinks and so on. They do deliver the same day - if you order by 10am they'll deliver any time after 5pm that day.
If I need food in a hurry I dial out for pizza or Chinese. Different distribution structure.
I REALLY want this to happen... (Score:2)
This especially rocks for 3 reasons:
1) Shopping cart I can actually view things -- never forget something. If I do? Append it to the order!
2) No more hunting for lost items -- Where Oh Where do they keep the spices? Just enter the spice name in search and click to add. I love this!
3) Quick -- It's hard to multitask in the grocery store, Its much easier to shop while programming or doing non-productive things (like reading slashdot).
Anyone who wouldent pay $4 for this is nuts, IMHO. All I can ask, is that one of these companies opens up a ROCHESTER NY branch
Re:I REALLY want this to happen... (Score:2)
Don't complain though, at least you have variety up there with Wegmans. I get to deal with a P&C store and they only carry the basics and the really weird stuff like canned calimari. So if I want anything more flavorful that spaghetti or hamburgers, I have to drive 25 minutes to a real grocery store.
For those of you on the West Coast... (Score:4, Insightful)
I must admit, though, that I'd rather see a startup company doing this than the already-established grocery stores. I was a happy Webvan customer, and I still think the model is quite viable. (Plus, I love the FreshDirect site design.) Here's hoping FreshDirect or a similar company takes a stab at this here in the Bay Area!
Re:For those of you on the West Coast... (Score:2)
-it is the same goddamn store and they have their rules about what brands / products they carry and they don't carry.
- I would rather see another company (preferrably a startup) to thrive and get some copetition in the area (like Netflix & BlockBuster)
- 10 bucks! Geez, that is steep. Around 5 bucks is okay.
Re:For those of you on the West Coast... (Score:4, Informative)
Myself, I prefer costco(warehouse store). You buy in bulk, but the cost is about 30% cheaper than the stores. Buy an executive account, and you get 2% of your money back at the end of the year.
An example, Milk is 3.60 at the normal store (3.99 online order), its 1.99 a gallon at the quickie mart, at costco its 2 for 2.70. I have a family of 6, and we drink almost a gallon of milk every 1-2 days, need to shop and save money.
-
Save a little money each month and at the end of the year you'll be surprised at how little you have. - Ernest Haskins
Re:For those of you on the West Coast... (Score:2)
I'm an Exec member myself, and it more than pays for itself. Plus there's the health issue: last week I needed something Costco didn't carry, so went into a regular grocery store for the first time in a couple years. I'm just not used to those high retail prices -- damn near gave me heart failure!!
Another perk of buying perishables at Costco is that they're a lot fresher than what you can get in a regular grocery, so they keep longer. This especially applies to eggs and dairy products. (Frex, eggs can be as much as 3 MONTHS old by the time they even reach the average grocery's shelves. Costco eggs are no more than a couple days old -- and will easily keep for 4-6 months in your fridge.)
They're finally building a Sam's Club in this area, so soon I'll have the best of both worlds
Re:For those of you on the West Coast... (Score:2)
The problem with Sams club is they seem to run out quicker of the basic's, (low inventory I think).. I think Sams club is bigger on the East cost, and expansion here is still new. Sams club had a bigger selection of munchies (chips/cheese puffs/snacks), which is good in some ways. (-:
BTW, I didnt know that about the Eggs, need to check into that.
Re:For those of you on the West Coast... (Score:2)
I think Sam's does try to keep inventory more to what moves immediately, which in turn means they're more likely to run out. I've noticed that as well.
I like having both, tho. What one hasn't, the other usually carries, and they keep each other honest in the price dept.
Re:For those of you on the West Coast... (Score:2)
Both have horrible websites. I can't even use Safeway's, because they don't offer any information about the product other than name, size and price. No nutritional information, ingredients, description or picture.
Albertson's is pretty bad too, but I used it for a while. Every order was screwed up in some way. Sometimes they'd leave items out (and still charge me), other times they'd deliver the wrong number of items or make stupid substitutions. Plus the Albertson's delivery people were not at all friendly. They were usually on-time though.
WebVan screwed up from time to time, too (especially near the end of its life), but at least I wasn't paying a delivery charge. And if they forgot to deliver an item, they would sometimes drive back to my house and deliver it.
It's obvious that neither Safeway and Albertson's are trying. I think they'll lose money, close their online shopping divisions and say that it just isn't possible for anyone to make any money doing it.
Speaking of Webvan... (Score:4, Funny)
...and all those other failed dot-coms, here's a little burst of nostalgia for you. [disobey.com]
It's an archive of screengrabs from a whole whack of sites that went belly up, including Webvan [disobey.com].
You'll laugh. You'll cry. It's better than "Cats."
Re:Speaking of Webvan... (Score:2)
as a turkish citizen, I have never heard those "dead" dotcoms except 2 of them
3dfx=my gfx cards maker
alladvantage.com=damn spammer gang
Isn't it interesting concept?
It's a Manhattan thing (Score:5, Insightful)
Manhattan is a special case in the US. Food is normally transported in semitrailers, but semitrailers are allowed in Manhattan only under severe restrictions. So stores in Manhattan need a distribution center somewhere nearby, where everything is transferred to smaller trucks.
This outfit avoids that step, by putting their warehousing operation just outside Manhattan and filling customer's orders directly from it. That's a big win. But it doesn't have to compete with big supermarkets where semis pull up to the loading dock at night.
Re:It's a Manhattan thing (Score:2)
I work at Freshdirect.com (Score:4, Interesting)
While there are brick and mortor grocery stores that delivery, I gotta say the food I've been picking up from the warehouse beats anything else. I guess there is some truth in the fact that what they get does cut out the middleman making things fresher. The pastries are great. MMMmmmmm pastries, especially the fruit tart.
Plus I like getting the already cooked meals by gourmet chefs at rather dirt cheap prices.
Anyway, just thought some would like to know how the food is coming from there.
Also we're rolling out very slowly, we're not trying to cover the entire city at once. This was Kosmo's mistake as well as Peapods. It looks like we'll be doing well in the future, just wish it was going to be publicly traded. Oh well, I'll settle for the food I've been getting.
Re:I work at Freshdirect.com (Score:2)
Did you just say, "I will work for food," or "Freshdirect puts food on my table."?
Hmm... FreshDirect... (Score:2)
UK (Score:2, Interesting)
Later, other large stores have joined in the fun, incluing Asda [adsa.com] (recently bought by WalMart), Sainsburys [sainsburys.com], and others (that I can't think of right now).
So really, I don't see how this is news for everyone.
I enjoyed a similar service (Score:2)
The selection was incredibly good, the food was always fresh, and I was quite pleased with their customer service.
It goes to show you that you can, indeed, be successful selling groceries online, if you play your cards right [grocerygateway.com]...
Common in the UK (Score:5, Interesting)
Despite how cool this whole idea sounds, we still trudge down to the actual store, pick the stuff by hand and get a cab back (which costs about 4 quid).
Why ? Well we tried it several times from different supermarkets and each time something was wrong - things missing, food with a same-day sell-by date and the van turning up hours late...a right bugger if you were staying in to wait for it. The missing items were either just missing or marked "out of stock". We refuse to believe that the supermarket has run out of bread and bananas.
So we'd have to go to the shops anyway to pick up the missing stuff anyway.
Also, they will select replacement items if something is out of stock if you wish. However the selection is usually made by the store surrealist and not too helpful. Sorry, we're out of cheese, so we have selected some curry powder and a mop as a replacement.
tesco.com (Score:5, Informative)
Re:tesco.com (Score:2)
Grocery shopping is now fun (Score:2, Informative)
It's so easy to walk into the kitchen and see what I need, then order with an 802.11b enabled PDA.
Grocery store business is dying, except for WMT (Score:2)
Walmart's super stores will put them all outta business, even the delivery guys because as soon as WMT enters that business (which they may be already doing in some markets --- anybody know?), it'll be another slaying with Walmart out as king.
Re:Grocery store business is dying, except for WMT (Score:5, Interesting)
The other downside to Wal-Mart is their selection is somewhat limited, but they usually carry everything I'm looking for, so it's not a big deal for me. Oh, and they can't sell beer after midnight. Damn blue laws...
DennyK
Re:Grocery store business is dying, except for WMT (Score:2)
Oh, poor you, no grocery store alchohol after midnight. In Maryland, they can't sell it at all. Want to cook with some wine (no, not the salt solution passed off as "cooking wine", the real stuff)? That'd be a separate stop at the liquor store, then.
On the upside, Metro is open 24-7, Giant is open almost-24-7 (they close for a bit Sunday morning), and Mars and Han Ah Reum (which are the best for produce) are at least open until 10pm.
I used to do my shopping at 1am, but I've found that as long as you don't do something crazy like visit an Asian supermarket on a Sunday afternoon, and generally avoid rush hour shopping, it's not bad at all.
I'd also much rather shop at a locally owned and run business like Mars than a massive soul-eating entity such as Wal-Mart. I save money by buying fresh food and cooking it myself. It takes more time than getting TV dinners, Stouffer's, or whatever, but I get enjoyment out of cooking, and it tastes better.
This is actually what concerns me the most about online shopping: produce quality. There are always a few rejects in the bin, and I wonder whether they'll use them or not. If I go to the store and the broccoli is just OK, I'll revise my dinner plans for that night. If I click on "order" beneath a picture of perfect broccoli and it shows up wilted, I'm stuck.
Re:Why you shouldn't shop at Walmart (Score:2)
Here's why you shouldn't shop at Walmart, ever:
I don't know the story here, but I'm pretty certain that the courts will take care of it if true. Employers who blatantly shortchange their employees get slapped down. Plus, employers who habitually abuse their employees have a hard time hiring and retaining people. Keep in mind that U.S. unemployment is still very low.
No, automobiles destroy the social fabric of neighborhoods. Wal-Mart is just continuing the social change that started fifty years ago when cars became widespread.
I *love* Wal-Mart's "cencorship"! The kind of music I like the best tends to be rife with profanity, offensive themes, etc. IMO, none of that stuff adds anything whatsoever to the music and, although it doesn't bother me much, I have kids running around and I'd have a hard time teaching them to use good language if they heard some guy screaming the F word blasting out of my stereo while I was working. The bands may think that their offensiveness is important to their art, but I don't really care what they think, I'm paying their bills.
Lucky for me, even if the bands think that the stylized rendition of a penis on their latest album cover really adds significantly to public dialog, Wal-Mart will tell them they have to get rid of it, and I (and millions of others) can buy the CD with some assurances.
The conditions under which many products are produced is deplorable. The same thing was normal in the US 100 years ago, and it was terrible. However, that's an issue for the countries and people involved to deal with, just as we did (and continue doing), and it's very likely that our interference will do more harm than good.
Why? Economics. Industrialized countries have highly educated workforces and easy access to automation, which means that we can produce goods more cheaply and effectively than countries without those advantages, right? No, because we also have a labor force that demands short work hours, good conditions and high pay. What competitive advantages do third-world countries have? Their only real asset is their poverty. Because they have little, their people are willing to work longer, harder and in worse conditions than wealthy people would. And exploiting that one advantage is the only way they can get ahead. They cannot afford to educate all of their people for 17 years, or even 13 years. They cannot afford to buy expensive equipment. They cannot afford high wages, or 40-hour work weeks or, in many cases, even basic safety equipment.
All of that is very sad, true, but look at history and you'll see that all of the currently wealthy nations passed through a similar time. Right now, those poor countries produce cheap goods and sell them to wealthy countries, and they buy almost nothing the wealthy countries sell. Over time, this trade imbalance will erode the relative advantages of the wealthy countries and improve the situation of the poor countries (typically more improvement than erosion, this is not a zero-sum game), and as their wealth increases the people of the poor nations will obtain more personal power and eventually they'll be able to institute their own systems to prevent abuses.
On the other hand, if the wealthy steadfastly refuse to allow the poor to exercise their *sole* competitive advantage, then the poor will remain poor for much longer, having to lift themselves purely by their own bootstraps, without the benefit of international trade (except with similarly poor nations).
If you want to take this from a social/national level down to an individual level, go find a sweatshop worker in China and ask him if he would prefer to continue working 14 hours per day, 7 days per week in deplorable and unsafe conditions to make a meager wage that barely feeds his family, or if he'd rather be unemployed and watch his children starve. If American companies (including Wal-Mart) refused to buy sweatshop goods, the result would not be an improvement in the sweatshop conditions, the result would be closure of the factories as the production migrated to industrialized countries with automated factories.
The point of all this is that while your complaint is correct, (a) it's a much broader issue than just Wal-Mart and (b) it would really be a good idea to come up with a solution to the root problem (poverty), rather than just addressing the symptoms. Historically, we know that the odds are good that things will gradually improve if we just leave well enough alone. That doesn't mean it's the *only* way to improve the situation, but boycotts sure aren't going to help (that's like taking a man's last crust of bread to wave it around and complain that it's moldy -- makes you look like a compassionate person, but the guy whose bread you took is starving).
Personally, the best proposal I've heard is for the wealthy countries to give more student and work visas, and maybe even provide small subsidies. Allow the poor people to come and work here, in good conditions, for reasonable (to them) wages, and get educated here, and encourage them to save up and then go home and build something useful with the knowledge and funds they've acquired. The idea is to try to accelerate the transfer of wealth. Unfortunately, many, many of the wealthy nations' citizens oppose the idea of accelerating the transfer of wealth.
And the bit about Nike just makes me laugh: Nike took a major PR hit and they'll say anything and criticize anyone who will help take the pressure off them. What they say is meaningless.
I can see the marketeers now (Score:2, Funny)
Six months later: You're fired! The sales never panned out.
Oh well. (Score:2, Informative)
Unsurprisingly it is big stablished companies who have been providing this service. It took them a while to realize why this is good, but when they finally got around it they got it right.
UK situation (Score:3, Interesting)
Is that not the case in the US? Don't the main supermarkets do this as standard?
Cheers,
Ian
MN has SimonDelivers (Score:4, Informative)
Troy
Re:MN has SimonDelivers (Score:2, Informative)
I'm not looking to turn this into a sales pitch... it's just pretty amazing to me that they've been able to keep that up. According to a section of the FAQ, they started in April of 1999. Is there really that much investment in infrastructure in conventional grocery stores that a company like SimonDelivers can afford to replace it with a fleet of vans and a high-tech warehousing system and still charge (virtually) no delivery fee.
More to the point, why couldn't Webvan, then?
Whats the big deal? (Score:4, Insightful)
Its Koc holdings "migros" grocery (joint venture with swiss migros) and works well, they even deliver stuff 2-3 hours later, WITHOUT any fee.
http://online.migros.com.tr/index_sanal.html (in turkish)
Also they use those cool GSM credit card machines so you don't have to give your CC over the net.
I don't understand the big deal. I mean, if it was a VRML or VR shop you bought stuff by actually walking around on browser (yes a UK company exist), it would be big news, but whats the deal with this one?
VC and success (Score:2, Insightful)
And companies today that were around before the boom, and are still around today, have nightmares trying to get small reinvestments and loans cuz they're the dreaded "IT COMPANIES".
Way to go on making it work FreshDirect.
And in other news.... (Score:2)
We've got Peapod in Chicago (Score:2)
To all the naysayers out there that say "Eh, you lazy fuck, I can't believe you have your groceries delivered" I have this to say: screw you. I cook almost every night and having to carry food by hand across the city or rely on a friend with a car is simply out of the question. A bi-monthly peapod delivery makes sure that I don't have to worry about running out of food.
Before I signed up, I held on to my receipts from the grocery stores around town to compare. The prices are no more expensive than any other store, and sometimes cheaper. As long as I order $100 or more, delivery is $5 (plus a tip to guy that hauls my food up 2 flights of stairs). All non-perishable goods are stored in their warehouses (which is how the keep overhead low, methinks) but all fresh foods are picked up from local markets and suppliers to area restaurants.
Peapod rocks. Having your groceries delivered to your house/apartment ROCKS. Shopping for groceries in my PJ's from my home ROCKS.
What ramifications will this have? (Score:2)
kroger as food as webvan (Score:2)
The most important question: (Score:2)
The ISP I work for bought up Webvan's monitors in a bulk purchase - almost all of the screens in the developer and tech support departments have a metal Webvan asset tag on the front. I'm hoping this new company gets some big LCD screens.
--
Evan
Revenue or profit (Score:2)
I use Freshdirect all the time... (Score:2, Informative)
Since then, I have used them about 10 times, and so far it has been good. The prices are the same that you would see in a large grocery store in the suburbs. The only problem I have seen is that they don't carry a lot of grocery items i like. They specialize in fresh foods. Since I am not a gourmet chef, I tend to buy the easy to cook items.
I am just happy that I don't have to shop at Gristedes anymore. The thing that bothers me about NYC is that every deli/grocery store claims they are 'gourmet' you'll see the dirtiest slop whole of a store (gristedes) and they will carry 40 different cheeses, 40 different olive oils and nothing else!
I will continue to support fresh direct, but I am skeptical that they will not stay in business. Or if they do, they will raise prices to the NYC going rate which is extortion.
Anyhow, if you are in one of there delivering zip codes (if you are you surely have heard of them) I highly recommend trying them. The delivery people are very nice, and they actually do not accept tips.
In a city like NYC where customer service is second rate, it is nice to see a company like them come around.
Notice: I do not have any relationship with the company; I am merely a new resident of NYC that believes buying groceries for a reasonable price should be a right for everyone.
Tesco (Score:2)
Re:Peapod (Score:2)
-Istealmymusic, Slashdot New Economy Analysist
Re:Blah (Score:2)
What does this have to do with the story, though? Except that now you'll have one less reason to leave the computer.
I suggest going cold turkey on the computer. Ask the wife to help you.
Cold Turkey (Score:2)
http://www.coldturkey.com/
This site has not been properly configured!
Please contact the webmaster
See? What did I tell you?!!
Re:What's new? (Score:2)
Looks like even they are "Anonymous" like you
Re:Steps (Score:2)
It's not funny anymore!!!!!!!!
$*@!!*!# slashdot lameness filter won't let me do that in all caps
Re:Sounds good, but..... (Score:2, Insightful)
All you have to do is judge the quality of the food you receive from the online place. If it sucks, don't buy there. For many, it's convenient. Several people I know use a similar service here and are very happy with it.
-Kevin
Re:Superbug city (Score:2, Informative)
weiyuent,
True, anti-bacterial drugs (antibiotics) used in less than extermination levels do increase the speed at which bacteria develop resistance to the drugs.
However, not all things that are 'anti-bacterial' are drugs, or things for which a particular strain could develop resistance.
For example, the following things are anti-bacterial without being drugs;
For these items, there is little or NO capability for the bacteria to adapt to them and still maintain any threat to humans.
Also, there is the commonly quoted on the package anti-bacterial soap. ALL soap is anti-bacterial because of what it does to the viscosity of water and the surfaces of the bacteria, NOT because there are drugs in it (although I would not doubt that some manufacturers did add drugs or drug-like compounds). Some manufacturers were simply adding 'anti-bacterial' on the soap package, not changing the soap itself. They realized that consumers were apparently not aware that soap is anti-bacterial itself. [What did the package say? anti-bacterial' or 'antibiotic']
Likewise, there are many types of catalytic surfaces that screw with the outer coating of bacteria in a way such that they die if they come in contact with the surface. The anti-bacterial coating described in the article is probably something like that.
Please pay attention to what type of anti-bacterial things you are against, using lots of drugs everywhere is bad and does make problematic strains. However, it is NOT true that all things anti-bacterial can generate resistant strains, in fact we rely on these simple and useful things constantly in our every-day lives. The things that are antibiotic (as in drugs) that can cause resistant strains are the things that one should be concerned about.