Comment His only crime (Score 0) 45
Was fleecing the dumb and rich, laundering the money and maybe a little tax evasion on the side.
Was fleecing the dumb and rich, laundering the money and maybe a little tax evasion on the side.
Nobody said zebras are alone. I certainly didn't. Your google search certainly doesn't establish a causal relationship.
Once it's ratified by the dictionaries, it IS proper English. There's no need to make yourself look like a fuddy-duddy by complaining about such trivia. The world moves on.
..had a Meccano set.
They were the favourite xmas gift of dads and grandfathers.....
They were metal, and solid. Motors and gears and bearings and everything....
Chinesium.
That was a question a former colleague of mine used to ask new hires. The answers ranged from confusion to a detailed analysis of the merits of each.
...laura
Eventually questionable usage does tend to get ratified by the dictionaries. It doesn't make you sound any less juvenile to use it though, like you are too lazy to use proper English or follow long standing linguistic conventions.
Depending on your location and choice of show, there might not be any availability whatsoever aside from piracy.
Itâ(TM)s not 2006, raspberry piâ(TM)s arenâ(TM)t going to mine anything.
This needs to be taken care of on the tariff and market access side... If we really want them to bring the manufacturing home we need to make it very expensive to bring both finished goods with the target components and the components themselves across the US border... But the reality is ultimately someone is going to WANT the US market and will build whatever they have to in order to get it.
Your US Government could contractually insist that all CPUs
They are 'minting' NFTs for "recovered physical artifacts from the Titanic". Maybe you should try reading the summary for once?
Spend is a verb and a noun.
From https://dictionary.cambridge.o...:
spend
noun [ S ]
ECONOMICS, FINANCE
the amount of money that is spent on a particular activity:
While banning this one app is a good thing, it's hard to call them "absolutely 100% right" on the issue of device security, considering all the staff are still conducting state business on consumer-grade smartphones. All of it's made in China and loaded with the standard suite of Big Tech spyware from the US. Doubtlessly riddled with security holes on top of that.
TikTok is 1% of the problem. The rest remains unaddressed.
This was discussed in the Assange case,
"[...] because of extradition practices, any such superseding indictment would most likely need to come soon, before Britain formally decides whether to transfer custody of him."
He said today: âoeThe New York Times report is wrong and understates the dangers to Assange. What it states is normally the case in extradition treaties, but itâ(TM)s not the case in the relevant U.S.-British extradition treaty.
https://accuracy.org/release/c...
Apparently there could be more to it than just "Nope, once he's out, he's the property of the US Injustice System," but... didn't he already get extradited? he agreed to it months ago.
I get the feeling we're going to see the same thing with car prices. There is a more competition in the car market, but the price spike wasn't so extreme, and it's easier to hide the cost from Joe Average through financing.
"For the children" is a favorite cheap tactic used by both the right and the left.
Right. If that's not an example of Trump-derangement syndrome then I don't know what is.
When Trump says it metaphorically; it's because he meant it.
When everyone else says it metaphorically; your argument is that only an idiot would take them seriously.
Only an idiot would take either side's call metaphors as literal statements. Yet here you are taking them seriously, just like the 12 unarmed morons who were let into the white house, which democrats thought would take over the nation somehow or start a revolution. Lots of morons in this picture all over.
The 4k torrents of The Last Of Us look amazing.
RADIO SHACK LEVEL II BASIC READY >_