Touché

Um, right.. but where was I wrong? If you're just going to cry and can't even refute anything that I called out, then it just makes you look like a whiny retard.

So it was Bush who did all that? I don't understand where Trump come into play. I can't find anything about him making changes to BAPCPA that would affect medical debt.

I think that's a good idea if it stops increasing fuel taxes.

If they just tack on more fuel taxes, then EVERYONE is paying taxes for interstates that many of them don't even use. So....Yeah, how about you maintain them by charging the people that actually use them? Does that really sound insane to you???

This is how all taxes should be. You should tax/charge the people who use or want to use services. Don't keep piling on taxes that everyone must pay.

I mean goddamn the Dems love their slavery.

Wow, another slashdotter with TDR. Big surprise lol.

What do worker protection laws have to do with taxes and the current administration? Are you saying that protection laws can't exist without taxes?

And medical bankruptcy.... did you just make that up? This was news to me and seemed insane, so I searched and couldn't find anything even close to that. The only thing done was the reversal of rules that prevented medical debt from appearing on credit reports. Um, ok. Why should your debt be hidden from credit reports when their entire purpose is to look at income vs debt and your likeliness to pay them off??? No idea where you got that other idea from.

Compared to other EV trucks, yeah it's pretty good. But they're replacing the lightning with a Hybrid. Toyota's hybrid pickup can get nearly 700 miles on its Eco mode.

Such a dumb comment because both the Rivians and the Cybertrucks are selling incredibly poor when compared to the Ford Lightning. Rivian sold like 1/5th as many electric pickups as Ford. Cybertruck sold 40% less than the Ford Lightning. I'm referring to sales over the last year, so very recent stuff. So what exactly makes those other brands superior? And why is it terrible to model it after the F-150 when it's the highest selling truck in the US, their primary market?

Chevy literally only moved 3k more trucks than Ford over the last year; it's practically neck and neck.

The low sales aren't due to quality or features. And Ford isn't dropping the truck due to it being overshadowed by competitors. It's due to cost and practicality. Nobody who needs a pickup is going to pay a min of $60k for one that can only tow for 100 miles before recharging.

Ford is replacing the Lightging with a hybrid pickup, which makes far more sense and are far superior.

The software industry needs unions? Why? Unions suck for skilled jobs.

There is zero chance that they're going to get the rights to twitter. This is probably just a publicity stunt to get their dumb platform more known.

Should be a crime to bring that game back to life.

The article talks about all the reasons that the game failed, but doesn't once mention how gamers were laughing at it and calling it a joke before it was even released. After its release, they doubled down. It says that Sony didn't market it enough to make people aware of it, and yet I don't know anyone who hasn't heard of it. Delusions and cope for sure.

Right. But most people would rather deal with Nazis over all of the fascists and racists who are flooding Bluesky. Lesser of two evils.

I see more Nazis on Bluesky though.

Obviously I'm using that term in the liberal sense, but you know all about that based on your post. Crazy how even Jewish people and patriots use Twitter/X over Bluesky, even though it's apparently full Nazis lmfao.

Funny how "good journalism" had magically disappeared after Musk purchased it and introduced the ability to call out facts and bias. You ever think that it was always full of poor journalism prior to that? Maybe it's just that your echo chamber broke down. Kind of says a lot about what's all over Bluesky, don't you think?

I think you're beginning to understand taxes now. Good job.

And yes. Just like the mob.

Let's work on abolished the IRS before caring about whether the top shareholders are making enough millions off of sales to China or not.

Did you read the rest of that sentence? Seems you missed the part where I said "under fair use". You can wish really really hard, but it won't make it true. This is why watch party streams are almost never covered under the fair use doctrine, and never covered if it's for commercial use.

What was false? Yes, you can obviously form an opinion about something immediately after you've watched it. That's not what was stated. I said you that cannot criticize UNDER FAIR USE in this manner. Streaming a copy of the content to your viewers through a "watch party", and criticizing it, is not covered by fair use. This is exactly the same as renting a movie, streaming it, and then making some comments.

Fair Use effectively allows you to reference the original work to illustrate or show the subject of your critique (or any other covered use). You're not referencing anything if you haven't seen it before. The Fair Use doctrine does not cover playing copyrighted work that you simply intend to criticize.