So how do you know when to stop re-asking?
Why did the Irishman run a bug-checking LLM over his code before release?
To be sure
To be sure
To be sure
If it's still getting inconsistent results when run multiple times over the same code, the LLM needs more work.
If your concern is that one person in your government could delete your ID then you've got bigger concerns than having your ID deleted.
They do have bigger concerns than that, because US judicial and legislative systems are currently bound to the executive branch, and their executive branch is locked under kompromat.
Which is the exact reason nobody should allow Iran to steal the Strait of Hormuz.
I didn't think there was this problem with the SoH a few months back - was Iran trying to claim it last year?
When the local community is expected to pay the price for infrastructure upgrades imposed by a single business pulling resources, that's a big problem
In Australia, you're charged for both water usage and your connection on every bill. A home pays a small amount for their connection. A business that uses similar amounts of water will need the same type of connection, so will pay a similar connection charge. A business that uses fair more water than others will pay a higher connection fee to maintain the infrastructure to support that connection. It's literally user pays based on your usage. Is that not how it's done in the US?
What lifestyle choices are children making?
Obviously, who will be their parents, as that directly leads to whether they're urban or rural dwellers, smokers, wood/coal/gas or electrically cooked meals - perhaps with a private chef in the chefs kitchen with their own air filter, how new their cars are and whether they're EVs or not, those types of things.
So if anyone's to blame for poor lung health in children, it's themselves for picking bad parents.
But lets not pretend that our government works, regulating industry has become a quid-pro-quo or a pay to play scheme where governments are using regulations to extort businesses for things that dont matter, and neglecting their mandate to regulate adequately. Europe is especially guilty of this, but the American government is ridiculous, and I would bet people aligning with both sides of the aisle would agree. We need reform, badly.
It's a top-down approach - when your federal government is fully entrenched in graft and corruption it tends to increase those at lower levels of government as they can see there's no accountability for their own bad behaviour. Start with your political parties and demand honest, law-abiding, and trustworthy candidates for office at every level.
Pardon me. 2-3 million "Tons" not pounds... of radioactive tailings to get enough material for 300-400 new reactors. Also meaning, NONE OF US, will live farther than 60 miles from a reactor by 2050...
Nuclear power is banned in my country, so I'll be thousands of km from the nearest generating reactor - even the test medical ones we have are 1000+ km away.
We'll get our renewable power primarily from firmed solar, wind, and hydro sources. Heck, ATM now we're a little over 50% renewable supply for the entire country. It's going to continue increasing.
Without their own ability to manufacture batteries at scale they can't hope to compete.
BYD started making batteries, and when it was successful enough there it branched out towards making cars - and along the way vertically integrating virtually their entire supply chain.
Other car makers are dependent on external suppliers, and this shows in their inability to screw down costs.
I just looked out the window from work (37 floors up, close to the CBD centre), I can see some landmarks at least 60km distant. We only have smog now when there's forest fires.
Apple has enough gadgets to refine for the next decade before they need to introduce something else.
About the only thing missing are AR glasses, which I understand they're working on. The other hardware I've heard of (cars, TVs etc) seem to have been dropped, which IMO is a good thing. Keep the mobile devices and integrate with other things.
Well, you can make the hydrogen easier to handle by binding it to carbon... Perhaps synthesizing jet fuel with carbon recaptured from the atmosphere will win, since it doesn't require modifying the planes and the new tech is on the ground.
This seems the most sensible solution currently - sure synthetic avgas will be expensive, but retrofitting or replacing every plane in existence, plus all the storage refitting, transport, and generation - surely there's a point at which it makes sense to use the synthetic fuel instead?
Are we primarily waiting for excess renewable energy to reduce costs enough to make it viable?
There may be a tipping point where the proverbial shit hits the fan, and there is no competent person to look at it, analyze it, or fix it. What now, Saint Peter?
I believe there was a documentary predicting this exact scenario?
Stupido, Dumb and Dumber, Idiocracy? Something like that.
What we need are the programmers from the 70s, 80s and 90s that went into those cryo-sleep chambers to wake up and rearchitect these codebases from scratch in Assembly and C.
If the OS stores the user account birthday, whatever API is used should ask if the user is XX yrs old or not and the OS gives a TRUE or FALSE response. No other data should be available, and the website should only be able to ask this once per cookie/session where an account is not saved.
What becomes more complicated is a shared device such as a smart TV - does the TV need everyone's account or does it default to child-friendly mode for general operations, and you need to login to a service that has your birthday so as to allow for adult access?
...having a very predictable op-ex, you know the bill is $2500 every month, no surprises...
I don't know if you track this, but I am - and some SaaS companies love the annual renewal dance where they throw out eye-watering annual increases (25+%) and then graciously dropping it a bit like they're doing you a favour by only going up by 20%.
It seems that more and more mathematicians are using a new, high level language named "research student".
