Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft The Almighty Buck

Microsoft Develops XP 'Light' for Thailand 551

GoatJuggler writes with this Bangkok Post report that "Microsoft announced plans to develop a discounted, slightly crippled version of Windows XP for Thailand."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Develops XP 'Light' for Thailand

Comments Filter:
  • How to have both... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Foolhardy ( 664051 ) <[csmith32] [at] [gmail.com]> on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:22PM (#8221179)
    Microsoft is notorious for bundling things to cause lock-in.
    How are they going to balance that with creating a light version of XP?
  • by ramzak2k ( 596734 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:24PM (#8221189)
    I would like to get my hands on one of these if it does not include all the applications i dont need - windows messenger , internet explorer, Outlook express. Just the basic UI. I can customize it the way i need. Lesser the functionality, more secure the box will be.
  • by pilot1 ( 610480 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:26PM (#8221208)
    Yes, I did RTFA, and it said nothing about what would be different between the "light" version and the normal version.

    Is it going to have fewer M$ programs bundled with it or what? And if it is, what the hell isn't too tightly integrated for them to remove? Solitare and pinball?
  • Give me a break (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:26PM (#8221210)
    If they think this will stop people from pirating in Thailand try again. That is like telling a pirate in the US that Windows XP Home is $200 but you can get a 'light' version for $40 or $50.

    The pirates will still pirate! DUH

    It happened with music. People bantered this whole "when the music companies get a realistic business model and stop charging highway robbery for 1 or 2 good songs yada yada and rest is filler". When iTunes and other services popped up "copyright infringement" (as they candidly call it) didn't stop or slow down. That was just the vocal point they argued for now they will find something else. Before it was fair use. Next it will be "I don't think artist x deserves a mansion so I can judge how much is enough for them" or some crud.
  • Addiction (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:27PM (#8221214)
    Customers of this new entry level version of Windows would be presented with a clear and easy upgrade path to both Windows XP Home or Windows XP Professional, he added.

    In France, tobacco companies have started selling packs of cigarettes containing only 19 cigarettes instead of 20. A "crippled" pack of smokes in a sense. Why? so that those who can't afford full-size packs since the latest price rises (read: kids and teens) can buy the 19 cigarette pack and get hooked.

    Sounds like Microsoft is doing exactly that with poor countries: snare customers then pull on the knot. "buy our cheapo limited software, then when you need more functionalities, it'll be a lot more expensive to ditch Microsoft and go for free-software than pay for the Microsoft upgrade".

    But I guess it's business as usual, all companies do that sort of thing, not just Microsoft, I'm not shouting evil-M$ here. But I do hope the Thai government sees through the trap ...

  • Re:why do it? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by s20451 ( 410424 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:28PM (#8221220) Journal
    Am I the only one who thinks this is to keep Linux and other free operating systems out of third world countries? In that sense it would be a strategic move.

    Looks like Microsoft is finally listening to their poorer customers.
  • Re:But Wait... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by AKnightCowboy ( 608632 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:36PM (#8221282)
    Didn't they already released Windows XP Home?


    Try reading the article. Windows XP Home was still too expensive for these users in Thailand. I seriously doubt you'll be able to get it outside of some OEM deals on computers sold in Thailand so I wouldn't get so enthused over this.

  • Re:But Wait... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by LostCluster ( 625375 ) * on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:38PM (#8221299)
    The pro-Linux camps, however, have something to worry about here. Basically, Microsoft is willing to create a cut-rate version of XP rather than risk the users there switching over to Linux....
  • by jay-oh-eee! ( 750468 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:41PM (#8221311) Homepage
    It's funny, people complain about how MS forces you to install everything (IE, Outlook, etc) and call in "anti-competitive" and when they offer it somewhere with these things stripped out it's called "crippled". There's no winning the article poster or OP, it seems.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:41PM (#8221314)
    I would like to get my hands on one of these if it does not include all the applications i dont need - windows messenger , internet explorer, Outlook express. Just the basic UI. I can customize it the way i need. Lesser the functionality, more secure the box will be.

    It sounds like you want windows XP embedded. For the embedded market, MS lets you pick & choose which parts of the OS you want.

    Strangely enough, MS also says that this is completely impossible for the regular version, and that IE cannot be separated from the OS.
  • by LostCluster ( 625375 ) * on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:43PM (#8221332)
    It's highly likely that one of the tweaks they're making to this "light" version is to lock it to the Thai language. If you want to use English, you must upgrade to the full-price XP Home at whatever the local equal to US$99 is...
  • Re:Addiction (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:47PM (#8221357)
    That makes absolutely no sense at all. So reducing the price by a whopping 5% makes them "affordable"?

    No, but it keeps the price of a pack under the psychological limit of EUR 5. Over that price, studies have shown that people are much more reluctant to buy.
  • by HawkPilot ( 730860 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:50PM (#8221378)
    It doesn't even say why Microsoft is doing it: concerns about piracy? relative crappiness of Thai computers? price concerns?

    My guess is that they are releasing a product with a price point that the market can bear. It kinda makes since economically. The alternative would be to release WinXP Home at the same relative prices that they are selling it for in the rest of the world. And have it not sell because it is too expensive based on the average earnings.

    They could just sell XP Home at a reduced price but that would admit both the monopolistic practice of "same product - different price," depending on where you live, that movie studios and others have been accused of doing. Also, people would realize that the marginal cost of each addition copy sold of any software product is so low that the rest of the world will not stand for the prices that they are currently paying. After all, why would you want to pay $100 for a licensed copy of Win XP Home when you know that it is sold elsewhere for $10 and you are essentially paying for digital bits on a plastic disc that cost practically nothing to manufacture. Sure, the programmers have to get paid but doesn't $100 for your copy seem excessive? Therefore, avoid this scenerio and sell a crippled version. [My vote would be to "cripple" it by not including IE ]

    I have not verified this, but I would imagine that computer hardware is generally cheaper in that part of the world and legal software makes up a higher percentage of TCO. This is probably just another factor.

  • by Pharmboy ( 216950 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:50PM (#8221381) Journal
    Actually, I am guessing the "crippled" comment was more of a troll for the original author. Its a sure way to get comments, but then again, thats not a problem on /.

    I agree with the other posts, I wouldn't call this crippled if it runs the apps, I would call it streamlined. I would be interested in a copy, if they "crippled" out the media players and such. Im sure it still has IE tho, since they wont let you use windowsupdate with Firebird.
  • by farnz ( 625056 ) <slashdot&farnz,org,uk> on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:51PM (#8221387) Homepage Journal
    There's an EU anti-trust investigation ongoing into unfair practices by Microsoft. If MS can sell Windows and Office cheaply in Thailand, one of the EU's questions is likely to be "Why can't you do that here?"; this crippled version aims to do an end run around such ideas by giving an obvious answer.
  • Re:Addiction (Score:3, Interesting)

    by kju ( 327 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @07:58PM (#8221423)
    In germany some companies started to sell packs with 10 cigarettes, which seems to make much more sense than only leaving 1 cigarette out of 20.
  • by jay-oh-eee! ( 750468 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:04PM (#8221468) Homepage
    You're not serious, right? Just because they're forcing a different option doesn't mean that they aren't still forcing the choice.

    I'm serious exactly because they're not "enforcing a different option", they're enforcing nothing -- they're taking stuff out, not replacing it with something else.

    Since WMP, for example, isn't replace with WMP-lite.
  • Some other examples (Score:5, Interesting)

    by uptownguy ( 215934 ) <UptownGuyEmail@gmail.com> on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:07PM (#8221485)
    Reminds me of US pharmaceutical companies charging some countries more than others for some drugs. Like HIV drugs, for example.

    ...or gas stations charging 10 cents more/gallon at the only downtown pump versus one of many in the suburbs.

    ...or books on the New York Times bestseller list being discounted by 15% at some bookstores but not others...

    ...or taxis and buses charging an additional "downtown zone" or "rush hour zone" rate for the same ride...

    ...or the vending machine at the movie theater charging you $2 for a 16 oz. coke when you could buy a 12 pack for less that double that...

    ...or the hip bar downtown charging $6 for a Heineken but the college bar where my brother lives sells beer for 75 cents on tap...

    ...or the cell phone company letting you make free calls on weekends but charging you 25 cents/minute for weekdays...

    Yeah. Gosh. supply. Demand. Different markets. Variable pricing strategies. Absolutely shocking. We simply must create laws so that the government can set fair prices for everyone. [wikipedia.org]
  • who would want it? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Mark19960 ( 539856 ) <MarkNO@SPAMlowcountrybilling.com> on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:08PM (#8221492) Journal
    when you can pirate the 'full' version for less?
    isnt that what they do there?
    Micro$oft could GIVE the 'lite' version away and STILL be in the same position.
  • Re:Microsoft Plan (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Threni ( 635302 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:14PM (#8221525)
    It's a masterstroke, isn't it. Surely people will just pirate the US version? Or perhaps a most local one, if it's in a language they speak?
  • Red Herring (Score:3, Interesting)

    by UnknowingFool ( 672806 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:16PM (#8221531)
    I read the article and it isn't very clear about what is being removed out of XP Lite. It is clear that it will be cheaper than XP Home. I'm sure the things that won't be removed are: IE, Media Player, maybe even MSN Explorer.

    Maybe there won't be much at all removed, but MS needs to justify the lower price. Otherwise, if it offered Windows XP Home at dramatically lower prices, some governments may start asking the 64,000 question:

    "Well, Bill when we said we couldn't afford XP Home at Z price and considered Linux, you say you can offer it at 1/3 Z price. If that was the case, why didn't you offer that before? Were you gouging us that much?"

  • by Jason1729 ( 561790 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:21PM (#8221561)
    Any version of XP a consumer can legally get is already crippled beyond use. It has a huge bug called "product activation" which means you can not reinstall the product you supposedly bought without Microsoft's permission. This renders the product completely useless because you won't be able to re-install it in 5 or 10 years to access old data, or if somehow newer MS code is even worse.

    Why is some other version with an insignificant additional crippiling newsworthy?

    Jason
    ProfQuotes [profquotes.com]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:31PM (#8221620)
    there's 3 reasons:
    1. Some countries (eg Canada) set a limit on the price of pills based on what manufacturing costs. This assumes that the RD, testing, and other setup costs are 0. Notice that there aren't any drug companies based on Canada that produce new drugs.
    2. Some countries (eg the African ones) threaten to pass laws which ignore IP rights and legalize generics.
    3. Some countries have lower incomes, standard of living, etc. By dropping the price within that country, overall revenue can be increased (lower price * more sales > higher price * fewer sales).
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:33PM (#8221628)
    all you have to do is "borrow" the MSIE COM .jar files. ;-) (haven't tried it though)
  • Re:why do it? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Tony Hoyle ( 11698 ) <tmh@nodomain.org> on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:34PM (#8221636) Homepage
    A friend just bought a radeon SE, got a firmware hack for it and it became a full radeon... Not sure what model, though (I was only half listening at the time) but it seems ATI only produce one board an cripple it for the cheaper end of the market.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:37PM (#8221643)
    Yeah. Gosh. supply. Demand. Different markets.

    So wait, you mean that companies only get to call it a global marketplace when it benefits them?

    I guess pure chaos would erupt and the world itself would shatter into trillions of little rocks if companies were forced to either pick a global market or a local market, and were forced to stick to it. None of the current "labor is a global market, we'll hire programmers from 3rd world countries and fire our own programmers" "Oh, but software is a local market. We'll make this area pay 1/100th what the other pays, and give them an inferior product to boot. But it will take 2 years to produce. Oh, and to make sure we can enforce this, we'll create a DMCA protected access control to make sure nobody pays extra to get a copy early and try to use it in the wrong zone, and to make sure that nobody in the 100x zone buys and uses a cheap copy."

    But thats ok, after all its Good Old American Capitalism, and in the future we won't have to bother to elect people, since the corporations will just buy whoever they want into the presidency and congress (openly, instead of the current practice of giving money for some reason which can't really be explained but most certainly isn't outright bribery, oh no, giving money to elected people and expecting them to vote your way is never bribery). And just like always they'll declare a new tax cut for the 500 or so people with over $5billion income, and shift the burden onto the millions and millions of people making $10,000 a year, that is, if they're even lucky enough to manage to get a job, what with PhDs taught in US schools on US taxpayers' dimes who then move back to their home country in Umswanigosta going for $5000 a year.

    But hey, companies doing whatever the hell they want is all ok with you.
  • Re:But Wait... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by maxbang ( 598632 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:39PM (#8221659) Journal

    There's more to it than that - I'm venturing they're releasing this in hopes that people will purchase something from them, not from the local "vendor" on the corner selling XP out of the back of his autorikshaw. That way they get a little money. The Linux thing is valid, but part of a larger picture.

  • by Moderator ( 189749 ) * on Sunday February 08, 2004 @08:48PM (#8221722)
    Yeah, the full version costs a full $5 at Panthip Plaza in Krung Thep.
  • Re:But Wait... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Jaysyn ( 203771 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @09:02PM (#8221856) Homepage Journal
    This is the same 10 user limit as in Windows 2000 Pro, but I *think* it's defeatable (in Win2K) with a registry hack. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    Jaysyn
  • by saarbruck ( 314638 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @09:22PM (#8221980) Homepage
    I seem to recall not so long ago Microsoft claiming it was impossible [com.com] to remove components or offer any sort of modular form of Windows? Wasn't this one of the prime arguments that MS used in the antitrust trial? "No, your honor, we can't remove Internet Explorer. It just doesn't work that way." I really wish the defense witness had been allowed to demonstrate [com.com] just how modular XP embedded is...
  • Re:But Wait... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Pharmboy ( 216950 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @09:24PM (#8221991) Journal
    Win2k is 10, and I am not sure about NT4. I want to say it is like Win95, being the same interface without plug and play, meaning a default of 10 but changeable in the NetBeui properties (along with NCBS, which I have no idea is for). But I can't swear to NT4 or older. I have a copy of NT 3.1 around here somewhere, I could install and see I guess:) I know WfW 3.11 had no limitations, but was rather slow. At least it would network with Win95

    There is no technical reason for the limitation, its purely a licensing thing. You know....

    3. Profit!

    Oh, on another point. I have a network with about 20 computers right now that needed a simple file server, so its got a P3/1ghz server running Windows 95, lol. The stations are all 98/ME/2k/pro. The 2k and pro boxes connect ok because I have file/printer sharing OFF on all the rest. They are more forgiving about connecting to a 9x "server". On a pure xp network, you just dont see the computers over the threshold. They don't exist.

    And no, it was not easy getting 95 to run properly and semi secure on a newer box without proper drivers, but it runs well as long as you boot it every month (it runs out of seconds to count at about 39 days and like all 95, will autocrash then). And since it is firewalled off the net (hardware and software) it does the job. Oh, and yes, its even a licensed copy of 95.
  • by jsse ( 254124 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @09:41PM (#8222092) Homepage Journal
    Yes, I did RTFA, and it said nothing about what would be different between the "light" version and the normal version.

    Becase they're not going to take out any more functionalities, they'd just block them.

    Do you realize that XP Home is just a couple of DLL away from XP pro? A complete guide to convert XP pro from XP home is out there.

    It's more economical to block them rather than taking them away. :)
  • by drpatt ( 557639 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @09:59PM (#8222176)
    I would like to get my hands on one of these if it does not include all the applications i dont need - windows messenger , internet explorer, Outlook express.

    This version of Windows has been around for a long time. It is called NT4.
  • by BigBadBri ( 595126 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @10:02PM (#8222187)
    Bet you 1500 baht buys a weeks food for a decent sized family.

    Of course Microsoft should price products according to the target market, but given the doctrine of first sale, and the principles of free trade, if you can get a product legitimately for 1500 baht in Thailand, then that same product will become available everywhere for the same price.

    Now you can either have free trade, or you can have fair regional pricing.

    Personally, I'll take Linux.

  • thats not possible (Score:3, Interesting)

    by geekoid ( 135745 ) <dadinportland&yahoo,com> on Sunday February 08, 2004 @10:16PM (#8222279) Homepage Journal
    won't it break the OS? I mean the told a judge that there OS couldn't be broke apart.
  • Re:But Wait... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Pharmboy ( 216950 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @10:21PM (#8222298) Journal
    If policy allows, do yourself a favour and replace 95 on that server with e-smith linux. It was recently spun back to the community by Mitel and I've yet to see a more intuitive, simple Samba server.

    I had played with samba and found the performance to be very good, but had trouble getting both 95 and 98 to connect. Now thats not an issue, since all the 95 boxes are gone. I am planning to move it over this summer (too busy this time of year). Had not heard of e-smith, tho, thanks for the lead.
  • I see potential... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by vandan ( 151516 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @10:27PM (#8222326) Homepage
    I think if you removed IE, Outlook Express, Active Desktop, Windows Media Player, and Digital Rights Management from Windows, it would be far LESS crippled, and actually MORE valuable.
  • Re:But Wait... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Rallion ( 711805 ) on Sunday February 08, 2004 @10:55PM (#8222475) Journal
    That's interesting...I was at a LAN with 11 people, and we had 100% network functionality. Sharing files and all. All running various versions of XP. ...am I magic? Seriously. I believe you. But I believe me too.
  • by superpulpsicle ( 533373 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @12:59AM (#8223026)
    Like WinXP home and professional, there is a program out there (cough.. NTswitcher) which changes a couple registry settings and poof... home becomes identical to professional. As was the same with the windows 2000 series, I am pretty sure XP light is the same thing regardless of what M$ marketing saids.
  • interesting (Score:3, Interesting)

    by CAIMLAS ( 41445 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @02:34AM (#8223355)
    I wonder what exactly 'reduced functionality' will mean? No more 'security loopholes' allowing 'power users' to use machines as remote gateways? :P

    Kidding aside, I wonder what exactly they plan on stripping out. Personally (as others here have mentioned as well), I'd love to see a version of XP, minus all the GUI tweaks, 'tools' that nobody uses (sans defrag), IE, WMP, and the like. I imagine that, if it's in the least bit operable, and it's available in English, it would see widespread pirating due to the suckyness of XP.

    Then again, it might just be their way of saying it's going to have fully implimented DRM :P
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 09, 2004 @02:56AM (#8223433)
    Take, for instance, the Quadro line of cards by nVidia. You are buying an intentionally crippled card everytime you buy a GeforceFX. Same hardware, sans a couple switched transistors and a slightly modified BIOS. In other words, they made the Quadro, and then crippled it to be the GeForce.


    Interesting.
    I wonder why the Quadro line is priced between $500 and $1800 while the GeForce line is priced between $40 and $500.
    Those must be some mighty expensive transistors they removed...
    To me that means either the professionals who buy the Quadro are being ripped off, or NVidia is losing money on the GeForce.
  • by Jennifer E. Elaan ( 463827 ) on Monday February 09, 2004 @04:05AM (#8223672) Homepage
    100 baht sounds a little steep. I saw VCD's going for more like 30-40 when I was there. And this wasn't underground either. I wasn't entirely sure that the products were actually pirate, though, because DVD's were going for only a little more (~120 baht or so).

    Still, it's true enough. The government doesn't seem to care at all about foreign copyrights. And these aren't underground operations either. This is all out for public display.

    PS. $1US ~= 40 baht.

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...