Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Politics aside for a moment. (Score 1) 538

I'll be the outlier then, this was a stupid, arrogant thing to do, especially since Sarah Palin has been busted for the same thing in recent memory.

That being said, it's still not anywhere near enough to make me vote for anyone the GOP has trotted out thus far.

And please don't bring up 3rd parties, last time I voted a 3rd party was in 2000 (in Florida) & we ended up with GWB for two terms.

Never again. Better to change a party from the inside.

Comment: Re:Sounds good (Score 1) 599

by Jaysyn (#49138431) Attached to: Republicans Back Down, FCC To Enforce Net Neutrality Rules

Because the FCC generally isn't allowed to release an incomplete regulatory document because of the effect it can have on the markets. It's always been this way with a single exception in my lifetime. If you had actually read this thread you'd know that.

And you wouldn't look like such a doofus.

Comment: Re:Sounds good (Score 2) 599

by Jaysyn (#49131877) Attached to: Republicans Back Down, FCC To Enforce Net Neutrality Rules

If you had done a bit of research, or DEITY$ forbid, read the very thread you are posting on, you'd know that what you are parroting is disingenuous drivel.

It's 8 pages of regulations. The bulk of the document is responding to the millions of FCC comments as they are required to do by law.

Also, the text of the ICC/USF was 751 pages, so as regulatory documents go, this one isn't anything special.

But, by all means, keep on being a useful idiot.

You scratch my tape, and I'll scratch yours.