Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

ID Theft Made Easy

Posted by CowboyNeal on Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:26 PM
from the buying-in dept.
chiagoo writes "You may remember that 70% of the time, people will reveal their passwords for chocolate. Well, at this year's Infosecurity Europe, it was revealed that 92% of the 200 attendees surveyed would gladly trade enough information to steal their identities for a chance to win theater tickets. Social engineering at its best. Why spend time writing bots and rootkits when people will give you what you want for a piece of candy or a ticket to see The Pacifier?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
ID Theft Made Easy | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 435 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • by garcia (6573) * on Monday March 28 2005, @12:27PM (#12067024)
    (http://www.lazylightning.org/)
    One man "provided all his information without question, but returned five minutes later asking for it back, as he thought that we could use it to gain access to his online bank account," Sellick recalled. "We gave him back his survey form, but did not provide any evidence of who we were. If we had been fraudsters, he would have been too late."

    I refuse to do business with any Lakeville Liquor store in Lakeville, MN because they require a license swipe to verify my birthday. While they claim on a sign on the counter that they respect my privacy what does that really mean? Do the clerks know that those machines can store an XLS spreadsheet of all the information scanned? Do they know if those that own/operate the stores use that information later? Perhaps it's just to CYOA if some question arises from authorities later but how can I be so sure? I can't so I drive the two and a half miles out of my way to get my wine/beer somewhere else that doesn't scan. I make sure to tell the clerks that I buy there because they don't scan. Most don't care but perhaps someone will overhear me.

    The manager at the Lakeville store sure did. I asked "are you going to scan that?" and when the clerk said she was I told her I would like my license back and that I was sorry that I couldn't do business with them. The clerk had no problems with it but the manager muttered that I was an "asshole" under his breath. Somehow I'm the asshole for protecting my privacy. If only more people would refuse to hand over their personal information. What happens if someone robbed the liquor store and stole the little scan box along with the register, would you be a bit more concerned then?

    How about the gas station that writes down your license plate information when you purchase gas w/o paying at the pump. It's just for their economic safety they say. Do you know how much information you can get on the owner of a car from their license plate? What happens if I go inside, buy a few items, and pay w/my credit card? They now have my CC # and my personal information. That's enough for ID theft as well. I saw the clerk write down my license plate and I asked them for the paper when I left. They were a little confused as to how I knew they did that and they were VERY confused as to why I would want that back. I didn't feel the need to educate them on it though.

    Even I am not immune to this sort of scamming for info. While out drinking with friends (drunk actually) I was approached by an attractive female working for Marlboro. She would give me cheap cigarette coupons and a free Zippo lighter if I let them give me a survey. Drunk, distracted, and clueless, I swiped my license and took the survey. I have been getting coupons and various "gifts" in the mail since. I could have been completely duped by these people and not had a single clue. Luckily they were who they said they were and I'm not seeing any miscellaneous charges being rung up by any cigarette companies trying to cover their lawsuits with my money. Anyone (no matter how careful) can be owned. By the way - I don't even smoke cigarettes.

    So, just because we know a company (or its representatives) we should not trust them with our personal information and the more people that are willing to trade over their private/personal information for a bottle of wine, a 12 pack of cheap beer, or a free Zippo might want to think twice.
  • Any good info though (Score:5, Interesting)

    by slashnutt (807047) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:28PM (#12067033)
    (Last Journal: Friday June 17 2005, @07:32AM)
    it was revealed that 92% of the 200 attendees surveyed would gladly trade enough information to steal their identities for a chance to win theater tickets.

    Yeah it is cool to think that 92% of the people you have enough info to steal their identity. But lets put theory to practice and see how much of the 92% gave real information.

    For me any form online I was born in 1900. My zip code is 12345, usually 666 Elm street, Amityville, NY. Phone number is 1-800-328-7448 and call anytime. I would make of 250,000+ or anything thing they have in the list that is higher. My occupation is the first drop down. Oh and my email address is who you are @mailinater.com. If the site looks up the information than I just go the governors web site and copy that info and use that. So I bet if you run a web site and you found that one than you probably could cross reference that info back to me and I would only say good job.

    So I speculate that the 92% you have data from that you'll have 25% techices that give you 100% BS. It will occur to the general population once more and more people get burned to keep quiet.

  • Money made easy (Score:3, Interesting)

    by SamMichaels (213605) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:28PM (#12067041)
    I have absolutely no problem earning a living from recovering virused, spyware-ridden and cracked systems (or I guess in this case, "here's my password systems"). I encourage this idiot behavior :)
  • Moral of the story (Score:5, Insightful)

    No matter how many privacy "protections" there are, it won't stop people from volunteering their own personal information.
  • by GAATTC (870216) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:29PM (#12067050)
    For free identity theft monitoring, please send your name, social security number, birth date, credit card numbers with expiration dates, and address to protectmyidentity@gmail.com. We will take care of your credit record for you and guarantee that you will never have to worry about your good credit record ever again.
  • Exchange by michelcultivo (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:30PM
  • ah, social engineering (Score:5, Interesting)

    by lethalpotato37 (871428) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:31PM (#12067082)
    (http://www.intelligentcanuck.com/)
    I entered my friend's e-mail in hotmail, and clicked the forgotten password button. It gave me his secret question, and from there I simply asked him it. Its a secret question! Ack.
  • Bogus data (Score:5, Interesting)

    by crush (19364) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:31PM (#12067083)

    Whenever I have spare time I go out of my way to answer surveys like these with bogus data. Like they say "It'll only take a couple of minutes of your time Sir!"

    I consider it an important and useful civic act to poison the noosphere with false data in order to throw off the pundits, pollsters, advertisers and fraudsters.

    • Bogus data doesn't work by Simonetta (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:01PM
    • Re:Bogus data (Score:4, Funny)

      by ackthpt (218170) * on Monday March 28 2005, @01:11PM (#12067495)
      (http://www.dragonswest.com/ | Last Journal: Monday November 05, @07:35PM)
      I consider it an important and useful civic act to poison the noosphere with false data in order to throw off the pundits, pollsters, advertisers and fraudsters.

      Name: Andrew Nonymuss
      Occupation: Executive Assisstant to the Vice Peon of Menial Affairs
      Income: 400,000 zorkmids (I don't know what that is in dollars
      Age: 39.14246575342465753424657534246575
      Ethnic: Some of the above, but in no particular order.
      Have you bought any of our products before? Only when I couldn't find anything else to disembowel a Kodiak Marmoset with.
      Were you satisfied with it? Why don't you ask the Marmoset?
      Would you buy any of our products again? Only if it's that or be stoned by an angry mob.

      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • This is truly sad (Score:5, Funny)

    by heir2chaos (656103) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:31PM (#12067084)
    I could see giving up the info for a good movie, but come on, the Pacifier?? :)
    • Re:This is truly sad (Score:5, Informative)

      by stratjakt (596332) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:41PM (#12067173)
      (Last Journal: Sunday November 11, @09:31AM)
      Theater tickets, not cinema tickets. Submitter is just an asshole.

      Tickets to something like Phantom can cost from hundreds to thousands of dollars for good seats, depending on the city. However, they will almost certainly get you laid.

      I wouldn't even stop walking for free movie tickets.
      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Information is king. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Dimentox (678813) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:32PM (#12067091)
    Personally I think that most people are not aware that the information that they are giving could be used in that way. The problem is that our personal information has become more and more frequently asked. I remember back years ago when you could actually refuse to give your SSN but now your SSN has become a more Unified Personal ID number. This in itself is a shame. People need to be educated about what information should be given. With the article there I am sure there are quite a bit of people who actually use social engeneering to gain what they seek. But there are the other ones who would rather do things anon. What have you all done/given to win things? I know that when i refure to give out my information they usually say they cant give me what I won. It really makes you question what this information they gain is being used for when you win something. I am sure it goes into some marketing DB somewhere that the company uses. But one can never be sure or safe. My X Wife one time had identity theft happen to her and it was a major hastle for us to sort it out. Though we have no idea how the information was gained. Let me tell you tracking down where the information was gained is close to impossible.
  • Telemarketing / Teleservices (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TechnologyX (743745) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:32PM (#12067092)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday November 23 2005, @03:00PM)
    Being in the telemarketing industry, I can whole heartedly confirm the stupidity of most people. Hell, I can get someone's credit card, shipping address, and telephone number, and then they ask "oh, what was this product again??"

    Flash some useless piece of shit on TV, get Chuck Norris to pretend like he uses it, and people will fall all over themselves to give you all their personal information. I bet I could even ask for their SSN on a Super Duper Blender call and they would cough it up.
  • AC (Score:5, Funny)

    by gammygator (820041) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:33PM (#12067098)
    That Anonymous Coward dude must've really screwed up. Everybody seems to have his password.
    • Re:AC by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:42PM
    • Re:AC (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 28 2005, @01:20PM (#12067573)
      That Anonymous Coward dude must've really screwed up. Everybody seems to have his password.

      Actually, I just post a lot
      [ Parent ]
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • rootkit (Score:4, Funny)

    by stonebeat.org (562495) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:33PM (#12067104)
    (http://validate.sf.net/)
    Why spend time writing bots and rootkits when people will give you what you want for a piece of candy or a ticket to see The Pacifier?

    must write rootkits, to allow for future logins. don't want to be handing out candy, for each time i want to login into a system.
  • biometrics (Score:3, Insightful)

    I'll make the obligatory comment: Biometrics! The sooner the price comes down on these and the reliability goes up, they will be much better than passwords. I think today, two factor authentication is enough of a hurdle.

    I know fingerprints can be foiled with rubber or BREATHING, but if you combine that with voice print or retinal scan, it should be pretty secure, even today. Add in facial recognition, and you've got a secure environment.

    All authentication mechanisms are just hurdles. You have to hope your hurdles are high enough to obstruct the level of cracker that is after your information.

    I have convinced people at work that making people change their passwords every month totally backfires; it causes utter INsecurity when the people can't remember the password because they have to change it all the time. They end up putting it on post-it notes in drawers next to the desk. I understand the motive, to increase the time it takes to brute-force the password, but when the users are going to do this in reaction to this because they have so many to remember, then you have zero security.

    In short, we NEED biometrics, and we need them widely available and cheap.
    • Re:biometrics by sulli (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:39PM
      • Re:biometrics (Score:5, Insightful)

        by rjelks (635588) on Monday March 28 2005, @01:01PM (#12067386)
        (http://www.geekinformed.com/)
        "Replacing a compromised retina scan is mighty difficult, however."

        I'd rather give up my wallet in a mugging than have to fork over MY EYE.

        Seriously, I have a feeling that biometrics will just be spoofed. I'm sure I read an article about Gummy Bears and foiling a finger-print scanner. As long as there are people in charge of information, social engineering will be able to cut through all of these countermeasures.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:biometrics by the-build-chicken (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @07:53PM
          • Re:biometrics by rjelks (Score:2) Tuesday March 29 2005, @11:22AM
        • Re:biometrics by sulli (Score:2) Thursday March 31 2005, @01:52PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Not So by Ironsides (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:48PM
      • Re:Not So by lucifuge31337 (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @03:40PM
    • Re:biometrics by dayid (Score:3) Monday March 28 2005, @12:53PM
      • Re:biometrics by lucifuge31337 (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @03:43PM
        • Re:biometrics by dayid (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @05:34PM
          • Re:biometrics by lucifuge31337 (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @06:10PM
        • Re:biometrics by DZign (Score:2) Tuesday March 29 2005, @09:38AM
          • Re:biometrics by lucifuge31337 (Score:2) Tuesday March 29 2005, @09:45AM
      • Re:biometrics by chialea (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @04:12PM
    • Re:biometrics by danharan (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:58PM
      • Re:biometrics by alatesystems (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @03:41PM
    • Re:biometrics by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @01:00PM
    • by clickster (669168) on Monday March 28 2005, @01:43PM (#12067910)
      On transactions where the person isn't present (such as grocery store transactions, etc), wouldn't this still be suceptible to Man in the Middle attacks? Let's say that, in the near future, home fingerprint scanners become popular. Think about it. I want to sign into my online banking, I have to swipe my finger. Some identity thief in Podunk, Idaho can't just log into my account. But if I'm transmitting my fingerprint, can't it be intercepted and used again later, the same as a password? You might be able to avoid dupe transactions by attaching some sort of special identifier, but you can't keep me from hacking my fingerprint-swiping machine to send Person X's fingerprint to the online banking site instead of mine. It's just a file.

      I've had the same issue with signing my name on electronic signature pads (I do it, I just don't like it). Once I do that, it can't be hard to take my signature that is on file and simply move it to a different location in your database and attach it to a different transaction can it? Then you print out a copy of the receipt for that new transaction and BAM!! There's my signature. And since it's electronic, I MUST have signed for it. Why there's even a timestamp. Let's see who has electronic copies of my signature...oh, FedEx, UPS, Airborne Express, DHS, damn near every place I've ever used my debit card, and the list goes on.

      Granted, a regular ink signature can be faked, but everyone accepts that. For some reason, when you tack on the word "electronic", everyone suddenly seems to drop their guard and simply accept its authenticity as the gospel even though it's usually even LESS secure. Don't even get me started on "electronic voting"
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:biometrics by geoff lane (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @02:10PM
    • Re:biometrics by northstarlarry (Score:1) Tuesday March 29 2005, @12:24AM
    • Re:biometrics by Dark Coder (Score:2) Tuesday March 29 2005, @05:41AM
    • Re:biometrics by shis-ka-bob (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @02:04PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Of course the real problem is... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:34PM
  • giving up passwords (Score:4, Insightful)

    by markov_chain (202465) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:36PM (#12067129)
    TFA: Last year, people at a transit station gladly gave up their passwords for a chocolate Easter egg.

    What passwords? Did they check them? This doesn't sound too credible.
  • Can I have a cookie? by Bongoots (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:37PM
  • by sssmashy (612587) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:37PM (#12067137)

    and other personal data, just for a bit of candy. Heck, I'd do it for free. I just wouldn't give them the correct password. I'd also make sure that the personal data I gave them was total BS.

    So how do we know that the seemingly credulous participants in the survey weren't lying?

  • Free Chocolate (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 28 2005, @12:37PM (#12067138)
    Dear Sir,

    ASSISTANCE REQUIRED FOR ACQUISITION OF MASS QUANITY OF CHOCOLATE

    I write to inform you of my desire to acquire large quanities of chocolate in your country on behalf of the Director of Contracts and Finance Allocations of the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing in Nigeria.

    Considering his very strategic and influential
    position, he would want the transaction to be as
    strictly confidential as possible. He further wants his identity to remain undisclosed at least for now, until the completion of the transaction. Hence our desire to have an overseas agent.

    I have therefore been directed to inquire if you would agree to act as our overseas agent in order to actualize this transaction.

    The deal, in brief, is that the funds with which we intend to carry out our proposed investments in your country is presently in a coded account at the Nigerian Apex Bank (i.e. the Central Bank of Nigeria) and we need your assistance and password to transfer the funds to your country in a convenient bank account that will be provided by you before we can put the funds into use in your country.
  • Who says they gave their real personal data? by stankulp (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:39PM
  • Doesn't matter by Turn-X Alphonse (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:39PM
  • oops by Bad to the Ben (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:40PM
  • This is NOTHING (Score:5, Informative)

    by msaulters (130992) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:40PM (#12067164)
    (http://www.google.com/)
    I was at Wal-Mart late one night last week.

    You know those self-checkout stations they have now? Each and every one of them was spitting out paper slips non-stop that were records of the day's transactions. My roommate snapped a photo.

    Each and every slip had the full credit card number, the expiration date, and a copy of the cardholder's signature.

    They were unattended, and the workers had placed plastic bags to catch the slips as they fell out of the machines.

    There must have been hundreds...

    At just one Wal-Mart...

    Out of thousands of stores.
    • Re:This is NOTHING by Datamonstar (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:59PM
      • Re:This is NOTHING by lowrydr310 (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @01:31PM
      • Re:This is NOTHING by msaulters (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @03:43PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:This is NOTHING (Score:5, Insightful)

        by wfberg (24378) on Monday March 28 2005, @01:12PM (#12067502)
        I still have a bag full of old receipts with full credit card numbers I'm trying to figure out how to dispose.

        Wait until winter. Burn as fuel. Stir around the ashes. Easy-peasy-lemon-cheesy. No need for cross-cutting shredders.

        Wait.. Wait, forget I said that. As luck has it, I have a "data destruction" company. I've got some really advanced cross-cutting shredders, right here, siree! Just fork over your metric loads of privacy-sensitive information, and a few hundred bucks for disposal, and go and have a good night's sleep. And if people from the credit-card company call, saying some-one's been using your cards out-of-state, just remember they're most likely identity thieves trying to scam you into giving them your personal information. After all, all your data was safely destroyed....
        [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:This is NOTHING by nospmiS remoH (Score:3) Monday March 28 2005, @01:10PM
    • Re:This is NOTHING by Fareq (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:20PM
    • Re:This is NOTHING by hackstraw (Score:3) Monday March 28 2005, @01:32PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Doesn't surprise me one bit... by HikeFanatic (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:42PM
  • I've RTFA... by griffinn (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:43PM
  • The participants answered questions (Score:3, Insightful)

    by kevin_conaway (585204) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:44PM (#12067206)
    (http://pyscrabble.sf.net/)
    Not necessarily divulged information. These studies are worthless because they ignore the very blatant fact that people can and most likely do give false information.
  • Wait one damn minute (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anita Coney (648748) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:44PM (#12067210)
    Tickets for The Pacifier was NOT part of the deal. You promised me advanced tickets to Revenge of the Sith damnit! If I don't get those tickets soon, I swear I'll change my password!
  • by JudgeFurious (455868) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:45PM (#12067216)

    I'm about as close to paranoid about my personal information as anyone I know and my identity was stolen about 5 weeks ago. I give out practically nothing and it still happened. The part that drives you up the wall is how nobody seems to really give a crap about it. The police yawn, write the report, and leave. The stores all want an affidavit and then go away. Your bank gives you a new account and returns your money. Aside from the pile of paperwork I had, and am still having to deal with it doesn't seem to bother anyone that this happens. This money must have come from somewhere right?

    I know I got all my cash back but I'd bring back roadside crucifixion in a heartbeat if I could get my hands on the guy who wrote $5K worth of checks using my info.
  • The writeup is wrong (Score:3, Informative)

    by porges (58715) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:45PM (#12067217)
    (http://donboy.blogspot.com/)
    Well, at this year's Infosecurity Europe, it was revealed that 92% of the 200 attendees surveyed would gladly trade enough information to steal their identities for a chance to win theater tickets.

    It's 92% of a sample of 200 random Londoners, not 200 of the people who attended Infosecurity Europe.
  • This is good news.... for me by chudik (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:46PM
  • Hey the ssn actually helps here for once by Facekhan (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:47PM
  • Information found out other ways by Antony-Kyre (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:48PM
  • It could happen to you. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by de_boer_man (459797) on Monday March 28 2005, @12:50PM (#12067270)
    I've been very careful about keeping my credit card information safe, but somehow, someone got my credit card information and used it for an online spending spree for e-goods.

    I then used social engineering to MY advantage to get information about the person using my credit card information. This moron did absolutely nothing to cover his tracks. After the police and Visa are through with him, maybe I'll post his information here and see if he likes being on the receiving end of this kind of theft.
  • If they give it to you... by mersy (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:51PM
  • why i write bots and rootkits ... by Triumph The Insult C (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:53PM
  • The way I see it, this is not a sign that people need to be taught not reveal details about their personal life to allow identity theft, but that the standards for allowing new/changed credit and other profitable (including non-monetary) benefits from identity theft should include identifiers that people will not normally give away without realizing it's significance.

    Biometrics are a good example, but even that does not go far enough.

    How about a video clip where the person says something like "I explicitly authorize the following change to my personal credit/identity profile; Please add a $2453 credit line for ABC appliances to purchase a new washer/drier". This and every other change could be stored with the credit/identity profile. It could be done with a simple mic/webcam and some database extensions.

    Birth certificates could include DNA data and/or DNA hashes and new credit/identity profiles could require checking that and recording of a baseline "I Bob Jones authorize the creation of a new credit profile".

    New changes to that profile could be checked against past photos / voice prints anytime a change is requested. Impersonators would have to look and sound very much the person being imitated.

    This would be A very strong standard to block fraud indeed.

    Legislation would be required to prevent the misuse of this kind of DNA data and the accepting of new credit/identity changes without it.

    In Summary: Its not the users who are broken, its the system that does not take into account their likely behaviour and provide cost effective technical solutions to the weaknesses of that behaviour.
  • I'll give info to people I trust by davidwr (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:55PM
  • My avatar.... by signalgod (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:57PM
  • Previously investigated by astralbat (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:04PM
  • Ha! by Hershmire (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:04PM
  • If you dont give it out, someone else will by behemot (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:08PM
  • Chocolate? by AnalogDiehard (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:12PM
  • I'd lie to a pollster for free chocolate - by wsanders (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:13PM
  • But It's Theater! by blueZhift (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:14PM
  • Who's the dummy? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Rev Snow (21340) on Monday March 28 2005, @01:18PM (#12067563)
    Think system wide and find the real
    flaw here. Are people really stupid
    to provide a handful of facts about
    themselves? Or are the banks stupid
    to accept a handful of facts as
    evidence of authorization to access
    an account?

    Seems to me this whole "identity theft"
    is an exercise in blaming people for the
    banks' failures. I haven't had my
    "identity stolen" -- whatever that's
    supposed to mean. No, the bank has been
    tricked, defrauded into giving up my
    money to someone who happens to know my
    mother's maiden name. That's the bank's
    policies hurting the bank's ability to
    do its job -- keep my money safe. That's
    not my problem.

    Calling it "identity theft" and holding
    me responsible for preventing it is just
    an attempt to turn the banks' problem into
    my problem -- one they are happy to help
    me solve for a fee of $10 a month.

    No, thanks, I decline to pay a monthly
    fee to do the bank's work for it.

  • Candy From Babies by Doc Ruby (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:22PM
  • Comprehensive 6-Step plan to avoid Identity Theft. by ac3boy (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:24PM
  • 6-Step plan Edited by ac3boy (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @01:27PM
  • by Ulric (531205) on Monday March 28 2005, @01:36PM (#12067816)
    (http://siag.nu/ulric/)
    The password would be 12345. That's the kind of password an idiot would use on his luggage.
  • How do they know that people aren't lying? by LABob (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @01:38PM
  • People just don't think by nothingtodo (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @01:39PM
  • I Don't Even Need To Ask - They Just Email Them by curran (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @01:41PM
  • Who is the actual source of the problem? by SLOGEN (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @01:47PM
  • Think for yourselves by bitswapper (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @01:47PM
  • Look out for the Red Flags! by night_flyer (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:51PM
  • . . . Oh crap! by AcidLacedPenguiN (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @02:23PM
  • mmmmm Chocolate...... by Mark Gillespie (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @02:23PM
  • It is the system that makes ID theft possible by amiliv (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @02:24PM
  • Current authentication schemes are outdated by sabertiger (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @02:44PM
  • You may remember... by TheAwfulTruth (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @04:14PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • For a lighter by greenbird (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @04:39PM
  • Reverse it by omega9 (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @04:49PM
  • DMV by thegoofy (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @05:20PM
  • Just Search FileSharing for "Taxes" by georgehm3 (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @05:29PM
  • I got Password Safe but what about my swap file? by windowpain (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @06:11PM
  • Re:Win free cruise vacation!!! by soft_guy (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:40PM
  • Re:send mine to... by Reignking (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @12:44PM
  • Re:Yeah. by halivar (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @01:01PM
  • Re:Trade pwd 4 sex (Score:5, Funny)

    by cyber0ne (640846) on Monday March 28 2005, @01:29PM (#12067722)
    (http://www.cyber0ne.com/)
    Trade pwd 4 sex

    Actually, I did that once. My girlfriend and I were having a fight because she accused me of not trusting her. As a show of trust and good faith, I told her my main password for important stuff. Shortly afterwards, we had make-up sex. After she fell asleep, I went and changed my passwords.
    [ Parent ]
  • 19 replies beneath your current threshold.