Furthermore, the reality is that litigated patents are already reviewed by a panel of experts: the expert witnesses called by the parties.
Which is one of the problems with patents per TA, patents are not reviewed prior to rubber stamping them which leads to patent trolling and settling for those who cannot afford to defend themselves against bogus violations claims. Proper review coming in the door would reduce the problems.
Link to Original Source
Because truth is an absolute defense against libel.
Only in the United States. It's backwards in many European countries.
"The amount taken from your paycheck has absolutely no effect on the total you have to pay for the year."
And that's the problem - if they're going to just TAKE it from me without permission - just take out what I owe, and LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE.
Thankfully, I've been able to sustain myself on less than 8,000 a year (below poverty,) so I don't have to file, and if I filed now for back taxes, they'd likely owe me tons of money.
Probably not. You might think you are smart by doing this, but really $8k per year? How much have you lost in standard of living by hiding out in the Ozarks? Also: "tons of money". Any "tons of money" refund claims would likely be denied due to the fact that you have not timely filed your returns.
You know, I work with people who don't want the government in their lives. Funny thing is my main job is a government job. So the government is already in their lives. One guy takes time off so he can get his full amount of Social Security (read government money) and pension from his previous government job. You sound a lot like that guy.
The appropriate charge would be capital contempt of court, with expedited sentencing and a fast tracked execution. Firing squad is a little hard to justify in the US, but maybe if the bailiff shouted "he's coming right for us!" before shooting they could get around the details.
The creators of South Park need your address so they can send their C&D letter for misappropriation of their Intelletcual Property, specifically the phrase, "he's coming right for us!". This phrase is only to be used by characters on the show to justify blowing the crap out of innocent rabbits and deer with fully automated firearms.
But they still have the exclusive right to legally distribute it.
The statute makes no distinction between "the exclusive right to legally distribute it" and "the exclusive right to distribute it". If you're going to read something like that into the statute, you're going to need some serious citations.
What is the difference between, the statuatory (we are talking about the written statute) right to exclusive distribution and the right to legally distribute? The fact that it's a statute means legal distribution. If it weren't in the statute there would be no legal right to distribute. There is no need to write the word "legal" into the statute. The word "legally" is explicit.
Of course that would mean switching out all of the current servers.