Slashdot Log In
Facebook Gets New Integrated IM Client
Posted by
Zonk
on Fri Oct 05, 2007 03:46 PM
from the this-is-the-problem-with-having-no-friends dept.
from the this-is-the-problem-with-having-no-friends dept.
Stitch_Surfs writes "Blognation is reporting that the IM client FriendVOX has gone live for Facebook. This is the first time that Facebook users (of which there are now some 32 million) can communicate with one another from directly within the Facebook application. This development, by UK-based Techlightenment, effectively closes the loop for any external applications to be used (or necessary) for communication among Facebook users.'It will be interesting to see how quickly FriendVox is adopted and could it ever replace Twitter by simply using the Facebook status. The other question is what will Facebook do if FriendVox ever became too popular? Would they seek to buy it or replicate it themselves? This is the real dilemma facing all Facebook developers living inside the Facebook walled garden, and recently this happened when a developer showed Facebook their new marketplace application which would run inside of Facebook. Inside of two weeks Facebook had suddenly launched their own marketplace!'"
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Facebook Gets New Integrated IM Client
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 79 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
hyperbole (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.atomjax.com/)
Really? The first time they could communicate with each other? what were they doing on the site before?
Re:hyperbole (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday August 29 2006, @06:44PM)
Facebook isn't creepy... (Score:1)
(http://pandora.com/)
Oh good. (Score:2)
(http://www.ablabla.org/)
Popular instant messaging systems be damned, we need another way to send our friends links to shock sites that doesn't work with any others!
Why. (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't get me wrong...from a business sense, I understand why it's being done. From a lot of my friend's point of view, I notice that a large portion of them like the idea of of the applications...but still. Slowly, Facebook is becoming more and more like MySpace....and that's definitely not good.
Developer talking here (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.webgeekworld.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday April 27 2006, @07:47AM)
So, what you're saying is... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Developer talking here (Score:4, Informative)
(Last Journal: Monday October 23 2006, @12:44PM)
Antisocial social networks (Score:2)
(http://stefanco.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 14, @11:09AM)
This is great! Someday, maybe this tool will allow Facebook users to communicate with users on other websites. Imagine the possibilities!
Right now, the web is fragmented into many different isolated islands. Each service requires a different registration, uses different protocols, and are generally incompatible with one another. It's difficult for UserA on Facebook to communicate with UserB on MySpace. Users on AOL Instant Messenger can't talk to users on Yahoo Instant Messenger!
My parents don't use Facebook, AIM or any other social networking technology. Let's think of a solution for them too!
I propose we connect all of these large websites and services, possibly using a series of interconnected networks, well defined common protocols. I think we should call it 'The Interweb'.
Meebo (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://satertek.info/)
http://auburn.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=2354779593 [facebook.com]
This Just In: FUNWALL! (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.threesquirrels.com/)
Mosoto - Alpha Facebook IM Client (Score:1)
another IM client... (Score:2)
(http://www.draconpern.com/)
jabber/xmpp? (Score:3, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday June 14 2005, @06:02PM)
that way any recent non-specific im client should be able to access it, and gtalk at the same time.
Site Down... (Score:2)
(http://www.clan-ncw.com/)
at least it's not myspace (Score:2)
Just what we need (Score:2)
(http://www.depletedcranium.com/)
A proper British take on Facebook (Score:3, Funny)
http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w89/pickledpizza/facebook2.jpg [photobucket.com]
Just brilliant.
Question to Story submitter and Accepting editor (Score:2)
(http://www.noooxml.org/petition)
If this kind of junk makes into front page of slashdot second time in a month (check http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/23/0019224 [slashdot.org] which is there on APPLE topic with a referrer? URL), why the hell are you suggesting us to pay/subscribe to get rid of ads? I could care less about ads, there are 3 layers of disabled software which would allow me to erase them. We, subscribers pay so Slashdot wouldn't have to post this kind of PR junk to front page.
Also, the accepting editor should know that besides whatever he hears on IRC or Web, Slashdot community aren't really lifeleless nerds who doesn't know how things work.
First, there was a completely off topic (Apple topic? Come on) story with a referrer URL and now this story.
If this kind of PR junk , site abuse makes to front page, lets all go elsewhere and "fix that" instead of trying to fix a broken thing.
Why not a Pidgin/Purple plugin then? (Score:1)
And LiveJournal provides a jabber server. (Score:2)
(http://scorch.quickfox.org/)
It's been done before, MySpace has that MySpaceIM thing.
I didn't see such a commotion over LJ providing Jabber or MySpace doing that MySpaceIM thing.
Re:Legally XSS by Facebook? (Score:2, Informative)
(http://blogs.bootsnall.com/2wanderers)
Re:Legally XSS by Facebook? (Score:1)
(http://hateatron.com/)
Re:seriosly (Score:1)
Re:facebook future (Score:4, Insightful)
A) Learn to read things before you fill them out/agree to them, and
B) Resign any position that gives you signing authority at your current job.
Re:who cares so what not news (Score:2)
(http://www.noooxml.org/petition)
Slashdot-as usual gets victimised by someones professional PR agenda it seems.
I expect some big media scandal coming from Facebook soon. It is completely unexplainable to me, it must have some form of thing going on.
It is _really_ stinking PR since Facebook is not implementing XMPP, they are just coming up with a new propetioary closed protocol.
This is the Digg scheme. Post a PR crap to some blog, make it digg up by dedicated "Web 2" monkeys (actually getting paid) and really profit.
Can Zonk explain what kind of "light" he saw in this story to make into front page of Slashdot? I have never used "serious problems with story? Alert" which is appearing on "future stories" when you are subscriber but if I saw this story, I really would.
What the hell is Facebook? What kind of unique thing it offers? What kind of this IM client offers? Working in web page? Jabber guys implemented it at Netscape 6.2 days for Gods sake! Even AOL mail client has AIM working inside along with Yahoo mail.
Re:my analysis (Score:1)
And Slashdot is...?