If we do this we can get ahead of the Machines before they develop enough smarts to realize humans can be used as biological batteries to power their AI collective.

Maybe you guys should just add price tags to all bug reports so users know how much they need to pay for you to care. Lots of goalpost moving here. First you give the ol' cliche "if you want it fixed, get coding" to now bringing how much one has contributed financially into it. You're making commercial software sound preferable. At least then we know the relationship is transactional up front.

It's not lying about it. There's no requirement a company line-item every single product on earnings. Apple has been doing it for years in their reporting, that's why none of the rumors sites can give hard numbers on how badly the iPhone Mini flopped (or the iPhone Air is flopping now) -- Apple has them reported mixed with the more successful models. Their "services" category in earnings includes AppleCare, iCloud, Apple Music subscriptions, App Store fees, and even the Google Search licensing payment. Here is one of their 10Q filings if you want to see for yourself. There is no breakdown of those individual services listed.

I'm going to assume you're misunderstanding my question. I'm only referring to the AI business.
The AI business is not succeeding if it needs to be amalgamated on a balance sheet with other ventures to hide that it's bleeding money.

Reporting bugs is literally a way people who are not software developers can contribute to open source software.

Are you saying only issues reported by coders deserve any attention? Because that sounds a bit antithetical if you're marketing your product to everyday people, as Mozilla does.

Great to hear, maybe now they can look at some of the other 15+ year old bugs they have been ignoring (except when they want to close a new report as a dupe, of course).

It's doesn't sound like a successful business venture if you're having to increase operation expenses at this rate and not be raking in the revenue.

Devices like that normally advertise (or at least mention it) on the product page. It's supposed to be a security feature.

I don't have any personal experience owning a Windows S device, but I feel like I've looked at it before and simply trying to open a command prompt triggers a message about it and steers you to a setting to disable the S mode, with lots of scary language added about how if you do there is no way to put it back.

--
I forget what 8 was for.

It was supposed to make Windows universal on personal computers, tablets, and smartphones. One interface for all three. Apps that ran on all three. Normalize an app store that set guardrails up on what you did on your computer, and brought Microsoft revenue just like the iOS App Store does Apple.

Was it a blanket indictment? I hope they will be cozy in prison, but the way law and order are handled now they might be in bed with powerful people.

Because lots of mouthbreathers only know how to do stuff on "apps" on their phones. The idea they can use Safari in the phone to access websites of the same services is too much.

This seems rather redundant with the AI Sidebar feature they already have. I can interact with a chatbot whenever I want with their existing tool. I guess the difference here is the AI will be watching the browsing to assist you further? Funny how we went to fearing third-party cookies and cross-site scripting to asking a third-party to shoulder surf while we use the Internet.

Also curious what Mozilla as a company is going to focus on after this. Doesn't seem like there is much more AI they can distract themselves with beyond making the browser completely chatbot voice-controlled so you have to verbally ask the computer to see sites.

Wouldn't sensitive cameras be what you want in the case of navigating an environment in low lighting?
Also, have they heard of LiDAR?

I heard the music of vein celebrities goes right to the heart for their fans.

No, the point is we want equal treatment under the law. If corporations get a free pass for copyright infringement -- for profit even in this case, then no more shakedowns of Joe Sixpack because he downloaded a Metallica album to listen to on his iPod.