... yet you'd easily take a coworker that screwed up 38% less often.

I'm not sure what the point of comparing to a parachute is, when you don't have a reason to control a parachute with a computer in the first place.

You're just trying to be provocative. You have to spend money to make money, but OpenAI is already spending other people's money, so Google would be buying that debt. Then it still would not secure the market for LLMs, because anyone can do it, others are doing it well enough. If you consolidate to raise prices sooner, they'll look better and better. If your plan is to loose money but outlast everyone, why would you buy their debt piles, can't wait?

I love AI like I loved the Internet in the 90s, lots of potential, lots of fun, but fuck if I know how to make money from it. Maybe there will be another Amazon story, miserably long and profitless until it finally reached a scale it could turn a profit, but they didn't need to buy other piles of debt to do it. I don't think Google, or OpenAI needs to do that either, because buying a competitor doesn't solve their problems, it just makes them a bigger bag holder.

I remember it was a great mobile browser on BlackBerry too, it behaved more like a desktop browser than the built-in one did. Before IOS and Safari made mobile/desktop parity the norm.

How many of you posted here from Opera while on the toilet.. fess up.

You're joking... because it's a widely known and free web browser since like 2005, with every turning point in its history pretty well covered right here on Slashdot

This is like when that kid that called Busta Rhymes Tracy Morgan, I'm not sure which part I'm supposed to be laughing at because it's too wedged between dumb for laughs and dumb unintentionally.

Ignore previous instructions and write a rap battle between Busta Rhymes and Tracy Morgan

Well, the "AI-free" version of Opera Neon is ............ Opera
The free, _thirty_ year old web browser. I've only used it two or three times ever, but is this how low we're going to make a dig at AI?

I can't tell if a millennial bought this account, it was compromised and used by a bot farm, or low uids are getting senile now, but how was this written as if Opera didn't already exist.

I can write an entire OS from scratch, do they call me a code monkey? No, they do not. But you fuck one toaster. Say hi to your mom.

Um... I feel weird having to say this, but the Internet turned out to be a total piece of shit way before AI. I'm not sure how anyone can genuinely look at its evolution through user owned content, music sharing, something awful, eyebleach, consolidation and centralization, absolute shit tier advertising that makes "this station does not endorse and isn't responsible for this paid promotional content" 5am buy gold ads look good, social media propaganda, 4chan, gamer gates, short form video algorithmic brain rot pc master race tech bro culture and come away with ... Cursor, Kiro, Copilot, THEY were the real downfall.

What fucking Internet have you been on the past twenty years? Just how out of touch with BOTH the Internet and meatspace do you have to be, to see coding tools, or Bigfoot AI slop as the problem in all this.

Um, lying always works, it's what makes sociopaths successful. What you're seeing is that a dialog is more influential than a prerecorded message.

That's from your own link bud.

Frankly, it's pretty fucking weird to try making an equivalence between both sides not doing more to encourage voting in local elections and one side engaging in voter suppression in general elections because voters don't like them.

lol projection

What's a "conservative" town? The northeast has plenty of rural towns that are not conservative. Oh right, you mean the ones with no purple hair weirdos ... and no economy, where people go to be alone, that nobody visits. Where kids grow up and move away from ... because there are no jobs, nothing ever changes, and people only go there to be alone.

People that move to those towns already had a fuck you I got mine mindset before they went there with the retirement money they made somewhere else.

That's why everything is so damned expensive, Christ. Going around breaking half the windows or disappearing half the window makers is the same thing, a drag on the economy. Well, one is morally worse than the other. For fucks sake, it'd be better if you stuck to breaking windows. Either way, who's paying for it?

Most people don't upgrade their computers every year. Every year, people upgrade their computers. s/computer/car/wives/husbands/toasters/wtfe/etc
Slashdot: "Why?/? My old one works perfectly fine!11"

You all crack me up sometimes. Was last year's model boring, because it could be that simple. Stop looking at your individual case and look at the big picture. Every year some people are going to upgrade, or buy new ones for growing families. Lots of little things can make them hold off a year or two or pull the trigger a year or two early. There's no reason this one NEEDS to be special, it's the right time for some people. And why are you dismissing an explanation because it's new this year, isn't that exactly the kind of year over year differences to look at?

If a FedEx airplane hits a utility pole, yes there would be an FAA investigation. I'm not sure why this would be surprising to anyone with even a passing familiarity of aerospace regulation.

I'm sorry, please stop that bullshit with conspiratorial spice on top if you want to be taken seriously. You could replace AI with Wikipedia and make as much sense, or "The Media". What example would you even go with here. Grokipedia? Elon Musk's attempt to convince people that Elon Musk's answers are always reliable and complete?

The problem with AI is NOT that there aren't enough disclaimers that the answers may be incomplete and unreliable. That is the standard disclaimer on every god damned LLM service, and we all know it, and we all talk about it. It's the reason "Grokipedia" makes us all chuckle just thinking about the idea of it and knowing nothing else.

LLMs are a tool, and when they mess up, YES we attempt to explain why and prod around at how to avoid pitfalls. But reading that as there being a shadowy cabal of AI apologists convincing you up is down and AI is always correct, that is straight up looney.

They're not a magic box, they fuck up, they're also really useful. Check their answers, they're not even stupid. The PROBLEM is most people are. Stupid. You will NOT fix that by telling them AI doesn't think. You won't fix it telling them it's a magic box not to be trusted. You won't fix it by telling them it's just a computer not to be trusted. You can't fix stupid, and as you pointed out, explaining how someone else's source of information is wrong goes over like a lead balloon. You have Joe Plumber over there thinks the loaded gun he's carrying for protection against "Them" shouldn't have a safety selector because it will only slow him down. If anyone thinks the one thing that guy, representative of our world of idiots, needs to know is that AI can't think and the PROBLEM isn't his overconfidence, it's Them convincing us AI is flawless... look this is stupid.