Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:corrupt (Score 1, Insightful) 163

They increased prices on consumers to pay for the tariffs, this is known. The consumer collective paid for it, the consumers should be refunded directly, the consumers paid the price, not the megacorps (the largest benefactor from this).

In the end, there will be no attempt to force the corporations to repay the consumers. We gave up on treating humans as important in the face of corporations at some point in the 1980s. From that point forward, corporations and the ultra-wealthy who found them, have been deemed far more important than consumer class individuals. The government being forced to hand money back to the corporations will most likely be fine and dandy. Anything beyond that? No go. Consumers are fodder, cattle for the collective to harvest. There is no need for concern. The system is working precisely as designed.

Drain the middle class and down. Feed the upper class and the government.

Stop acting like the problem wasn't implementing the tariffs in the first place in an entirely chaotic and arbitrary manner to extort deals that favor the Trumps.

You're not a victim because you paid more for a laptop, you first world problem cry baby. The only rational thing to do when crazy people took the economic helm was start saving money and spending less. Stop crying about some abstract class problem when the corrupt policy at the root of this was so crystal fucking clear. If you spend all you take in and have no savings, then I truly feel for you, I have been there, three OD charges in one day, waiting for payday to turn my phone back on, just getting raked by calling cards, ATM fees, cellular overages, it fucking sucked. We definitely need to reduce wealth disparity, and protect people from being preyed on, but you are not trapped in some consumer class. You fuckers better all vote, instead of rolling over and bitching like someone else is supposed to fix shit for you.

Comment Re:corrupt (Score 1) 163

They increased prices on consumers to pay for the tariffs, this is known

How are you going to pay "the consumers" back? Everybody an equal share? How about those people who intentionally buy American and hardly buy anything else? Should they be reimbursed? Do you have receipts that show how much extra you paid? Without a doubt, prices were raised. But quite often a lot of businesses chose to reduce their own profit - i.e. the costs of the tariffs were shared and prices weren't raised as much as the costs. Sorting this sort of thing out is just about impossible.

I don't understand it could work any other way than the people who directly paid the tariffs (businesses for the most part) should be the ones that get their money back. If they in turn choose to reimburse their customers, good for them.

What do you mean buy American? 51% assembled in America.. mostly, from mostly components mostly assembled in America built from raw materials mostly dug up or cut down in America? You were all exposed to imports and the effects of tariffs. But I agree that refunding everyone is stupid, importers were taxed, we paid market prices.

If we want to lay blame for fucked up market prices, there's one person we can point to.

Comment Re:The underlying issue (Score 1) 142

I don't see anything better about MacOS than windows. Windows is more for power users and MacOS is more for people who want their hand held, that's all. Also it seems there is very little freeware on MacOS and you have to pay for everything. I replace both with Linux if I can.

Come on man, "freeware" gives you away so bad, like if you're not using open source software already, what would installing Linux do for you.

You think you're a Windows power user because you have two monitors or replaced your OEM graphics driver.
I think I'm a Windows power user because 100% of my day is spent in a WSL terminal and I don't do dick with Windows outside of that black rectangle and vscode and ... a password manager and.. browsers..um.. the screen clipping tool in 11 actually rocks too. Besides the point.
That's for work, for fun (don't tell) I'm ssh/mosh/tmux'd from my iPad sidekick into a Mac Mini vibe coding side projects that I push to Linux instances in the cloud.

You know, maybe I'm not a Windows power user, I'm not doing anything windows centric, no powershell no win32 application development no .NET. And I'm not setting up fancy workflows with Automator on my Mac or building cool iPhone apps, I have one HomeKit automation. And I'm not bootstrapping my compiler, recompiling my kernel, rebuilding the world on a custom glibc in Linux. But I can do all of those things, and I know anyone that says platform X,Y or Z is for power users is fulllllll of shit. It's sort of like moving away from your home state and feeling like you're not from there, that new place. Before long you go home and realize you're not from there anymore either, you've been away as long as you were there. Then what the fuck are you. Not nothing, not half something, you're everything, or you're something on the way to everything, you always have been.

You don't need to replace anything with Linux, you need to open a terminal. Make something, break something just for fun, you can do that anywhere, on all the platforms. You don't switch, you grow somewhere else for a while.

Comment Re:nice (Score 1) 25

I'm sure the three people who bought the vision pro will appreciate it.

I do, huge virtual high def 2D screens for entertainment is one of the use cases it absolutely excels at. For watching a movie, it's top notch.
That's not what most people think a VR/AR headset should be used for, but fuck them and the ignorant opinion they rode in on, it's amazing.

VR games are nice... but everyone plays games on 2D screens, everyone watches movies and tv shows on 2D screens. The AR pass-through and the high resolution are what make it great for virtual 2D display. That Apple hasn't worked out a deal with Sony and Microsoft for similar native game streaming is mind boggling, hopefully the steam thing is a pilot for the rest.

The price needs to come down, a lot, and being a solo experience is really a limiting factor for families. Think what you will about Apple, but passthrough+high res display with the virtual display use case could end up being more popular than the VR/3D game mode. My main problem is I have a family, I don't get to watch movies alone and I have to fight over the game consoles. I sure AF don't have time to fart around in a VR game and occupy the entire living room. But sit on the couch (with neck support ugh..) and watch the same thing as everyone else but AR augmented bigass screen, that's different, or playing a game on a second virtual display while also watching whatever the family wants to watch on the main tv. There are some really good use cases with widespread appeal, once the price comes down and more manufacturers figure it out. Stop thinking about them as just VR headsets.

Comment Re:What replaces their journalism? More yellow? (Score 1) 27

Top notch Journalism takes time to verify before printing. Today that doesn't work well when several Joe Blows have already put out a blog post on the same topic with no fact checking and even if completely wrong no one will bother to read the Journalist's equivalent in a few days after all the verification has been done.

It's a terrible place to be for those that want to deliver actual Journalism. And just as bad for those that welcome actual Journalism. The noise to signal ratio is just that bad.

On /. over the decades
"Why should I deal with ads, the internet is free"
"Why should I deal with paywalls, I can get the same AP article for free from a shittier website."
"Why should I deal with the news, I can get everything from Facebook"
"Why should I read anything ever it's all biased"

"Wants.. actual journalism" ... is some no true Scotsman bullshit, because you're either informed, read multiple sources and exercise critical thinking, or a moron.

To anyone that can't find "actual journalism", fuck you right in the ear hole with a rusty corncob. What will replace it... you're looking at it, morons.

Comment Re: Weak PR (Score 2) 118

It's probably worse than that, because it's so populist and infeasible it has to be on purpose. I think it's bait to give politicians something unwinnable to squabble over instead of playing games with electricity prices, and obstructing datacenter construction, things that are bipartisan and more likely to actually happen.

Comment Re: Maybe stick to the speed limit? (Score 1) 200

Next, most drivers tend to ignore signs and pick a speed based on their vehicle capabilities, road design, weather, and traffic conditions.

Dude the 85th percentile is literally a measure of what 85% of people drive when no signs are posted, based on their vehicles capabilities, road design, weather, and road conditions.

What are you arguing for, 90, 95%, the maximum, no limit? It's unreasonable to have no posted speeds, because half of you assholes just want to drive faster than the person in front of you and will unnecessarily accelerate to pass all the damned time on any twisty hilly road possible. Jesus Christ, you're not getting there any sooner. As soon as you finish passing and reduce your speed when you think the guy you passed can't see you anymore your average speed is no different. If you constantly fight upstream passing every single car, you still only shave seconds off your trip time and deserve every ticket you get.

Use a fucking GPS, just to drive across town even. Flip to whatever screen or setting shows your ETA. Now speed, and watch what it's all for. Fucking idiots.

Comment Re: ...not that you should be speeding on public r (Score 1) 200

Speeding is defined relative to an arbitrary value

It's more like the 85th percentile of observed traffic, and other factors are considered. Maybe it's different in some small towns, but not anywhere getting a fancy average speed monitoring system. Haven't you driven over those rubber hose sensor things laid across the road before, that's how they do the traffic study AFAIK.

https://www.ite.org/technical-...

Comment Re: Laws are weird (Score 2) 200

Speed limits are set to ensure a ready supply of people to fine. The more effective and automatic enforcement is, the larger a problem there is going to be with the public.

Wait, there's abuse, like waiting at the bottom of a steep hill with a speed reduction. Automating the abuse, to wash hands, like red light cameras printing money for every slightly rolling right turn on red. An officer might be too embarrassed to do in person. Then there's average speed over some distance, and that's ... what?

Unless that's straight up hidden from the public I'm not seeing how it's possibly abusive. And speed limits aren't always abused anyway, come on.

Shitty speed limits are usually shit for a good reason, there's a turn at the bottom of the hill so the speed reduction is placed at the top to give you time. Or my favorite, going through an intersection it reduces from 40 to 30 at the far side, but coming the opposite direction the 40 sign is placed at the far side again, making it asymmetric.. and counter intuitive because there's no 30 sign facing you as you enter.. that part may be abusive. From an engineering pov these all make sense though, the visibility is different on both approaches to the intersection for example. But the cops waiting at the bottom of the hill instead of around the corner, or the cop watching that intersection and farming tickets for driving 40 twenty feet in front of the 40 sign, THOSE are abusive. If those two things were automated they'd get voted out of town as fast as that right turn on red camera was in my small town.

Comment Re: ... Wut? WHAT? (Score 0) 25

OK grandpa, what are you talking about propaganda and refrigerators? You want me to fax you a copy of the Radio, Westinghouse, G.E. pages from my grandparents encyclopedia set, or can you ask your nurse to tune the Internet receiver to Google.

You're talking about the time that commercial broadcasting was brand new and Westinghouse was a GE rival, they made industrial equipment, home electrical appliances, trains, radios etc.

This is like ten seconds of reading.
https://earlyradiohistory.us/1...

How do you reduce a G.E. scale industrial powerhouse to "refrigerator manufacturer" and the advent of commercial broadcasting to "propaganda", as if the top two electrical equipment manufacturers in the country would not be involved in the brand new market of commercial radio broadcast. Really weird take on a pivotal time in American history, just saying.

Comment Re:Skyrocketed and 5%? (Score 1) 49

I missed this.. how are we supposed to make sense of these numbers from the expanded OS Version table?
This distribution looks more like what I'd expect real Linux desktop gaming usage to be. So there's what, ~10 other versions of MacOS reporting in with each .05%
And for Linux there's like a hundred or more at .05% each? What's in that long tail, there are a lot of distro choices out there, but these aren't crusty old mail servers, they're gaming systems that someone went out of their way to respond to the HW survey? The top five add up to 1% and I'm having a hard time believing there are actually many desktops below that.

OSX 2.35% +1.19%
MacOS 26.3.0 64 bit 0.55 % +0.40%
MacOS 26.3.1 64 bit 0.49 %+0.49%
MacOS 26.2.0 64 bit 0.23 %-0.21%
MacOS 15.7.4 64 bit 0.14 %+0.14%
MacOS 15.7.3 64 bit 0.10 %0.00%
MacOS 15.6.1 64 bit 0.10 %+0.04%
MacOS 26.4.0 64 bit 0.07 %+0.07%
MacOS 15.5.0 64 bit 0.06 %+0.06%
MacOS 26.1.0 64 bit 0.05 %+0.05%
MacOS 12.7.6 64 bit 0.05 %+0.05%

Linux 5.33% +3.10%
Arch Linux 64 bit 0.34 %+0.15%
Linux Mint 22.3 64 bit 0.27 %+0.13%
Ubuntu Core 24 64 bit 0.14 %+0.06%
Linux Mint 22.2 64 bit 0.07 %+0.02%
Ubuntu 25.10 64 bit 0.06 %+0.06%
Manjaro Linux 64 bit 0.06 %+0.06%

Slashdot Top Deals

The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.

Working...