Slashdot Log In
Google Upgrades Blogger
Posted by
Zonk
on Tue Aug 15, 2006 08:45 AM
from the bout-time dept.
from the bout-time dept.
thetan writes "Google has announced the first major upgrade to Blogger since taking over the creaking old platform. Still in beta, the new service offers a tie-in to your Google Account, dynamic pages, separate comment feeds, new layouts, an apparent merger with Google's Page Creator for WYSIWYG editing, integration of feeds, public/private access control and — of interest to bloghackers — tag-based labels for categories. Take the tour."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I'll Stick to nano (Score:1, Flamebait)
(http://twoturtlelovers.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Friday May 25, @03:01PM)
Even better than MySpace (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://andrewman327.stumbleupon.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday August 09 2006, @02:31PM)
I am glad that Google has made this upgrade. Blogger has always had a pretty clean layout that doesn't get in the way of the content (are you listening MySpace?) and makes sites pretty easy to read. Ever since they announced Google Pages I wondered when they were going to integrate it into Blogger. I played with Pages and found that while it lacks power and advanced features, it just plain works. That is the most important thing. After all, most people above a certain coding ability will probably have their own sites and will not be using Blogger in the first place.
You know that Google has come up with something great when they announce that it has made it out of testing and into Beta stage.
Re:Even better than MySpace (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://weill.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday October 01 2005, @01:18PM)
Call me back when it's been released. I've used Blogger for years and frankly I don't like being jerked around with features I didn't ask for at the cost of reliability. Remember when only beta testers got to use beta software, leaving the rest of us with a presumably stable release?
Re:I'll Stick to nano (Score:5, Funny)
Give me a break, emacs has supported whatever it is this article is about for too long now.
When to use Tags (versus Categories) (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.davidcatalano.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday September 24 2006, @06:19PM)
I think the addition of labels is the most significant upgrade to Blogger. Now, if only I could tag my Slashdot Journal [imediaconnection.com] entries.
I do have a question. Many blogs support both Categories and Tags. I understand Google's desire to simplify things, so I think if I could have only one or the other, I'd choose tags. Now that Moveable Type 3.3 has come out and natively supports both tags and categories, I'm at a loss as to when to use which. Do I stick w/ my Categories and leave tagging for a tag cloud and for hooks for Technorati?
Re:When to use Tags (versus Categories) (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.demodulated.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday January 05 2006, @01:38PM)
As regular readers of both I MUCH prefer categories. If I'm interested in what one of my blog heros has to say on a broad topic I have a lot more success and fun browsing through everything in a category than by trying to figure out some arbitrary keyword.
You do what you feel suits your blog content and organization best, but if it were me I'd set up categories. I might be old fashioned, though.
Re:When to use Tags (versus Categories) (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/)
Categories also allow your users to read 'virtual blogs'. On several blogs that I read regularly, I don't have the main page bookmarked - but rather one or more category pages. This allows me to read entries on say, geocaching, while avoiding entries on cats.
Bloghackers? (Score:5, Funny)
That is just so Web 2.0, isn't it?
"tie-in to your google account" (Score:5, Insightful)
Not just a "tie-in", but a forced migration, similar to flickr moving to using yahoo accounts:
Am I the only one really disliking this? I don't want to tie all the pieces of information about me together. I want to keep them separate, running on different domains, having nothing to do with each other! It's bad enough that Google can tie my searches to my email, but when it's able to tie it together with my cat pictures and what I had for dinner last night (okay, so not really), that's really several bridges too far.
Re:"tie-in to your google account" (Score:5, Funny)
Not fair! I want to be able to keep all my data private and my accounts separate, but also get all the benefits of letting Google see all my data and keeping my accounts in one place. We can send a man to the moon but we can't do this?!
Still in beta (Score:1, Offtopic)
What does Google actually have (other than search) that isn't in beta? There comes a point when you just have to release something (as much as you can do in web apps). How long has Google Groups been in 'beta' now?
Does it work with Konqueror/Safari yet? (Score:2)
OpenID? (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://nanosheep.net/)
Pretty good. I like it, anyway. (Score:1)
lable (Score:1)
Google vs. Microsoft (Score:1)
(http://www.intuality.com/)
Yes, but did they fix sftp yet? (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Saturday February 17 2007, @08:39PM)
This leads me to believe that they aren't using a standard client, but rather wrote their own, with all that implies.
I had hoped that when Google acquired them, all that would be quickly resolved, but apparently not.
A serious question about Blogger and spam (Score:2)
(http://www.codemonkeyramblings.com/)
I want an updatel filters comments out (Score:2)
(http://snarfangel.blogspot.com/)
Now if only thier feeds weren't crippled (Score:1)
A gaping hole in functionality... (Score:2)
(http://tooi.org/ | Last Journal: Monday July 24 2006, @08:50AM)
Give me one that generates Markov-chain paragraphs based on Google Sets metacategories, and you'll have purchased my buy-in.
Call me an old fart. (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Tuesday September 13 2005, @03:45PM)
But seriously if you think that what I have to say is interesting you really need to go outside.
"Get off my lawn Digest."
Me and my good buddy Google (Score:1)
Beta again? (Score:1)
(http://friskr.com/)
You mean "Back to the Feature"?
Popular search engines faster [friskr.com]
Non-blogspot hosting? (Score:2)
(http://www.davidglover.org/)
Re: WYSIWYG editing (Score:1)
(http://klenwell.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday February 08 2007, @12:41PM)
Blogger offers direct access to (near) standards-compliant XHTML code. I practically learned how to design websites tinkering with their templates. If you know HTML and CSS, it gives you everything you'd want with Google Pages.
I just hope they don't start limiting this as they expand the WYSIWYG bells and whistles.
Finaly saving on Googleware cycles (Score:1)
(http://convergence.in/blog)
At last you decided to save on your CPU cycles and also have a faster means to index rather than crawling the static page.
tags for future and past posts? (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://marcrust.blogspot.com/)
Anybody know if this will be implemented for future entries only, or if you can go back and tag your old posts?
It would be convenient if they added a way to search your blog for keywords, and tag all matching entries.
sftp fix? (Score:1)
JavaScript redirect (Score:1)
(http://johnbokma.com/)
Cool (Score:2)
(http://trollchat.org/)
Well behind the competition (Score:1)
(http://andypiper.wordpress.com/)