Maybe media people don't write stories based on blog rants?
There is a difference between censoring and ignoring. It's been proven (the best she got from the sexy-time-served journalist is 1st mention in a steam early-access-thing round up) that she got no reviews for sex, so who was right to ignore the story? Some people see censorship, some see ignoring the ramblings of an angry person.
Even if the gaming media took it up, it would have taken days to actually do some research, interview people, write the story, and put it up, and by that point 'the outrage' had reached a boiling point.
Why did it take allegations of sex to incite the riot and not the numerous instances of cash and paid-for-reviews?